Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-22 Thread Zac Epkes
I dont know if this is it but ive plaed with DirectCD, it does NOT write to 
the cd normally, it creates a file with its own type of file system :-/ if u 
put in in a windows box u will see it will install the files needed to read 
from it...  I dont know if this is it but it could be... hope this helps

- overid3 =]

On Thursday 22 March 2001 15:53, Nate Amsden wrote:
> Alexander Poquet wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I have a rather large collection of MP3s that I burned onto CDs using my
> > step-brother's burner, which is on a Windows box.  I burned it on using
> > the DirectCD system.  Anyway, I compiled Joliet extension support into
> > my kernel and can mount the CDs fine; I get a directory listing, and
> > all seems to work okay.
> >
> > However, I was unable to play the MP3s off the CD -- I presumed this was
> > because I have an old computer whose CD read speed was simply too slow.
> > So I decided to copy the file onto my drive.  Upon doing so, cp hangs
> > for a long time as the CD sounds like it's 'trying' to read.  Eventually,
> > I get "cp: reading 'Foo - Bar.mp3': Input/output error" on stderr.
> >
> > However, the cp was partially successful: a portion of the file does
> > seem to transfer.  I know this isn't a problem with my drive because my
> > Debian CD, which I burned on the same CD burner (albeit without the
> > DirectCD stuff) reads quite correctly, even with large files (like
> > tetex-base). Of course, that's ISO9660 + rockridge instead of joliet
> > extensions.  I can get small text files and such off of the CD.  The
> > partially cp'd mp3 is not corrupted in any way, it's just not complete.
> >
> > I know it isn't the CD, because I can read them properly with my
> > roomate's Windows computer.
>
> it is the CD. or the drive take your pick. ive been burning cds for about 6
> years now and i CONSTNANTLY see that problem. no matter what the cdr brand
> (from plextor to sony to matshita etc), to cdr media brand(tried about a
> dozen different brands). and ive tried about 6 different cd-r drives
> and in at least 3 different operating systems on probably a dozen different
> computers. it happens accross all of them. some more some less. especially
> on large files. and of course ive tried about 8 different cd-r programs.
>
> CDROMs just dont play well with CDR media. some of the older drives do
> (~8X ide) some drives are better then others but on the dozens of cdroms
> ive used all of them have the problem to some extent. CDR/CDRW drives
> have the best chances of reading a CDR/CDRW CD media. now on small
> files like MP3s i don't see it happen as often, mostly on large
> 100MB+ files(almost gauranteed if its 200MB+ on any drive).
>
> after all the variables i have changed my conclusion is that cdr
> media just doesn't work in some cdroms. maybe its the lasers in
> the drives themselves..maybe its the vibration/rpms ..who knows.
>
> i've just come to accept it and not use CDR for certain kinds of
> backup, or make smaller files.
>
> nate



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-22 Thread Carel Fellinger
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 01:53:47PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
...
> it is the CD. or the drive take your pick. ive been burning cds for about 6
> years now and i CONSTNANTLY see that problem. no matter what the cdr brand
> (from plextor to sony to matshita etc), to cdr media brand(tried about a 
> dozen different brands). and ive tried about 6 different cd-r drives
> and in at least 3 different operating systems on probably a dozen different
> computers. it happens accross all of them. some more some less. especially
> on large files. and of course ive tried about 8 different cd-r programs.
> 
> CDROMs just dont play well with CDR media. some of the older drives do
> (~8X ide) some drives are better then others but on the dozens of cdroms
> ive used all of them have the problem to some extent. CDR/CDRW drives
> have the best chances of reading a CDR/CDRW CD media. now on small
> files like MP3s i don't see it happen as often, mostly on large
> 100MB+ files(almost gauranteed if its 200MB+ on any drive).
> 
> after all the variables i have changed my conclusion is that cdr
> media just doesn't work in some cdroms. maybe its the lasers in
> the drives themselves..maybe its the vibration/rpms ..who knows.

Just to make sure you're talking of *CD-Recordables* here and not
 _CD-Rewritables_?  I myself I've never seen or heard of such problems
with CD-Recordables.  On the other hand I've experienced and heard
often of all the above problems in relation with _CD-Rewritables_ .

