Re: Status of java-package
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 07:34:59PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: I am surprised of the disapperance of javaws, since many mangement console use them... And I do not count on hardware (or SOC) vendors to upgrade them to whatever the new scheme will be. It's better in the long term to keep around a dedicated vm to talk to the old stuff than carry old unmaintained java forever forward. The resources to maintain a bunch of old java releases simply don't exist. Mike Stone
Re: Status of java-package
Le 08/22/18 à 18:32, Sven Hoexter a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > Hi, > >> Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN >> storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for >> this... > I hope it's not something based on Webstart? Because Webstart will no > longer be part of Java 11. So I guess at least some of us will have to > keep a copy of a JRE with javaws around for some time. > That is also the reason why the Java 8 support in the current java-package > shipped in Debian is kind of sufficient. Java 9 and 10 are only short > term releases and starting with Java 11 quite a few things will change, > and I think there is no real need for this repackaging of Oracle JREs > anymore. > > Cheers, > Sven > > Alas java .class compiled with java 10 cannot be run by a java 8 VM, so it is difficult. I'll keep a copy of java 8 or 10 for those things. I am surprised of the disapperance of javaws, since many mangement console use them... And I do not count on hardware (or SOC) vendors to upgrade them to whatever the new scheme will be.
Re: Status of java-package
Hi, I downloaded all 3 DVD images for Debian 9.5 I installed the first one, but I would like to know how can I check the other two DVDs to see if there is software I might want to use/install. Thanks, Sent from BlueMail On Aug 22, 2018, 10:34 AM, at 10:34 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: >On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > >Hi, > >> Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle >SAN >> storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one >for >> this... > >I hope it's not something based on Webstart? Because Webstart will no >longer be part of Java 11. So I guess at least some of us will have to >keep a copy of a JRE with javaws around for some time. >That is also the reason why the Java 8 support in the current >java-package >shipped in Debian is kind of sufficient. Java 9 and 10 are only short >term releases and starting with Java 11 quite a few things will change, >and I think there is no real need for this repackaging of Oracle JREs >anymore. > >Cheers, >Sven
Re: Status of java-package
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: Hi, > Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN > storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for > this... I hope it's not something based on Webstart? Because Webstart will no longer be part of Java 11. So I guess at least some of us will have to keep a copy of a JRE with javaws around for some time. That is also the reason why the Java 8 support in the current java-package shipped in Debian is kind of sufficient. Java 9 and 10 are only short term releases and starting with Java 11 quite a few things will change, and I think there is no real need for this repackaging of Oracle JREs anymore. Cheers, Sven
Re: Status of java-package
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:55:49AM CEST, Sven Hoexter said: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java > > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the > > packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses > > oracle JRE on debian ? > > I'm currently maintaining my own fork because I did not get around > to properly hijack the package. I had at some point contact with one > of the prior maintainers but we could not get around merging my Java 9 > changes at that point. > > So for now my fork is here: > https://git.sven.stormbind.net/?p=sven/java-package.git;a=summary > > Usage instruction if you do not want to build a Debian package out > of it: > https://sven.stormbind.net/blog/posts/deb_java-package-oracle-jdk9/ > > > It's not completely polished but I'm reluctant to invest more time > because I assume we all move on to OpenJDK in some form in Januar 2019. > > Context: > As far as I know Oracle JRE/JDK builds will be only available for paying > customers on a contract by September 2018 for Java 11 and January 2019 > for Java 8. At that point everyone else will propably migrate to some form > of OpenJDK. If it's the one shipped by your distro or 3rd parties like > Azul needs to be determined on a case by case basis I guess. > There will still be reference binary OpenJDK builds published on > jdk.java.net but I'm not sure if it's worth to provide support for them > in java-package. > > > Cheers, > Sven Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for this... -- Erwan
Re: Status of java-package
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:30:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Hi, > Incidentally, it has been a long time since I encountered any Java that > would run on the Oracle JVM but not on OpenJDK. Are you sure you need > to even bother with the Oracle JVM? The main point so far was to aid debugging because you could be certain on which code base you build and run it. If everyone is using a slightly different build it's quite hard to track down bugs. In one of my past jobs someone actually found three bugs in the JVM and we once were victim of a regression in the expat parsers in a few Java releases. If you can not say for sure at which exact version your developers are, and which one you use in production, and that often across Windows, OS X, and various Linux distributions, the situation can be quite unpleasant. I actually do not care for my desktop system at home, but if you run a lot of stuff on the JVM in production, it can be an issue. Sven
Re: Status of java-package
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Hi, > > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the > packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses > oracle JRE on debian ? I'm currently maintaining my own fork because I did not get around to properly hijack the package. I had at some point contact with one of the prior maintainers but we could not get around merging my Java 9 changes at that point. So for now my fork is here: https://git.sven.stormbind.net/?p=sven/java-package.git;a=summary Usage instruction if you do not want to build a Debian package out of it: https://sven.stormbind.net/blog/posts/deb_java-package-oracle-jdk9/ It's not completely polished but I'm reluctant to invest more time because I assume we all move on to OpenJDK in some form in Januar 2019. Context: As far as I know Oracle JRE/JDK builds will be only available for paying customers on a contract by September 2018 for Java 11 and January 2019 for Java 8. At that point everyone else will propably migrate to some form of OpenJDK. If it's the one shipped by your distro or 3rd parties like Azul needs to be determined on a case by case basis I guess. There will still be reference binary OpenJDK builds published on jdk.java.net but I'm not sure if it's worth to provide support for them in java-package. Cheers, Sven
