Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-23 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
 On Dec 22 2004, William Ballard wrote:
  You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu be *the*
  Gnome menu.
 
 Now, that would be a good thing, IMO. Seeing the applications separately
 isn't that intuitive for the new users that I've been using as guinea
 pigs for deploying Open Source Software.

Absolutely. The debian menu system's menu should be the primary menu for
all menu-carrying apps imho. Any arguments against it are usually
complaints about the menu system which should be fixed, not ignored.
Having two menus in KDE/GNOME vs. the rest of the world is too
confusing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-23 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:47:11AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
 On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
  On Dec 22 2004, William Ballard wrote:
   You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu
   be *the* Gnome menu.
  
  Now, that would be a good thing, IMO. Seeing the applications
  separately isn't that intuitive for the new users that I've been
  using as guinea pigs for deploying Open Source Software.
 
 Absolutely. The debian menu system's menu should be the primary menu
 for all menu-carrying apps imho. Any arguments against it are usually
 complaints about the menu system which should be fixed, not ignored.
 Having two menus in KDE/GNOME vs. the rest of the world is too
 confusing.

So, why not file the bug reports to request these changes?

-- 
Jamin W. Collins

To be nobody but yourself when the whole world is trying it's best night
and day to make you everybody else is to fight the hardest battle any
human being will fight. -- E.E. Cummings


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-23 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:47:11AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
  On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
   On Dec 22 2004, William Ballard wrote:
You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu
be *the* Gnome menu.
   
   Now, that would be a good thing, IMO. Seeing the applications
   separately isn't that intuitive for the new users that I've been
   using as guinea pigs for deploying Open Source Software.
  
  Absolutely. The debian menu system's menu should be the primary menu
  for all menu-carrying apps imho. Any arguments against it are usually
  complaints about the menu system which should be fixed, not ignored.
  Having two menus in KDE/GNOME vs. the rest of the world is too
  confusing.
 
 So, why not file the bug reports to request these changes?

Oh no.

Aside from reasons already stated, not all programs are listed under
Gnome menu.  Gnome menu is a nice addition but it is not yet substitute
of Debian menu.

Current set up is a good practical compromie.

If you hate Debian menu for any reason, you can erase it by putting
empty contents file in somewhere like /etc/menu with the program name as
the file name.  I do not care to do so though.



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-23 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
  On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:47:11AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
   On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Dec 22 2004, William Ballard wrote:
 You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu
 be *the* Gnome menu.

Now, that would be a good thing, IMO. Seeing the applications
separately isn't that intuitive for the new users that I've been
using as guinea pigs for deploying Open Source Software.
   
   Absolutely. The debian menu system's menu should be the primary menu
   for all menu-carrying apps imho. Any arguments against it are usually
   complaints about the menu system which should be fixed, not ignored.
   Having two menus in KDE/GNOME vs. the rest of the world is too
   confusing.
  
  So, why not file the bug reports to request these changes?
 
 Oh no.
 
 Aside from reasons already stated, not all programs are listed under
 Gnome menu.  Gnome menu is a nice addition but it is not yet substitute
 of Debian menu.

Perhaps I missed something but this didn't seem to be a suggestion to
have the Gnome menu replace the Debian menu, but rather the Debian menu
replace the Gnome menu.  So, I don't see how your comment applies.

 Current set up is a good practical compromie.

From a geek perspective yes.  From an average user perspective, not
really.  It not very intuitive.  Sure, once a user has had it explained
to them, they know where to look, but I've seen a number that haven't
found it initially.

-- 
Jamin W. Collins

This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-23 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:47:11AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
  Absolutely. The debian menu system's menu should be the primary menu
  for all menu-carrying apps imho. Any arguments against it are usually
  complaints about the menu system which should be fixed, not ignored.
  Having two menus in KDE/GNOME vs. the rest of the world is too
  confusing.
 
 So, why not file the bug reports to request these changes?

I am working up to it - I think such a bug has to be carefully phrased
and the quality of most menu entries needs to be improved, which is a
bit of an easier target short-term.

I have filed quite a lot of menu-related bugs on a number of packages,
mostly related to hints. I'd also love to have the menu system turn
hints on by default :)

http://bugs.debian.org/from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.debian.org/from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]archive=yes


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread Bob Alexander
Why are so many more applications listed under 
Gnome's-Applications-Debian menu that directly into Gnome-Applications ?

For instance the installed k3b is only in the former list under Debian 
menu-Apps-System and not where I would have expected it 
Gnome-Applciations-Multimedia (for instance).

TIA,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread William Ballard
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 07:39:45PM +0100, Bob Alexander wrote:
 Why are so many more applications listed under 
 Gnome's-Applications-Debian menu that directly into Gnome-Applications ?

The former uses Debian's menu system.  The latter uses its own mechanism 
and makes its own decisions about what to include.

You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu be 
*the* Gnome menu.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread Rogério Brito
On Dec 22 2004, William Ballard wrote:
 You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu be *the*
 Gnome menu.

Now, that would be a good thing, IMO. Seeing the applications separately
isn't that intuitive for the new users that I've been using as guinea
pigs for deploying Open Source Software.

-- 
Learn to quote e-mails decently at:
http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php
http://learn.to/quote
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Dec 22 2004, William Ballard wrote:
You could file a bug and request an option to have Debian's menu be *the*
Gnome menu.

Now, that would be a good thing, IMO. Seeing the applications separately
isn't that intuitive for the new users that I've been using as guinea
pigs for deploying Open Source Software.
Except that those of us that do not use GNOME (WindowMaker, in my case)
Only see the apps from the Debian menu system.  That is, unless I bother
to build my own entire menu heirarchy.  Personally, I think it is fine
the way it is.  Besides, pretty much every app that has built-in GNOME
integration already puts itself into the GNOME menu.
-Roberto


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread Benjamin A'Lee
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 03:48:33PM -0500 or thereabouts, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
 Except that those of us that do not use GNOME (WindowMaker, in my case)
 Only see the apps from the Debian menu system.  That is, unless I bother
 to build my own entire menu heirarchy.  Personally, I think it is fine
 the way it is.  Besides, pretty much every app that has built-in GNOME
 integration already puts itself into the GNOME menu.
 
 -Roberto

I think he means (optionally) replacing the GNOME menu with the Debian 
menu; that would save having two separate menu heirarchies.  Anyone
who doesn't use GNOME would be unaffected. 

-- 
 -Benjamin Matthew A'Lee

Termisoc Secretary: http://www.termisoc.org/
Home Page: http://benalee.co.uk/
Public Key: BEC9DC1A
The right to bear arms is only slightly less silly 
  than the right to arm bears.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread Rogério Brito
On Dec 22 2004, Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
 I think he means (optionally) replacing the GNOME menu with the Debian 
 menu; that would save having two separate menu heirarchies.

I meant exactly that.

 Anyone who doesn't use GNOME would be unaffected.

Exactly, I personally use fluxbox (it's something that won't make my
unfortunately old computer slow to a crawl). I would expect the integration
not to interfere with the (already) nice way of maintaining menus for other
desktop environments and window managers.

I hope that it is clear now.


Cheers, Rogério.

-- 
Learn to quote e-mails decently at:
http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php
http://learn.to/quote
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Gnome and Debian menus. Why ?

2004-12-22 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Dec 22 2004, Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
I think he means (optionally) replacing the GNOME menu with the Debian 
menu; that would save having two separate menu heirarchies.

I meant exactly that.

Anyone who doesn't use GNOME would be unaffected.

Exactly, I personally use fluxbox (it's something that won't make my
unfortunately old computer slow to a crawl). I would expect the integration
not to interfere with the (already) nice way of maintaining menus for other
desktop environments and window managers.
I hope that it is clear now.
All clear.  Sorry for the misunderstanding.
-Roberto


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature