Re: GDB and ADA.
> > What is the best way to have hamm system support debugging of ADA programs > > in > > gdb ? > > Install the slink version of gdb, try if it works; if it doesn't, submit a > useful bug report. > >dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/devel/gdb_4.17-4.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gn at.deb > Note the "gnat" in there. [23:02:45 shaul]$ zcat /usr/doc/gdb/changelog.Debian.gz | head -n 16 | tail * re-integrated gnat support. (Was repported as a bug against 4.16, patch had been integrated then, but dropped while switching to version 4.17). (NB: Not being an ADA expert, I'd appreciate if s/o could confirm it now works properly, thanx) -- Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 3 Jul 1998 18:46:28 +0200 [23:03:05 shaul]$ I am only at the beginning of my ADA course, and my gdb knowledge is limited to the basic operations. But it seems to me that gdb support for ADA is working (at least the basic functionality). Please note that I didn't thoroughly test it, though. I'll submit a bug report if I'll encounter one. -- System Information Package: gdb Version: 4.17-4.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat Debian Release: 2.0 Kernel Version: Linux rakefet 2.0.34 #2 Thu Jul 9 10:57:48 EST 1998 i586 unknown Versions of the packages gdb depends on: ii libc6 2.0.7t-1 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files) ii libreadlineg2 2.1-10.1 GNU readline and history libraries, run-time ii ncurses3.4 1.9.9g-8.8 Video terminal manipulation - shared librari
Re: GDB and ADA.
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 08:21:26AM +0200, shaul wrote: > I tried to look for slink's gdb. All I could find is some m68k staff. (I > did find some relevant lines in Contents-i386.gz) What did I miss ? dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/devel/gdb_4.17-4.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat.deb Note the "gnat" in there. HTH, Ray -- J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may [EMAIL PROTECTED] | not be a better one than the one the blocks | live in but it'll be a sight more vivid. | - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Re: GDB and ADA.
I tried to look for slink's gdb. All I could find is some m68k staff. (I did find some relevant lines in Contents-i386.gz) What did I miss ? > > > What is the best way to have hamm system support debugging of ADA programs > > in > > gdb ? > > Install the slink version of gdb, try if it works; if it doesn't, submit a > useful bug report. >
Re: GDB and ADA.
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 11:30:28PM +0300, shaul wrote: > It seems to me that hamm's version of gdb doesn't support debugging of ADA > programs. > Will that be changed in slink? >From the changelog in slink's gdb: * re-integrated gnat support. (Was repported as a bug against 4.16, patch had been integrated then, but dropped while switching to version 4.17). (NB: Not being an ADA expert, I'd appreciate if s/o could confirm it now works properly, thanx) > What is the best way to have hamm system support debugging of ADA programs in > gdb ? Install the slink version of gdb, try if it works; if it doesn't, submit a useful bug report. HTH, Ray -- Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.
GDB and ADA.
It seems to me that hamm's version of gdb doesn't support debugging of ADA programs. Will that be changed in slink? cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/gdb has gdb-4.16.gnat.1.12.diff.gz and gdb-4.16.gnat.1.13.diff.gz. Are they usable for hamm's gdb (4.17) ? Since the latest gnat version is 3.10, what does the 1.1? on the above files' name stand for ? What is the best way to have hamm system support debugging of ADA programs in gdb ? Did bo's gdb supported debugging of ADA programs ?