Re: Status of java-package
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Hi, > > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the > packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses > oracle JRE on debian ? > I don't know about java-package, as I have not used it many years. However, you can download the .tar.gz and just unpack it (I would think /opt is a good choice of target location). Or you can download the .rpm and use alien to turn it into a .deb. Incidentally, it has been a long time since I encountered any Java that would run on the Oracle JVM but not on OpenJDK. Are you sure you need to even bother with the Oracle JVM? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez
Status of java-package
Hi, This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses oracle JRE on debian ? -- Erwan
Oracle's Java package status
Hello, I think you all are aware of the recent news for Oracle's java binaries that will be removed from almost every linux distribution repositories¹ because of the new Oracle's policy for redistributing this packages (sigh...). So far so good but I can foresee there will be several users (me included :-P) that will need to use Oracle's packages instead openJDK, so is there any FAQ or How-To guide to make this step smoothly for users that will need to install both Java JRE and plugin (32 and 64 bits) in Debian upcoming Wheezy and onwards? I can open a "wishlist" bug for that but before flooding BTS I better ask how this will be managed or if there will be an "action-path" for this. ¹http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.09.01.16.52...@gmail.com
Re: java-package
>It's avaible in contrib in all Debian flavours. Remember that the >command you've to call is make-jpkg. Hmm. Perhaps that's the problem. Maybe I don't have contrib listed in my repositories. I'll check that when I'm back to work on Monday. Thanks, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: java-package
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 10:32:21PM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote: > Hello. I tried to install java-package, so that, via fakeroot, I could > install sun's java runtime environment. Java-package did not exist, however. > Has something new happened that I'm not aware of? It's avaible in contrib in all Debian flavours. Remember that the command you've to call is make-jpkg. Sven -- If you won't forgive me the rest of my life Let me apologize while I'm still alive I know it's time to face all of my past mistakes [Less than Jake - Rest Of My Life] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
java-package
Hello. I tried to install java-package, so that, via fakeroot, I could install sun's java runtime environment. Java-package did not exist, however. Has something new happened that I'm not aware of? Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Resolved] Re: make-jpkg (java-package) on jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin failed
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin > > I test on stable and testing. > > I do : > > fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin > > I've this : > > """ > /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 419: /etc/mailcap: > Permission denied > /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 443: /etc/mime.types: > Permission denied > /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 444: /etc/mime.types: > Permission denied > /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 445: /etc/mime.types: > Permission denied > grep: /etc/mime.types: No such file or directory > /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 455: /etc/mime.types: > Permission denied > > Done. > > Testing extracted archive... > Invalid size (90 MB) of extracted archive. Probably you have not > enough free disc space in the temporary directory. Note: You can > specify an alternate directory by setting the environment variable > TMPDIR. > > > Aborted. > """ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/ubd0 986M 272M 665M 29% / > tmpfs 15M 4.0K 15M 1% /dev/shm > > It's a bug ? You've the same issue with this java version ? I've the same bug with j2sdk-1_4_2_12-linux-i586.bin """ /home/stephane/j2sdk-1_4_2_12-linux-i586.bin: line 511: 2335 Killed $UNPACK_CMD $javahome/`dirname $i`/`basename $i .jar`.pack $javahome/$i Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/jsse.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/charsets.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/ext/localedata.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/plugin.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/javaws/javaws.jar Done. Testing extracted archive... Invalid size (68 MB) of extracted archive. Probably you have not enough free disc space in the temporary directory. Note: You can specify an alternate directory by setting the environment variable TMPDIR. Aborted. """ I don't undestand, I've enough free disk space. I found my issue : not enought memory. I'm in User Mode Linux session without swap :(
Re: make-jpkg (java-package) on jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin failed
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin I test on stable and testing. I do : fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin I've this : """ /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 419: /etc/mailcap: Permission denied /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 443: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 444: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 445: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied grep: /etc/mime.types: No such file or directory /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 455: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied Done. Testing extracted archive... Invalid size (90 MB) of extracted archive. Probably you have not enough free disc space in the temporary directory. Note: You can specify an alternate directory by setting the environment variable TMPDIR. Aborted. """ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/ubd0 986M 272M 665M 29% / tmpfs 15M 4.0K 15M 1% /dev/shm It's a bug ? You've the same issue with this java version ? I've the same bug with j2sdk-1_4_2_12-linux-i586.bin """ /home/stephane/j2sdk-1_4_2_12-linux-i586.bin: line 511: 2335 Killed $UNPACK_CMD $javahome/`dirname $i`/`basename $i .jar`.pack $javahome/$i Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/jsse.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/charsets.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/ext/localedata.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/lib/plugin.jar Creating j2sdk1.4.2_12/jre/javaws/javaws.jar Done. Testing extracted archive... Invalid size (68 MB) of extracted archive. Probably you have not enough free disc space in the temporary directory. Note: You can specify an alternate directory by setting the environment variable TMPDIR. Aborted. """ I don't undestand, I've enough free disk space.
make-jpkg (java-package) on jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin failed
Hi, I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin I test on stable and testing. I do : fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin I've this : """ /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 419: /etc/mailcap: Permission denied /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 443: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 444: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 445: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied grep: /etc/mime.types: No such file or directory /home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 455: /etc/mime.types: Permission denied Done. Testing extracted archive... Invalid size (90 MB) of extracted archive. Probably you have not enough free disc space in the temporary directory. Note: You can specify an alternate directory by setting the environment variable TMPDIR. Aborted. """ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/ubd0 986M 272M 665M 29% / tmpfs 15M 4.0K 15M 1% /dev/shm It's a bug ? You've the same issue with this java version ? Thanks for your help, Stephane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems while making java package using fakeroot
Mark Grieveson wrote:
The Debian package has been created in the current directory. You can
install the package as root (e.g. dpkg -i
sun-j2sdk1.5_1.5.0+update08_i386.deb).
Removing temporary directory: done
So, after the last step, if my deb finally okay? Should I be worrying
about the "format of 'NEEDED so' not recognized" warnings?
Another webpage (Ubuntu groups) mentions that the warnings about
permissions denined while creating system directories can be ignored.
Can somebody who has done this sucessfully explain if I am doing this
right?
Thanks,
->HS
Yes, you're doing it right. Just do what it tells you to do ("You can
install the package as root (e.g. dpkg -i
sun-j2sdk1.5_1.5.0+update08_i386.deb)."
Mark
Exactly. I was a bit confused myself when I saw so many "errors". A
google search provided me with clarity that the package was fine.
On another note, the link that you followed for installing jdk only
tells you how to install using 'make-jpkg'. This link
(http://wiki.serios.net/wiki/Debian_Java_JRE/JDK_installation) seems a
bit more extensive. It covers other ways of installing jdk. In
particular, if you scroll down to section 2 (The different methods of
installing JRE), you'll notice in yellow that there are java packages
for Debian available in unstable/no-free. I think these may be better.
I've already tried them and they install plugins, etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems while making java package using fakeroot
The Debian package has been created in the current directory. You can
install the package as root (e.g. dpkg -i
sun-j2sdk1.5_1.5.0+update08_i386.deb).
Removing temporary directory: done
So, after the last step, if my deb finally okay? Should I be worrying
about the "format of 'NEEDED so' not recognized" warnings?
Another webpage (Ubuntu groups) mentions that the warnings about
permissions denined while creating system directories can be ignored.
Can somebody who has done this sucessfully explain if I am doing this
right?
Thanks,
->HS
Yes, you're doing it right. Just do what it tells you to do ("You can
install the package as root (e.g. dpkg -i
sun-j2sdk1.5_1.5.0+update08_i386.deb)."
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems while making java package using fakeroot
To install the Java from Sun, I was following the steps given here: http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/debianjava.htm When I do the fakeroot command to make the deb package out of the java bin file I had previously downloaded, I get this kind of output: $> fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin .. .. .. inflating: jdk1.5.0_08/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man1/rmic.1 inflating: jdk1.5.0_08/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man1/serialver.1 inflating: jdk1.5.0_08/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man1/idlj.1 Creating jdk1.5.0_08/lib/tools.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/rt.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/jsse.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/charsets.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/ext/localedata.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/plugin.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/javaws.jar Creating jdk1.5.0_08/jre/lib/deploy.jar mkdir: cannot create directory `/etc/.java': Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/etc/.java/.systemPrefs': No such file or directory touch: cannot touch `/etc/.java/.systemPrefs/.system.lock': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `/etc/.java/.systemPrefs/.system.lock': No such file or directory touch: cannot touch `/etc/.java/.systemPrefs/.systemRootModFile': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `/etc/.java/.systemPrefs/.systemRootModFile': No such file or directory /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 435: /etc/mailcap: Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Permission denied cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/pixmaps/sun-java.png': Permission denied cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/icons/HighContrast/48x48/apps/sun-java.png': No such file or directory cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse/48x48/apps/sun-java.png': No such file or directory cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/icons/LowContrast/48x48/apps/sun-java.png': No such file or directory /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 583: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 584: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 585: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 586: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 587: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 588: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 591: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.mime: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 592: /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.mime: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 595: /usr/share/application-registry/java-archive.applications: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 596: /usr/share/application-registry/java-archive.applications: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 597: /usr/share/application-registry/java-archive.applications: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 598: /usr/share/application-registry/java-archive.applications: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 599: /usr/share/application-registry/java-archive.applications: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 600: /usr/share/application-registry/java-archive.applications: Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Permission denied cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/pixmaps/sun-java.png': Permission denied cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/icons/HighContrast/48x48/apps/sun-java.png': No such file or directory cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse/48x48/apps/sun-java.png': No such file or directory cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/icons/LowContrast/48x48/apps/sun-java.png': No such file or directory /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 583: /usr/share/mime-info/java-web-start.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 584: /usr/share/mime-info/java-web-start.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line 585: /usr/share/mime-info/java-web-start.keys: Permission denied /home/red/tmp/dat/jdk-1_5_0_08-linux-i586.bin: line
Re: Java package
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What's the name of a Java package for Mozilla? Check j2se-package on http://z42.de/debian/ -- Kai Weber * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.glorybox.de gpg-key: 0x594D4132 icq: 102024972 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Java package
Em Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:40:06 +0200, Otto Wyss escreveu: > What's the name of a Java package for Mozilla? Depends on what you want. Runtime, SDK? Check http://apt-get.org./ and http://blackdown.org./ -- Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (44) 3028 7467 ext34 Rua Guarani 361 ap 601 +55 (44) 3025 6253 87.014-040 MaringÃ, PR +55 (44) 8803 1729 http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java package
What's the name of a Java package for Mozilla? O. Wyss -- How to enhance your code, see "http://freshmeat.net/projects/wxguide/"; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using java-package
I installed java-package from unstable and downloaded the sun sdk1.4. Using make-jpkg I created a .deb file which I then installed. How do I now get my system to see this version of java? No links were created in /etc/alternatives. On a different system in the past I used a tool from http://z42.de/debian/ which, after creating the deb, would then put in place the infrastructure for actually using it. Is there something comparable in unstable? Am I missing something obvious? Alternatively, are any of the free jvm's now comparable to the one from Sun? Thanks, Richard ___ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug in Blackdown Java package?
--- Christian Schoenebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi! > > I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails: > > Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ... > update-alternatives: unable to make > /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to > /etc/alternatives/javaplugin_oji-mozilla-cvs.so: No such file or directory > > Shouldn't that script at least check if there is a /usr/lib/mozilla > directory > instead of /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs ? > > Regards, > Christian > I fixed that by creating a symlink from /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs to /usr/lib/mozilla/ I believe that their unstable package assumes you run the Mozilla snapshot (not a fair assumption I would say). -Roberto Sanchez ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug in Blackdown Java package?
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:24:17PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails: > > Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ... > update-alternatives: unable to make > /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to > /etc/alternatives/javaplugin_oji-mozilla-cvs.so: No such file or directory > > Shouldn't that script at least check if there is a /usr/lib/mozilla directory > instead of /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs ? Yes. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bug in Blackdown Java package?
Hi! I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails: Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ... update-alternatives: unable to make /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to /etc/alternatives/javaplugin_oji-mozilla-cvs.so: No such file or directory Shouldn't that script at least check if there is a /usr/lib/mozilla directory instead of /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs ? Regards, Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Java Package
I've installed the following packages: jdk-apidocs 1.0.2-1Java 1.0.2 API. jdk-common 1.0.2-3JDK (Java Development Kit) jdk-static 1.0.2-3JDK (Java Development Kit) - Static part I keep getting an error like: java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i486/bin/java and the binary isn't there. Are there some more steps I need to take to set this up or is this a bug? From what I see, things should be working fine. -- - Willie Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.quicklink.net/~gith/ - -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
