Re: Re: dhcp/ethernet question (solved)

2003-09-18 Thread Alice Pinard
Oh, just for reference turns out reinstalling with the cdset that uses
the 2.4 kernel fixed this invisibly...

*shrug* :)

=
-Alice
Also _cute_ and _fluffy_!!! (from Lilo and Stitch)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: dhcp/ethernet question

2003-09-07 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:11:47AM -0700, Alice Pinard wrote:
 I realize that there's other information that may be necessary but I'm not
 sure what else might be particularly relevant at this pint

What does /etc/network/interfaces look like?  And where's this pint?
I could use one.  8:o)


- -- 
 .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/W2SlUzgNqloQMwcRAu9bAJ43279Y+nIyXjSAzbzgq34ZMNrBKgCfeaoJ
I18DRL7vDxanFPFf7gn+kJw=
=OTyk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: dhcp/ethernet question

2003-09-07 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:42:27PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
 If you are using an ethernet connection to the modem, then most likely you
 need to enable the DHCP server in the modem.  

Nope.  It's handled by Comcast's headends.  Comcast is pretty good
about not shipping funktastic modems.

- -- 
 .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/W2TVUzgNqloQMwcRAs+FAJ9nXhLaqEHXdkiTw7KM5g0KbJA9JwCfVUi6
5eKMtMG+NpTVa9tPCmG1ehU=
=dHXR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



dhcp/ethernet question

2003-09-06 Thread Alice Pinard
hi, I'm trying to set up a firewall to connect to my cable modem ISP
(comcast) using DHCP

I've got a 3c905 ethernet card and I've got the 3c59x module running. I've
got the auto eth0 and iface eth0 inet dhcp lines in the
/etc/network/interfaces file. The ethernet cable is plugged in on both
ends, the cable modem is plugged in and it has lights.

I am getting a 'weirdness' and I'm not sure if it's on the DHCP end or the
ethernet end.

Basically if I do an ifconfig the ethernet card is entirely missing the
line that would begin with inet addr. It's not blank, it's not there with
a 0.0.0.0 address, it's just not there.

basically it looks like this

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:60:97:97:E9:92  
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:1298 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1298
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:443916 (433.5 KiB)
  Interrupt:10 Base address:0xff00 


I realize that there's other information that may be necessary but I'm not
sure what else might be particularly relevant at this pint

Is there anything off the top of anyone's head that would suggest what
area I should be directing my troubleshooting?

thanks


=
-Alice
Also _cute_ and _fluffy_!!! (from Lilo and Stitch)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: dhcp/ethernet question

2003-09-06 Thread Roberto Sanchez
 --- Alice Pinard [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: 
 hi, I'm trying to set up a firewall to connect to my cable modem ISP
 (comcast) using DHCP
 
 I've got a 3c905 ethernet card and I've got the 3c59x module running. I've
 got the auto eth0 and iface eth0 inet dhcp lines in the
 /etc/network/interfaces file. The ethernet cable is plugged in on both
 ends, the cable modem is plugged in and it has lights.
 
 I am getting a 'weirdness' and I'm not sure if it's on the DHCP end or the
 ethernet end.
 

If you are using an ethernet connection to the modem, then most likely you
need to enable the DHCP server in the modem.  Your modem probably has a web-
based interface, where you can just bring up the page by typing in (for
example)
http://192.168.1.254 (the address for my Westell).  You may have a different
address that you can get from the modem's documentation or from tech support.

Once you have that, you can bring up eth0 with a static address, browse to the
modem, enable DHCP, and then bring eth0 back down and then up on DHCP.  If you
do it that way you let the modem handle the acquisition of the address from the
ISP and then it just NATs you out.

 Basically if I do an ifconfig the ethernet card is entirely missing the
 line that would begin with inet addr. It's not blank, it's not there with
 a 0.0.0.0 address, it's just not there.
 
 basically it looks like this
 
 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:60:97:97:E9:92  
   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
   RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
   TX packets:1298 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1298
   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
   RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:443916 (433.5 KiB)
   Interrupt:10 Base address:0xff00 
 

I think that happens when the card is present and there is no way for it to get
an address.  I.e., if you bring it up static and then take it down, when you
try again with DHCP and it can't find a DHCP server it will use the old static
address (I believe).

