Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:12:58 +0200 Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rene, > > I have never installed OOo on an ARM machine, but do you know, HOW much > Memory I must have to run it? I have a Atmel AT91SAM9G20 (400 MHz) with > 256 MByte SDRAM and 2x 512 MByte NAND Flash and a Freescale i.MX31 (532 > MHz) with 512 MByte mobile SDRAM and 512 MByte of NAND Flash. > I am running openoffice on a 500MHz G4 with 512MB RAM. Start up is a little slow but otherwise it performs well enough. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Hi Rene, I have never installed OOo on an ARM machine, but do you know, HOW much Memory I must have to run it? I have a Atmel AT91SAM9G20 (400 MHz) with 256 MByte SDRAM and 2x 512 MByte NAND Flash and a Freescale i.MX31 (532 MHz) with 512 MByte mobile SDRAM and 512 MByte of NAND Flash. Am 2008-10-21 10:57:44, schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, > > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Shalom Tzafrir, Am 2008-10-18 18:16:59, schrieb Tzafrir Cohen: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the > > ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1. > > $ rmadison openoffice.org > openoffice.org | 1.1.3-9sarge8 | oldstable | source, all > openoffice.org | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | etch-m68k | source > openoffice.org | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch5 |stable | source, amd64, i386, > powerpc, sparc > openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | unstable | source, amd64, armel, i386, > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~beta2-1 | experimental | sparc > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc2-1 | experimental | powerpc > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 | experimental | i386 > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | source, amd64 > > So just upgrade from i386 to amd64, and your're done :-) ROTFL Israelian Joke? Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Ron Johnson wrote: b >> And you won't be able to install it on pure lenny, needs one lib from >> sid. The other one (liblucene2-java) can be omitted when you don't >> install the metapackage (openoffice.org) or don't need search in the >> help... >> >> At some time there will be a lenny-backport, though. > > Or he could install directly from www.openoffice.org or go-oo. > well, I'd rather do it through aptitude, so It would show and update regularly.. When I tried to add it to my Ubuntu laptop, all the .debs installed, but it balked at the menus, saying there was a conflict, and I couldn't figure out how to resolve the conflict. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 367800 Registered Ubuntu User #12459 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On 10/21/08 05:53, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Paul Cartwright wrote: so on my Lenny system, if I run this command: apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org will it overwrite my existing 2.4 installation, or will I have 2 OOs available ? think a bit... Same package names -> overwrites 2.4. And you won't be able to install it on pure lenny, needs one lib from sid. The other one (liblucene2-java) can be omitted when you don't install the metapackage (openoffice.org) or don't need search in the help... At some time there will be a lenny-backport, though. Or he could install directly from www.openoffice.org or go-oo. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On 10/21/08 03:57, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1. $ rmadison openoffice.org openoffice.org | 1.1.3-9sarge8 | oldstable | source, all [snip] openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 | experimental | i386 openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | source, amd64 So just upgrade from i386 to amd64, and your're done :-) In the meanwhile it's available for i386 now :) $ rmadison -s experimental openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-core | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc Grüße/Regards, René (the maintainer, and sorry for the hassle, -1 and -2 failed to build on the i386 buildd) No problem. We all appreciate you tireless work wrangling this huge blob. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Hi, Paul Cartwright wrote: > so on my Lenny system, if I run this command: > > apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org > > will it overwrite my existing 2.4 installation, or will I have 2 OOs > available ? think a bit... Same package names -> overwrites 2.4. And you won't be able to install it on pure lenny, needs one lib from sid. The other one (liblucene2-java) can be omitted when you don't install the metapackage (openoffice.org) or don't need search in the help... At some time there will be a lenny-backport, though. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Rene Engelhard wrote: > $ rmadison -s experimental openoffice.org-core I just tried that command and got the same results.. never heard of rmadison before!! > openoffice.org-core | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc > > Grüße/Regards, > > René > (the maintainer, and sorry for the hassle, -1 and -2 failed to build > on the i386 buildd) so on my Lenny system, if I run this command: apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org will it overwrite my existing 2.4 installation, or will I have 2 OOs available ? -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 367800 Registered Ubuntu User #12459 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Hi, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the > > ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1. > > $ rmadison openoffice.org > openoffice.org | 1.1.3-9sarge8 | oldstable | source, all > openoffice.org | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | etch-m68k | source > openoffice.org | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch5 |stable | source, amd64, i386, > powerpc, sparc > openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | unstable | source, amd64, armel, i386, > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~beta2-1 | experimental | sparc > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc2-1 | experimental | powerpc > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 | experimental | i386 > openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | source, amd64 > > So just upgrade from i386 to amd64, and your're done :-) In the meanwhile it's available for i386 now :) $ rmadison -s experimental openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-core | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc Grüße/Regards, René (the maintainer, and sorry for the hassle, -1 and -2 failed to build on the i386 buildd) -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the > ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1. $ rmadison openoffice.org openoffice.org | 1.1.3-9sarge8 | oldstable | source, all openoffice.org | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | etch-m68k | source openoffice.org | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch5 |stable | source, amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openoffice.org | 1:2.4.1-11 | unstable | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~beta2-1 | experimental | sparc openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc2-1 | experimental | powerpc openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 | experimental | i386 openoffice.org | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | source, amd64 So just upgrade from i386 to amd64, and your're done :-) -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] || best ICQ# 16849754 || friend -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On 10/18/08 11:59, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: But even after I just updated apt, I still get this: # apt-get update [yadda yadda] $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org openoffice.org: Installed: 1:2.4.1-9 Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11 Version table: 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0 1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages 1:2.4.1-11 0 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages *** 1:2.4.1-9 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status That's strange, I updated my openoffice.org packages a couple days ago to the 3.0.0 version (1:3.0.0-2), to be more precise. My sources.list entry: deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free Hmmm, now *that* is interesting. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On 10/18/08 11:38, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote: [snip] Experimental1:3.0.0-3 It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now. Thanks! But even after I just updated apt, I still get this: # apt-get update [yadda yadda] $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org openoffice.org: Installed: 1:2.4.1-9 Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11 Version table: 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0 1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages 1:2.4.1-11 0 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages *** 1:2.4.1-9 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Of course experimental is "NotAutomatic: yes" archive ... Its default Pin-Priority value is 1 which is smaller than one for installed package 100 That's not the point. You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
Ron Johnson wrote: > But even after I just updated apt, I still get this: > > # apt-get update > [yadda yadda] > $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org > openoffice.org: >Installed: 1:2.4.1-9 >Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11 >Version table: > 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0 >1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages > 1:2.4.1-11 0 > 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages > *** 1:2.4.1-9 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status That's strange, I updated my openoffice.org packages a couple days ago to the 3.0.0 version (1:3.0.0-2), to be more precise. My sources.list entry: deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free -- Now that I have my "APPLE", I comprehend COST ACCOUNTING!! Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://move.to/hpkb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote: >> [snip] >>> Experimental1:3.0.0-3 >>> >>> It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now. >> >> Thanks! > > But even after I just updated apt, I still get this: > > # apt-get update > [yadda yadda] > $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org > openoffice.org: > Installed: 1:2.4.1-9 > Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11 > Version table: > 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0 > 1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages > 1:2.4.1-11 0 > 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages > *** 1:2.4.1-9 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Of course experimental is "NotAutomatic: yes" archive ... Its default Pin-Priority value is 1 which is smaller than one for installed package 100 http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/getwiki/html/ch03.en.html#archivelevelreleasefiles http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/getwiki/html/ch03.en.html#tweakingcandidateversion Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:21:18 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote: >> [snip] >>> Experimental1:3.0.0-3 >>> >>> It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now. >> >> Thanks! > > But even after I just updated apt, I still get this: > > # apt-get update > [yadda yadda] > $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org > openoffice.org: > Installed: 1:2.4.1-9 > Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11 > Version table: > 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0 > 1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages > 1:2.4.1-11 0 > 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages > *** 1:2.4.1-9 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Experimental gets a very low priority (1) by default so you have to ask for these versions explicitly, e.g.: apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOo 3.0 still not ready?? (was Re: Non-Debian Provided Packages)
On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote: [snip] Experimental1:3.0.0-3 It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now. Thanks! But even after I just updated apt, I still get this: # apt-get update [yadda yadda] $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org openoffice.org: Installed: 1:2.4.1-9 Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11 Version table: 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0 1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages 1:2.4.1-11 0 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages *** 1:2.4.1-9 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
