Re: Problem with netgear card
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 03:19:07PM -, Brian Schramm wrote: > gcc -DMODULE -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c natsemi.c > from the bottom of the natsemi.c file. My file placement is standard for the > kernel. I have a link to the 2.2.19 source directory by the name of linux. I > have the drivers stored in the /usr/src/module directory. Try adding -I/usr/src/linux/include to the command line. Something like this should do it: gcc -DMODULE -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -I/usr/src/linux/include \ -O6 -c natsemi.c Keep that all on one line. If modversion.s is there then this will tell the compiler where to get it. noah -- ___ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html pgpG44LR60IUq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with netgear card
gcc -DMODULE -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c natsemi.c from the bottom of the natsemi.c file. My file placement is standard for the kernel. I have a link to the 2.2.19 source directory by the name of linux. I have the drivers stored in the /usr/src/module directory. I hope this helps. Brian "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:28:45AM -, Brian Schramm wrote: > > I never ran mrproper. The last time I did that I had trouble bringing > > everything back to a good compile so I don't do that any more. Admittedly, > > that was a long time ago and many kernels back. > > > > I have looked in the directory that you said and I have a modversions.h file. > > So, I do not know what I can do about this problem. > > In that case you must just be telling the compiler to look in the wrong > place for kernel include files. Post the command line you're using to > compile the natsemi.c driver. > > noah > > -- > ___ > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ > | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html > > -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with netgear card
OK. So after you install the kernel source package, then it should include the .config used to make the kernel image, and as was mentioned below, it should also contain the modversions.h that was created by "make menuconfig". If you install the kernel package, then you should be able to compile the netdrivers. (Sorry about asking these questions, but I am not able to get a Debian running yet. I haven't learned enough about disk partioning, file system assignment, and the boot process to make the correct choices to allow my disk based boot to get beyond "LI". It's cool how each letter in LILO means something during its run. But I digress.) Mike --- Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kernel source is not part of the defalt load for > Debian. You have to choose > that package after you have the system installed. > > Brian > > Michael Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Here's a newbie question about the instructions > below: > > > > If I load Potato from scratch, will there be a > kernel > > source directory that has a modversions.h file in > it? > > > > Mike > > > > > > --- "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:24:17PM -0400, Brian > > > Schramm wrote: > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > > > > > > The kernel needs to be configured (i.e. make > config > > > || make menuconfig > > > || make xconfig must have been run). The > > > modversions.h file you > > > mentioned (in a long list of other garbage, all > of > > > which I chopped > > > out) is automatically generated by the > configuration > > > process. You need > > > to configure the kernel precisely the way it was > > > configured when you > > > built it. It's generally a good idea to keep a > copy > > > of the .config > > > around to make your life easier in cases like > this. > > > > > > noah > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ > > > | PGP Public Key: > > > http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html > > > > > > > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature > > > > > > > > = > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great > prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > -- > Brian Schramm > http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM > schrammbrian > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Problem with netgear card
Kernel source is not part of the defalt load for Debian. You have to choose that package after you have the system installed. Brian Michael Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Here's a newbie question about the instructions below: > > If I load Potato from scratch, will there be a kernel > source directory that has a modversions.h file in it? > > Mike > > > --- "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:24:17PM -0400, Brian > > Schramm wrote: > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > > > The kernel needs to be configured (i.e. make config > > || make menuconfig > > || make xconfig must have been run). The > > modversions.h file you > > mentioned (in a long list of other garbage, all of > > which I chopped > > out) is automatically generated by the configuration > > process. You need > > to configure the kernel precisely the way it was > > configured when you > > built it. It's generally a good idea to keep a copy > > of the .config > > around to make your life easier in cases like this. > > > > noah > > > > -- > > > > > ___ > > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ > > | PGP Public Key: > > http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html > > > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature > > > > = > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with netgear card
I never ran mrproper. The last time I did that I had trouble bringing everything back to a good compile so I don't do that any more. Admittedly, that was a long time ago and many kernels back. I have looked in the directory that you said and I have a modversions.h file. So, I do not know what I can do about this problem. Brian "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:40:39PM -, Brian Schramm wrote: > > Ok I am lost. I installed this system that I am running with potato and > > 2.2.17. I then downloaded the kernel source for 2.2.19 and compiled it the > > way I need it for my current system. So, what is this about keeping the > > .config file and configuring it the same way that the kernel was configured? > > Maybe I am lost but I am not sure what that has to do with me compiling the > > extra drivers for the netgear card. Do you mean that I need to compile again > > to generate this file? > > OK, lets start by assuming you have the kernel source in /usr/src/linux/ > When you ran 'make config' (or menuconfig or xconfig, whatever) you > generated a file /usr/src/linux/.config and > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h modversions.h is the key > file. When you ran 'make mrproper' you deleted both these files (and > whatever else was created by make config). > > So in order to create /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h, you > need to re-run make config. You don't need to re-compile the kernel at > all. > > What I recommend doing is saving a copy of /usr/src/linux/.config, so if > you ever do need to re-generate things like modversions.h in an > idendical configuration as before, you can just put the file in place > (/usr/src/linux/.config) and run 'make oldconfig'. > > noah > > -- > ___ > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ > | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html > > -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with netgear card
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:40:39PM -, Brian Schramm wrote: > Ok I am lost. I installed this system that I am running with potato and > 2.2.17. I then downloaded the kernel source for 2.2.19 and compiled it the > way I need it for my current system. So, what is this about keeping the > .config file and configuring it the same way that the kernel was configured? > Maybe I am lost but I am not sure what that has to do with me compiling the > extra drivers for the netgear card. Do you mean that I need to compile again > to generate this file? OK, lets start by assuming you have the kernel source in /usr/src/linux/ When you ran 'make config' (or menuconfig or xconfig, whatever) you generated a file /usr/src/linux/.config and /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h modversions.h is the key file. When you ran 'make mrproper' you deleted both these files (and whatever else was created by make config). So in order to create /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h, you need to re-run make config. You don't need to re-compile the kernel at all. What I recommend doing is saving a copy of /usr/src/linux/.config, so if you ever do need to re-generate things like modversions.h in an idendical configuration as before, you can just put the file in place (/usr/src/linux/.config) and run 'make oldconfig'. noah -- ___ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html pgpMj7ZMxgpA9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with netgear card
Ok I am lost. I installed this system that I am running with potato and 2.2.17. I then downloaded the kernel source for 2.2.19 and compiled it the way I need it for my current system. So, what is this about keeping the .config file and configuring it the same way that the kernel was configured? Maybe I am lost but I am not sure what that has to do with me compiling the extra drivers for the netgear card. Do you mean that I need to compile again to generate this file? Thanks for the help. Brian "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:24:17PM -0400, Brian Schramm wrote: > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > The kernel needs to be configured (i.e. make config || make menuconfig > || make xconfig must have been run). The modversions.h file you > mentioned (in a long list of other garbage, all of which I chopped > out) is automatically generated by the configuration process. You need > to configure the kernel precisely the way it was configured when you > built it. It's generally a good idea to keep a copy of the .config > around to make your life easier in cases like this. > > noah > > -- > ___ > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ > | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html > > -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with netgear card
Here's a newbie question about the instructions below: If I load Potato from scratch, will there be a kernel source directory that has a modversions.h file in it? Mike --- "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:24:17PM -0400, Brian > Schramm wrote: > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > The kernel needs to be configured (i.e. make config > || make menuconfig > || make xconfig must have been run). The > modversions.h file you > mentioned (in a long list of other garbage, all of > which I chopped > out) is automatically generated by the configuration > process. You need > to configure the kernel precisely the way it was > configured when you > built it. It's generally a good idea to keep a copy > of the .config > around to make your life easier in cases like this. > > noah > > -- > > ___ > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ > | PGP Public Key: > http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Problem with netgear card
