Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-29 Thread Siraj 'Sid' Rakhada


--On Monday, October 14, 2002 10:33:22 -0500 Keith G. Murphy 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I just noticed that it looks like the POP3 functionality has been
integrated into the latest squirrelmail (that is why one of the plugins
is marked obsolete), but the documentation on that is extremely sparse.
Some time, I am going to play with it...


All the pop3 mailfetch 'plugin' on squirrelmail does is logs into a pop3 
server and downloads the messages into an imap folder.
I have a few users who quite like the functionality of it.

Regards,

Sid


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-14 Thread Keith G. Murphy

Andy Saxena wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:23:25AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
 
Andy Saxena wrote:

I don't think Squirrelmail allows access to POP mailboxes.


Check out squirrelmail's web page.  Look at the plugins.
 
 
 Thanks for the pointer, but I don't see any plug-ins that allow POP
 access without downloading it in some way. I looked at the descriptions
 of Mail Fetch and Mail Fetchmail.
 
 An ideal situation would be being able to see the important message
 headers like From:  and Subject:  and then being able to download
 the message body by selecting a particular message; sort of like
 pop3browser.

Yeah, you're right, I see nothing that does that.
 
 I could be wrong, but I think the fundamental idea of Squirrelmail is
 IMAP access (consider the authentication procedure, for example).
 
 Besides, Squirrelmail doesn't provide any way to enter the email server
 information, username and password. I could've overlooked some
 plug-in that does this too :-}.
 
I am certain that you did.  Use the source, Luke.  :-)

I just noticed that it looks like the POP3 functionality has been 
integrated into the latest squirrelmail (that is why one of the plugins 
is marked obsolete), but the documentation on that is extremely 
sparse.  Some time, I am going to play with it...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-11 Thread Andy Saxena

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:03:05AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
 Andy Saxena wrote:
 I am a happy squirrelmail user, but I think the above solution is an
 elegant solution for a large user base. It's low-maintenance and
 hassle-free.
 
 Apparently, there's a squirrelmail plugin that does fetchmail.  Seems to 
 me that *might* fill in the missing piece that mail2web is doing for 
 you: letting the users maintain the retrieval process.

I don't think Squirrelmail allows access to POP mailboxes.

-Andy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-11 Thread Keith G. Murphy

Andy Saxena wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:03:05AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
 
Andy Saxena wrote:

I am a happy squirrelmail user, but I think the above solution is an
elegant solution for a large user base. It's low-maintenance and
hassle-free.

Apparently, there's a squirrelmail plugin that does fetchmail.  Seems to 
me that *might* fill in the missing piece that mail2web is doing for 
you: letting the users maintain the retrieval process.
 
 
 I don't think Squirrelmail allows access to POP mailboxes.
 
Check out squirrelmail's web page.  Look at the plugins.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-10 Thread Keith G. Murphy

Andy Saxena wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:33:29PM -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
 
I actually do all this, too (except the squirrelmail part -- I just use
mail2web with the IMAP options for web access). It *is* a beautiful
setup -- can't recommend it highly enough!

 
 
 If you have no trouble trusting strangers with your personal email, I
 guess this would work. mail2web is a pretty cool idea, though. I wonder
 if there's open sourced software that does the same thing.
 
 I am a happy squirrelmail user, but I think the above solution is an
 elegant solution for a large user base. It's low-maintenance and
 hassle-free.

Apparently, there's a squirrelmail plugin that does fetchmail.  Seems to 
me that *might* fill in the missing piece that mail2web is doing for 
you: letting the users maintain the retrieval process.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-09 Thread Andy Saxena

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:33:29PM -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
 I actually do all this, too (except the squirrelmail part -- I just use
 mail2web with the IMAP options for web access). It *is* a beautiful
 setup -- can't recommend it highly enough!
 

If you have no trouble trusting strangers with your personal email, I
guess this would work. mail2web is a pretty cool idea, though. I wonder
if there's open sourced software that does the same thing.

I am a happy squirrelmail user, but I think the above solution is an
elegant solution for a large user base. It's low-maintenance and
hassle-free.

-Andy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-03 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney

-- David P James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Wednesday, 02 October 2002, 11:05 PM -0400):
 I've recently started using mutt remotely when I'm on campus to check 
 for email that Mozilla is automatically downloading to my Debian box at 
 home 
Not to be contrary, but why are you having Mozilla do the downloading?
Fetchmail is designed for this... and once it has retrieved the mail for
you, you could have any of your mail clients look at it directly on your
machine easily, as it would be in a standard place.

Just a thought.

 The 'problem' is that when mutt launches it automatically uses the
 mbox file at /var/mail/username. There is such a file on my system but
 little email ever comes its way, hence I have no interest in checking
 it. What I would like is to have Mutt default to opening up Mozilla's
 mbox at ~/.mozilla/default/.slt/Mail/pop.my.isp/Inbox . I can
 force mutt to open it by using the -f (and, for safety's sake, -R)
 parameter with that long filename, but I would prefer a quicker and
 more permanent solution. I've also noticed that there is no .mutt or
 the like file or directory in my home directory, which is somewhat
 perplexing.
I believe somebody else already noted this, but .muttrc is not created
on its own; you have to create your own. When you do (simply use your
favorite editor -- likely VIM if you're using mutt! -- and create a
~/.muttrc file), you'll need a line such as:
set folder=/path/to/spoolfile
Once this is in there, you won't need to use the -f switch.

I highly suggest reading the mutt manual; it's included with the Debian
distro at /usr/share/doc/mutt/html/manual.html. And also look into
fetchmail and procmail -- they are excellent tools for grabbing mail
from remote locations and delivering it to specific files/directories.

-- 
Matthew Weier O'Phinney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-03 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney

-- Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Thursday, 03 October 2002, 11:08 AM -0500):
 Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
 -- David P James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 (on Wednesday, 02 October 2002, 11:05 PM -0400):
 
 I've recently started using mutt remotely when I'm on campus to check 
 for email that Mozilla is automatically downloading to my Debian box at 
 home 
 
 Not to be contrary, but why are you having Mozilla do the downloading?
 Fetchmail is designed for this... and once it has retrieved the mail for
 you, you could have any of your mail clients look at it directly on your
 machine easily, as it would be in a standard place.
 
 And to increase the beauty, use some IMAP server to serve up the 
 fetchmail'ed messages.  That way, remote access from anywhere with all 
 kinds of mail clients becomes possible, along with a consistent and safe 
 view of all your folders.
 
 courier w/ssl (forget the package name) is a beautiful way to go.  Oh, 
 yes, you could also then use squirrelmail + apache-ssl so that you'd 
 have web access from anywhere.
 
 Like Matthew said, just a thought.
I actually do all this, too (except the squirrelmail part -- I just use
mail2web with the IMAP options for web access). It *is* a beautiful
setup -- can't recommend it highly enough!

-- 
Matthew Weier O'Phinney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-03 Thread David P James

Matthew Weier O'Phinney was roused into action on 10/03/02 09:30 and wrote:
 -- David P James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 (on Wednesday, 02 October 2002, 11:05 PM -0400):
 
I've recently started using mutt remotely when I'm on campus to check 
for email that Mozilla is automatically downloading to my Debian box at 
home 
 
 Not to be contrary, but why are you having Mozilla do the downloading?
 Fetchmail is designed for this... and once it has retrieved the mail for
 you, you could have any of your mail clients look at it directly on your
 machine easily, as it would be in a standard place.
 

Because;
(1) It hadn't occurred to me to do that, and
(2) It kind of depends on what happens once the file is on the computer. 
Mozilla can be told to place its mail file anywhere, but it doesn't 
appear to have the option (like Mutt or to some degree Kmail) of 
'directly' reading a mailfile - Mozilla is set up to download and then 
read, not to read only. That's not to say that Mozilla's mail file can't 
be modified by something other than itself, it can - you just don't want 
to be doing that when Mozilla is actually running (say, when I'm home, 
which would mean that I'd have to shut off fetchmail whenever Mozilla 
Mail starts up). It would be nice if Moz could be told to read mbox 
files directly, but it can't. I'd even consider switching away from Moz, 
but I have yet to find any other [GUI] mail client that handles the 
concept of sub-folders as Moz does, or that can sort email by 'Order 
Received' rather than simply by date. My long-term hope is that Moz gets 
improved or that Minotaur will make up for Moz's deficiencies (mailing 
list handling, as another example).

On the other hand, if fetchmail downloads it to somewhere in /var/mail 
and I manage to set up a server for other mail clients to download 
from, would that not result in having an mbox file in multiple places, 
thereby wasting space? (ie wherever fetchmail puts it *and* also in the 
usual Mozilla location when Moz downloads it?). I suppose I could 
still tell Mozilla to delete the file from the server (eg, /var/mail), 
but then this seems to be a lot of extra file swapping, configuring as 
well as installing another programor two for what would appear to be no 
real gain.

As it is now, Mozilla downloads mail and anything else can read it 
wherever Mozilla puts it. I just need to be able to configure Mutt to do 
that, which I have now been able to do.

 I believe somebody else already noted this, but .muttrc is not created
 on its own; you have to create your own. When you do (simply use your
 favorite editor -- likely VIM if you're using mutt! -- and create a
 ~/.muttrc file), you'll need a line such as:
 set folder=/path/to/spoolfile
 Once this is in there, you won't need to use the -f switch.
 
 I highly suggest reading the mutt manual; it's included with the Debian
 distro at /usr/share/doc/mutt/html/manual.html. And also look into
 fetchmail and procmail -- they are excellent tools for grabbing mail
 from remote locations and delivering it to specific files/directories.
 

I had looked at the manual and the man page but I hadn't figured out 
that Mutt doesn't create a .muttrc file when first invoked. I saw 
references to it but I'm a little bit leary of creating a file that, 
from the documentation, *sounds* as if it ought to be there already. 
Anyway, problem solved now.

Thanks,
-- 
David P. James
4th Year Economics Student
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario
http://members.rogers.com/dpjames/

The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe.
-Dr. Leonard McCoy, Star Trek IV


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-03 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney

-- David P James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Thursday, 03 October 2002, 05:27 PM -0400):
 Matthew Weier O'Phinney was roused into action on 10/03/02 09:30 and wrote:
 -- David P James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 (on Wednesday, 02 October 2002, 11:05 PM -0400):
 
 Not to be contrary, but why are you having Mozilla do the downloading?
 Fetchmail is designed for this... and once it has retrieved the mail for
 you, you could have any of your mail clients look at it directly on your
 machine easily, as it would be in a standard place.
 
 
 Because;
 (1) It hadn't occurred to me to do that, and
 (2) It kind of depends on what happens once the file is on the computer. 
 Mozilla can be told to place its mail file anywhere, but it doesn't 
 appear to have the option (like Mutt or to some degree Kmail) of 
 'directly' reading a mailfile - Mozilla is set up to download and then 
 read, not to read only. That's not to say that Mozilla's mail file can't 
 be modified by something other than itself, it can - you just don't want 
 to be doing that when Mozilla is actually running (say, when I'm home, 
 which would mean that I'd have to shut off fetchmail whenever Mozilla 
 Mail starts up). It would be nice if Moz could be told to read mbox 
 files directly, but it can't. I'd even consider switching away from Moz, 
 but I have yet to find any other [GUI] mail client that handles the 
 concept of sub-folders as Moz does, or that can sort email by 'Order 
 Received' rather than simply by date. My long-term hope is that Moz gets 
 improved or that Minotaur will make up for Moz's deficiencies (mailing 
 list handling, as another example).
If I remember correctly, though, Mozilla can use IMAP (and I do, because
I use it on my Windows box when I need to read mail) -- which means
that if you use it as an IMAP mail reader, it will leave the mail where
it's delivered.

You might also want to look into Evolution -- I'd been using Mozilla for
mail for awhile until Evolution matured, and found it to be a good GUI
mail client. It's standards compliant, which means that it will read
mail wherever it is, thus leaving it in a central location for other
mail clients to read it.

 On the other hand, if fetchmail downloads it to somewhere in /var/mail 
 and I manage to set up a server for other mail clients to download 
 from, would that not result in having an mbox file in multiple places, 
 thereby wasting space? (ie wherever fetchmail puts it *and* also in the 
 usual Mozilla location when Moz downloads it?). I suppose I could 
 still tell Mozilla to delete the file from the server (eg, /var/mail), 
 but then this seems to be a lot of extra file swapping, configuring as 
 well as installing another programor two for what would appear to be no 
 real gain.
Actually, if you set up your mail server to deliver to Maildir (either
in the MTA's configuration or through procmail, which is what you'd do
if you were to set up an IMAP server), it would go to your user
account's ~/Maildir/ directory, which would act kind of like your spool.
From there, you could use clients like Mozilla, which semi-require their
own mail directory formats, to contact the IMAP server, and other
clients, such as mutt, kmail, etc, to simply use the Maildir format
(these other clients could also use the IMAP protocol, as then the
configuration would be standard).

 As it is now, Mozilla downloads mail and anything else can read it 
 wherever Mozilla puts it. I just need to be able to configure Mutt to do 
 that, which I have now been able to do.
Of course, these are just suggestions -- if you've got it working, and
it works the way you want it to -- good. I offer these suggestions as
somebody who fiddled around with email clients for years, always having
to change formats and mail spool locations whenever I found a new one
that used a slightly different storage format. Standards exist to make
such fiddling unnecessary -- which is why a fetchmail/procmail/IMAP
setup makes a lot of sense if you'll be using multiple clients to read
your mail.

-- 
Matthew Weier O'Phinney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mutt and mailboxes

2002-10-02 Thread Vineet Kumar

* David P James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021002 20:05]:

 interest in checking it. What I would like is to have Mutt default to 
 opening up Mozilla's mbox at 
 ~/.mozilla/default/.slt/Mail/pop.my.isp/Inbox . I can force mutt 

To specify your spoolfile, put set spoolfile=~/.mozilla/... in your
.muttrc .  Alternatively, set your $MAIL environment variable in your
shell's startup scripts.

 solution. I've also noticed that there is no .mutt or the like file or 
 directory in my home directory, which is somewhat perplexing.

Mutt will read a .muttrc if you write one, but it won't write one on its
own.

Further places to look for help are the mutt manual (in
/usr/share/doc/mutt, or on the web), and the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
archives, the mutt homepage, Sven Guckes' mutt site, and (of course)
google.

good times,
Vineet
-- 
http://www.doorstop.net/
-- 
http://www.aclu.org/It's all about Freedom.



msg04936/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-13 Thread Udo Mueller

Hallo Sven,

* Sven Salzwedel schrieb [13-09-02 05:28]:
 Christian Schmidt schrieb am Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:16:49PM +0200:
  Sven Salzwedel wrote on 12.09.2002:
   
   ich habe mehrere Mailboxes wo neue mails reinkommen, also z.B.
   /var/mail/user und ~/Mail/list-deb-de ... was mich jedoch stört, ist
   dass als standard mailbox beim starten von Mutt /var/mail/user genommen
   wird, auch wenn sie leer is. Kann ich Mutt so konfigurieren dass beim
   start in eine andere mailbox gewechselt wird, wenn /var/mail/user leer
   ist? wenn ja, any hints? ;)
  
  Du koenntest Dir auch einen Alias auf mutt legen, der dann immer
  mutt -y aufruft...

Oder, wenn du mutt nur starten willst, wenn auch neue Mails da
sind, direkt mit mutt -Z aufrufen, dann wird automtisch in eine
Mailbox mit neuen Mails gewechselt. Falls keine neuen Mails da
sind, wird mutt jedoch nicht gestartet.

Gruss Udo

-- 
Aus Murphy's Gesetzen:
Das Backup, das du gerade gemacht hast, wirst du nie brauchen.



msg18648/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-12 Thread Sven Salzwedel

Hallo Liste,

ich habe mehrere Mailboxes wo neue mails reinkommen, also z.B.
/var/mail/user und ~/Mail/list-deb-de ... was mich jedoch stört, ist
dass als standard mailbox beim starten von Mutt /var/mail/user genommen
wird, auch wenn sie leer is. Kann ich Mutt so konfigurieren dass beim
start in eine andere mailbox gewechselt wird, wenn /var/mail/user leer
ist? wenn ja, any hints? ;)

gruß


-- 
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)




Re: Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-12 Thread Jens Schuessler

* Sven Salzwedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-09-02 20:56]:
 
 ich habe mehrere Mailboxes wo neue mails reinkommen, also z.B.
 /var/mail/user und ~/Mail/list-deb-de ... was mich jedoch stört, ist
 dass als standard mailbox beim starten von Mutt /var/mail/user genommen
 wird, auch wenn sie leer is. Kann ich Mutt so konfigurieren dass beim
 start in eine andere mailbox gewechselt wird, wenn /var/mail/user leer
 ist? wenn ja, any hints? ;)

Indem du mutt -y aufrufst.

$man mutt
-yselect a mailbox specified in your `mailboxes' list
oder aber
-Zopen the first folder with new message, exit immediately
if none

$mailboxes musst du in deiner .muttrc definieren, bei mir sieht das so
aus:
mailboxes `find /home/jgs/Mail -type f -print | grep -v saved |xargs`
das zeigt mir nach mutt -y eine Übersicht aller Mailboxen, wobei die
mit neuer Mail mit einem N gekenzeichnet sind.

HTH
Jens


-- 
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)




Re: Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-12 Thread Christian Schmidt

Sven Salzwedel wrote on 12.09.2002:
 
 ich habe mehrere Mailboxes wo neue mails reinkommen, also z.B.
 /var/mail/user und ~/Mail/list-deb-de ... was mich jedoch stört, ist
 dass als standard mailbox beim starten von Mutt /var/mail/user genommen
 wird, auch wenn sie leer is. Kann ich Mutt so konfigurieren dass beim
 start in eine andere mailbox gewechselt wird, wenn /var/mail/user leer
 ist? wenn ja, any hints? ;)

Hast Du die uebrigen Mailboxen mit dem mailboxes-Kommando in die
.muttrc eingetragen?

Du koenntest Dir auch einen Alias auf mutt legen, der dann immer
mutt -y aufruft...

Gruss,
Christian
-- 
Christian Schmidt | Germany | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key ID: 0x4BB05393


--
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)




Re: Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-12 Thread Sven Salzwedel

Christian Schmidt schrieb am Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:16:49PM +0200:
 Sven Salzwedel wrote on 12.09.2002:
  
  ich habe mehrere Mailboxes wo neue mails reinkommen, also z.B.
  /var/mail/user und ~/Mail/list-deb-de ... was mich jedoch stört, ist
  dass als standard mailbox beim starten von Mutt /var/mail/user genommen
  wird, auch wenn sie leer is. Kann ich Mutt so konfigurieren dass beim
  start in eine andere mailbox gewechselt wird, wenn /var/mail/user leer
  ist? wenn ja, any hints? ;)
 
 Hast Du die uebrigen Mailboxen mit dem mailboxes-Kommando in die
 .muttrc eingetragen?
 
 Du koenntest Dir auch einen Alias auf mutt legen, der dann immer
 mutt -y aufruft...
 
