Re: Predictable network device names [was: Please help me identify package so I can report an important bug
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:59:49AM +0200, Kamil Jońca wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de writes: [...] > > and of course, if you are using a desktop environment and NetworkManager > > or systemd-networkd, it's probably better to go with the flow and let > > them do. > > About year ago none of them was able to handle my config. > (Some interfaces used by vms , and proper snat for them.) I've supported those only for pretty bog standard setups. Mainly end users who have to cope with longer stretches without local friendly hackers. I don't believe they are useful for special situations or knowledgeable users. Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Predictable network device names [was: Please help me identify package so I can report an important bug
to...@tuxteam.de writes: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:30:27AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [following up on myself, bad style, I know] > >> For my laptop, I very much prefer to say "sudo ifup eth0" than to >> say "sudo ifup en0ps&&@*#!☠" thankyouverymuch :) > > and of course, if you are using a desktop environment and NetworkManager > or systemd-networkd, it's probably better to go with the flow and let > them do. About year ago none of them was able to handle my config. (Some interfaces used by vms , and proper snat for them.) KJ -- http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
Predictable network device names [was: Please help me identify package so I can report an important bug
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:30:27AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [following up on myself, bad style, I know] > For my laptop, I very much prefer to say "sudo ifup eth0" than to > say "sudo ifup en0ps&&@*#!☠" thankyouverymuch :) and of course, if you are using a desktop environment and NetworkManager or systemd-networkd, it's probably better to go with the flow and let them do. Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature