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:24:17PM -0400, Brian Schramm wrote: > > Any other ideas? > The kernel needs to be configured (i.e. make config || make menuconfig || make xconfig must have been run). The modversions.h file you mentioned (in a long list of other garbage, all of which I chopped out) is automatically generated by the configuration process. You need to configure the kernel precisely the way it was configured when you built it. It's generally a good idea to keep a copy of the .config around to make your life easier in cases like this. noah -- ___ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html pgpNBC5SwDbzI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with netgear card
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:24:17PM -0400, Brian Schramm wrote: | OK, I am ccing the list on this. I do have the source installed. I | installed the deb package for 2.2.19 and compiled the kernel for the | machine that it is running on. I want to use that kernel also since that | is the one that I am using for the new system too. | | So, I do not believe that the system is missing anything or else I would | not be able to compile the kernel. | | Any other ideas? Did you compile the driver monolithically into the kernel? If not, then you should check your /etc/modules.conf file to see if you have associated the driver module with the ethernet device. Also, are you sure you have the correct driver? This list has mentioned the tulip, natsemi and ne drivers being associated with Netgear cards similar to yours. The stock kernel should work just fine if you configure the proper module to load. -D
Re: Problem with netgear card
OK, I am ccing the list on this. I do have the source installed. I installed the deb package for 2.2.19 and compiled the kernel for the machine that it is running on. I want to use that kernel also since that is the one that I am using for the new system too. So, I do not believe that the system is missing anything or else I would not be able to compile the kernel. Any other ideas? Brian Schramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian www.linuxexpert.org On Fri, 18 May 2001, Michael Mueller wrote: > Brian, > > Hmm. Too bad I didn't copy the group. SOemone else > may have a better answer than I am able to give. > > Judging from the output you show below, my guess is > that your machine is missing the kernel sources and > header files. (Yep, that's what it is. modversions.h > should exist in your /usr/src/linux/include/linux > directory. If you do not have this directory > structure, then you ust create it.) > > In a nutshell, here's what might get you compiling: > > get the kernel source for your kernel from > ftp.us.kernel.org. You want the version for your new > machine - not your working machine - in case they are > different (use "uname -a). Read up on how to compile > a kernel for more detail on installing the tarball on > your working machine (L. Doc. Proj.). You don't > actually need to compile the kernel. All you need to > do is unpack it in the right place with the right > procedure. Once you've got the kernel source > installed, then you can resume building your net > drivers. > > Feel free to continue this discussion on a private > thread. Put "MIKE!" in the subject line to get my > attention when I scan my email reader. > > Good luck. > Mike > > --- Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I cannot even get it to compile. The page tells me > > what to do but it does not > > work. Here is the error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/modules# gcc -DMODULE -Wall > > -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c > > natsemi.c > > natsemi.c:103: linux/modversions.h: No such file or > > directory > > In file included from natsemi.c:125: > > kern_compat.h:42: linux/modversions.h: No such file > > or directory > > > > Can you help? > > > > Brian > > > > > > Michael Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > OK , I had that problem too: new system and no > > > driver. > > > > > > Luckily you have another working system attached > > to > > > the Internet. > > > > > > 1. load new machine > > > 2. get netdrivers.tgx from scyld and build > > natsemi.o > > > (maybe pci-scan.o too) > > > 3. put driver .o files on floppy and mount on new > > > machine > > > 4. load .o files to /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/net > > > 5. configure > > > 6. reload > > > 7. enjoy > > > > > > Mike > > > --- Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > OK, If I use my good Debian system to build this > > > > custom kernal, is there a way > > > > to get this to the box that only has the kernel > > on > > > > it? I am at the reboot of > > > > the install on this one and it is running 2.2.19 > > > > like my other machine. > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > Tomaas Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > > > > > dont use the tulip driver as its only in use > > for > > > > the netgear fa310 > > > > > what you need to use is the src for the > > natsemi > > > > driver > > > > > its at > > > > > http://www.scyld.com/network/ethercard.html > > > > > > > > > > Tomaas Ortega > > > > > "Hey, does anybody else hear that giant > > sucking > > > > sound? That's my will to > > > > > live" > > > > > www.dematerialised.com - coming soon > > > > > www.dematerialised.com/zeitgeist/ > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > From: "Brian Schramm" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: > > > > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:48 PM > > > > > Subject: Problem with netgear card > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a new machine here with a netgear > > fa311 > > > > network card in it. I want > > > >