 
 I realize that there's other information that may be necessary but I'm not
 sure what else might be particularly relevant at this pint
 
 Is there anything off the top of anyone's head that would suggest what
 area I should be directing my troubleshooting?
 
 thanks
 
 
 =
 -Alice
 Also _cute_ and _fluffy_!!! (from Lilo and Stitch)
 

-Roberto

___
Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS
Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más...
http://messenger.yahoo.es


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: dhcp/ethernet question

2003-09-06 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:11:47AM -0700, Alice Pinard wrote:
 hi, I'm trying to set up a firewall to connect to my cable modem ISP
 (comcast) using DHCP
...
 I am getting a 'weirdness' and I'm not sure if it's on the DHCP end or the
 ethernet end.
 
 Basically if I do an ifconfig the ethernet card is entirely missing the
 line that would begin with inet addr. It's not blank, it's not there with
 a 0.0.0.0 address, it's just not there.
...
 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:60:97:97:E9:92  
   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
   RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
   TX packets:1298 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1298
   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
   RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:443916 (433.5 KiB)
   Interrupt:10 Base address:0xff00 
...

It's correct to assume you have a dhcp client installed (mine is dhcp3)?

What messages can you find in /var/log/syslog when you bring up the
interface?  Is there a call out by the client?  

Kenward
-- 
In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be 
_teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, 
because passing civilization along from one generation to the next 
ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone 
could have. - Lee Iacocca


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ethernet question

2001-12-03 Thread J.A.Serralheiro
thats right. With one ethernet plug, you need to have 3 cards. 2 in the
computer that actually is connected to the plug. one card for the pplug
and one card for communications with thte other computer. ofcourse the
other computer must have another card. No special software is needed.
read networking how to. you just need to create a small sub-network with
your two computers and configure routing and ifconfig in the computer with
the 2 cards
the howto tells muth more about this


On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Alec wrote:

 Hi
 
 How does one connect two computers to the internet throught one ethernet 
 socket? Does one of them have to have two ethernet cards and run special 
 software?
 
 Thanks
 
 Alec
 
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



ethernet question

2001-12-02 Thread Alec
Hi

How does one connect two computers to the internet throught one ethernet 
socket? Does one of them have to have two ethernet cards and run special 
software?

Thanks

Alec

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: ethernet question

2001-12-02 Thread Timo Blazko Boewing

Alec wrote:

How does one connect two computers to the internet throught one ethernet 
socket? Does one of them have to have two ethernet cards and run special 
software?


Technically, one socket would not do the job. But to your querstion:

One computer acts as a gateway. One interface is connected with the 
internet (eg. ethernet adaptor for xDSL, modem, ISDN adaptor etc.). A 
second adapter is used to bridge the internal network/te second 
computer with the internet.
The first one (gateway) therefore an ethernet card (will be the 
second one if using xDSL). You can use NAT (network address 
translation) to let the other computer send and receive data to/from 
the internet through the gateway.
You do not need external/additional software to do this, just use 
iptables of the 2.4 kernel series.


The gateway will establish a connection like a single workstation 
while setting up an additional script in /etc/init.d/ will activate 
NAT (ipforward or ipmasquerading) and additional firewall rules.


Thus, a gateway's client will send a request to the gateway. That 
repackages this request and sends it out in his name (IP). On 
receive, it knows from which client the request came and sends the 
results back.


Hope thi helped,

Timo



Ethernet question

2000-05-12 Thread Urban Gabor
Hello,

I have and Ethernet card in my HP Kayak, and the M$ NT 
recognises it as:
HP Ethernet with Lan Remote Power.

I'd like to install slink, can I use the card as generic 
Ethernet?

Thanx
Gabaux



Re: Ethernet question

2000-05-12 Thread ktb
First you need to find out if that card is supported.  If it is then
find out which driver you need.  Then you compile that driver into you
kernel or as a module.  Someone may know which card your talking about
and tell you which driver you need, if it is supported.  If not there
are a couple places on line you can look --

http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Hardware-HOWTO.html

http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO.html

Try searching the list's archives also.
hth,
kent

Urban Gabor wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I have and Ethernet card in my HP Kayak, and the M$ NT
 recognises it as:
 HP Ethernet with Lan Remote Power.
 
 I'd like to install slink, can I use the card as generic
 Ethernet?
 
 Thanx
 Gabaux



AMD PCNET PCI Ethernet question

2000-04-01 Thread syed huq
Hi,

(absolute Newbie to Linux):
Using Slink and trying to setup my eth0 for the first time. I am reading
the Ethernet-HOW-TO and have a few ques.

When I did dmesg | more, it did not show any eth'N' messages so my first
installation did not see the card.

I looked under /lib/modules/2.0.36/ and found pcnet32.o which is what
the HOW-TO says as being the correct driver for AMD PCNET PCI.

if I do a ifconfig as root, I still do not see the eth0. 
if I do a modprobe eth0, I don't get anything.

Can you help me detect my Ethernet Card without having to compile my
kernal(cause I don't know how and don't want to get into that if I can
avoid it).

If I have to edit the /etc/conf.module, what exactly should I add/edit ?

Thanks in advance,
kuraldeb



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1


Re: AMD PCNET PCI Ethernet question

2000-04-01 Thread Joseph A. Martin
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, syed huq wrote:

 I looked under /lib/modules/2.0.36/ and found pcnet32.o which is what
 the HOW-TO says as being the correct driver for AMD PCNET PCI.
 
 if I do a ifconfig as root, I still do not see the eth0. 
 if I do a modprobe eth0, I don't get anything.

eth0 is a semi-virtual interface. There is not actual eth0 driver,
rather eth0 is provided by the actual ethernet driver. I may be
wrong here (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I am) but I
believe you can do a 'modprobe pcnet32' and then do

ifconfig eth0 up 1.2.3.4

Otherwise add the following line to /etc/modules.conf:

alias eth0 pcnet32

later,
joseph
--
the LaterDude
ICQ: 52640402
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ice-works.com/personal/LaterDude/index.html

All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of
my employer unless otherwise noted.


Ethernet question

2000-01-10 Thread Paul M. Foster

Just transferred over from Red Hat 6.1 to Debian 2.1. My NIC card worked
fine in Red Hat and appears to work okay in Debian _if_ I issue an

ifconfig eth0

command. Naturally, though, I'd like this to happen on boot. I have the
appropriate lines in conf.modules, but I have a feeling there is some
setting somewhere in the init/rc hierarchy that I need to make to have it
automatically load. In addition, it appears that the NIC card is not
associating with a real IP address, only 0.0.0.0. Any idea how to fix this
as well?

Paul M. Foster




Re: Ethernet question

2000-01-10 Thread Jim B
You can put:

ifconfig eth0 ip netmask netmask

into /etc/init.d/network .


You will probably also have to add your route line in there as well.


On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Paul M. Foster wrote:

 
 Just transferred over from Red Hat 6.1 to Debian 2.1. My NIC card worked
 fine in Red Hat and appears to work okay in Debian _if_ I issue an
 
 ifconfig eth0
 
 command. Naturally, though, I'd like this to happen on boot. I have the
 appropriate lines in conf.modules, but I have a feeling there is some
 setting somewhere in the init/rc hierarchy that I need to make to have it
 automatically load. In addition, it appears that the NIC card is not
 associating with a real IP address, only 0.0.0.0. Any idea how to fix this
 as well?
 
 Paul M. Foster



Re: Ethernet question

2000-01-10 Thread aphro
when i want to change network settings to take effect everytime it boots i
edit /etc/init.d/network

hope you enjoy debian, ive played with a few rh boxes and they about drove
me mad.

nate

On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Paul M. Foster wrote:

paulf 
paulf Just transferred over from Red Hat 6.1 to Debian 2.1. My NIC card worked
paulf fine in Red Hat and appears to work okay in Debian _if_ I issue an
paulf 
paulf ifconfig eth0
paulf 
paulf command. Naturally, though, I'd like this to happen on boot. I have the
paulf appropriate lines in conf.modules, but I have a feeling there is some
paulf setting somewhere in the init/rc hierarchy that I need to make to have it
paulf automatically load. In addition, it appears that the NIC card is not
paulf associating with a real IP address, only 0.0.0.0. Any idea how to fix 
this
paulf as well?
paulf 
paulf Paul M. Foster
paulf 
paulf 
paulf 
paulf 
paulf -- 
paulf Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
paulf 

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
   Vice President Network Operations   http://www.firetrail.com/
  Firetrail Internet Services Limited  http://www.aphroland.org/
   Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
10:25pm up 143 days, 10:25, 2 users, load average: 1.91, 1.76, 1.62


Re: Ethernet question

2000-01-10 Thread Randy Edwards
 Just transferred over from Red Hat 6.1 to Debian 2.1. My NIC card worked
 fine in Red Hat and appears to work okay in Debian _if_ I issue an
 ifconfig eth0

   This is typically done in the script /etc/init.d/network  That script is
generated at install when you answer the questions about your network
setup.  If you take a look at it and edit it, you should see all of the
various network parameters (IP address, subnet mask, etc.) to set up your
ethernet card.

   If not, just reply back for some more info.

-- 
 Regards,| Debian GNU/ __  o  http://www.debian.org
 .   |/ / _  _  _  _  _ __  __
 Randy   |   / /__  / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) |  // /_/ /_/\/ /___/  /_/\_\
 http://www.golgotha.net | because lockups should only be for convicts.


Re: Ethernet question

2000-01-10 Thread Shaul Karl
You might want to check /usr/doc/sysvinit/examples/network (from the sysvinit 
package).

 
 Just transferred over from Red Hat 6.1 to Debian 2.1. My NIC card worked
 fine in Red Hat and appears to work okay in Debian _if_ I issue an
 
 ifconfig eth0
 
 command. Naturally, though, I'd like this to happen on boot. I have the
 appropriate lines in conf.modules, but I have a feeling there is some
 setting somewhere in the init/rc hierarchy that I need to make to have it
 automatically load. In addition, it appears that the NIC card is not
 associating with a real IP address, only 0.0.0.0. Any idea how to fix this
 as well?
 
 Paul M. Foster
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 



Re: Ethernet question

2000-01-10 Thread 2
heya, paul

have a look in /etc/init.d/network

from

da bobstopper


-Original Message

Just transferred over from Red Hat 6.1 to Debian 2.1. My NIC card worked
fine in Red Hat and appears to work okay in Debian _if_ I issue an

ifconfig eth0

command. Naturally, though, I'd like this to happen on boot. I have the
appropriate lines in conf.modules, but I have a feeling there is some
setting somewhere in the init/rc hierarchy that I need to make to have it
automatically load. In addition, it appears that the NIC card is not
associating with a real IP address, only 0.0.0.0. Any idea how to fix this
as well?

Paul M. Foster




-- 
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null

- End of forwarded message from Paul M. Foster -


Re: Ethernet Question

1998-07-16 Thread Tomt
At 10:55 AM 7/12/1998 +0800, you wrote:
Could be.  Routing is not that hard, but it depends a bit on what kernel
you are using.  2.1.x is easier than earlier kernels.
I'm using 2.0.29 is that a problem?

For a very good debugging tool use tcpdump.  You will see both incoming
and outgoing packets, so you can tell at once how far the ping is getting.
I got that. Very nice, now I'm spoiled I miss that in other Os's that would
help so much when troubleshooting.

Thanks



--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: Ethernet Question(Repost with more info)

1998-07-13 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Everthing looks good. ARP packets are most likely what you're seeing on your 
hub. Can
you check out your NT machine's configuration?

Tomt wrote:

 Heres my previous message
 ___
 Hi Everyone,

 I've managed to get tcp/ip networking up and running on my Debian machine.
 I have my 3com 3x509 configured to ip address 192.168.0.1, I have one other
 machine on my local network(for now) and it is ip 192.168.0.2.

 How can I get my debian machine to see(ping) the other machine?

 My hub shows activity but ping just sits there like it is receiving nothing.

 Does this have something to do with the routing table? I've been studying a
 little and the more I read about the routing tables the more confused I get.

 Could someone clear my up on this?

 Thanks for any help in
 advance
 
 Heres ifconfig output

 loLink encap:Local Loopback
   inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
   UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
   RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
   TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0

 eth0  Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:24:23:89:65
   inet addr:192.168.0.1  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
   RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
   TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
   Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300

 Heres route -n output

 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  01 eth0
 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo

 Now another question, my other computer is a Windows NT machine how can I
 can that I have connectivity between the two machines?
 Is ping the answer here or what?

 Thanks

--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Ethernet Question

1998-07-12 Thread Tomt
Hi Everyone, 

I've managed to get tcp/ip networking up and running on my Debian machine. 
I have my 3com 3x509 configured to ip address 192.168.0.1, I have one other
machine on my local network(for now) and it is ip 192.168.0.2. 

How can I get my debian machine to see(ping) the other machine? 

My hub shows activity but ping just sits there like it is receiving nothing. 

Does this have something to do with the routing table? I've been studying a
little and the more I read about the routing tables the more confused I get. 

Could someone clear my up on this?

Thanks for any help in advance




--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: Ethernet Question

1998-07-12 Thread Joost Witteveen
 Hi Everyone, 
 
 I've managed to get tcp/ip networking up and running on my Debian machine. 
 I have my 3com 3x509 configured to ip address 192.168.0.1, I have one other
 machine on my local network(for now) and it is ip 192.168.0.2. 
 
 How can I get my debian machine to see(ping) the other machine? 
 
 My hub shows activity but ping just sits there like it is receiving nothing. 
 
 Does this have something to do with the routing table? I've been studying a
 little and the more I read about the routing tables the more confused I get. 

You could help us help you by showing what your routing tables currently
look like. But on the other hand, I can probably help you by showing
what my routing tables look like:

$ /sbin/route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  01 eth0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  01 lo

$ /sbin/ifconfig eth0
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 48:54:E8:2A:77:73  
  inet addr:192.168.1.2  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1532 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:1644 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
 collisions:0 
  Interrupt:9 Base address:0xdf00 

$ cat /etc/init.d/network 
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
IPADDR=192.168.1.2
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.1.0
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
GATEWAY=
ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}
route add -net ${NETWORK}
[ ${GATEWAY} ]  route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1


If this doesn't help you, show us the output of those commands,
and we'll help you!


[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Ethernet Question(Repost with more info)

1998-07-12 Thread Tomt
Heres my previous message
___
Hi Everyone, 

I've managed to get tcp/ip networking up and running on my Debian machine. 
I have my 3com 3x509 configured to ip address 192.168.0.1, I have one other 
machine on my local network(for now) and it is ip 192.168.0.2. 

How can I get my debian machine to see(ping) the other machine? 

My hub shows activity but ping just sits there like it is receiving nothing. 

Does this have something to do with the routing table? I've been studying a 
little and the more I read about the routing tables the more confused I get. 

Could someone clear my up on this?

Thanks for any help in
advance

Heres ifconfig output

loLink encap:Local Loopback  
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0

eth0  Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:24:23:89:65
  inet addr:192.168.0.1  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
  TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
  Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300 


Heres route -n output

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  01 eth0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo


Now another question, my other computer is a Windows NT machine how can I
can that I have connectivity between the two machines? 
Is ping the answer here or what? 

Thanks



--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


ethernet question

1998-01-22 Thread G. Kapetanios

Hi all,

For about 12 hours I get through syslog every couple of minutes messages
messages such as Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple buffers status
... . Now I have gotten this message before but only a couple of time and
then it stopped. I asked the list about it and was told that it is
beacause of high network load and nothing to do with hardware. However I
now get it not only in tty8 where syslog messages appear but in my working
console . As a matter of fact while I write this message through telenet
to my mail sever I get the messages on my screen, I can't delete them and
can't really see what I am writing as the messages get jumbled up with the
text . Is this normal ? 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
It does not happen in xterms (that is something at least ) 

Thanks
George  


---
George Kapetanios
Churchill College
Cambridge, CB3 0DSE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
U.K.  WWW: http://garfield.chu.cam.ac.uk/~gk205/work_info.html
---



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: ethernet question

1998-01-22 Thread Martin Bialasinski
G. Kapetanios [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 beacause of high network load and nothing to do with hardware. However I
 now get it not only in tty8 where syslog messages appear but in my working
 console . As a matter of fact while I write this message through telenet
 to my mail sever I get the messages on my screen, I can't delete them and
 can't really see what I am writing as the messages get jumbled up with the
 text . Is this normal ? 

Yes. You can tell syslog to display messages on the console. This is normaly
done for messages of a certain priority. In my /etc/syslog.conf, there is:

# Emergencies are sent to everybody logged in.
#
*.emerg * 

Maybe there is something similar in yours.

Most programms have a key to restore the screen in such case (e.g a
talkrequest is a similar case).

In pine/pico this is CTRL-L.

Ciao,
Martin


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .