Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-05-01 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
For the command line there is swish++.
Its worth a try but it requires a configuration file (see 
/usr/share/doc/swish++).
-- 
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-30 Thread Paul Johnson
Rick wrote:
 What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
 since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
 would like to index all, including metadata...

I just recently switched from Google Desktop for Linux to beagle for
that task.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-30 Thread Dave Patterson
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2009-04-30 08:56:38 -0700]:

 
 I just recently switched from Google Desktop for Linux to beagle for
 that task.
 

Lenny or Sid?

-- 
Dave


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-30 Thread Paul Johnson
Dave Patterson wrote:
 * Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2009-04-30 08:56:38 -0700]:
 
  
 I just recently switched from Google Desktop for Linux to beagle for
 that task.

 
 Lenny or Sid?
 

Lenny.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-28 Thread John Magolske
* Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com [090427 21:03]:
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 20:17, Jeff Zhang ideal...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Rick rick0...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine

There was a thread discussing this last year:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/10/thrd3.html#01357

I haven't gotten around to implementing any of the suggestions yet,
hope to do so soon, am leaning towards recoll. One feature that's
important to me is a cli interface.

  roll is my favourite for such thing.
 
 What is roll? I don't see it in Sid

I think that was meant to be recoll.

John


-- 
John Magolske
http://B79.net/contact


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-28 Thread Jeff Zhang
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, John Magolske listm...@b79.net wrote:

 * Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com [090427 21:03]:
  On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 20:17, Jeff Zhang ideal...@gmail.com wrote:
   On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Rick rick0...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine

 There was a thread discussing this last year:

 http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/10/thrd3.html#01357

 I haven't gotten around to implementing any of the suggestions yet,
 hope to do so soon, am leaning towards recoll. One feature that's
 important to me is a cli interface.

   roll is my favourite for such thing.
 
  What is roll? I don't see it in Sid

 I think that was meant to be recoll.


yes, sorry for mistype


Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-28 Thread David Baron
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 01:43:05 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org 
wrote:
  What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
  since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
  would like to index all, including metadata...
 
  I have not used any of them extensively, but from playing around
  with Beagle and Tracker, I prefer Tracker. Tracker is supposed
  to be lighter on resources than Beagle.  Tracker also does not
  depend on Mono, if you care about that sort of thing.
 
  Another option is Strigi, which has community connections to
  KDE (but it does not have KDE or QT dependencies).

 Correction, the Strigi daemon does not have QT or KDE
 dependencies. The default client, however, is in QT.

I am currently running recoll which seems the least intrusive.
I you want to use nepomuk, you are stuck with the strigi stuff.
Nepomuk, even with NO indexing, is a system-hawg. Ihave to manually renice it 
just to make KDE4 usable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-27 Thread Rick
What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
would like to index all, including metadata...


Thanks!
Rick



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-27 Thread Daryl Styrk
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:43:42PM -0400, Rick wrote:
 What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
 since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
 would like to index all, including metadata...
 
 
 Thanks!
 Rick
 

I used Beagle for a while.  You can customize it a bit for your own needs.. It 
will take a while to index everything.  

$ aptitude show beagle

snip

Description: indexing and search tool for your personal data
 A desktop search util for indexing and searching user's data. At the moment, 
it can index filesystems, Pidgin logs, Evolution mail and data,
 RSS and other. 
 
 Beagle project web is at http://beagle-project.org/
Homepage: http://www.beagle-project.org/

-- 
Daryl Styrk
Naples, FL USA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-27 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:43, Rick rick0...@gmail.com wrote:
 What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
 since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
 would like to index all, including metadata...

I have not used any of them extensively, but from playing around
with Beagle and Tracker, I prefer Tracker. Tracker is supposed
to be lighter on resources than Beagle.  Tracker also does not
depend on Mono, if you care about that sort of thing.

Another option is Strigi, which has community connections to
KDE (but it does not have KDE or QT dependencies).
Unfortunately, there seems to be a lull in Strigi development right
now.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-27 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:30, Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:43, Rick rick0...@gmail.com wrote:
 What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
 since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
 would like to index all, including metadata...

 I have not used any of them extensively, but from playing around
 with Beagle and Tracker, I prefer Tracker. Tracker is supposed
 to be lighter on resources than Beagle.  Tracker also does not
 depend on Mono, if you care about that sort of thing.

 Another option is Strigi, which has community connections to
 KDE (but it does not have KDE or QT dependencies).

Correction, the Strigi daemon does not have QT or KDE
dependencies. The default client, however, is in QT.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-27 Thread Jeff Zhang
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Rick rick0...@gmail.com wrote:

 What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
 since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
 would like to index all, including metadata...



roll is my favourite for such thing.


Re: Desktop Search Engines

2009-04-27 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 20:17, Jeff Zhang ideal...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Rick rick0...@gmail.com wrote:

 What would be a good choice, for a desktop search engine,
 since have TB of Music and Video, and GB of .pdf files,
 would like to index all, including metadata...



 roll is my favourite for such thing.

What is roll? I don't see it in Sid, and a google of roll desktop search
is uninformative.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Desktop search engines

2008-10-22 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:38:23 -0700
John Magolske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

...

 My understanding is that recoll is gui only...is that true? I've been

recoll can be run from the CLI with the -t switch.  I don't have much
experience using it this way.

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Desktop search engines

2008-10-21 Thread Amit Uttamchandani
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:38:23 -0700
John Magolske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 * Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081020 12:49]:
  On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:23:25 -0700
  Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I was looking for a simple desktop search engine, something that tracks
   metadata, etc. And since I'm not using KDE or GNOME, I would like
   something that does not depend on either.
  ...
   I am trying them out now but any experiences or suggestions?
   
   Also this machine is not too powerful (500MHz G4), so I guess something
   lightweight would be great.
  
  I use recoll; it's not very slick, but it works.  I don't have
  experience with any of the others.
 
 My understanding is that recoll is gui only...is that true? I've been
 looking for a lightweight desktop search engine that can be used at
 the command line. I've used glimpse, which seemed ok, but it's not a
 FOSS solution:  http://webglimpse.net/sublicensing/licensing.html
 
 Some cli-compatible search tools I've heard about:
 
 swish++
 http://swishplusplus.sourceforge.net/
 
 tracker (...but I guess this is a GNOME thing)
 http://www.gnome.org/projects/tracker/
 
 Namazu
 http://www.namazu.org/
 
 Strigi
 http://strigi.sourceforge.net/
 
 Has anyone had experience with any of these?
 
 Thanks,
 
 John
 
 -- 

I actually just installed strigi, I tried recoll but couldn't get it to
work properly. Strigi is actually quite fast. I am not sure about the
command line but the strigiclient is a simple gui and seems to work as
expected. Also it has minimal dependencies. I haven't tried the others.

Also note that today was my first day using strigi. I will be
experimenting with the other alternatives and see how they go.

Amit


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Desktop search engines

2008-10-21 Thread Paul Johnson
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
 I am trying them out now but any experiences or suggestions?
   
Google Desktop is desktop environment agnostic enough to work outside
Linux, too.  Though it's non-free, so not a part of Debian.  However,
it's at least free-beer, and we all use Google...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Desktop search engines

2008-10-21 Thread machiner
Hello,

 
 I was looking for a simple desktop search engine, something that tracks
 metadata, etc. And since I'm not using KDE or GNOME, I would like
 something that does not depend on either.
 
 After some analysis I came down to the following choices:
 
  1. Strigi
   - small, lightweight, development still active, seems to be platform
 independent.
 
  2. beagle
   - huge dependencies but widely used
 
  3. tracker
   - no too many dependencies, seems like it is still developed but no
 new releases since a couple of months
 
  4. doodle
   - smallest out of all
   - not updated since 2007?
 
 Right now, I'm leaning towards Strigi, doodle, tracker (in that
 order)...
 
 I am trying them out now but any experiences or suggestions?
 
 Also this machine is not too powerful (500MHz G4), so I guess something
 lightweight would be great.
 
 Thanks,
 Amit
 
 


On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:23:25 -0700
Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

As another posted, Recoll.  I've been using it for some time and it's damned 
fast,
can do some pretty amazing searches, and it doesn't take 3 days to index my 67GB
worth of crap.

Give Recoll a try, it's in the Lenny repos as well as all the helpers, too.
(catdoc and such).


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Desktop search engines

2008-10-20 Thread Amit Uttamchandani

I was looking for a simple desktop search engine, something that tracks
metadata, etc. And since I'm not using KDE or GNOME, I would like
something that does not depend on either.

After some analysis I came down to the following choices:

 1. Strigi
  - small, lightweight, development still active, seems to be platform
independent.

 2. beagle
  - huge dependencies but widely used

 3. tracker
  - no too many dependencies, seems like it is still developed but no
new releases since a couple of months

 4. doodle
  - smallest out of all
  - not updated since 2007?

Right now, I'm leaning towards Strigi, doodle, tracker (in that
order)...

I am trying them out now but any experiences or suggestions?

Also this machine is not too powerful (500MHz G4), so I guess something
lightweight would be great.

Thanks,
Amit


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Desktop search engines

2008-10-20 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:23:25 -0700
Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I was looking for a simple desktop search engine, something that tracks
 metadata, etc. And since I'm not using KDE or GNOME, I would like
 something that does not depend on either.

...

 I am trying them out now but any experiences or suggestions?
 
 Also this machine is not too powerful (500MHz G4), so I guess something
 lightweight would be great.

I use recoll; it's not very slick, but it works.  I don't have
experience with any of the others. 

 Thanks,
 Amit

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Desktop search engines

2008-10-20 Thread John Magolske
* Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081020 12:49]:
 On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:23:25 -0700
 Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I was looking for a simple desktop search engine, something that tracks
  metadata, etc. And since I'm not using KDE or GNOME, I would like
  something that does not depend on either.
 ...
  I am trying them out now but any experiences or suggestions?
  
  Also this machine is not too powerful (500MHz G4), so I guess something
  lightweight would be great.
 
 I use recoll; it's not very slick, but it works.  I don't have
 experience with any of the others.

My understanding is that recoll is gui only...is that true? I've been
looking for a lightweight desktop search engine that can be used at
the command line. I've used glimpse, which seemed ok, but it's not a
FOSS solution:  http://webglimpse.net/sublicensing/licensing.html

Some cli-compatible search tools I've heard about:

swish++
http://swishplusplus.sourceforge.net/

tracker (...but I guess this is a GNOME thing)
http://www.gnome.org/projects/tracker/

Namazu
http://www.namazu.org/

Strigi
http://strigi.sourceforge.net/

Has anyone had experience with any of these?

Thanks,

John

-- 
John Magolske
http://B79.net/contact


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]