 Gruss,
 Christian
 -- 
 Christian Schmidt | Germany | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PGP Key ID: 0x4BB05393

danke euch beiden ;) , mailboxes hab ich drin und alias ist jetzt auch
gesetzt, das ist sogar noch eine komfortablere Lösung als ich wollte.

gruß


-- 
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)




Re: Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-12 Thread Stefan Blechschmidt

Sven Salzwedel schrieb:
 Hallo Liste,
 
 ich habe mehrere Mailboxes wo neue mails reinkommen, also z.B.
 /var/mail/user und ~/Mail/list-deb-de ... was mich jedoch stört, ist
 dass als standard mailbox beim starten von Mutt /var/mail/user genommen
 wird, auch wenn sie leer is. Kann ich Mutt so konfigurieren dass beim
 start in eine andere mailbox gewechselt wird, wenn /var/mail/user leer
 ist? wenn ja, any hints? ;)

Vielleicht hilft dir diese Info:

Mailboxen angeben, die Nachrichten empfangen

Benutzung: mailboxes [!]Dateiname [ Dateiname ... ]

Mit diesem Befehl werden die Mailboxen definiert, in denen das System
empfangene Nachrichten ablegt und die deshalb auf neue Nachrichten
überprüft werden sollen. Standardmäßig wird in der Hauptstatuszeile
angezeigt, wie viele dieser Mailboxen neue Nachrichten enthalten.

Beim Wechsel der Mailbox kann man mit der Leertaste durch die
Mailboxen blättern, die neue Nachrichten enthalten.

Wenn man in einer Datei-Liste die Tabulator-Taste drückt, erscheint
ein Menü, in dem die Dateien aufgeführt sind, die mit dem mailboxes
Befehl angegeben wurden und in dem angezeigt wird, welche davon neue
Nachrichten enthalten. Mutt startet automatisch in diesem Modus, wenn
es von der Kommandozeile aus mit der -y Option aufgerufen wurde.

Anmerkung: Neue Mail wird erkannt, indem für die Mailbox-Datei das
letzte Zugriffsdatum mit dem Datum der letzten Änderung verglichen
wird. Hilfsprogramme wie biff, frm und andere, die auf die Mailbox
zugreifen, können (wenn sie die Zugriffszeit nicht zurücksetzen) daher
dafür verantwortlich sein, daß Mutt nie neue Mail meldet.

Anmerkung: Die Dateinamen im mailboxes Befehl werden bereits
aufgelöst, wenn der Befehl ausgeführt wird. Wenn diese Namen also
Kürzel (wie etwa ``='' and ``!'') enthalten, dann sollte jede
Variablendefinition, die auf die Bedeutung dieser Zeichen Einfluß hat
(etwa $folder und $spoolfile) vor dem mailboxes Befehl stehen. 

-- 
/// servus
   (..)  - stefan
oo0-\/-0oo---
http://www.sbsbavaria.de/


-- 
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)




Re: Mutt + verschiedene Mailboxes

2002-09-12 Thread akira z

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 danke euch beiden ;) , mailboxes hab ich drin und alias ist jetzt auch
 gesetzt, das ist sogar noch eine komfortablere Lösung als ich wollte.

noch komfortabler gehts damit:

mailboxes `find /home/your_home_dir/Mail -type f -print | grep -v saved |xargs`

damit brauchst du nicht jeden mailboxe eintrag haendisch durchfuehren, alle 
mailbox-files in ~/Mail werden automatisch in die Liste aufgenommen.
greetinx
christo

- -- 
root@sis# shutdown -h now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9gWli8ZgdQO2Zi7QRAkY4AJsFRiwe3MzgTUeO4oM/2hm4f8K0NQCaA69o
FvsqrtPvT31dPCxKjdGYahY=
=5pt0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)




Re: mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2001-01-01 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 05:24:58PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
 
 As root, from a directory you don't mind building in:
 
 $ apt-get update

this needs root

 $ apt-get source mutt

this does not.

[snip]

 Build and make package.  Following assumes you're in the mutt source 
 directory:
 
 $ debian/rules build
 $ debian/rules binary

$ fakeroot debian/rules binary

or replace both steps with:

dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot

you need not and should not compile source as root unless there is a
very good, necessary reason for doing so.  (building glibc packages
require real root and not fakeroot.)

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/


pgpXlPkpnwT7n.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2000-12-31 Thread kmself
on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:04:39AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com 
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
 on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:56:46AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com 
 (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
  Package: mutt
  Version: 1.3.12-2
  Woody.
  
  I'd recently added the following lines to my ~/.muttrc to allow use of
  (and access to) compressed mailboxes.  They're now coming up as unknown
  commands on mutt invocation on an update to the latest mutt in Woody.
  Anyone know the problem or got a fix?  Bug tracking lists nothing
  appropriate on the topic.
 
 It appears that the gzip patch was lost in the shuffle.

Officially, even.  It's listed in the README, as Marco d'Itri (mutt
maintainer) pointed out in response to the bug report.  I've requested
it be added, as this breaks backward compatibility.

Meantime, I'm about to learn how to compile from sources and apply the
patch myself.  Tips, anyone?

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.  http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?  There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/http://www.kuro5hin.org


pgpM7SVEBanDV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2000-12-31 Thread kmself
on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 12:46:54PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com 
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
 on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:04:39AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com 
 (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
  on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:56:46AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com 
  (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
   Package: mutt
   Version: 1.3.12-2
   Woody.
   
   I'd recently added the following lines to my ~/.muttrc to allow use of
   (and access to) compressed mailboxes.  They're now coming up as unknown
   commands on mutt invocation on an update to the latest mutt in Woody.
   Anyone know the problem or got a fix?  Bug tracking lists nothing
   appropriate on the topic.
  
  It appears that the gzip patch was lost in the shuffle.
 
 Officially, even.  It's listed in the README, as Marco d'Itri (mutt
 maintainer) pointed out in response to the bug report.  I've requested
 it be added, as this breaks backward compatibility.
 
 Meantime, I'm about to learn how to compile from sources and apply the
 patch myself.  Tips, anyone?

Ok, got it figured out.

If you don't already, add a 'source' package list line to your
/etc/apt/sources.list file:

deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free

As root, from a directory you don't mind building in:

$ apt-get update
$ apt-get source mutt

Get the appropriate comresseded mailbox patch, and follow directions for
applying patch, from:

http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/
   
You need to create a new rules file from the old one as follows.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:debian]$ diff rules.old rules 
17c17,18
   --with-pgp --with-mixmaster --with-ncurses --with-sasl 
---
   --with-pgp --with-mixmaster --with-ncurses --with-sasl \
   --enable-compressed

Build and make package.  Following assumes you're in the mutt source directory:

$ debian/rules build
$ debian/rules binary

If everything looks OK, install:

$ dpkg -i ../muttversion.deb

You might want to place this on hold so it's not overwritten on your next 
upgrade:

$ echo mutt hold | dpkg --set-selections

Cheers.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.  http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?  There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/http://www.kuro5hin.org


pgpyNxPLgKHcK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2000-12-31 Thread Mike
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
 
 Ok, got it figured out.

Wish I could say the same.

 If you don't already, add a 'source' package list line to your
 /etc/apt/sources.list file:
 
 deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
 
 As root, from a directory you don't mind building in:
 
 $ apt-get update
 $ apt-get source mutt

So far, so good.

 Get the appropriate comresseded mailbox patch, and follow directions for
 applying patch, from:
 
 http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/

Got it and applied it.  Well, once I realized which directory I was supposed
to be in, that is. ::grin::

 You need to create a new rules file from the old one as follows.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:debian]$ diff rules.old rules 
 17c17,18
--with-pgp --with-mixmaster --with-ncurses --with-sasl 
 ---
--with-pgp --with-mixmaster --with-ncurses --with-sasl \
--enable-compressed
 
 Build and make package.  Following assumes you're in the mutt source 
 directory:
 
 $ debian/rules build

Here's where it's falling apart for me.  I run this and get the following:

make[3]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/m4'
Making all in po
make[3]: Entering directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
cd .. \
   CONFIG_FILES=po/Makefile.in CONFIG_HEADERS= \
   /bin/sh ./config.status
creating po/Makefile.in
linking ./intl/libgettext.h to intl/libintl.h
make[3]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
make[3]: Entering directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
file=./echo de | sed 's,.*/,,'.gmo \
   rm -f $file  PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file de.po
/bin/sh: no: command not found
make[3]: *** [de.gmo] Error 127
make[3]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12'
make: *** [build] Error 2

For now I've added the --disable-nls option to the debian/rules file as a
workaround, as I can do without multi-lingual support.  After doing that, it
compiles - I'm using the version I compiled now.  I'm just kinda wondering
what I did wrong.

 $ debian/rules binary
 $ dpkg -i ../muttversion.deb
 $ echo mutt hold | dpkg --set-selections

These steps were no problem, once I got the thing to compile.
-- 
Mike Werner  KA8YSD   | He that is slow to believe anything and
  | everything is of great understanding,
'91 GS500E| for belief in one false principle is the
Morgantown WV | beginning of all unwisdom.



pgpB2Kgx45UYM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2000-12-31 Thread kmself
on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 09:55:44PM -0500, Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
  
  Ok, got it figured out.
 
 Wish I could say the same.

...

  $ debian/rules build
 
 Here's where it's falling apart for me.  

Forgot to mention I had to install a dev package, forget exactly which
one it was...

 I run this and get the following:
 
 make[3]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/m4'
 Making all in po
 make[3]: Entering directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
 cd .. \
CONFIG_FILES=po/Makefile.in CONFIG_HEADERS= \
/bin/sh ./config.status
 creating po/Makefile.in
 linking ./intl/libgettext.h to intl/libintl.h
 make[3]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
 make[3]: Entering directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
 file=./echo de | sed 's,.*/,,'.gmo \
rm -f $file  PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file de.po
 /bin/sh: no: command not found

I'd check the build tree for something that looks like it ought to be
'no', and find out why it didn't build.

 make[3]: *** [de.gmo] Error 127
 make[3]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12/po'
 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
 make[2]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12'
 make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
 make[1]: Leaving directory /root/temp/mutt-1.3.12'
 make: *** [build] Error 2
 
 For now I've added the --disable-nls option to the debian/rules file as a
 workaround, as I can do without multi-lingual support.  After doing that, it
 compiles - I'm using the version I compiled now.  I'm just kinda wondering
 what I did wrong.
 
  $ debian/rules binary
  $ dpkg -i ../muttversion.deb
  $ echo mutt hold | dpkg --set-selections
 
 These steps were no problem, once I got the thing to compile.

Happy trails.  Happy new millennium, BTW.



-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.  http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?  There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/http://www.kuro5hin.org


pgpAc5CKj0Mvm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2000-12-30 Thread kmself
on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:56:46AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com 
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
 Package: mutt
 Version: 1.3.12-2
 Woody.
 
 I'd recently added the following lines to my ~/.muttrc to allow use of
 (and access to) compressed mailboxes.  They're now coming up as unknown
 commands on mutt invocation on an update to the latest mutt in Woody.
 Anyone know the problem or got a fix?  Bug tracking lists nothing
 appropriate on the topic.

It appears that the gzip patch was lost in the shuffle.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.  http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?  There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/http://www.kuro5hin.org


pgpEOUA89Ztyx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


mutt -- compressed mailboxes, exerimental breaks 'open-hook', etc.

2000-12-29 Thread kmself
Package: mutt
Version: 1.3.12-2
Woody.

I'd recently added the following lines to my ~/.muttrc to allow use of
(and access to) compressed mailboxes.  They're now coming up as unknown
commands on mutt invocation on an update to the latest mutt in Woody.
Anyone know the problem or got a fix?  Bug tracking lists nothing
appropriate on the topic.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.  http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand?  There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/http://www.kuro5hin.org


pgpcAZxoypjpT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mutt and Mailboxes

1999-01-20 Thread Robert Wilderspin
On 19 Jan 99 06:21:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen M
Lavelle) wrote:

I am using Mutt to read my email fetched from my ISP
I understand how to move a message to another mailbox by pressing

You pressed it too soon!


Rob Wilderspin
--
But I need it to crash once every few days - 
reboots are the only chance I get to sleep...
--= (send replies to rob@)


Mutt and Mailboxes

1999-01-19 Thread Stephen M Lavelle
I am using Mutt to read my email fetched from my ISP
I understand how to move a message to another mailbox by pressing