-- 
groetjes, carel



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-22 Thread Nate Amsden
Alexander Poquet wrote:
> 
> Hi folks.
> 
> I have a rather large collection of MP3s that I burned onto CDs using my
> step-brother's burner, which is on a Windows box.  I burned it on using
> the DirectCD system.  Anyway, I compiled Joliet extension support into
> my kernel and can mount the CDs fine; I get a directory listing, and
> all seems to work okay.
> 
> However, I was unable to play the MP3s off the CD -- I presumed this was
> because I have an old computer whose CD read speed was simply too slow.
> So I decided to copy the file onto my drive.  Upon doing so, cp hangs
> for a long time as the CD sounds like it's 'trying' to read.  Eventually,
> I get "cp: reading 'Foo - Bar.mp3': Input/output error" on stderr.
> 
> However, the cp was partially successful: a portion of the file does
> seem to transfer.  I know this isn't a problem with my drive because my
> Debian CD, which I burned on the same CD burner (albeit without the DirectCD
> stuff) reads quite correctly, even with large files (like tetex-base).
> Of course, that's ISO9660 + rockridge instead of joliet extensions.  I
> can get small text files and such off of the CD.  The partially cp'd mp3
> is not corrupted in any way, it's just not complete.
> 
> I know it isn't the CD, because I can read them properly with my roomate's
> Windows computer.

it is the CD. or the drive take your pick. ive been burning cds for about 6
years now and i CONSTNANTLY see that problem. no matter what the cdr brand
(from plextor to sony to matshita etc), to cdr media brand(tried about a 
dozen different brands). and ive tried about 6 different cd-r drives
and in at least 3 different operating systems on probably a dozen different
computers. it happens accross all of them. some more some less. especially
on large files. and of course ive tried about 8 different cd-r programs.

CDROMs just dont play well with CDR media. some of the older drives do
(~8X ide) some drives are better then others but on the dozens of cdroms
ive used all of them have the problem to some extent. CDR/CDRW drives
have the best chances of reading a CDR/CDRW CD media. now on small
files like MP3s i don't see it happen as often, mostly on large
100MB+ files(almost gauranteed if its 200MB+ on any drive).

after all the variables i have changed my conclusion is that cdr
media just doesn't work in some cdroms. maybe its the lasers in
the drives themselves..maybe its the vibration/rpms ..who knows.

i've just come to accept it and not use CDR for certain kinds of
backup, or make smaller files.

nate


-- 
:::
ICQ: 75132336
http://www.aphroland.org/
http://www.linuxpowered.net/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-22 Thread Hall Stevenson
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:53:38PM -0800, Alexander Poquet wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I have a rather large collection of MP3s that I burned onto CDs
using my
> > step-brother's burner, which is on a Windows box.  I burned it on
using
> > the DirectCD system.  Anyway, I compiled Joliet extension support
into
> > my kernel and can mount the CDs fine; I get a directory listing, and
> > all seems to work okay.
>
> NOTE: Unless directed to "Make CD readable by most other CD-ROMs" or
> some such, DirectCD writes using "CDFS" and doesn't write some other
> necessary info for ISO9660/Joliet conformance.  If I understand
> correctly, this "CDFS" is UFS??  This may not be the problem, since I
> wonder how Linux could mount the CD without the newer filesystem
support
> (maybe it looks close enough to iso9660 to fool the kernel?).  It's
> worth investigating though...  I know for a fact, if you don't do this
> with DirectCD, older Windows machines will not be able to read these
> CD's (not to mention Mac's).

It's actually "UDF", not "UFS". There is experimental support in the
kernel for reading drives like this. There's also a site on
sourceforge.net, who's name escapes me at the moment, with more
information on this.

You are correct about telling DirectCD to make the CD readable by other
drives... if you don't do that, many non-Windows users will have trouble
with the disc. I have Easy CD Creator and it installed DirectCD, but I
quickly removed it.

Regards
Hall



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-22 Thread Alson van der Meulen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 08:13:22PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:53:38PM -0800, Alexander Poquet wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> > 
> > I have a rather large collection of MP3s that I burned onto CDs using my
> > step-brother's burner, which is on a Windows box.  I burned it on using
> > the DirectCD system.  Anyway, I compiled Joliet extension support into
> > my kernel and can mount the CDs fine; I get a directory listing, and
> > all seems to work okay.
> 
> NOTE: Unless directed to "Make CD readable by most other CD-ROMs" or
> some such, DirectCD writes using "CDFS" and doesn't write some other
> necessary info for ISO9660/Joliet conformance.  If I understand
> correctly, this "CDFS" is UFS??  This may not be the problem, since I
> wonder how Linux could mount the CD without the newer filesystem support
> (maybe it looks close enough to iso9660 to fool the kernel?).  It's
> worth investigating though...  I know for a fact, if you don't do this
> with DirectCD, older Windows machines will not be able to read these
> CD's (not to mention Mac's).
CDFS = UDF afaik, the 2.4 kernel has read-only support for UDF, so i
don't think it's very close to iso9660.

i suggest burning the CD with some other windows burning program, like
easy cd creater, nero or winoncd

-- 
,---.
> Name:   Alson van der Meulen  <
> Personal:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   <
> School:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]<
`---'
Well, my files were backed up.
-



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-21 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:53:38PM -0800, Alexander Poquet wrote:
> Hi folks.
> 
> I have a rather large collection of MP3s that I burned onto CDs using my
> step-brother's burner, which is on a Windows box.  I burned it on using
> the DirectCD system.  Anyway, I compiled Joliet extension support into
> my kernel and can mount the CDs fine; I get a directory listing, and
> all seems to work okay.

