Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
On February 11, 2003 07:42 am, Dave Whiteley wrote: There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20! Yes, there are several. I checked first on my machine with apt-cache search kernel-image-2.2.20 then double-checked at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages by searching for kernel-image-2.2.20 under stable, and in both cases got the following hits: stable kernel-image-2.2.20-idepci 2.2.20-5 (1360.6k) Linux kernel binary image. stable kernel-image-2.2.20-compact 2.2.20-5 (1689.8k) Linux kernel binary image. stable kernel-image-2.2.20 2.2.20-5 (5803.3k) Linux kernel binary image for version 2.2.20. stable kernel-image-2.2.20-reiserfs 2.2.20-4 (1669.3k) Linux kernel binary image for version 2.2.20. -- -Levi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
#include hallo.h * Dave Whiteley [Tue, Feb 11 2003, 12:42:55PM]: I am trying to generate a new set of boot disks for an old system (see another thread). Which Thread? Where? There are dozens of new threads in this ML. I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20. There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20! Archive maintainance Bug in 3.0r1, the packages should still be in the pool. New boot-floppies will have 2.2.22, see http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf3024/. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Daten sind Aneinanderreihungen von kleinen Mustern ohne Bedeutung -- aus Mantis Seminararbeit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:53:46AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Dave Whiteley [Tue, Feb 11 2003, 12:42:55PM]: I am trying to generate a new set of boot disks for an old system (see another thread). Which Thread? Where? There are dozens of new threads in this ML. Sorry. That data was omitted, because it is not important for this topic. I did not want to split discussion of that problem (which is now solved) over two threads. I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20. There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20! Archive maintainance Bug in 3.0r1, the packages should still be in the pool. New boot-floppies will have 2.2.22, see http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf3024/. Yes, the package is available, but not listed in the stable distribution on the Debian Packages web page. This is why I was not sure if this was a reportable bug or not. Thanks for your reply. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Daten sind Aneinanderreihungen von kleinen Mustern ohne Bedeutung -- aus Mantis Seminararbeit -- Dave Whiteley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +44 (0)113 343 2059 School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering The University of Leeds. Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:30:22PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:19:03PM +, Dave Whiteley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:34:19PM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20.
There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20!
?
Yes there is! There is no 2.4.20 though.
snip
Are you sure! It is a bit tricky for me to know, as I run my apt
source including the testing distribution, and then I do see 2.2.20,
however when I look at the stable package lists on debian.org, 2.2.20
is missing.
Are we talking about 2.4.20 or 2.2.20? 2.2.20 is, AFAIK, still the
default kernel on the boot floppies, and is also available as a
kernel-source and kernel-image package in woody. 2.4.20 is not, and
probably never will be available in woody, since it was not released
until well after woody froze. Woody does contain both 2.4.18 boot
floppies and kernel-{image,source} packages though.
--
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ertius.org/
I am talking about 2.2.20.
I was trying to do something with the stable boot-disks, and when I
looked to see what version kernel they used I found 2.2.20.
I then looked at the Debian Packages web site under the stable
distribution, and the source package for 2.2.20 was not listed.
This is no real problem to me as 2.2.20 is available under testing (or
sid?), so my question REALLY was,
Is the fact that 2.2.20 is missing from the stable package list a
bug?
Does this make things clear?
Dave
--
Dave Whiteley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone +44 (0)113 343 2059
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
The University of Leeds. Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:19:03PM +, Dave Whiteley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:34:19PM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20.
There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20!
?
Yes there is! There is no 2.4.20 though.
snip
Are you sure! It is a bit tricky for me to know, as I run my apt
source including the testing distribution, and then I do see 2.2.20,
however when I look at the stable package lists on debian.org, 2.2.20
is missing.
Are we talking about 2.4.20 or 2.2.20? 2.2.20 is, AFAIK, still the
default kernel on the boot floppies, and is also available as a
kernel-source and kernel-image package in woody. 2.4.20 is not, and
probably never will be available in woody, since it was not released
until well after woody froze. Woody does contain both 2.4.18 boot
floppies and kernel-{image,source} packages though.
--
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ertius.org/
msg30447/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
Is it a bug? I am trying to generate a new set of boot disks for an old system (see another thread). I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20. There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20! Dave -- Dave Whiteley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +44 (0)113 343 2059 School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering The University of Leeds. Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20. There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20! ? Yes there is! There is no 2.4.20 though. When are we likely to see 2.4.20? Keith ___ _ Keith O'Connell. -o) Maidstone, Kent. (UK) /\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug? - Boot disks and Kernel Source
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:34:19PM +, Keith O'Connell wrote: I see that the boot floppies use a kernel 2.2.20. There is not a stable package for kernel 2.2.20! ? Yes there is! There is no 2.4.20 though. snip Are you sure! It is a bit tricky for me to know, as I run my apt source including the testing distribution, and then I do see 2.2.20, however when I look at the stable package lists on debian.org, 2.2.20 is missing. snip Keith ___ _ Keith O'Connell. -o) Maidstone, Kent. (UK) /\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v Nice Tux! Dave -- Dave Whiteley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +44 (0)113 343 2059 School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering The University of Leeds. Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
