Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-03 Thread Lee Braiden
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 01:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> From: Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back
> Date: 02 Mar 2002 23:59:21 +0100
> 
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 07:25:51PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > Don't want to nit-pick, but it seems worth clarifying, given the
> > confusion this often causes...
> > 
> > > From: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > KDE and Gnome are no window managers. They are session managers.
> > 
> > No, they're not.  KDE is an integrated window manager & more -- what the
> > KDE team and others refer to as a Desktop Environment (hence kDE).  Both
> > projects include session managers, but are not limited to that.  GNOME
> > doesn't have a window manager as such, although there are lots of window
> > managers that are compatible with GNOME.  GNOME is essentially a Desktop
> > Environment too, but I'm not sure they'd define the project that way.
> > 
> 
> Do want to nit-pick :-)
> 
> Yes they are, from the point of view of Debians X architecture, which
> does not recognize the "Desktop Environment" concept.
> 
> ~>apt-cache show gnome-session | grep Provides
> Provides: x-session-manager
> ~>apt-cache show kdebase | grep Provides
> Provides: x-session-manager
> 

This is the kind of confusion I was talking about.  It makes perfect
sense that gnome-session would provide x-session-manager.  gnome-session
is *not* GNOME, however, neither is kdebase KDE.

Since, as I've said, GNOME includes a session manager, then you would
expect to find a GNOME package which provides session-manager, but
that's not what I'm discussing.

> See also the thread that started with this message:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/debian-devel-200012/msg01821.html
> 

To quote from that

>>"Branden has agreed to update /etc/X11/Xsession to try to exec
>>x-session-manager before x-window-manager."
>>>What is the problem with registering gnome-session and
>>>kde-session as x-window-manager?

This backs up the issue as you seem to understand it, but as I say,
there has been a misunderstanding.

-- 
Lee Braiden,
Artelos.com

mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 24346459
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread will trillich
okay, with no other context than what's below, i can see a
communication breakdown:

On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 11:59:21PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 07:25:51PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > Don't want to nit-pick, but it seems worth clarifying, given the
> > confusion this often causes...
> > 
> > > From: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > KDE and Gnome are no window managers. They are session managers.
> > 
> > No, they're not.  KDE is an integrated window manager & more -- what the
> > KDE team and others refer to as a Desktop Environment (hence kDE).  Both
> > projects include session managers, but are not limited to that.  GNOME
> > doesn't have a window manager as such, although there are lots of window
> > managers that are compatible with GNOME.  GNOME is essentially a Desktop
> > Environment too, but I'm not sure they'd define the project that way.
> 
> Yes they are, from the point of view of Debians X architecture, which
> does not recognize the "Desktop Environment" concept.
> 
> ~>apt-cache show gnome-session | grep Provides
> Provides: x-session-manager
> ~>apt-cache show kdebase | grep Provides
> Provides: x-session-manager

both of those packages (gnome-session and kdebase) PROVIDE
x-session-manager's. just as Lee said, above:

> > Both
> > projects include session managers, but are not limited to that.

"INCLUDE", not "ARE". nit-pick, indeed. :)

-- 
I use Debian/GNU Linux version 2.2 and american english v1.0;
Linux server 2.2.17 #1 Sun Jun 25 09:24:41 EST 2000 i586 unknown
 
DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #71 from Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
So exactly WHICH SHELL ARE YOU RUNNING? Simply try
echo $SHELL
or
printenv SHELL
AFAIK any shell that does not set $SHELL is broken.

Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 07:25:51PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
> Don't want to nit-pick, but it seems worth clarifying, given the
> confusion this often causes...
> 
> > From: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > KDE and Gnome are no window managers. They are session managers.
> 
> No, they're not.  KDE is an integrated window manager & more -- what the
> KDE team and others refer to as a Desktop Environment (hence kDE).  Both
> projects include session managers, but are not limited to that.  GNOME
> doesn't have a window manager as such, although there are lots of window
> managers that are compatible with GNOME.  GNOME is essentially a Desktop
> Environment too, but I'm not sure they'd define the project that way.
> 

Do want to nit-pick :-)

Yes they are, from the point of view of Debians X architecture, which
does not recognize the "Desktop Environment" concept.

