Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-02-01 Thread mtsouk
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Jason Pepas wrote:

 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:58:50 -0600
 From: Jason Pepas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: will trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Backup Consensus?
 Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:11:41 -0600 (CST)
 Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  a bootable cd collection as a backup. now that's *cool*.

 you might check out mondo as well.

 apt-cache show mondo

 -jason pepas


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I will second for mondo/mindi.
Just one importang thing: After burning your backup cds, test them by
doing a full restore! Only then you will know for sure that it is working
properly.

cheers,
Mihalis.

-
:wq


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus? - added to list

2003-01-31 Thread Alvin Oga


hi ya jason

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Jason Pepas wrote:

 for what it's worth, here's what I use to backup.
 
 --- cut backup.marsala.sh ---
 #!/bin/sh
 
 # jason pepas's backup script - see http://jason.pepas.com
 # shell script tutorials:
 #  http://www.freeos.com/guides/lsst/
 #  http://www.linuxnewbie.org/nhf/intel/programming/introbashscript.html

your script has been added to the list too ...
http://www.Linux-Backup.net/app.gwif.html

thanx
alvin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-31 Thread Jean-Marc Chaton
* Pigeon [Wed, 29/01/2003 at 18:22 +]
 
 British phones had a # key on the keypad for several years before the
 exchanges were upgraded to the point where you could actually do
 anything with it. When this happened, the recorded help/instruction
 messages were at something of a loss as to what to call it. The key
 you've been ignoring for the last 10 years was no good, because that
 applied to * as well. They settled on square for a while, which I
 think is unquestionably the most revolting term I've heard for this
 symbol. They mostly call it hash now.


In France, we call it the sharp key (dièse in French), coz the sign is
also used in musical notation (internationally I think).

-- 
Jean-Marc Chaton, Infra Team, IBM Paris Lab 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Janssen
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:59, Jean-Marc Chaton wrote:
 * Pigeon [Wed, 29/01/2003 at 18:22 +]
  
  British phones had a # key on the keypad for several years before the
[snip]
  symbol. They mostly call it hash now.

 In France, we call it the sharp key (dièse in French), coz the sign is
 also used in musical notation (internationally I think).

M$ calls C# C-Sharp... So I assume the 'sharp' name is international...
even though I also call it 'hash' or in dutch 'hekje'.

Mark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-30 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Pigeon wrote:

 OK, Just to make things more complicated British money changed around
 1970 from 1 pound = 240 pennies from 1 pound = 100 new pennies, ie.
 the value of the pound stayed the same but the penny changed. The
 1/240-pound sort of pennies are now called old pennies, but of
 course they were just pennies at the time.


Some more wacky fun facts about British money.

The d abbreviation for penny comes from the Latin denarius which was the
standard coin of the Roman empire.

During the middle ages Britain also used the mark which was equivalent to
13s 4d (160d)

During, Victorian times there was also a coin called the florin
which was 2 shillings.

Guinea comes from the region of West africa also known as the gold coast
(modern Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone)

A pound sterling is so-called because it was originally the value of a
pound of sterling silver.  sterling comes from Easterling which is what
German Hanseatic merchants were called during the middle ages.

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-30 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:16:43PM -0500, David P James wrote:
 Pigeon was roused into action on 2003-01-29 13:38 and wrote:
 
 How the British came to pronounce lieutenant leftenant, I still
 don't know. The American pronunciation lootenant is surely much
 closer to the original - French, presumably.
 
 
 My guess is that the British (and proper Canadian) pronounciation of 
 lieutenant came from the fact that it would have been spelled 
 levtenant or something similar at some point in the past (there used 
 to be no difference in script between 'u' and 'v'). This probably would 
 have been reinforced by the notion of a left hand man. There is no 
 equivalent in English that I can think of to the French pronounciation. 
 The best I can come up with is 'lee-uh' for the lieu portion, so 
 really not all that similar to the American (if it is closer it's by 
 accident). Far more likely for the American is the German 'loy' or 'loi' 
 beginning.

Sorry, me being sloppy. I should have said lootenant follows the
usual rules of mangled pronunciation used by a native English speaker
reading French and pronouncing it English style, so in lieu becomes
in loo or in liew, very rarely in lee-uh. But as you say, it's
pretty much what would happen to Leutnant as well.

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-30 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
 A pound sterling is so-called because it was originally the value of a
 pound of sterling silver.  sterling comes from Easterling which is what
 German Hanseatic merchants were called during the middle ages.

I need to read less fiction and more history; to me an easterling is
someone from beyond the Sea of Rhûn :-)

-- 
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
  temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  -- Benjamin Franklin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-30 Thread bob parker
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 04:12, you wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 10:12, bob parker wrote:
  On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 07:51, Ron Johnson wrote:
   On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 07:47, bob parker wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:22, Pigeon wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:03:47PM +1100, bob parker wrote:
  On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:32, Grant Bowman wrote:
  
   [snip]
  
Thanks for the support. Re /var, I just did a du -h on it and mine
comes out at 1.1 gig! Any thoughts on what is essential and what is
not?
  
   The apt cache isn't essential.  So, this might clear out a bunch:
   # apt-cache clean
 
  Did that,

 From your OP, did you say that you *do* know what's taking up all the
 space?  If not, try this:
 # du --max-depth=3 /var

 Maybe that'll give you guidance on what to zap.

 Also, if you do tar j, then that 1.1GB will probably fit on a CD-R...

Ron,

Thanks for your comments.

I went thru the list in some detail - about half of it is log history. There 
is also a heap of news items.  My postgres databases are there also
and get backed up from my home dir via pg_dumpall.

For a simple backup/restore setup I don't doubt that one of the existing 
packages would be best. 

I'm only using a home machine and am unwilling to blow 3 cdrs and more 
particularly the time it takes, to do a full backup.

So my idea is to avoid backing up what I already have on the original 
installation cds, and just backup the actual changes I have made since the 
install.

Based on the discussions on this thread and my investigations of my /var
I think I need to include my current and most recent copy of my logs. The 
rest I am prepared to abandon in the event of a wipeout.

Obviously there is some risk in doing that, if the cause of the wipeout is 
some cracker activity that shows only in logs more than a few days old.
I'm on dialup, hence no static ip address so I am quite comfortable with
that risk.

The other downside to my method is that any restore from a disaster will be 
fairly time consuming, needing a new install instead of just recreating a disc
image from what is on a set of cdrs. I'll eventually upgrade my hard drive so
I will test my ability to clone what I have from the backup set then.

Rgards
Bob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-30 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:56:26AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
  A pound sterling is so-called because it was originally the value of a
  pound of sterling silver.  sterling comes from Easterling which is what
  German Hanseatic merchants were called during the middle ages.
 
 I need to read less fiction and more history; to me an easterling is
 someone from beyond the Sea of Rh?n :-)

Doesn't work; I haven't read it for over 10 years, but easterling
still means the same to me as to you!

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 10:56, Nathan E Norman wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
  A pound sterling is so-called because it was originally the value of a
  pound of sterling silver.  sterling comes from Easterling which is what
  German Hanseatic merchants were called during the middle ages.
 
 I need to read less fiction and more history; to me an easterling is
 someone from beyond the Sea of Rhûn :-)

Who wants to bet where JRRT got easterling from

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-30 Thread Jason Pepas
On Sunday 26 January 2003 03:32 pm, Grant Bowman wrote:
 Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
 what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
 asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
 this has been discussed in the past.

for what it's worth, here's what I use to backup.

--- cut backup.marsala.sh ---
#!/bin/sh

# jason pepas's backup script - see http://jason.pepas.com
# shell script tutorials:
#  http://www.freeos.com/guides/lsst/
#  http://www.linuxnewbie.org/nhf/intel/programming/introbashscript.html


# --
# set variables:
# --


directoryname=`date +%Y-%m-%d`_`hostname`_backup
current=current_`hostname`
fullbackuplabel=Full Backup of `hostname` on `date '+%B %e, %Y'`
fullbackupname=`date +%Y-%m-%d`_full.tar.gz
fullbackuplogname=`date +%Y-%m-%d`_full.log
incrementalbackuplabel=Incremental Backup of `hostname` on `date '+%B %e, 
%Y'`
incrementalbackupname=`date +%Y-%m-%d`_incremental`date +%H%M`.tar.gz
incrementalbackuplogname=`date +%Y-%m-%d`_incremental`date +%H%M`.log


# --
# functions:
# --


fullbackup()
{
# create backup directory
if test ! -e /backup/$directoryname; then
echo Creating /backup/$directoryname directory
mkdir /backup/$directoryname
fi

# create (or update) a shortcut called current to this directory
echo Updating /backup/$current pointer
rm /backup/$current
ln -s /backup/$directoryname /backup/$current

# keep track of creation date of full backup (used with incremental 
backups)
echo Updating /backup/$current/lastfullbackupdate
date/backup/$current/lastfullbackupdate

# create backup
echo Running tar...
tar --create  --label $fullbackuplabel --files-from 
/root/scripts/whattobackup --exclude-from /root/scripts/whatnottobackup 
--ignore-failed-read --absolute-names --verbose --gzip --file 
/backup/$current/$fullbackupname  /backup/$current/$fullbackuplogname 21
gzip /backup/$current/$fullbackuplogname
echo Done. Created /backup/$current/$fullbackupname
echo To view the log, type:
echo  zcat /backup/$current/$fullbackuplogname
}


incrementalbackup()
{
# create variable with date of last full backup
lastfullbackupdatevar=`cat /backup/$current/lastfullbackupdate`

# check for existence of incremental backup
if test -e /backup/$current/$incrementalbackupname; then 

echo Your last incremental backup was less than 60 seconds ago.
echo Wait a minute and try again.

else 

# create incremental backup
echo Running tar...
tar --create --label $incrementalbackuplabel --files-from 
/root/scripts/whattobackup --exclude-from /root/scripts/whatnottobackup 
--ignore-failed-read --after-date $lastfullbackupdatevar --absolute-names 
--verbose --gzip --file /backup/$current/$incrementalbackupname  
/backup/$current/$incrementalbackuplogname 21
gzip /backup/$current/$incrementalbackuplogname
echo Done. Created /backup/$current/$incrementalbackupname
echo To view the log, type:
echo  zcat /backup/$current/$incrementalbackuplogname

fi
}


# --
# main routine:
# --

# first get a list of all packages installed.
dpkg --get-selections  /etc/apt/selections

# clear out apt's packages
#apt-get clean

# now perform the backup.
echo -- Backup Script Running... --

if test `date +%A` = Sunday  ! -e /backup/$directoryname; then

# if it is sunday and you havent yet done a full backup, do so
echo Performing Weekly Full Backup...
fullbackup;

elif test ! -e /backup/$current/*full.tar.gz; then

# if there is no current fullbackup, make one
echo No Current Full Backup - Performing Full Backup Now...
fullbackup;

else

# otherwise, do an incremental backup
echo Performing Incremental Backup...
incrementalbackup;

fi # end if statement

echo -- Backup Script Done --

--- cut ---

(pts/6)jason@marsala:/root/sbin-scripts$ cat whattobackup.marsala 
/boot
/etc
/home
/root
/temp
/usr/local
/var