Re: Problem with netgear card
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:04:13PM +, John Griffiths wrote: > > I've always just loaded the tulip module on install with those cards and sat > back to enjoy the ride > Err, no, the netgear FA-311 and 312 are not tulip cards. The 310 is. The 311 and 312 are based on the national semiconductor (nominal semidestructor) DB83815 chip. Completely different, not compatible, not tulip based. You actually can build your driver and not recompile the whole kernel. You need to get the kernel sources that correspond with the kernel-image you're running. Get the source from the web page that other have mentioned and follow the instructions for building it, taking care to ensure that it gets its kernel includes from the directory containing the Linux source for the kernel that you're running. Then copy it to the right location in /lib/modules/, run depmod -a, then 'modprobe natsemi' HTH, noah -- ___ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html pgpYvJlxj0eIJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with netgear card
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 02:48:30AM +, Brian Schramm wrote: | I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 network card in it. I want to | install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find are for Redhat. Has | anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? I have two netgear cards, and I think they are the fa311 (I could be wrong though). Mine are ISA cards, one in a Debian box and one in a DOS/Win95 box. To get the Debian one working I first put it in a DOS box, booted with their driver disk and ran the setup utility. I did this to turn off PnP. Then I put it in the Debian box and added the following to /etc/modules.conf (actually to a different file under /etc/modutils and ran update-modules) : alias eth0 ne io=0x300 ( I am not at the box right now, and it might have been alias eth0 ne2000 io=0x300 ) Everything has worked fine for me. As others have suggested go to Donald Becker's site (at scyld.com) and see what he says there. He is a smart guy who wrote all (or nearly all) the ethernet drivers for linux. HTH, -D
Re: Problem with netgear card
On Fri, 18 May 2001 23:04:13 John Griffiths wrote: > At 03:00 AM 5/18/01 -, Brian Schramm wrote: > >Tryed, also I did not try any command paramiters. > > > >Brian > > > > We'll have to hope the big brains have an idea > > I've always just loaded the tulip module on install with those cards and sat back to enjoy the ride > > WARNING - > This email is confidential and may contain copyright material. > If you are not the intended recipient of Capital Monitor's original e-mail, > please notify me by return e-mail, delete your copy of the message, and > accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused. > Republication or re-dissemination, including posting to news groups or web > pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Capital > Monitor Pty Ltd. > > > > John GriffithsTel 02 6273 4899 > Capital Monitor Pty Ltd Fax 02 6273 4905 > Press Gallery Mobile: 0412 690 643 > Parliament House e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Canberra ACT 2600 http://www.capmon.com > Australia ICQ No: 7933859 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > there is a new module called ng_tulip, which has been made for the fa311 card that you mentioned...the tulip one doesnt work properly in later kernels...try the ng_tulip one :)
Re: Problem with netgear card
OK, If I use my good Debian system to build this custom kernal, is there a way to get this to the box that only has the kernel on it? I am at the reboot of the install on this one and it is running 2.2.19 like my other machine. Brian Tomaas Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > dont use the tulip driver as its only in use for the netgear fa310 > what you need to use is the src for the natsemi driver > its at > http://www.scyld.com/network/ethercard.html > > Tomaas Ortega > "Hey, does anybody else hear that giant sucking sound? That's my will to > live" > www.dematerialised.com - coming soon > www.dematerialised.com/zeitgeist/ > - Original Message - > From: "Brian Schramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:48 PM > Subject: Problem with netgear card > > > > I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 network card in it. I want > to > > install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find are for Redhat. Has > > anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? > > > > Thanks > > > > Brian > > > > -- > > Brian Schramm > > http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with netgear card
Addendum to earlier reply... I made the same mistake - confusing the 311 and 310. I am not sure if the natsemi driver needs the pci-scan.o driver. THe website site below will tell all. Sorry about that. Mike --- Tomaas Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dont use the tulip driver as its only in use for the > netgear fa310 > what you need to use is the src for the natsemi > driver > its at > http://www.scyld.com/network/ethercard.html > > Tomaas Ortega > "Hey, does anybody else hear that giant sucking > sound? That's my will to > live" > www.dematerialised.com - coming soon > www.dematerialised.com/zeitgeist/ > - Original Message - > From: "Brian Schramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:48 PM > Subject: Problem with netgear card > > > > I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 > network card in it. I want > to > > install Debian on it but the only drivers I can > find are for Redhat. Has > > anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? > > > > Thanks > > > > Brian > > > > -- > > Brian Schramm > > http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM > schrammbrian > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Problem with netgear card
I recently spent lots of time on the LRP mailing list. THis topic was handled frequently. Perhaps this is not a Debian issue. Check out www.scyld.com for lots of in-depth info on drivers. My guess is that you need the new pci-scan.o and the new tulip.o driver. http://www.scyld.com/network/ http://www.scyld.com/network/tulip.html I use a Linksys LNE100TX v4.1 in one of my machines. It uses the tulip.o driver. But it needs the pci-scan.o module too. (See scyld site for explanation.) method for installing: // get netdrivers.tgz from scyld // unzip/tar into a clean directory // make sure /usr/src/linux is ready for compiling // with the machine having the fa311 installed make pci-scan.o make tulip.o cp *.o /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/net // next lines can be in a script that is run during // system initialization /sbin/insmod /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/net/pci-scan.o /sbin/insmod /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/net/tulip.o /sbin/depmod -a // config your driver I have many dents in my skull from this topic. Hope you get through with less pain. Mike --- Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 > network card in it. I want to > install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find > are for Redhat. Has > anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? > > Thanks > > Brian > > -- > Brian Schramm > http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM > schrammbrian > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Problem with netgear card
dont use the tulip driver as its only in use for the netgear fa310 what you need to use is the src for the natsemi driver its at http://www.scyld.com/network/ethercard.html Tomaas Ortega "Hey, does anybody else hear that giant sucking sound? That's my will to live" www.dematerialised.com - coming soon www.dematerialised.com/zeitgeist/ - Original Message - From: "Brian Schramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:48 PM Subject: Problem with netgear card > I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 network card in it. I want to > install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find are for Redhat. Has > anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? > > Thanks > > Brian > > -- > Brian Schramm > http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Problem with netgear card
At 03:00 AM 5/18/01 -, Brian Schramm wrote: >Tryed, also I did not try any command paramiters. > >Brian > We'll have to hope the big brains have an idea I've always just loaded the tulip module on install with those cards and sat back to enjoy the ride WARNING - This email is confidential and may contain copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient of Capital Monitor's original e-mail, please notify me by return e-mail, delete your copy of the message, and accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused. Republication or re-dissemination, including posting to news groups or web pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Capital Monitor Pty Ltd. John Griffiths Tel 02 6273 4899 Capital Monitor Pty Ltd Fax 02 6273 4905 Press Gallery Mobile: 0412 690 643 Parliament Housee-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Canberra ACT 2600 http://www.capmon.com Australia ICQ No: 7933859
Re: Problem with netgear card
Tryed, also I did not try any command paramiters. Brian John Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > At 02:48 AM 5/18/01 -, Brian Schramm wrote: > >I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 network card in it. I want to > >install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find are for Redhat. Has > >anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? > > Use the tulip module > -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with netgear card
At 02:48 AM 5/18/01 -, Brian Schramm wrote: >I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 network card in it. I want to >install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find are for Redhat. Has >anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? Use the tulip module
Problem with netgear card
I have a new machine here with a netgear fa311 network card in it. I want to install Debian on it but the only drivers I can find are for Redhat. Has anyone gotten this card to work with Debian? Thanks Brian -- Brian Schramm http://www.linuxexpert.orgICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