~>apt-cache show gnome-session | grep Provides
Provides: x-session-manager
~>apt-cache show kdebase | grep Provides
Provides: x-session-manager

See also the thread that started with this message:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/debian-devel-200012/msg01821.html

-- 
Note that I use Debian version 3.0
Linux emac140 2.4.17 #1 s?n feb 10 20:21:22 CET 2002 i686 unknown

Hans Ekbrand

pgpurBbMpYFCh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 07:25:51PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
> Don't want to nit-pick, but it seems worth clarifying, given the
> confusion this often causes...

:-) Feel free ...

> > From: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [...]
> > KDE and Gnome are no window managers. They are session managers.
> 
> No, they're not.  KDE is an integrated window manager & more -- what the
> KDE team and others refer to as a Desktop Environment (hence kDE).  Both
> projects include session managers, but are not limited to that.  GNOME
> doesn't have a window manager as such, although there are lots of window
> managers that are compatible with GNOME.  GNOME is essentially a Desktop
> Environment too, but I'm not sure they'd define the project that way.

Heh, yes, of course *sheepish grin*. I use Gnome myself, but I was just
too hasty to get to the point below:

> > You
> > need to run
> > 
> > update-alternatives --config x-session-manager
> 
> But yes, that will do what's required.

-- 
Matijs



Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Lee Braiden
Don't want to nit-pick, but it seems worth clarifying, given the
confusion this often causes...

> From: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back
> Date: 02 Mar 2002 13:25:45 +0100
> 
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 03:29:00AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > One (of several) ways to do this is (as root):
> > > update-alternatives --config x-window-manager
> > > [...]
> > 
> > That doesn't seem to do the job here.  Running that command gives me
> > two choices twm and sawfish.  No mention of kde or gnome.  Both of
> > which are installed.
> > 
> 
> KDE and Gnome are no window managers. They are session managers.

No, they're not.  KDE is an integrated window manager & more -- what the
KDE team and others refer to as a Desktop Environment (hence kDE).  Both
projects include session managers, but are not limited to that.  GNOME
doesn't have a window manager as such, although there are lots of window
managers that are compatible with GNOME.  GNOME is essentially a Desktop
Environment too, but I'm not sure they'd define the project that way.

> You
> need to run
> 
> update-alternatives --config x-session-manager
> 

But yes, that will do what's required.


-- 
Lee Braiden,
Artelos.com

mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 24346459
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 01/03/02 Bob Thibodeau did speaketh:

> > Now I can startx but now I get put into a kde session.  I'd sooner set
> > my hair on fire, and I'm mostly bald.  

I pulled mine out long ago. ;-)

Be sure to disable Ctrl-Alt-Backspace if you use startx. Otherwise, you
can lock the screen, and someone can come along and shut down X and get a
prompt as you. 

Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort."  -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix


pgpG1BlhiczZX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 03:29:00AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > One (of several) ways to do this is (as root):
> >
> > update-alternatives --config x-window-manager
> >
> > [...]
> 
> That doesn't seem to do the job here.  Running that command gives me
> two choices twm and sawfish.  No mention of kde or gnome.  Both of
> which are installed.
> 

KDE and Gnome are no window managers. They are session managers.  You
need to run

update-alternatives --config x-session-manager

startx first tries to run x-session-manager, and if that fails
x-window-manager. You can set the window manager gnome should use from
the control center. x-window-manager has nothing to do with that.

Matijs.



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Glyn Millington
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


>
> That doesn't seem to do the job here.  Running that command gives me
> two choices twm and sawfish.  No mention of kde or gnome.  Both of
> which are installed.
>
> I do want to use sawfish so set that as default but startx still
> starts kde.

If you have got as far as startx, then you need an .xinitrc file in your
home directory - NOT .xsession, that's for the pretty login ;-)

In there put

#!/bin/sh
exec sawfish &
exec gnome-session

and make it executable.