(pts/6)jason@marsala:/root/sbin-scripts$ cat whatnottobackup.marsala 
*.mp3
*.mpg
*.avi
*.wav
*.mov
*.asf
*.rm
*.iso
*.flac
*.zip
*.exe
data.bin
/usr/local/fonts
/usr/local/games
/usr/local/j2re
/usr/local/j2re1.4.0
/usr/local/winbackup
/var/cache/apt/archives


-jason pepas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-30 Thread Jason Pepas
 a bootable cd collection as a backup. now that's *cool*.

you might check out mondo as well.

apt-cache show mondo

-jason pepas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-30 Thread Jeremy Gaddis
 -Original Message-
 From: Jason Pepas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:52 PM
 To: Grant Bowman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Backup Consensus?
 
 
 On Sunday 26 January 2003 03:32 pm, Grant Bowman wrote:
  Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached 
 on exactly
  what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
  asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for 
 URLs to where
  this has been discussed in the past.
 
 for what it's worth, here's what I use to backup.
 
 --- cut backup.marsala.sh ---

[snip]

very nice script, just modified it a bit to suit my environment
and tried it out.

thanks,
j.

--
Jeremy L. Gaddis   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.gaddis.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-29 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:13:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:50:12PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
  OT: so where's the lexicon that relates quid, guinea, bob,
  shilling, pence, pound and so forth, for the ignorant
  north-americaner? :)

 1 pound = 240 (old) pennies
 1 pound = 100 new pennies
 Quid = pound (slang)
 Pence = alternative form of Pennies
 Shilling = 12 old pennies = 5 new pennies
 Half-crown = 2/6 (2 shillings and 6 pence), 30 old pennies, 12.5 new
 pennies
 Bob = shilling (slang)
 Hapenny = half-penny (elision)
 Thruppenny bit = 3 (old) penny coin

so (old) 1 pound/quid was 20 shillings/bobs, each of which was
12 pence/pennies, for a total of 240 pence/d; a crown would have
been 4bob+12d (60d, or 1/4quid, also 15 thrupenny).

(old)
1quid=  20bob=  240pence
1£   =  20s  =  240d

right?

 Guinea = 1 pound 1 shilling.

1guinea  =  1£+1s =  21s  = trés bizarre

 Sovereign = Gold coin worth one pound

1sovereign = 1£

how'm i doin'?

and the new system has much less romance:

1£ = 100p, woo hoo (no bob?)

it's a shame our ancestors didn't use base dozen [3x4]. then the
fraction 1/3 would be a nice .4 (and .6 would be a nice half, .3
would be one fourth)... alas, ten engenders much more difficult
math. at least hours and minutes use a very workable base 60...

 I tend to use terms like quid or pound because I still
 expect pound (£) signs to be turned into hash (#) signs by
 non-British equipment. To make matters worse, Americans
 sometimes call hash signs pound signs, so asking did my pound
 signs come out OK can get a misleading answer. Puzzles me a
 bit - I thought # was an American symbol anyway - does it just
 have two American names, one of which is better at crossing
 oceans? (Because pound is heavy, and sinks?)

two people separated by a common language, remember. :)
americans tend to call things by almost anything but their
proper name (at least i seldom get it right)-- and then expect
the rest of the world to just understand... (here in the
american midwest it's as if no other nation ever existed!)

sometime in the last decade there was a big push to submit names
for the # button on the phone, here... pound was apparently
the winner.

hash-mark, number-sign (we're #1!), grid, etc...

-- 
I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0;
Linux server 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 2003 i586 unknown
 
DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #24 from Will Trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Curious about DISK PARTITIONING schemes? That's a frequent topic
at debian-user -- look for it in the archives at lists.debian.org
or read Karsten's approach at
http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html

Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:31:58AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:13:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
  1 pound = 240 (old) pennies
  1 pound = 100 new pennies
  Quid = pound (slang)
  Pence = alternative form of Pennies
  Shilling = 12 old pennies = 5 new pennies
  Half-crown = 2/6 (2 shillings and 6 pence), 30 old pennies, 12.5 new
  pennies
  Bob = shilling (slang)
  Hapenny = half-penny (elision)
  Thruppenny bit = 3 (old) penny coin
 
 so (old) 1 pound/quid was 20 shillings/bobs, each of which was
 12 pence/pennies, for a total of 240 pence/d; a crown would have
 been 4bob+12d (60d, or 1/4quid, also 15 thrupenny).

You wouldn't tend to say x bob and ...; x shillings and y pence was
usually pronounced x and y or x and ypence, so a crown would have
been four and twelvepence, except that 12d == 1s, so a crown was
actually five shillings.

Quid tends not to be used with fractions. Five quid, yes; 1/4
quid, no. Oh, and neither bob nor quid normally takes an s in the
plural.

 and the new system has much less romance:
 
   1? = 100p, woo hoo (no bob?)

I think I might have heard bob still used for 5p, but I wouldn't swear
to it. The term's sometimes still used by older people to refer to an
unspecified small amount of money. I don't fall into that category,
though; I just about remember ha'pennies before they were abolished in
1984.

-- 
Colin Watson  [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-29 Thread bob parker
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:40, Pigeon wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:47:38AM +1100, bob parker wrote:
  On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:22, Pigeon wrote:
   Couple of suggestions:
   - might be an idea to save /var as well
   - if you're into kernel customising, make sure you have a rescue
   kernel with built-in support for all your critical hardware (ie, not
   as modules). I NEARLY got caught without a kernel that would recognise
   my Initio 9100UW SCSI card, but managed to find one. (Phew!)
  
   Pigeon
 
  Thanks for the support. Re /var, I just did a du -h on it and mine comes
  out at 1.1 gig! Any thoughts on what is essential and what is not?

 Well, I saved the whole thing precisely because I wasn't sure what is
 essential and what is not... There's a lot of stuff there about
 apt/dpkg configuration, most of which will be rebuilt when you
 reinstall packages, but you might need some of it if your system has a
 complex mix of packages from different sources/branches. All I
 specifically needed were /var/spool/mail/pigeon and
 /var/spool/exim/input/*.

 Depending on how frequently you make backups, /var/log/* might have
 useful stuff that might help you determine why you needed the backup.

 My /var is only 63Mb; I guess I'm not the sort of user to commemt on
 what might be essential when it's grown to 1.1 gig.

 Still, 1.1 gig should compress down to less than 700Mb, so it'll all
 go on one CD.

 (Related thought: Must make statically-linked rescue versions of tar,
 gzip, bzip2, fileutils...)

 Pigeon

You motivated me to have a good look at /var.

The mail spooler is no problem because I have kmail leaching it continually 
so it gets caught in the backup of $USER.
var/log and htdig account for about 1/4 gig each and there are about a 
gazillion or so news items. I think prudence might warrant saving the newer 
logs at least.  The rest is welcome to dissappear if it must.

The installed packages are at least listed in a file in $USER so they are 
quite restorable from the install discs. How much bother that would be I do 
not know. I'd love to be able to sort the installed package list by cd so I'd 
have the minimum no of media changes on a reinstall.

I'm presently downloading Knoppix, I expect that it would do double duty as a 
rescue disc.

Thanks

Bob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-29 Thread bob parker
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:32, Colin Watson wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:31:58AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
  On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:13:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
   1 pound = 240 (old) pennies
   1 pound = 100 new pennies
   Quid = pound (slang)
   Pence = alternative form of Pennies
   Shilling = 12 old pennies = 5 new pennies
   Half-crown = 2/6 (2 shillings and 6 pence), 30 old pennies, 12.5 new
   pennies
   Bob = shilling (slang)
   Hapenny = half-penny (elision)
   Thruppenny bit = 3 (old) penny coin
 
  so (old) 1 pound/quid was 20 shillings/bobs, each of which was
  12 pence/pennies, for a total of 240 pence/d; a crown would have
  been 4bob+12d (60d, or 1/4quid, also 15 thrupenny).

 You wouldn't tend to say x bob and ...; x shillings and y pence was
 usually pronounced x and y or x and ypence, so a crown would have
 been four and twelvepence, except that 12d == 1s, so a crown was
 actually five shillings.

 Quid tends not to be used with fractions. Five quid, yes; 1/4
 quid, no. Oh, and neither bob nor quid normally takes an s in the
 plural.


In Oz we used to be on Lsd also, changed in 1966. And sure it was 2 quid 
except when someone avered that They wouldn't be dead for quids

Bob

Here in Oz we use the metric system. The unit of length is the metre, unless 
you have a 1000 of them; then it's the mutter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-29 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:00:20PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
 This one time, at band camp, Charlie Reiman said:
  # has several names but most will be lost on non-techies. I'm not even
  sure why we call it the pound symbol since we Americans usually abbreviate
  pounds (the unit of weight) with the equally cryptic lbs.

So do we Brits! And I think the French do too. They don't use kilos
for everything. Due to utterly stupid EU legislation, it's now illegal
to sell things by the pound in Britain, but legal in France. AARGH!

 Comes from the latin libra, which means, I don't know, something to do
 with weights or scales.  Like the symbol for the astrological sign.

Libra is the plural of librum, which means... pound.

  The many names of # that I know:
  
  The tic-tac-toe symbol

Or noughts-and-crosses sign (same game, different names!)

  The hash
  The pound
  The octothorpe (don't ask)
 Just from the 8 points on it's exterior.  Oddly, spelled with and
 without the trailing 'e'
  The comment character
  
  All of these names are terrible. I like hash because then the omnipresent
  #! becomes the hash-bang, or shebang for short.

That's kinda cute... but I call ! pling, which seems sort of
onomatopoeic.

 
 Hear, hear.  Although I'm all for linguistic oddities that come from a
 mixed up history of compromises and disparate influences, myself.  Kind
 of like linux, really.

They can be a pain in the arse until you figure them out. The English
word for the military rank colonel apparently swapped back and forth
between French and Italian derivations, until finally settling to a
French spelling and an Italian pronunciation. When I was about 5, two
lads taking part in a war game baffled me utterly by telling me that
they were the kernels, which I thought were grains of wheat. Now I
have a directory containing various versions of the core of my Linux
system which is called colonels.

How the British came to pronounce lieutenant leftenant, I still
don't know. The American pronunciation lootenant is surely much
closer to the original - French, presumably.

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-29 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:48:04PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:13:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
  I tend to use terms like quid or pound because I still expect
  pound (?) signs to be turned into hash (#) signs by non-British
  equipment. To make matters worse, Americans sometimes call hash signs
  pound signs, so asking did my pound signs come out OK can get a
  misleading answer. Puzzles me a bit - I thought # was an American
  symbol anyway - does it just have two American names, one of which is
  better at crossing oceans? (Because pound is heavy, and sinks?)
 
 Your '?' character worked here, though I make sure I have my locale set
 properly (en_US where I am, in sunny South Dakota).

When the mail came back it had turned into a question mark. It
displayed correctly in the editor (jed) when I typed it in. jed saved
it as hex A3. It went out, and came back, and now mutt's pager
displays it as a question mark; if I hit | to pipe the mail to a hex
dump it's still hex A3, but when I go to jed to type a reply, now it
really is a question mark (hex 3F).

From the console, if I try and type a pound (money) sign at the
command prompt, it appears to be interpreted as hash signreturn.
Ie. it displays a hash sign, then gives me a new line, new prompt.
If I hexdump the standard input, to see if it's generating 23 0A or
A3, I find A3... but it displays as a pound(money) sign. WEIRD!

 The '#' has a crapload of names: some I know are
 
 1) pound sign; apparently bags of dry goods used to have the number
 of pounds followed by the '#' sign.  I learned this term back in my
 Apple ][ days (or daze).  The phone company annoyingly calls this the
 pound key (yet the asterisk is the star key?  Whatever).

British phones had a # key on the keypad for several years before the
exchanges were upgraded to the point where you could actually do
anything with it. When this happened, the recorded help/instruction
messages were at something of a loss as to what to call it. The key
you've been ignoring for the last 10 years was no good, because that
applied to * as well. They settled on square for a while, which I
think is unquestionably the most revolting term I've heard for this
symbol. They mostly call it hash now.

 PS Is there a one character symbol for a shilling? Does anyone other
 than the US use the '?' (cent) character?  How the hell do I type a
 euro character? :-)

Sort of. Two shillings is 2/-; two shillings and sixpence (half
a crown) is 2/6. Two shillings _could_ be 2/ but 2/- was much
more common. You could also write 2s. or occasionally 2s, though
dropping the dot from abbreviations was much less common then than it
is now. So, one character symbols were possible, but the convention
was usually a two-character form.

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-29 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 07:47, bob parker wrote:
 On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:22, Pigeon wrote:
  On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:03:47PM +1100, bob parker wrote:
   On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:32, Grant Bowman wrote:
[snip]
 Thanks for the support. Re /var, I just did a du -h on it and mine comes out 
 at 1.1 gig! Any thoughts on what is essential and what is not?

The apt cache isn't essential.  So, this might clear out a bunch:
# apt-cache clean

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-28 Thread bob parker
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:22, Pigeon wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:03:47PM +1100, bob parker wrote:
  On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:32, Grant Bowman wrote:
   Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
   what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
   asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
   this has been discussed in the past.
  
   I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list.  Please
   cc me on replies.
  
   Thank you very much,
 
  FWIW I first of all dump my postgres databases into $HOME, then make a
  list of my installed (debian) packages, also in $HOME.
 
  I then backup $HOME excluding browser cache files, /etc and /usr/local.
 
  My idea is that after a disaster I'd make a minimum debian install,
  restore $HOME, /usr/local. After that I'd reinstall my packages from the
  list I gathered and then selectively restore /etc to get my configs back
  the way I had them.
 
  I've never used this in anger and I'd welcome any suggestions from the
  wiser heads out there.

 Well, this is almost exactly what I did when I found I couldn't
 straightforwardly upgrade from slink to woody, and needed to install
 woody but keep all my settings from slink. Main difference is I didn't
 save /usr/local, since it was full of stuff I'd need to recompile
 anyway to work with the upgraded libc6. It worked... very well. See
 thread Can't upgrade from slink to woody or similar. The only
 problems I had were specific to the upgrade situation and wouldn't
 arise when restoring the original version.

 Couple of suggestions:
 - might be an idea to save /var as well
 - if you're into kernel customising, make sure you have a rescue
 kernel with built-in support for all your critical hardware (ie, not
 as modules). I NEARLY got caught without a kernel that would recognise
 my Initio 9100UW SCSI card, but managed to find one. (Phew!)

 Pigeon

Thanks for the support. Re /var, I just did a du -h on it and mine comes out 
at 1.1 gig! Any thoughts on what is essential and what is not?

Regards
Bob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-28 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:50, will trillich wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:37:57PM +,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
 
 
 OT: so where's the lexicon that relates quid, guinea, bob,
 shilling, pence, pound and so forth, for the ignorant
 north-americaner? :)

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=quid
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=guinea
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sterling

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Pigeon
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:50:12PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
 OT: so where's the lexicon that relates quid, guinea, bob,
 shilling, pence, pound and so forth, for the ignorant
 north-americaner? :)

OK, Just to make things more complicated British money changed around
1970 from 1 pound = 240 pennies from 1 pound = 100 new pennies, ie.
the value of the pound stayed the same but the penny changed. The
1/240-pound sort of pennies are now called old pennies, but of
course they were just pennies at the time.

Quid = pound (slang)
Pence = alternative form of Pennies
Shilling = 12 old pennies = 5 new pennies
Half-crown = 2/6 (2 shillings and 6 pence), 30 old pennies, 12.5 new
pennies
Bob = shilling (slang)
Hapenny = half-penny (elision)
Thruppenny bit = 3 (old) penny coin

Guinea = 1 pound 1 shilling. This is something to do with the gold
standard; British money used to be defined in terms of so much gold
being worth 1 guinea. No idea why this weird unit was used. Then we
came off the gold standard, then went back onto it for a while but
this time in terms of pounds instead of guineas, then came off it again.