NOTE: Unless directed to "Make CD readable by most other CD-ROMs" or
some such, DirectCD writes using "CDFS" and doesn't write some other
necessary info for ISO9660/Joliet conformance.  If I understand
correctly, this "CDFS" is UFS??  This may not be the problem, since I
wonder how Linux could mount the CD without the newer filesystem support
(maybe it looks close enough to iso9660 to fool the kernel?).  It's
worth investigating though...  I know for a fact, if you don't do this
with DirectCD, older Windows machines will not be able to read these
CD's (not to mention Mac's).

-- 
Eric G. Miller 



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-21 Thread Matthew Dalton
Alexander Poquet wrote:
> > How slow?
> 
> I'm actually not sure, because I didn't buy the computer.  Is there
> some way to tell how fast Debian thinks it is?

I don't know...


> Well, as it happens, the CDR that works (the Debian one) and the CDRs
> that don't (the MP3 M$ formatted ones) are the same dye type -- in fact,
> they are from the same box.

Bugger. There goes that theory.


> Also, the fact that I can get varying amounts of data off the CD seems
> to further discredit this theory.

Not really. I used to get the same behaviour with my old 2x.



Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-21 Thread Alexander Poquet
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:20:15PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> How slow?

I'm actually not sure, because I didn't buy the computer.  Is there
some way to tell how fast Debian thinks it is?  But 2x, maybe 4x at
most would be my guess.

> I used to have problems reading some (not all) CD-Rs with my old 2x
> cdrom. The problem was just that the drive was not designed to read
> those CDs -- it was just too old. I suspect that the varying amounts of
> success I had (ie some CDRs worked, others didn't) was due to the dye
> types used in the different CDRs. I never worked out which dyes were
> better than others. Now I have a cdrom that reads everything (including
> CDRWs) so there's no problem.

Well, as it happens, the CDR that works (the Debian one) and the CDRs
that don't (the MP3 M$ formatted ones) are the same dye type -- in fact,
they are from the same box.  

Also, the fact that I can get varying amounts of data off the CD seems
to further discredit this theory.  Why should I be able to read some of
it, and not other parts?

Of course, I know next to nothing about CDs, CDRs, and the like...

-- 
Alexander Poquet| We leave the obvious generalizations to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| reader.  -- Israel Herstein
Use of PGP preferable in reply  |   Use Linux!


pgpTWRGwXrVN8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-21 Thread Matthew Dalton
Alexander Poquet wrote:
> However, I was unable to play the MP3s off the CD -- I presumed this was
> because I have an old computer whose CD read speed was simply too slow.

How slow?

I used to have problems reading some (not all) CD-Rs with my old 2x
cdrom. The problem was just that the drive was not designed to read
those CDs -- it was just too old. I suspect that the varying amounts of
success I had (ie some CDRs worked, others didn't) was due to the dye
types used in the different CDRs. I never worked out which dyes were
better than others. Now I have a cdrom that reads everything (including
CDRWs) so there's no problem.



Problem reading Windows CDR

2001-03-21 Thread Alexander Poquet
Hi folks.

I have a rather large collection of MP3s that I burned onto CDs using my
step-brother's burner, which is on a Windows box.  I burned it on using
the DirectCD system.  Anyway, I compiled Joliet extension support into
my kernel and can mount the CDs fine; I get a directory listing, and
all seems to work okay.

However, I was unable to play the MP3s off the CD -- I presumed this was
because I have an old computer whose CD read speed was simply too slow.
So I decided to copy the file onto my drive.  Upon doing so, cp hangs
for a long time as the CD sounds like it's 'trying' to read.  Eventually,
I get "cp: reading 'Foo - Bar.mp3': Input/output error" on stderr.

However, the cp was partially successful: a portion of the file does
seem to transfer.  I know this isn't a problem with my drive because my
Debian CD, which I burned on the same CD burner (albeit without the DirectCD
stuff) reads quite correctly, even with large files (like tetex-base).  
Of course, that's ISO9660 + rockridge instead of joliet extensions.  I
can get small text files and such off of the CD.  The partially cp'd mp3
is not corrupted in any way, it's just not complete.

I know it isn't the CD, because I can read them properly with my roomate's
Windows computer.  

So basically, I'm at a loss.  Has anyone had similar problems?  I have
an ATAPI compat cd-rom drive, am running linux 2.4.2, Debian/testing.
This problem occured also when my box was stable with a 2.2.17 kernel.

This is a CDR, not a CDRW, btw.
Thanks for any help you can give.  I'm at a loss w/o my music!

-- 
Alexander Poquet| We leave the obvious generalizations to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| reader.  -- Israel Herstein
Use of PGP preferable in reply  |   Use Linux!


pgpaRTkw0wrqS.pgp
Description: PGP signature