Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-20 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:


 Google has more ways to identify you than cookies or a login token,


Well, we're talking now about the filtering of search results for
dubious motives.

Someone posted a link to a web page that looked liked it was written and
designed with the average six-year-old in mind, that told us  what we
already knew, that if you turn on, or don't turn off, saving your search
history in google and search while your logged in to their services,
they tailor your results (and inform you of the fact with a little icon
or something while they're at it).

The rest of what has been claimed (different results when using
different browsers and/or ip addresses within the same country) although
perfectly amenable to scientific inquiry, remains unsubstantiated.

I do know as a google.fr user that google tailors results by *language*,
but *a priori* I don't see how that can be construed as nefarious in any
way, nor how you can get around it.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6rg0o.2b2.cu...@einstein.electron.org



No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com [2014-11-19 
10:48 +0200]:
 Sadly, whoever told you that was misinformed - and misinformed
 you. Google results may vary according to the constantly updating
 search index - and search terms - but the search history, either
 stored in your browser history, or your Google profile (if you
 login to a Google account) does *not* affect results.

Can you please back this up with evidence? I would love to be proven
misinformed.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
before he died, rabbi zusya said: in the world to come they will not
ask me, 'why were you not moses?' they will ask me, 'why were you not
zusya?'


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:

 Can you please back this up with evidence? I would love to be proven
 misinformed.


I went over to google.fr, put 

systemd for administrators pdf

in the search slit (or whatever it's called)

and got

 The systemd - 0pointer.net
 0pointer.de/public/systemd-ebook-psankar.pdf

as the first hit.

Do you get something else?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6p5d1.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:05:38PM CET, Curt cu...@free.fr said:
 On 2014-11-19, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
 
  Can you please back this up with evidence? I would love to be proven
  misinformed.
 
 
 I went over to google.fr, put 
 
 systemd for administrators pdf
 
 in the search slit (or whatever it's called)
 
 and got
 
  The systemd - 0pointer.net
  0pointer.de/public/systemd-ebook-psankar.pdf
 
 as the first hit.
 
 Do you get something else?

Joerg got
http://www.bandwidthco.com/whitepapers/os/linux/systemd/systemd%20for%20Administrators.pdf

Not same document.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141119132622.gl19...@rail.eu.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:

 Joerg got
 http://www.bandwidthco.com/whitepapers/os/linux/systemd/systemd%20for%20Administrators.pdf

 Not same document.



Who's Joerg?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6p7tu.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Ron
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:26:22 +0100
Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:

 On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:05:38PM CET, Curt cu...@free.fr said:

   Can you please back this up with evidence? I would love to be proven
   misinformed.

  I went over to google.fr, put 
  systemd for administrators pdf
  in the search slit (or whatever it's called)
  and got
   The systemd - 0pointer.net
   0pointer.de/public/systemd-ebook-psankar.pdf
  as the first hit.
  Do you get something else?

 Joerg got
 http://www.bandwidthco.com/whitepapers/os/linux/systemd/systemd%20for%20Administrators.pdf
 Not same document.

I also get 0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd-pdf.html

Cheers,
 
Ron.
-- 
   Image
 Old houses were scaffolding once,   
   and workmen whistling.
-- T.E. Hulme

   -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org --
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141119110443.3fa8c...@ron.cerrocora.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:48:46PM CET, Curt cu...@free.fr said:
 On 2014-11-19, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:
 
  Joerg got
  http://www.bandwidthco.com/whitepapers/os/linux/systemd/systemd%20for%20Administrators.pdf
 
  Not same document.
 
 
 
 Who's Joerg?

Joerg Desh, who answered in message m4ep45$eju$1...@ger.gmane.org  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141119143001.gm19...@rail.eu.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:

 Joerg got
 http://www.bandwidthco.com/whitepapers/os/linux/systemd/systemd%20for%20Administrators.pdf

 Not same document.


This is confusing.  The claim is your Google search history affects your
Google search results.  I have no Google search history (easy enough, no
hoops, no hands).  So it must be Joerg (whoever she is) who's in the NSA
bubble?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6papd.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:37:33PM CET, Curt cu...@free.fr said:
 On 2014-11-19, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:
 
  Joerg got
  http://www.bandwidthco.com/whitepapers/os/linux/systemd/systemd%20for%20Administrators.pdf
 
  Not same document.
 
 
 This is confusing.  The claim is your Google search history affects your
 Google search results.  I have no Google search history (easy enough, no
 hoops, no hands).  So it must be Joerg (whoever she is) who's in the NSA
 bubble?

I do not know, I tested again, this time the document you gave was
second with a title Part 1. I also see it is less complete than the
latter.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141119150952.gp19...@rail.eu.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Ron
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:37:33 + (UTC)
Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:

 The claim is your Google search history affects your Google search results. 

Seems Google tailors your results depending on what you look at; frinstance if 
they see that you often go to the Wikipedia article on the query subject, they 
will put wikipedia higher in your results.
 
Cheers,
 
Ron.
-- 
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent
  than from the machinations of the wicked.

   -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org --
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141119121425.5ceaa...@ron.cerrocora.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, Renaud OLGIATI ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org wrote:

 The claim is your Google search history affects your Google search results. 

 Seems Google tailors your results depending on what you look at;
 frinstance if they see that you often go to the Wikipedia article on
 the query subject, they will put wikipedia higher in your results.
  

The link posted by Darac (http://dontbubble.us/) claims that Google results
are tailored *based on your search history*.

I don't have a search history. I had no cookies, either, when I made the
search. Nor was I logged in to their services.

So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6pevl.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Ron
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:49:09 + (UTC)
Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:

 The link posted by Darac (http://dontbubble.us/) claims that Google results
 are tailored *based on your search history*.
 
 I don't have a search history. I had no cookies, either, when I made the
 search. Nor was I logged in to their services.
 
 So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results. 

You may not have but we do; so we don’t get the plain vanilla results you do.

Or you don't get the same results as we do.
 
Cheers,
 
Ron.
-- 
There are three kinds of men:
 Those that learn by reading,
  The few who learn by observation,
  and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.

   -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org --
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141119132852.2b043...@ron.cerrocora.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Morel Bérenger
Le Mer 19 novembre 2014 16:49, Curt a écrit :
 So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results.

For example, it can guess from your IP from where you come, and show
results more... pertinent... considering your location.
A easy test: search for test. This word exists in several languages, so
using it on google.com from various IPs can be interesting, if you can.
You can also try to use any other variants of google (.fr, .us, etc) and
check if you are having the same results.
If results differ from a test to another, then, yes, google is bubbling you.

Now, is bubbling good or not, is a different question and I do not intend
to try to answer it :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/b568cd671b1a7041829b03909845a6bd.squir...@www.sud-ouest.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Darac Marjal
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:49:09PM +, Curt wrote:
 On 2014-11-19, Renaud OLGIATI ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org wrote:
 
  The claim is your Google search history affects your Google search 
  results. 
 
  Seems Google tailors your results depending on what you look at;
  frinstance if they see that you often go to the Wikipedia article on
  the query subject, they will put wikipedia higher in your results.
   
 
 The link posted by Darac (http://dontbubble.us/) claims that Google results
 are tailored *based on your search history*.
 
 I don't have a search history. I had no cookies, either, when I made the
 search. Nor was I logged in to their services.
 
 So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results. 

Do you regularly search from the same IP address? Do you regularly
search from the same browser? Do you regularly search from the same
country?

Because Google don't publish their search algorithm, it's impossible to
tell how they tailor their results for anonymous users. It's not
beyond the realms of possibility (nor beyond Google's resources) to
tailor results based on a number of factors. Firefox users prefer
github, Internet Explorer users are generally conservative, Chinese
users should not be shown 'unacceptable' ideas are all customisations
that Google *COULD* implement, all with the goal of getting the best
click-through statistics.

 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6pevl.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, Morel Bérenger berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
 Le Mer 19 novembre 2014 16:49, Curt a écrit :
 So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results.

 For example, it can guess from your IP from where you come, and show
 results more... pertinent... considering your location.

It could.

 A easy test: search for test. This word exists in several languages, so
 using it on google.com from various IPs can be interesting, if you can.

I'll have to call my brother in California. Or use a proxy.

 You can also try to use any other variants of google (.fr, .us, etc) and
 check if you are having the same results.

Well, from experience I know that they can differ in this case.

 If results differ from a test to another, then, yes, google is bubbling you.

So you go to google.fr, do a search, it gives you primarily
French-language results, and you're being bubbled? And ducky ducky a
gogo gives you results primarily in ... what?  What is the neutral,
non-bubbling lingo on this planet?  Just asking.

 Now, is bubbling good or not, is a different question and I do not intend
 to try to answer it :)

It may be good for a francophone, si tu ne causes pas la langue de M
Shakespeare!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6pkm2.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote:

 Do you regularly search from the same IP address? Do you regularly
 search from the same browser? Do you regularly search from the same
 country?


I see what you're driving at.  But as you can easily change browsers and
compare search results, I don't think we need Google to reveal their
algorithm to get to the truth of the browser matter (if there is any
truth to get at at all). 

As for country-specific results (language-oriented, certainly) how does
ducky ducky a gogo handle the Tower of Babel problem?  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm6pme9.2am.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: No Google bubble?

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 19/11/14 22:09, martin f krafft wrote:
 also sprach Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com [2014-11-19 
 10:48 +0200]:
 Sadly, whoever told you that was misinformed - and misinformed
 you. Google results may vary according to the constantly updating
 search index - and search terms - but the search history, either
 stored in your browser history, or your Google profile (if you
 login to a Google account) does *not* affect results.
 
 Can you please back this up with evidence? I would love to be proven
 misinformed.

With the greatest respect Martin - have you tried testing it yourself?

Fire up three boxes running Iceweasel, with one using a Google profile
with a search history and logged into Google, a second not logged into
Google but with a search history, and a third also not logged into a
Google account but with no search history - then paste the same search
term into the search box. Do let me know if you can't find the pdf under
discussion at the top of the search results.
systemd for administrators pdf
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd-pdf.html


If you refer to my original reply to Paul you'll note I quoted the
Google UK (and I'm not in the UK) blog notice where it states that
*modified* search results are clearly marked, and can be replaced with
*unmodified* search results by clicking on a button[*1] - please try
that before people prove a negative (assuming that's even possible).

Then, to be fair to the originally lambasted Brian - try *copying and
pasting* a search term.

And do note my original comment about the nature of Google's search
index - it's always changing (it's not a static index)[*2]. Even if you
do an identical search query at the same moment as I - we will get
different results (Google doesn't have a single international search
engine). Never-the-less, Brian's query *currently* will put that same
page at the top of the results (for the time being).


[*1] https://www.google.com/history/optout?hl=en

[*2] Now includes the OP's post

Here's the first URLs from the results (I've removed the dozen or so
that are above the search results):-
https://www.google.com/search?q=systemd+for+administrators+pdfamp;client=iceweasel-aamp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficialamp;channel=sbamp;source=lntamp;tbs=li:1amp;sa=Xamp;ei=O-9sVIXDG8OxmwW68ILADgamp;ved=0CBYQpwU
*http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd-pdf.html*
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:XL78OblSZFgJ:0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd-pdf.html+amp;cd=1amp;hl=enamp;ct=clnkamp;client=iceweasel-a
https://www.google.com/search?client=iceweasel-aamp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficialamp;channel=sbamp;q=related:0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd-pdf.html+systemd+for+administrators+pdfamp;tbo=1amp;sa=Xamp;ei=O-9sVIXDG8OxmwW68ILADgamp;ved=0CCMQHzAA
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-ebook-psankar.pdf
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jI2PwP6QAooJ:0pointer.de/public/systemd-ebook-psankar.pdf+amp;cd=2amp;hl=enamp;ct=clnkamp;client=iceweasel-a
https://www.google.com/search?client=iceweasel-aamp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficialamp;channel=sbamp;q=related:0pointer.de/public/systemd-ebook-psankar.pdf+systemd+for+administrators+pdfamp;tbo=1amp;sa=Xamp;ei=O-9sVIXDG8OxmwW68ILADgamp;ved=0CCkQHzAB
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/resources.html


Apropos of which, for those concerned about Google not providing search
results as a community service, please try the following Iceweasel
extensions:-
;Moxie's Google Sharing
;Wladimir Palant's Ad Block Plus
;Ove's Self-Destructing Cookies
;Giorio Maone's No Script


 

Kind regards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546cf397.8050...@gmail.com



Re: No Google bubble?

2014-11-19 Thread Martin Read

On 19/11/14 17:56, Curt wrote:

As for country-specific results (language-oriented, certainly) how does
ducky ducky a gogo handle the Tower of Babel problem?


I don't know if they apply any geoip checks to inbound traffic, but they 
certainly support the lang:ISO_language_code search term (compare the 
results of john wayne lang:en with john wayne lang:fr), and there 
are some fairly obvious heuristics that I'd expect any competent search 
engine implementer to apply like this query is written entirely in the 
Armenian alphabet, so we should probably prefer Armenian-language 
results even if the user has not specified 'lang:hy'.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546cf55f.5090...@zen.co.uk



Re: No Google bubble?

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 20/11/14 04:04, Darac Marjal wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:49:09PM +, Curt wrote:
 On 2014-11-19, Renaud OLGIATI ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org
 wrote:
 
 The claim is your Google search history affects your Google
 search results.
 
 Seems Google tailors your results depending on what you look
 at; frinstance if they see that you often go to the Wikipedia
 article on the query subject, they will put wikipedia higher in
 your results.
 
 
 The link posted by Darac (http://dontbubble.us/) claims that
 Google results are tailored *based on your search history*.
 
 I don't have a search history. I had no cookies, either, when I
 made the search. Nor was I logged in to their services.
 
 So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results.
 
 Do you regularly search from the same IP address? Do you regularly 
 search from the same browser? Do you regularly search from the
 same country?
 
 Because Google don't publish their search algorithm, it's
 impossible to tell how they tailor their results for anonymous
 users. It's not beyond the realms of possibility (nor beyond
 Google's resources) to tailor results based on a number of factors.
 Firefox users prefer github, Internet Explorer users are
 generally conservative, Chinese users should not be shown
 'unacceptable' ideas are all customisations that Google *COULD*
 implement, all with the goal of getting the best click-through
 statistics.

It's possible - but it's not the case. Click-through-statistics
isn't the primary purpose, relevant results is. It's possible that
people can live on orange juice alone - but nor is it the case. And
any demand to prove it does nothing to change a belief into a fact.

Google *can* tailor search results, the user can easily avoid tailored
search results. When Google tailors search results the fact they have
been tailored is clearly evident and a button is displayed, which upon
clicking, will give you un-tailored search results.

Impel != Compel


As previously stated (for those that can't or won't read) - there are
a number of factors that affect search results, the main ones being:-
;where you are when you make the query (the search engines are
distributed and not synched in real-time + they differ slightly
according to local language and laws)
;the index is based, mainly[*1] on backlinks harvested by Googlebot
i.e. it's dynamic (e.g. these posts modify the results)


[*1] Google employs thousands - while not published the search results
algorithm is not like the formula for Coke-a-Cola.


At what point does this thread become petty and stupid? While it may
satisfy the desires of those with a conspiracy axe to grind, or some
sort of resentment based on the false idea that Brian made them look
silly for not performing a simple search for an answer to their
question - none of this is remotely relevant to the OP's question.

--
The pure and simple truth is that the truth is rarely pure and never
simple


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546cfa09.3000...@gmail.com



Re: No Google bubble?

2014-11-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com [2014-11-19 
21:46 +0200]:
 With the greatest respect Martin - have you tried testing it
 yourself?

No, I have not used Google for over 5 years by choice because I do
not like it when profit-driven entities make decisions over what
I should see.

With all due respect: have you not heard of the search bubble or are
you denying it?

Ever since switching to duckduckgo.com, I've found the better
answers. At first it's hard because DDG shows you the stuff you
aren't used to, but when I research, this is the stuff I want to
see. I don't want to be reconfirmed in the bias and prejudices
I already have.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
perhaps debian is concerned more about technical excellence rather
 than ease of use by breaking software. in the former we may excel.
 in the latter we have to concede the field to microsoft. guess
 where i want to go today?
 -- manoj srivastava


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Curt cu...@free.fr [2014-11-19 17:49 +0200]:
 I don't have a search history. I had no cookies, either, when I made the
 search. Nor was I logged in to their services.
 
 So I don't see how Google could have tailored my results. 

Google has more ways to identify you than cookies or a login token,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
everyone has a little secret he keeps,
 i like the fires when the city sleeps.
  -- mc 900 ft jesus


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Re: No Google bubble?

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 20/11/14 08:14, martin f krafft wrote:
 also sprach Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com [2014-11-19 
 21:46 +0200]:
 With the greatest respect Martin - have you tried testing it
 yourself?
 
 No, I have not used Google for over 5 years by choice because I do
 not like it when profit-driven entities make decisions over what
 I should see.
 
 With all due respect: have you not heard of the search bubble or are
 you denying it?

The claimed respect is not immediately evident in the slanted questions.

 
 Ever since switching to duckduckgo.com, I've found the better
 answers. At first it's hard because DDG shows you the stuff you
 aren't used to, but when I research, this is the stuff I want to
 see. I don't want to be reconfirmed in the bias and prejudices
 I already have.
 
I'm happy you've found a search engine that satisfies your search
requirements. I'd be even happier if you mustered the tolerance that I
have for other people's choices of search engines.

[curious] What does any of this have to do with Debian-user??

Kind regards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546d123f.2060...@gmail.com



Re: No Google bubble? (was: systemd for administrators, printable version.)

2014-11-19 Thread Morel Bérenger
Le Mer 19 novembre 2014 18:26, Curt a écrit :
 Now, is bubbling good or not, is a different question and I do not
 intend to try to answer it :)

 It may be good for a francophone, si tu ne causes pas la langue de M
 Shakespeare!

Yes, it may. But sometimes it gets annoying, depending on one's uses, for
example when you're trying to find some stuff about programming, or asking
things in English.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/d6697f53b9dd977542f94d597183ac95.squir...@www.sud-ouest.org