If you don't want kde get rid of it!

apt-get --purge remove kdebase

but there are possibly more packages than that installed

You did install sawfish-gnome didn't you?  Sawfish, but with a few tweaks
for Gnome compatibility.

hth

Glyn
-- 

   **
   *  Here we are then...   *
   * http://members.tripod.co.uk/Christchurch2000uk *
   **



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> One (of several) ways to do this is (as root):
>
> update-alternatives --config x-window-manager
>
> You will be presented with a list of alternatives that are currently
> installed on your system. Pick one.
>
> If the one you want isn't there, install it and run update-
> alternatives again.
>
> This will set the system default. Individual users can override this
> by writing a .xsession file.

That doesn't seem to do the job here.  Running that command gives me
two choices twm and sawfish.  No mention of kde or gnome.  Both of
which are installed.

I do want to use sawfish so set that as default but startx still
starts kde.



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Chris Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> I've noticed that it will take a couple of hours to get this to you, but...
> what your looking for is .xsession or the .xinitrc

Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> One (of several) ways to do this is (as root):
>
> update-alternatives --config x-window-manager
>
> You will be presented with a list of alternatives that are currently
> installed on your system. Pick one.
>
> If the one you want isn't there, install it and run update-
> alternatives again.
>
> This will set the system default. Individual users can override this
> by writing a .xsession file.

k l u r t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> it can be set in your home directory's .xsession file
>
> echo "exec gnome" > ~/.xsession
>
> ...now you can startx and gnome will be your window manager.

Bob Thibodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> startx looks for ~/.xinitrc
> you can set up your options there 
>
> you probably have a system-wide xinitrc that calls kde

More good help.. thanks again.  Its kind of coming back a little now
seeing the postings here.  I've been doing upgrades but maintaining a
set of configs for a couple of years now and  haven't had to really
fuss with X stuff too much.  I've been able to put my rc files aside
and just plop them back in many times.

I caught hell when redhats defaut window manager changed from fvwm2 to
gnome a couple of years ago.  At first I cursed them for having made
the change, and hated gnome.  But if any of you have ever messed with
the acres of config involved with fvwm, it was really a blessing. 

Just now trying to follow the maze of sourced variables and directeries
with a gob of scritps in them uner /etc/X11  I never really did see
what is calling kde.  But I can set it as described above to over ride
what ever is happine in that  maze.

You need a road map to follow all the twists and turns in there.

I noticed at the default debian login (gnome) that the mouse is really
sluggish.  I know how to set it with xset m and of course once inside
the session with the control panel settings.  But to speed up the
sloth at the actual login probably needs to be put into xintrc.

Is it just a staight command in there like:
xset m 2 14   or the like?



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread Bob Thibodeau
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:23:24PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> > rinkles. 
> > 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Whee, got lots of help on that one.  And a couple easy fixes.
> Thank you all.
> 
> Now I can startx but now I get put into a kde session.  I'd sooner set
> my hair on fire, and I'm mostly bald.  
> 
> I guess I should uninstall all the kde stuff but I seem to recall
> there being a problem with some of them like the libs or base, that
> allow some other things to work.
> 
> All I really want is to use gnome/sawfish if in X.  When I say
> `startx' thats what I want to start.  I vaguely remember there being
> some place where you put a desktop choice and then its settled.

startx looks for ~/.xinitrc
you can set up your options there 

you probably have a system-wide xinitrc that calls kde

Bob

> 
> Does debian have something like that too?
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-02 Thread k l u r t
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 19:23, Harry Putnam wrote: 
> All I really want is to use gnome/sawfish if in X.  When I say
> `startx' thats what I want to start.  I vaguely remember there being
> some place where you put a desktop choice and then its settled.
> 
> Does debian have something like that too?

it can be set in your home directory's .xsession file

echo "exec gnome" > ~/.xsession

...now you can startx and gnome will be your window manager.

hope this helps

- k l u r t




Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Mark Zimmerman
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:23:24PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> > rinkles. 
> > 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Whee, got lots of help on that one.  And a couple easy fixes.
> Thank you all.
> 
> Now I can startx but now I get put into a kde session.  I'd sooner set
> my hair on fire, and I'm mostly bald.  
> 
> I guess I should uninstall all the kde stuff but I seem to recall
> there being a problem with some of them like the libs or base, that
> allow some other things to work.
> 
> All I really want is to use gnome/sawfish if in X.  When I say
> `startx' thats what I want to start.  I vaguely remember there being
> some place where you put a desktop choice and then its settled.
> 
> Does debian have something like that too?
> 

One (of several) ways to do this is (as root):

update-alternatives --config x-window-manager

You will be presented with a list of alternatives that are currently
installed on your system. Pick one.

If the one you want isn't there, install it and run update-
alternatives again.

This will set the system default. Individual users can override this
by writing a .xsession file.

-- Mark



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Chris Jenks

At 07:23 PM 3/1/02, Harry Putnam wrote:

Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles.
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.

Whee, got lots of help on that one.  And a couple easy fixes.
Thank you all.

Now I can startx but now I get put into a kde session.  I'd sooner set
my hair on fire, and I'm mostly bald.

I guess I should uninstall all the kde stuff but I seem to recall
there being a problem with some of them like the libs or base, that
allow some other things to work.

All I really want is to use gnome/sawfish if in X.  When I say
`startx' thats what I want to start.  I vaguely remember there being
some place where you put a desktop choice and then its settled.

Does debian have something like that too?


I've noticed that it will take a couple of hours to get this to you, but...
what your looking for is .xsession or the .xinitrc



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Harry" == Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Harry> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there
Harry> are a few rinkles.  1) I want to boot to console mode and
Harry> call x with startx.

Choose a runlevel that does not use X (I use 2). Rename the files in
/etc/rc2.d/ (if you chose level 2) that start the X daemons (gdm/kdm
or whatever you have installed) so that, for example, S20gdm is now
K20gdm. Edit /etc/inittab so that your default runlevel is 2. You
probably know exactly what I'm talking about.

Harry> Currently, I get popped right into X.  I thought this could
Harry> be contolled by setting the defalult run level /etc/inittab
Harry> But I see nothing in there that looks likely.

Debian sets all "normal, multiuser" run levels to be the same by
default.

Harry> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is
Harry> runlevel 2 X.  I don't think so.

Harry> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to
Harry> runlevel 5 which force boot to bring up X.  setting
Harry> runlevel 3 gave you a console login.

Harry> Where is this choice made on debian?

By the system admin, who edits the stuff in /etc/rcX.d/ as far as I
know (I'm relatively new to Debian).

Cheers!
Shyamal





Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Michel Loos
Em Sex, 2002-03-01 às 17:54, Kurt Yoder escreveu:
> Harry Putnam said:
> > Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> > rinkles.
> > 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> >
> > Currently, I get popped right into X.
> > I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level
> > /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
> >
> > In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> > don't think so.
> >
> > In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> > which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> > login.
> >
> > Where is this choice made on debian?
> 
> Remove xdm, gdm or kdm. If any of these are installed, they will dump you
> into X unless you're in single-user mode.
> 
> apt-get remove gdm
> 
> (or kdm or xdm if you have either of those instead)
> 

This is a solution, but not the best one (IMHO) because you
can want the x/g/k/dm in order to serve some connected X-terminals (or
slave workstations).
find the Xservers file corresonding to you ?dm (/etc/X11/xdm for ex.)
and comment the line 
:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X vt7 -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp
or equivalent.

Michel.




Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles. 
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.

Whee, got lots of help on that one.  And a couple easy fixes.
Thank you all.

Now I can startx but now I get put into a kde session.  I'd sooner set
my hair on fire, and I'm mostly bald.  

I guess I should uninstall all the kde stuff but I seem to recall
there being a problem with some of them like the libs or base, that
allow some other things to work.

All I really want is to use gnome/sawfish if in X.  When I say
`startx' thats what I want to start.  I vaguely remember there being
some place where you put a desktop choice and then its settled.

Does debian have something like that too?



RE: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Richard Wurdack
Wouldn't it be cleaner to just remove S99gdm from rcX.d?  They're just
symbolic links to the same file in init.d, right?  As long as you don't lose
that, it's fairly straightforward to relink.

(I'm a total novice, so spank me if I'm wrong :)

Richard Wurdack

 -Original Message-
From:   dman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Friday, March 01, 2002 1:07 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:        Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
| Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
| rinkles. 
| 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
| 
| Currently, I get popped right into X.
| I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
| /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
| 
| In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
| don't think so.
| 
| In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
| which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
| login. 
| 
| Where is this choice made on debian?

# mv /etc/rc2.d/S99gdm /etc/rc2.d/notS99gdm

(if you using gdm)

Debiain doesn't force any runlevel structure on you.  By default
they're all the same (except 0, 1, 6), but you can tweak them to your
heart's content.

Note that you can press Alt-Ctrl-F[123456] to get to a virtual
console, and Alt-Ctrl-F7 to get back to X.

-D

-- 

The Lord detests all the proud of heart.
Be sure of this: They will not go unpunished.
Proverbs 16:7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Gary Hennigan
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> > which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> > login. 
> > 
> > Where is this choice made on debian?
> > 
> 
> runlevels do not affect Debian.  We have a different philosohphy than RedHat. 
> In Debian, any installed package is assumed to have been installed on purpose
> by the admin.  This means that when you install a package it is ready to run
> and in the case of daemons actually running.  In Redhat the kitchen sink is
> installed and it is your job to enable and disable the items as desired.
> 
> At a command prompt as root do 'dpkg --purge xdm'.  This will remove
> xdm and let you start X by hand.  otherwise, yes, look at
> /etc/init.d/xdm and tweak as desired.

Debian as installed doesn't differentiate between runlevels 2-5 but
you can certainly set it up to do so. For example I have /etc/inittab
set to runlevel 3 by default, which starts up wdm and thus X, and I've
set up runlevel 2 to boot without wdm and X. Another common
configuration would be to leave out loading of the network at certain
run levels. I find this very useful, especially if you've upgraded
something like your graphics board or network card.

You do need to set this up yourself in Debian. The update-rc.d tool
can help here "man update-rc.d".

Gary



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles. 
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Currently, I get popped right into X.
> I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
> /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
> 
> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> don't think so.

The default runlevel in Debian is 2. And by default runlevels 2-5 are
all equal.

> 
> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login. 
> 
> Where is this choice made on debian?

The Debian Way is update-rc.d (or apt-get remove 
[your-display-manager-of-choice]). See man
update-rc.d.


pgpToN5Jodq6Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Simon Hepburn
On Friday 01 Mar 2002 6:32 pm, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles.
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.

remove package xdm, kdm, gdm or wdm (you don't state which display manager 
you have installed). 



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Shaul Karl
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles. 
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Currently, I get popped right into X.
> I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
> /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
> 
> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> don't think so.
> 


It is 2:

/tmp$ grep -A1 '# The default runlevel.' /etc/inittab 
# The default runlevel.
id:2:initdefault:
/tmp$ 


> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login. 
> 
> Where is this choice made on debian?
> 
> 


Debian does not use runlevel in order to differentiate between a system 
that runs X and one that does not.

There are several ways to get you booted to a console. Assuming you are 
booted to xdm (need to key in username+passwd), you can add a hash 
character ('#') in front of the line that begins with :0 in 
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers. That is, have it changed to something like:

#:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X vt7 -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp

You might want to look at /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz for more 
information about it (`How do I stop xdm from starting at boot?').


-- 

Shaul Karl
email: shaulka(at-no-spam)bezeqint.net 
   Please substitute (at-no-spam) with an at - @ - character.
   (at-no-spam) is meant for unsolicitate mail senders only.




Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles. 
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Currently, I get popped right into X.
> I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
> /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.

Sounds like you have gdm (or xdm or ?dm) installed. Substitute ? with
the appropriate letter below.

If you *always* want to start X by hand, then you shouldn't need ?dm.
de-install it. Or edit /etc/init.d/?dm to "exit 0" before it does
anything useful.

If you *mostly* want to start X by hand, then run 
# update-rc.d -f ?dm remove
This will remove the symlinks from /etc/rc*.d to ?dm, and should allow
you start it anyway by invoking /etc/init.d/?dm by hand

Note: I'm not sure how this approach fares if you upgrade ?dm - they
symlinks may reappear - update-rc.d will recreate them only if they were
cleanly removed, but not if some were left in place. More details on
"man update-rc.d"

> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> don't think so.

Have faith. The default *is* 2.
> 
> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login. 

Debian doesn't use runlevels for this. AFAIK runlevels 2-5 are
completely under the control of the sysadmin, but by default they are
identical.

I suspect that if we were to use runlevels for this sort of stuff, then
we'd quickly run out of them. This has been discussed on this list in
the past - probably somewhere in the archives @ http://lists.debian.org

HTH
-- 
Karl E. Jørgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.karl.jorgensen.com
 Today's fortune:
An economist is a man who would marry Farrah Fawcett-Majors for her money.


pgpwHviWJthpy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Thomas Shemanske

You must have a display manager installed (e.g. xdm, gdm ,kdm, wdm, etc)

If you remove it (apt-get remove xdm), you will not be popped into X

Runlevel 2 is the debian standard.  The init files are in /etc/init.d 
(corresponding to RH's /etc/rc.d/init.d)


TRS

Harry Putnam wrote:


Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
rinkles. 
1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.


Currently, I get popped right into X.
I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
/etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.


In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
don't think so.

In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
login. 


Where is this choice made on debian?







Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Bob Thibodeau
Which display manager is coming up?

On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles. 
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Currently, I get popped right into X.
> I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
> /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
> 
> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> don't think so.
> 
> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login. 
> 
> Where is this choice made on debian?
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread p
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles. 
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
> 
> Currently, I get popped right into X.
> I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
> /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
> 
> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> don't think so.
> 
> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login. 
> 
> Where is this choice made on debian?
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
//

# mv /etc/rc2.d/S99xdm /etc/rc2.d/dont_use_S99xdm

b.

// 



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread dman
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
| Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
| rinkles. 
| 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
| 
| Currently, I get popped right into X.
| I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
| /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
| 
| In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
| don't think so.
| 
| In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
| which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
| login. 
| 
| Where is this choice made on debian?

# mv /etc/rc2.d/S99gdm /etc/rc2.d/notS99gdm

(if you using gdm)

Debiain doesn't force any runlevel structure on you.  By default
they're all the same (except 0, 1, 6), but you can tweak them to your
heart's content.

Note that you can press Alt-Ctrl-F[123456] to get to a virtual
console, and Alt-Ctrl-F7 to get back to X.

-D

-- 

The Lord detests all the proud of heart.
Be sure of this: They will not go unpunished.
Proverbs 16:7



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Kurt Yoder
Harry Putnam said:
> Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
> rinkles.
> 1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.
>
> Currently, I get popped right into X.
> I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level
> /etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.
>
> In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
> don't think so.
>
> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login.
>
> Where is this choice made on debian?

Remove xdm, gdm or kdm. If any of these are installed, they will dump you
into X unless you're in single-user mode.

apt-get remove gdm

(or kdm or xdm if you have either of those instead)

-- 
Kurt Yoder
Sport & Health network administrator




Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Chris Jenks

At 01:32 PM 3/1/02, Harry Putnam wrote:

Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
rinkles.
1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.

Currently, I get popped right into X.
I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level
/etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.

In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
don't think so.

In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
login.

Where is this choice made on debian?


Run level 2 is standard, but if you've installed xdm or something of that
kind, then it will launch you strait into X, that's what' those packages do.

Chris



Re: Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> 
> In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
> which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
> login. 
> 
> Where is this choice made on debian?
> 

runlevels do not affect Debian.  We have a different philosohphy than RedHat. 
In Debian, any installed package is assumed to have been installed on purpose
by the admin.  This means that when you install a package it is ready to run
and in the case of daemons actually running.  In Redhat the kitchen sink is
installed and it is your job to enable and disable the items as desired.

At a command prompt as root do 'dpkg --purge xdm'.  This will remove xdm and
let you start X by hand.  otherwise, yes, look at /etc/init.d/xdm and tweak as
desired.



Avoid booting direct to X.. I want my starx back

2002-03-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Well, I got X working in my fresh woody install, but there are a few
rinkles. 
1) I want to boot to console mode and call x with startx.

Currently, I get popped right into X.
I thought this could be contolled by setting the defalult run level 
/etc/inittab  But I see nothing in there that looks likely.

In fact it claims the default is runlevel 2.  Or is runlevel 2 X.  I
don't think so.

In my redhat dealings it was possible to set default to runlevel 5
which force boot to bring up X.  setting runlevel 3 gave you a console
login. 

Where is this choice made on debian?