Sovereign = Gold coin worth one pound, from the days of the gold
standard; still officially worth one pound, but worth considerably
more to coin collectors. There was once an income tax fiddle where an
employer paid his employees a wage of a few pounds a week, but he paid
in sovereigns, so the employees then took them to a local coin dealer
and sold them for about 40 times their official value. The employer
then bought them back off the coin dealer for the next pay packet.

Sovereigns are now mostly used as the ornament on finger rings by drug
dealers and serial burglars. (That means ones who burgle a lot, not
ones who pinch your data via RS232.)

I tend to use terms like quid or pound because I still expect
pound (£) signs to be turned into hash (#) signs by non-British
equipment. To make matters worse, Americans sometimes call hash signs
pound signs, so asking did my pound signs come out OK can get a
misleading answer. Puzzles me a bit - I thought # was an American
symbol anyway - does it just have two American names, one of which is
better at crossing oceans? (Because pound is heavy, and sinks?)

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:13:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
 I tend to use terms like quid or pound because I still expect
 pound (£) signs to be turned into hash (#) signs by non-British
 equipment. To make matters worse, Americans sometimes call hash signs
 pound signs, so asking did my pound signs come out OK can get a
 misleading answer. Puzzles me a bit - I thought # was an American
 symbol anyway - does it just have two American names, one of which is
 better at crossing oceans? (Because pound is heavy, and sinks?)

Your '£' character worked here, though I make sure I have my locale set
properly (en_US where I am, in sunny South Dakota).

The '#' has a crapload of names: some I know are

1) pound sign; apparently bags of dry goods used to have the number
of pounds followed by the '#' sign.  I learned this term back in my
Apple ][ days (or daze).  The phone company annoyingly calls this the
pound key (yet the asterisk is the star key?  Whatever).

2) sharp sign; ask a musician.  I learned this one while taking
violin lessons, but I've never referred to the '#' as a sharp.

3) hash; dunno what the origin is but it works for me; I tend to use
this term exclusively to avoid confusion.

4) octothorpe; I guess this is the typographical name or something.
I even used to know _why_, but I'm too lazy to look it up.

PS Is there a one character symbol for a shilling? Does anyone other
than the US use the '¢' (cent) character?  How the hell do I type a
euro character? :-)

PPS i just used the compose key in PuTTY ... cool!

-- 
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  NEWS FLASH: Scientists decode the first confirmed alien transmission
  from outer space ...
  
   This really works! Just send 5*10^50 H atoms to each of the five
   star systems listed below. Then, add your own system to the top of
   the list, delete the system at the bottom, and send out copies of
   this message to 100 other solar systems. If you follow these
   instructions, within 0.25 of a galactic rotation you are guaranteed
   to receive enough hydrogen in return to power your civilization
   until entropy reaches its maximum!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Charlie Reiman


 -Original Message-
 From: Pigeon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:14 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

 I tend to use terms like quid or pound because I still expect
 pound (£) signs to be turned into hash (#) signs by non-British
 equipment. To make matters worse, Americans sometimes call hash signs
 pound signs, so asking did my pound signs come out OK can get a
 misleading answer. Puzzles me a bit - I thought # was an American
 symbol anyway - does it just have two American names, one of which is
 better at crossing oceans? (Because pound is heavy, and sinks?)

 Pigeon

# has several names but most will be lost on non-techies. I'm not even
sure why we call it the pound symbol since we Americans usually abbreviate
pounds (the unit of weight) with the equally cryptic lbs.

The many names of # that I know:

The tic-tac-toe symbol
The hash
The pound
The octothorpe (don't ask)
The comment character

All of these names are terrible. I like hash because then the omnipresent
#! becomes the hash-bang, or shebang for short.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Steve Juranich
On 28 January 2003 at 16:13,
Pigeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 misleading answer. Puzzles me a bit - I thought # was an American
 symbol anyway - does it just have two American names, one of which is
 better at crossing oceans? (Because pound is heavy, and sinks?)

I think the official name for it is 'the octothorpe'. Of course, the 
ascii program says:

quail (fun)$ ./ascii '#'
ASCII 2/3 is decimal 035, hex 23, octal 043, bits 00100011: prints as `#'
Official name: Pound
Other names: Number, Sharp, Crunch, Mesh, Hex, Hash, Flash, Grid, Octothorpe 

I think the two most common terms (at least in my neck of the woods) is 
pound and hash (favoring pound, it's more fun to pound stuff than 
hash it).

--
Stephen W. Juranich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electrical Engineering http://students.washington.edu/sjuranic
University of Washingtonhttp://ssli.ee.washington.edu/ssli



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Kent West
Charlie Reiman wrote:


# has several names


snip


. I like hash because then the omnipresent
#! becomes the hash-bang, or shebang for short.

 


I've heard #! referred to as splat-bang; I kind of like that.

Kent



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Seneca
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:48:04PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
 The '#' has a crapload of names: some I know are
[...] 
 4) octothorpe; I guess this is the typographical name or something.
 I even used to know _why_, but I'm too lazy to look it up.

In a book I have, it gives '#' a meaning of Insert a space (the
context is in revising a text).

octo - eight
thorp - I saw what this part means a while ago.  I think it is village

 PS Is there a one character symbol for a shilling? Does anyone other
 than the US use the '?' (cent) character?  How the hell do I type a
 euro character? :-)

IIRC, it was '/'.

-- 
Seneca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Charlie Reiman said:
 # has several names but most will be lost on non-techies. I'm not even
 sure why we call it the pound symbol since we Americans usually abbreviate
 pounds (the unit of weight) with the equally cryptic lbs.

Comes from the latin libra, which means, I don't know, something to do
with weights or scales.  Like the symbol for the astrological sign.

 The many names of # that I know:
 
 The tic-tac-toe symbol
 The hash
 The pound
 The octothorpe (don't ask)
Just from the 8 points on it's exterior.  Oddly, spelled with and
without the trailing 'e'
 The comment character
 
 All of these names are terrible. I like hash because then the omnipresent
 #! becomes the hash-bang, or shebang for short.

Hear, hear.  Although I'm all for linguistic oddities that come from a
mixed up history of compromises and disparate influences, myself.  Kind
of like linux, really.
-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | I have five dollars for each of you.  |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Bernhard Goetz   |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | |
 --



msg27043/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-28 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:47:38AM +1100, bob parker wrote:
 On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:22, Pigeon wrote:
 
  Couple of suggestions:
  - might be an idea to save /var as well
  - if you're into kernel customising, make sure you have a rescue
  kernel with built-in support for all your critical hardware (ie, not
  as modules). I NEARLY got caught without a kernel that would recognise
  my Initio 9100UW SCSI card, but managed to find one. (Phew!)
 
  Pigeon
 
 Thanks for the support. Re /var, I just did a du -h on it and mine comes out 
 at 1.1 gig! Any thoughts on what is essential and what is not?

Well, I saved the whole thing precisely because I wasn't sure what is
essential and what is not... There's a lot of stuff there about
apt/dpkg configuration, most of which will be rebuilt when you
reinstall packages, but you might need some of it if your system has a
complex mix of packages from different sources/branches. All I
specifically needed were /var/spool/mail/pigeon and
/var/spool/exim/input/*.

Depending on how frequently you make backups, /var/log/* might have
useful stuff that might help you determine why you needed the backup.

My /var is only 63Mb; I guess I'm not the sort of user to commemt on
what might be essential when it's grown to 1.1 gig.

Still, 1.1 gig should compress down to less than 700Mb, so it'll all
go on one CD.

(Related thought: Must make statically-linked rescue versions of tar,
gzip, bzip2, fileutils...)

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Clive Standbridge
On Tue 28 Jan 2003 16:48:04 +(-0600), Nathan E Norman wrote:
 
 How the hell do I type a euro character? :-)

You'd need iso-8859-15 encoding (locale en_US@euro perhaps?). Euro is 0xA4 which is ¤ 
(looks like a twinkly star) in iso-8859-1.

Hopefully there's a suitable compose sequence if you're in the right locale.

-- 
Cheers,
Clive


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Slang for money [was: Re: Backup Consensus?]

2003-01-28 Thread Clive Standbridge
On Tue 28 Jan 2003 16:13:56 +(+), Pigeon wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:50:12PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
  OT: so where's the lexicon that relates quid, guinea, bob,
  shilling, pence, pound and so forth, for the ignorant
  north-americaner? :)
 
 OK, Just to make things more complicated British money changed around
 1970 from 1 pound = 240 pennies from 1 pound = 100 new pennies, ie.
 the value of the pound stayed the same but the penny changed. The
 1/240-pound sort of pennies are now called old pennies, but of
 course they were just pennies at the time.

They were bloody big coins though.

 Quid = pound (slang)
 Pence = alternative form of Pennies
 Shilling = 12 old pennies = 5 new pennies
 Half-crown = 2/6 (2 shillings and 6 pence), 30 old pennies, 12.5 new
 pennies
 Bob = shilling (slang)
 Hapenny = half-penny (elision)
 Thruppenny bit = 3 (old) penny coin

To add my ha'p'orth (halfpennyworth), the denominations are/were abbreviated as:
 p - new pence
 d - old pence
 s - shillings
 L - pounds - £ is a stylised L

In other words our currency used to be L.s.d.


-- 
Cheers,
Clive


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-27 Thread bob parker
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:32, Grant Bowman wrote:
 Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
 what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
 asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
 this has been discussed in the past.

 I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list.  Please
 cc me on replies.

 Thank you very much,

FWIW I first of all dump my postgres databases into $HOME, then make a list 
of my installed (debian) packages, also in $HOME.

I then backup $HOME excluding browser cache files, /etc and /usr/local.

My idea is that after a disaster I'd make a minimum debian install, restore 
$HOME, /usr/local. After that I'd reinstall my packages from the list I 
gathered and then selectively restore /etc to get my configs back the way I 
had them.

I've never used this in anger and I'd welcome any suggestions from the wiser 
heads out there.

Regards
Bob
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-27 Thread Kevin . Bewley
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:32, Grant Bowman wrote:
 Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
 what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
 asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
 this has been discussed in the past.

 I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list.  Please
 cc me on replies.

 Thank you very much,

I use the Make CD Recovery program (http://mkcdrec.ota.be/). What it does
is allow me to make a Multi-CD, bootable backup of my Debian filesystem.
So, in the case of disaster recovery I can boot from disk one and reinstall
the whole thing from the CDs. At my current fs size of 3Gb this fits on 5
CD's, at 20p a disk this costs me about 1 of your english quids per backup.
I guess I could use CD-RW's but I ain't too bothered about it.

Make CD Revovery _might_ do compression if you need it though to cut down
on the number of disks - but I've never checked.

Hope this is useful for you, anyone else use this system? Thoughts anyone?

Cheers,
Kevin




The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity 
to whom it is addressed.  It may contain privileged and confidential information and 
if you are not an intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or take any action 
in reliance on it.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
immediately by telephone on +44 (0)1980 612100.  Please also destroy or delete the 
message from your computer.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-27 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:03:47PM +1100, bob parker wrote:
 FWIW I first of all dump my postgres databases into $HOME, then make a list 
 of my installed (debian) packages, also in $HOME.
 
 I then backup $HOME excluding browser cache files, /etc and /usr/local.
 
 My idea is that after a disaster I'd make a minimum debian install, restore 
 $HOME, /usr/local. After that I'd reinstall my packages from the list I 
 gathered and then selectively restore /etc to get my configs back the way I 
 had them.

sounds like a reasonable plan. got a script or two you'd care to
share? :)

-- 
I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0;
Linux server 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 2003 i586 unknown
 
DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #48 from Will Trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
To peruse your CURRENT VIM SETTINGS (there's LOTS of them)
from within Vim, simply do
:options
You can change them there, on-the-fly, as well. Type
ctrl-W ctrl-W to switch panes or ctrl-W q to close one.
Try :help to learn more.

Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-27 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:37:57PM +,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I use the Make CD Recovery program (http://mkcdrec.ota.be/).
 What it does is allow me to make a Multi-CD, bootable backup
 of my Debian filesystem.  So, in the case of disaster recovery
 I can boot from disk one and reinstall the whole thing from
 the CDs. At my current fs size of 3Gb this fits on 5 CD's, at
 20p a disk this costs me about 1 of your english quids per
 backup.  I guess I could use CD-RW's but I ain't too bothered
 about it.
 
 Make CD Revovery _might_ do compression if you need it though
 to cut down on the number of disks - but I've never checked.

a bootable cd collection as a backup. now that's *cool*.

ever had to use it (to make *sure* the restore works)?



OT: so where's the lexicon that relates quid, guinea, bob,
shilling, pence, pound and so forth, for the ignorant
north-americaner? :)

-- 
I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0;
Linux server 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 2003 i586 unknown
 
DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #16 from Will Trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Why are *.rpm (RED HAT PACKAGES) considered spawn of Satan?
Because the Debian package system is a lot more sophisticated
than the one Red Hat uses; lots more inter-dependency information
is built in to a *.deb package. If you bypass that with an *.rpm
file, you're taking chances with your system. Try to apt-get
install debian-only packages if possible. (Also check out the
alien package if you must.)

Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-27 Thread Pigeon
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:03:47PM +1100, bob parker wrote:
 On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:32, Grant Bowman wrote:
  Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
  what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
  asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
  this has been discussed in the past.
 
  I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list.  Please
  cc me on replies.
 
  Thank you very much,
 
 FWIW I first of all dump my postgres databases into $HOME, then make a list 
 of my installed (debian) packages, also in $HOME.
 
 I then backup $HOME excluding browser cache files, /etc and /usr/local.
 
 My idea is that after a disaster I'd make a minimum debian install, restore 
 $HOME, /usr/local. After that I'd reinstall my packages from the list I 
 gathered and then selectively restore /etc to get my configs back the way I 
 had them.
 
 I've never used this in anger and I'd welcome any suggestions from the wiser 
 heads out there.

Well, this is almost exactly what I did when I found I couldn't
straightforwardly upgrade from slink to woody, and needed to install
woody but keep all my settings from slink. Main difference is I didn't
save /usr/local, since it was full of stuff I'd need to recompile
anyway to work with the upgraded libc6. It worked... very well. See
thread Can't upgrade from slink to woody or similar. The only
problems I had were specific to the upgrade situation and wouldn't
arise when restoring the original version.

Couple of suggestions:
- might be an idea to save /var as well
- if you're into kernel customising, make sure you have a rescue
kernel with built-in support for all your critical hardware (ie, not
as modules). I NEARLY got caught without a kernel that would recognise
my Initio 9100UW SCSI card, but managed to find one. (Phew!)

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-27 Thread Alvin Oga

hi ya

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, will trillich wrote:

 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:03:47PM +1100, bob parker wrote:
  FWIW I first of all dump my postgres databases into $HOME, then make a list 
  of my installed (debian) packages, also in $HOME.
  
  I then backup $HOME excluding browser cache files, /etc and /usr/local.
  
  My idea is that after a disaster I'd make a minimum debian install, restore 
  $HOME, /usr/local. After that I'd reinstall my packages from the list I 
  gathered and then selectively restore /etc to get my configs back the way I 
  had them.
 
 sounds like a reasonable plan. got a script or two you'd care to
 share? :)

bunch of backup-scripts
http://www.Linux-Backup.net/app.gwif.html


for simple saving /etc  ( all your config files )
- stick in a floppy and copy /etc to floppy
( if it fits -- it should )

tar zcvf /dev/fd0 /etc ;; sync

-- to read it  --
tar ztvf /dev/fd0

-

for saving debian
dpkg --get-selections *  /mnt/floppy/backup.pkg.lst 

build up a minium debian sytem
dpkg --set-selections  /mnt/floppy/backup.pkg.lst
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get upgrade 


verify your config files and data and install /home  and /usr/local
assuming you were good about where you kept your user data

c ya
alvin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-26 Thread Grant Bowman
Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
this has been discussed in the past.

I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list.  Please
cc me on replies.

Thank you very much,

-- 
-- Grant Bowman[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Backup Consensus?

2003-01-26 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:32:19PM -0800, Grant Bowman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly
 what is necesary to backup a Debian system?  I'm sure this has been
 asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where
 this has been discussed in the past.
 
 I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list.  Please
 cc me on replies.

I don't know about full concensus, but this is what I recommend:

http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/backups.html

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of Gestalt don't you understand?
   Geek for hire:  http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]