Upgrading rex's libc, was Re: Bug in libc5.4.13

1997-01-20 Thread Adriano Nagelschmidt Rodrigues 
Tadeusz Bak writes:

[SNIP]

 > The bug is fixed in libc5.4.17 (from "bo" directory). So I think that 
 > libc in "rex" should be upgraded.

Yes, why not upgrade rex's libc? Nothing would break, the packages are
ready... If we want rex to be stable, that would be part of the normal bug
fixing routine.

Regards,

--
Adriano


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug in libc5.4.13

1997-01-20 Thread Tadeusz Bak 
That simple program compiled under Debian-1.2 (libc5.4.13) produces wrong 
results.

#include 
main()
{
  double a;
  printf("input: ");
  scanf("%lf", &a);
  printf("value = %f\n", a);
}

$ ./test01
input: 2e-3
value = 0.002000

$ ./test01
input: 2E-3
value = 2.00  


The bug is fixed in libc5.4.17 (from "bo" directory). So I think that 
libc in "rex" should be upgraded.

--
  Tad


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]