Re: Problems with PPP on boot

2006-06-27 Thread Tomaz Solc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

 In your case, is Bind being started by an init script in 
 /etc/init.d/?  If so, perhaps you could add a new init script that 
 brings up the PPPoE connection.  Then, using update-rc.d, add the 
 symbolic links to your script with a number that causes your PPPoE 
 init script to be run before the Bind init script and any others 
 that require the PPPoE link.

I haven't modified any of the relevant init scripts.

As far as I know the ppp daemon is started from /etc/rcS.d/S40networking
(it contains command 'ifup -a' which should bring up all network
interfaces, including ppp0)

Other daemons (bind, ntp, ...) are started from scripts that are linked
to /etc/rc2.d (S19bind, S23ntp-server, etc.).

The manuals you pointed me to say that /etc/rcS.d scripts are ran before
any of the /etc/rc2.d scripts.

I think the problem is that S40networking runs 'ifup -a' which in turn
runs pppd. pppd forks and returns immediately, which means that other
boot scripts are started while the ppp is making connection in the
background.

Best regards
Tomaz Solc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEoPsfsAlAlRhL9q8RAr2nAJwIQeaZa+qOVYrpUbwVuIg6NhjRrwCcDKr0
HjdK+n1LlYC4nKiTFLizhKE=
=9Zj5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problems with PPP on boot

2006-06-26 Thread Tomaz Solc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi everyone

I have a server running Sarge that is connected to the internet through
PPPoE (I have a DSL line). I'm running several services, including DNS
(bind 8.4.6-1) and ntpd.

When machine boots, it seems that sometimes daemons will start before
pppd manages to establish a connection. For some services like Apache
this presents no problem. But Bind and NTP will not listen for
connections coming from the internet, because the ppp0 network device
didn't exist when they were starting. This is quite a problem, because
the machine is crippled after a reboot until I manually restart Bind and
NTP.

I have my PPP connection configured in /etc/network/interfaces like this:

auto ppp0
iface ppp0 inet ppp
pre-up ifconfig eth1 up
post-up waitfor ppp0 30
post-down ifconfig eth1 down
provider dsl-provider-2.4

waitfor is a script that waits for ppp0 device to become available.
This was one of my failed attempts to try to halt the boot process until
the internet connection is established.

I've also tried to add scripts to /etc/ppp/ip-up.d that would restart
Bind automatically after successful connection, but this only partially
worked (my explanation is that sometimes bind haven't finished starting
when the script in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d tries to restart it)

Has anyone else had a problem like this? How can I force the boot
process to stop until ppp0 becomes available? I'm also interested in why
 my post-up script in /etc/network/interfaces isn't working. It seems
to be working correctly when I bring the ppp0 interface up manually with
ifup ppp0. Are these scripts started asynchronously on boot?

Thanks in advance
Tomaz Solc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFEoA29sAlAlRhL9q8RAt7aAJdgEu6Yw3jnlLCqvUwqXqZVqbH7AKCRddvo
xn54xVX3JWQoLPPNEuSndQ==
=2nRM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with PPP on boot

2006-06-26 Thread Dave Kuhlman
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:39:25PM +0200, Tomaz Solc wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Hi everyone
 
 I have a server running Sarge that is connected to the internet through
 PPPoE (I have a DSL line). I'm running several services, including DNS
 (bind 8.4.6-1) and ntpd.
 
 When machine boots, it seems that sometimes daemons will start before
 pppd manages to establish a connection. For some services like Apache
 this presents no problem. But Bind and NTP will not listen for
 connections coming from the internet, because the ppp0 network device
 didn't exist when they were starting. This is quite a problem, because
 the machine is crippled after a reboot until I manually restart Bind and
 NTP.
 
 I have my PPP connection configured in /etc/network/interfaces like this:
 
 auto ppp0
 iface ppp0 inet ppp
 pre-up ifconfig eth1 up
 post-up waitfor ppp0 30
 post-down ifconfig eth1 down
 provider dsl-provider-2.4
 
 waitfor is a script that waits for ppp0 device to become available.
 This was one of my failed attempts to try to halt the boot process until
 the internet connection is established.
 

My understanding is that the init scripts (in /etc/init.d/) are
run in sequence and that the two-digit number in the names of
the symbolic links in /etc/rc1.d/, /etc/rc2.d/, etc determines the
order in which the scripts in /etc/init.d/ are run.  For example,
S13gdm would be started before S14ppp.

Take a look at these:

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html#s-boot
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys#s-sysvinit
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys#s-/etc/init.d

And, by the way, using Debian tools such as update-rc.d will help
you manage those symbolic links.

I use RoaringPenguin PPPoE, so I have my own init script (one I
wrote; OK, I copied another script in /etc/init./ and made minor
modifications), which brings up the PPPoE link and starts my
firewall script.

In your case, is Bind being started by an init script in
/etc/init.d/?  If so, perhaps you could add a new init script that
brings up the PPPoE connection.  Then, using update-rc.d, add the
symbolic links to your script with a number that causes your PPPoE
init script to be run before the Bind init script and any others
that require the PPPoE link.

Did I understand your problem correctly?

Dave

[snip]

-- 
Dave Kuhlman
http://www.rexx.com/~dkuhlman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problems with PPP under Linux 2.4.19

2002-10-09 Thread Juston Girogm
Hi fellow debian users.
I recently compiled Linux 2.4.19 on my linux workstation. But when I try to connect to my ISP i encounter problems. It dials up as it should but just when it *should* exchangelogin information, passwords and such it just zaps. It works perfectly in linux 2.2.19. If anyone know what to do, please answer.
I dont have any logs from my system available at the time I'm writing this message. I'm sorry but hopefully someone might know something that might help me.

Thanks.Gratis e-mail resten av livet på: www.yahoo.se/mail
Busenkelt!

Re: Problems with PPP under Linux 2.4.19

2002-10-09 Thread John Hasler

Juston Girogm writes:
 I recently compiled Linux 2.4.19 on my linux workstation.

Did you also upgrade ppp?
-- 
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Problems with PPP under Linux 2.4.19

2002-10-09 Thread ajlewis2

In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
 --0-1690367834-1034174371=:44987
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 
 
 Hi fellow debian users.
 
 I recently compiled Linux 2.4.19 on my linux workstation. But when I try to connect 
to my ISP i encounter problems. It dials up as it should but just when it *should* 
exchange login information, passwords and such it just zaps. It works perfectly in 
linux 2.2.19. If anyone know what to do, please answer.
 
 I dont have any logs from my system available at the time I'm writing this message. 
I'm sorry but hopefully someone might know something that might help me.
 
  
 
 Thanks.

A common problem is to forget to include PPP in the new kernel.  It is not
in by default.

-- 
Anita
GnuPG key: 1024D/9EDAC910


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: changed to 2.4.16 - problems with PPP and USB

2002-02-12 Thread Jeff
Dan Kortschak, 2002-Feb-11 12:55 +1030:
 PPP:
 I have no idea what to do here - is there something that 2.4.x does
 differently with the serial connection for PPP?

If you compiled the kernel yourself,

CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC=y/m

This setting may be listed in Character Devices, I'm not sure.

jc

-- 
Jeff CoppockSystems Engineer
Diggin' Debian  Admin and User



changed to 2.4.16 - problems with PPP and USB

2002-02-10 Thread Dan Kortschak
Hi All, I've just shifted my potato install to 2.4.16 and am having
problems getting PPP or USB storage to work. The modules loaded are the
same (as far as it goes) as I have with 2.2.19. I've looked around as much
as I can to find what might be causing the problem, to no avail. The
relevant details (I hope) are below (roughly split according to either PPP
or USB problem).

PPP:
I have no idea what to do here - is there something that 2.4.x does
differently with the serial connection for PPP?

USB:
The appropriate USB modules are loaded and the /proc/bus/usb has the right
details for drivers and devices, but it still doesn't seem to recognise
/dev/sda4 as a block device (according to the documentation I've looked at
and the fuzzy memories I have when I used to run the 2.3 USB backport this
should work).


thanks for any help
Dan Kortschak

# lsmod
Module  Size  Used byTainted: P 
ppp_deflate44840   0 (unused)
ppp_generic24328   0 [ppp_deflate]
slhc4992   0 [ppp_generic]
ipx21772   0
appletalk  25268   0
usb-storage47720   0
binfmt_misc 8004   1
vfat   11984   0
smbfs  40704   0 (unused)
nfsd   77808   0 (unused)
lockd  54760   0 [nfsd]
sunrpc 71876   0 [nfsd lockd]
msdos   6384   0 (unused)
fat35852   0 [vfat msdos]

# wvdial
-- WvDial: Internet dialer version 1.41
-- Cannot open /dev/ttyS0: Input/output error

# ll /dev/ttyS0
crw-r-1 root dialout4,  64 Feb 10 10:47 /dev/ttyS0

# cat /proc/bus/usb/devices 
T:  Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 2
B:  Alloc=247/900 us (27%), #Int=  3, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor= ProdID= Rev= 0.00
S:  Product=USB OHCI Root Hub
S:  SerialNumber=c7813000
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms
T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=059b ProdID=0001 Rev= 1.00
S:  Manufacturer=Iomega
S:  Product=USB Zip 100
S:  SerialNumber=00F4E9C6
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
E:  Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=  0ms
E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=  0ms
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl= 32ms
T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=02 Dev#=  3 Spd=12  MxCh= 4
D:  Ver= 1.00 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=0409 ProdID=55ab Rev= 1.00
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=500mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl=255ms
T:  Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=03 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  4 Spd=1.5 MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=05ac ProdID=0201 Rev= 1.01
S:  Manufacturer=Alps Electric?M2452
S:  Product=M2452
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=100mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID  ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=keyboard
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   8 Ivl= 10ms
T:  Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=03 Port=01 Cnt=02 Dev#=  5 Spd=1.5 MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=046d ProdID=c001 Rev= 4.00
S:  Manufacturer=Logitech
S:  Product=USB Mouse
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr= 50mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID  ) Sub=01 Prot=02 Driver=usb_mouse
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   8 Ivl= 10ms

# cat /proc/bus/usb/drivers 
 usbdevfs
 hub
 usb_mouse
 keyboard
 usb-storage

# mount -t vfat /dev/sda4 /zip
mount: /dev/sda4 is not a valid block device

# dpkg -l ppp modutils kernel-image-2.4.16-newpmac
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  ppp2.4.1.uus-1Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon.
ii  modutils   2.4.11-1   Linux module utilities.
ii  kernel-image-2 2.4.16-1.1 Linux kernel binary image for new Power Maci

-- 
_   .`.`o 
 o| ,\__ `./`r
  Dan Kortschak   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   \/\_O O
  |`...'.\
  Before you criticise a man, try to walk a mile in his`  :\
  shoes. Then, if he doesn't like what you have to say,   : \ 
  you'll be a mile away, and you'll have his shoes.   :  \

By replying to this email you implicitly accept that your response may

Problems with ppp after upgrade to kernel 2.4.X

2001-11-05 Thread Markus Braun
Hi everybody!

This weekend I upgraded my server from potato to woody. Everything worked
fine. Then I upgraded my kernel from 2.2.14 to 2.4.13. And after that I run
into great problems with my ppp link. In the syslog I get sometimes VJ
decompression error and when I watch a the interface with ifconfig ppp0 I
get somethin like this

ppp0 
  RX packets:29 errors:16 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:43 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

At last the half of the received packets have an error. Sometimes I get a
realy fine connection with no errors, but most connections are bad. And when I
switch back to the 2.2.14 kernel all runs fine again!?!?!  I tried other 2.4
kernels (2.4.0 and 2.4.1) and got the same problems.

Additional I have a hylafax server running on this modem, but it doesn't make
a difference if the server is running or not. I can submit and receive faxes
without any problem, so it seems, that the modem and the serial connection to
the modem are ok.

Could this be an incompatibility between some of my isp dial in servers and
the 2.4 kernel?

Here my hard and software configuration:

IBM thinkpad 380E
Elsa microlink office modem

german t-online isp

kernel 2.4.13
pppd 2.4.1.uus
hylafax 4.1beta2

Thanks in advance for your help!!

mfg Markus Braun

--
Linux is like a Wigwam. No Windows, no Gates, and an Apache inside.
-
Markus Braunfon  fax: 07453/930851
Gartenstrasse 6  \|/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
72227 Egenhausen(o o)   homepage: www.krawel.de
-oOo-(_)-oOo-
 GnuPG Key: 0x1A5A7357 / C1CE DC19 B189 1712 419C  3944 6FA4 8F01 1A5A 7357



Problems with PPP

2000-04-30 Thread José María Pongilioni López



When I connect to the Internet, 'xconsole' shows 
the following:
 'ppp-compress-1' unable to 
locate module

I'm using Kernel 2.2.5, and I compiled PPP support 
as a module.
Is this correct? If not, how can I to workaround 
this?

Please, reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks.


Re: Problems with PPP

2000-04-30 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 02:23:39PM +0200, José María Pongilioni López wrote:
 When I connect to the Internet, 'xconsole' shows the following:
 'ppp-compress-1' unable to locate module
 
 I'm using Kernel 2.2.5, and I compiled PPP support as a module.
 Is this correct? If not, how can I to workaround this?
 
 Please, reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have the following in /etc/modutils/aliases (2.2.14 kernel)

alias char-major-108 ppp
alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate
alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate

Don't know about ppp-compress-1.  Hardware compression is usually better
anyway.  If you modify /etc/modutils/aliases, remember to run
update-modules.

-- 
¶ One·should·only·use·the·ASCII·character­set·when·compos­

» ing·email·messages.



Re: problems with ppp (think it's the modem)

2000-01-22 Thread mek
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, you wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 08:01:18PM +0100, mek wrote:
  dear debbie's,
  
  since yesterday i have problems setting up my internet-connection.
  did with pppconfig, did everything as written in my book, but it didnt work 
  at
  all.
  now today i saw when i do tail -f /var/log/messages:
  : abort on (VOICE)
  : abort on (NO DIALTONE)
  : abort on (NO ANSWER)
  : send (ATZ^M)
  : expect (OK)
  : ^M
  : NO CARRIER
  :  -- failed
  : Failed (NO CARRIER)
  : Exit
 
 Try minicom -s.  This will set up the modem parameters, etc.  You
 should be able to dial to you ISP (use ATDT 1234567 to actually dial the
 phone) and it will show you a screen asking for your ID and password.
 Then it will spew jibberish.  If you can get that far you are doing
 well.

mmm thanx!
in the meanwhile i was messing around in /etc/chatscripts/provider by editing
some lines and it helped, but now i do not see any progress anymore.
de chatscript says:

ABORT BUSY
ABORT VOICE
ABORT NO DIALTONE
ABORT NO ANSWERE
 ATZ
OK ATDT4

what gives me in /var/log/messages:

NO CARRIER^M
 ^M
 ATZ^M
 OK
-- got it
 send (ATDt4^M)
Serial connection established.
Using interface ppp0
Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/ttyS0
Remote message
local IP adres xxx.xx.xx.x
remote IP adres xxx.xx.xx.xxx

and here it remains:-(

 Also try http://www.grapevine.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html and make sure
 you modem is on the good list.

forunately not;-)
it's a cablemodem and it worked well under redhat

mek


problems with ppp (think it's the modem)

2000-01-21 Thread mek
dear debbie's,

since yesterday i have problems setting up my internet-connection.
did with pppconfig, did everything as written in my book, but it didnt work at
all.
now today i saw when i do tail -f /var/log/messages:
: abort on (VOICE)
: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
: abort on (NO ANSWER)
: send (ATZ^M)
: expect (OK)
: ^M
: NO CARRIER
:  -- failed
: Failed (NO CARRIER)
: Exit

this seemed to me that the modem is not working, but on the other machine (this
one where i am writing this) which runs redhat it works fine (at least if u can
read this mail:-)
so i looked around in the howto's but didnt find anything useful specific about
modem-problems. even not by searching on altavista.com (where many debian items
are listed)
my question is if someone would know any solution for this.

oh yes, since my casema.net account has some mailproblems till late in the
night, i would appreciate if u would reply to this antenna.nl address.

thanx in advance

mek


Re: Strange network problems on ppp interface

1999-11-03 Thread Dylan Thurston
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 04:18:31PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hm!
 I reported almost the exact same problem right about the time when kernel
 2.2.0 came out. At that time I was running 2.0.36+kerneli and had updated
 to 2.2.0, and didn't know a thing until our cable modem went out and I
 needed to use the Ricochet. I'm almost certain it's a kernel issue,
 because the same system worked fine with a Creative external modem on the
 same serial port.

I've been using kernel 2.2.12 or 2.2.13 since I got the modem, so I'm
fairly sure that the kernel isn't the problem here.  But you do give
interesting information, that it seems to be specifically related to
Ricochet's network.  I'll browse their web page.

Thanks!

--Dylan Thurston


Re: Strange network problems on ppp interface

1999-11-03 Thread ferret


On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Dylan Thurston wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 04:18:31PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Hm!
  I reported almost the exact same problem right about the time when kernel
  2.2.0 came out. At that time I was running 2.0.36+kerneli and had updated
  to 2.2.0, and didn't know a thing until our cable modem went out and I
  needed to use the Ricochet. I'm almost certain it's a kernel issue,
  because the same system worked fine with a Creative external modem on the
  same serial port.
 
 I've been using kernel 2.2.12 or 2.2.13 since I got the modem, so I'm
 fairly sure that the kernel isn't the problem here.  But you do give
 interesting information, that it seems to be specifically related to
 Ricochet's network.  I'll browse their web page.

H. Maybe whatever it was got fixed in the more recent kernels, if it
was actually a kernel problem. I was running stock Debian 2.1 (I don't
think I have my disc any longer) with a kernel built from kernel.org
Were you running a stock slink without any of the unofficial updates
before you upgraded to potato?

-- Ferret no baka



Re: Strange network problems on ppp interface

1999-11-03 Thread Dylan Thurston
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 07:29:44PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 H. Maybe whatever it was got fixed in the more recent kernels, if it
 was actually a kernel problem. I was running stock Debian 2.1 (I don't
 think I have my disc any longer) with a kernel built from kernel.org
 Were you running a stock slink without any of the unofficial updates
 before you upgraded to potato?

The update was basically from potato, version 25 October, to potato,
version 30 October, if I have my chronology straight.

Another update: ppp (still) works fine over my combo ethernet/modem
PCMCIA card.  The problem seems to be Ricochet-specific.

--Dylan Thurston


Re: Strange network problems on ppp interface

1999-11-03 Thread ferret

The only other thing I can think of checking is your radio's firmware. Not
having access to a Ricochet network right now I can't do any testing.

On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Dylan Thurston wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 07:29:44PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  H. Maybe whatever it was got fixed in the more recent kernels, if it
  was actually a kernel problem. I was running stock Debian 2.1 (I don't
  think I have my disc any longer) with a kernel built from kernel.org
  Were you running a stock slink without any of the unofficial updates
  before you upgraded to potato?
 
 The update was basically from potato, version 25 October, to potato,
 version 30 October, if I have my chronology straight.
 
 Another update: ppp (still) works fine over my combo ethernet/modem
 PCMCIA card.  The problem seems to be Ricochet-specific.



Strange network problems on ppp interface

1999-11-02 Thread Dylan Thurston
As of yesterday, I've been having some strange problems connecting
through my Ricochet modem.  I'm able to connect and ping places just
fine; however, all useful connections (e.g., telnet, ftp, or http)
fail: with telnet, for instance, I get the standard connect messages

Trying 128.32.183.1...
Connected to bosco.berkeley.edu.
Escape character is '^]'.

but then no welcome message.  There's a tcpdump of such an attempt
after my signature.  I'd suspect a packet filtering problem, but I'm
able to connect using my EtherNet card with no problem.

The only change in my configuration that seems like it might be
relevant is that I had just upgraded to the latest potato, after 5
days.  The only packages upgraded that seem like they could possibly be
relevant are hostname and libc6.

Anyone have any ideas what could cause this kind of problem?  Any help 
is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Dylan Thurston

tcpdump follows:
13:18:58.493742 204.179.128.200.1102  207.69.194.216.ftp: FP 
891443817:891443823(6) ack 890014480 win 16060 nop,nop,timestamp 1471784 
933090531 (DF)
13:19:13.180204 204.179.128.200.1039  128.32.136.9.domain: 61999+ A? 
bosco.berkeley.edu. (36)
13:19:14.523709 128.32.136.9.domain  204.179.128.200.1039: 61999* 1/4/7 (260)
13:19:14.527411 204.179.128.200.1103  128.32.183.1.telnet: S 
985306204:985306204(0) win 16060 mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1473387 
0,nop,wscale 0 (DF) [tos 0x10]
13:19:14.873703 128.32.183.1.telnet  204.179.128.200.1103: S 
3402697896:3402697896(0) ack 985306205 win 17520 mss 1460 (DF)
13:19:14.873862 204.179.128.200.1103  128.32.183.1.telnet: . ack 1 win 16060 
(DF) [tos 0x10]
13:19:14.918216 204.179.128.200.1103  128.32.183.1.telnet: P 1:28(27) ack 1 
win 16060 (DF) [tos 0x10]
13:19:17.913712 204.179.128.200.1103  128.32.183.1.telnet: P 1:28(27) ack 1 
win 16060 (DF) [tos 0x10]
13:19:22.493719 204.179.128.200.1102  207.69.194.216.ftp: FP 0:6(6) ack 1 win 
16060 nop,nop,timestamp 1474184 933090531 (DF)
13:19:23.913708 204.179.128.200.1103  128.32.183.1.telnet: P 1:28(27) ack 1 
win 16060 (DF) [tos 0x10]

10 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel


Re: Problems with ppp server

1998-12-17 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On 16 Dec, Joe Emenaker wrote:
 
 My only suggestion would be to try it without the asyncmap option (which
 should cause ppp to use the desperate asyncmap of 0x... which you
 could also try explicitly). If that works, start trying turning off a bunch
 of the bits in the asyncmap to see of the problem returns. Eventually, you
 may boil it down to the one or two characters than need to be escaped.
 
 - Joe
 

Thank You. That was the trick. Commenting out the asyncmap 0 option
worked. I should have realized something was amiss earlier. I am using
a digital TAU modem on the server side. It must need some characters to
be escaped. I will now try determining which. 

Gopal.

-- 

Gopal Narayanan  Ph #: (413) 545 0925
Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory Fax#: (413) 545 4223
University of Massachusetts  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amherst MA 01003
---


Problems with ppp server

1998-12-16 Thread Gopal Narayanan
Hello,

I am at wit's end with this problem. I am trying to set up a PPP
server at work. It is a Debian machine running hamm with ppp version
2.3.5-2. Same setup at my home-machine as well. I am setting this up
in the server with mgetty and AutoPPP.  Autoppp works and I get a
succesful PAP login. After that though, the home-client machine and
the work-server don't seem to communicate the local and remote
addresses properly - resulting in the home machine giving up saying
that it Could not determine local IP address and hangs up ppp with
No network protocols running

At home, I used pppconfig to setup the connection script. Note that
the home PPP setup and pppconfig scripts work for another ISP, the
official campus PPP connection that uses PAP. So I suspect that the
problem is not in my home machine. I am able to use minicom and get
connected to the debian work server. But since the home client is not
able to get its local IP address from the server, the ppp connection
fails.

I am enclosing relevant segments of syslog and my options files below
for both the client and server. For security purposes, usernames,
passwords, client and server names have been edited and made
generic. I would appreciate any help in this regard. I apologize for
the length of this message.

Gopal.


home client machine syslog-
Dec 16 08:47:44 home-client pppd[30193]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: abort on (BUSY)
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: abort on (VOICE)
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: abort on (NO ANSWER)
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: send (ATZ^M)
Dec 16 08:47:45 home-client chat[30194]: expect (OK)
Dec 16 08:47:46 home-client chat[30194]: ATZ^M^M
Dec 16 08:47:46 home-client chat[30194]: OK
Dec 16 08:47:46 home-client chat[30194]:  -- got it 
Dec 16 08:47:46 home-client chat[30194]: send (ATDT5551212^M)
Dec 16 08:47:46 home-client chat[30194]: expect (CONNECT)
Dec 16 08:47:46 home-client chat[30194]: ^M
Dec 16 08:48:07 home-client chat[30194]: ATDT5551212^M^M
Dec 16 08:48:07 home-client chat[30194]: CONNECT
Dec 16 08:48:07 home-client chat[30194]:  -- got it 
Dec 16 08:48:07 home-client chat[30194]: send (\d)
Dec 16 08:48:08 home-client pppd[30193]: Serial connection established.
Dec 16 08:48:09 home-client pppd[30193]: Using interface ppp0
Dec 16 08:48:09 home-client pppd[30193]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/ttyS1
Dec 16 08:48:09 home-client pppd[30193]: Warning - secret file 
/etc/ppp/pap-secrets has world and/or group access
Dec 16 08:48:09 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 asyncmap 
0x0 magic 0xfebf pcomp accomp]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 asyncmap 
0x0 magic 0xfebf pcomp accomp]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 asyncmap 
0x0 auth pap magic 0xcffd pcomp accomp]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 asyncmap 
0x0 auth pap magic 0xcffd pcomp accomp]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 asyncmap 
0x0 magic 0xfebf pcomp accomp]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xfebf]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: Warning - secret file 
/etc/ppp/pap-secrets has world and/or group access
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user=myname 
password=mypassword]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xcffd]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0xfebf]
Dec 16 08:48:12 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0xcffd]
Dec 16 08:48:13 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 Login ok]
Dec 16 08:48:13 home-client pppd[30193]: Remote message: Login ok
Dec 16 08:48:13 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
0.0.0.0 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:13 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:13 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 addr 
192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:16 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
0.0.0.0 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:16 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:16 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 addr 
192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:19 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
0.0.0.0 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:19 home-client pppd[30193]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:19 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 addr 
192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 16 08:48:22 home-client pppd[30193]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 
0.0.0.0 compress VJ 0f 01]
Dec 

Re: Problems with ppp server

1998-12-16 Thread Joe Emenaker
Autoppp works and I get a
succesful PAP login. After that though, the home-client machine and
the work-server don't seem to communicate the local and remote
addresses properly - resulting in the home machine giving up saying
that it Could not determine local IP address and hangs up ppp with
No network protocols running

Your ppp server needs to know what IP address it can give out to your
machine. However, it looks like you might already be doing this. I did
notice something a little odd, though...

Your home machine, not having an IP address, asks the work-server if it can
use 0.0.0.0...
  [HOME] sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 addr 0.0.0.0 compress VJ 0f 01]

Your work machine knows that this is silly and it sends back a ConfNak (to
request number id=1), telling your home machine that using that address is
absolutely out of the question. However, the nice thing it does is that is
says (to your home machine) Psstt...  ask me if you can use 192.168.1.3...
  [WORK] sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 addr 192.168.1.3]

However, the strange thing is that your home machine never shows reception
of this in the logs. It just keeps asking for 0.0.0.0 and your work-server
keeps trying to issue it an IP.

Another thing that's wierd, is that the home machine is acknowledging the
work-server's IP address, and the work server is SEEING those
acknowledgements...
  [WORK] rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 addr 192.168.1.54 compress VJ 0f 01]

but it keeps asking for it. Strange, indeed.

My only suggestion would be to try it without the asyncmap option (which
should cause ppp to use the desperate asyncmap of 0x... which you
could also try explicitly). If that works, start trying turning off a bunch
of the bits in the asyncmap to see of the problem returns. Eventually, you
may boil it down to the one or two characters than need to be escaped.

- Joe



problems with PPP Debian 2.0 beta

1998-07-15 Thread Chris R. Martin
I recently upgraded my 'base' system to 2.0 beta, and also installed PPP
2.3.5-2. However, when I did this, ppp stopped working. It will dial, and
it fails with the message peer refused to authenicate. Obviously this
didn't happen before...

I've checked pap-secrets  and that looks the same.. in fact everything
looks the same that it did before.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Chris

please cc me by email


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: problems with PPP Debian 2.0 beta

1998-07-15 Thread Michael B. Taylor

auth is selected in /ppp/options now.  It wasnt before.  I had to put
noauth in /ect/ppp/peers/provider to override it and get a connection.


Mike

On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 at 09:28:53PM -0500, Chris R. Martin wrote:
 I recently upgraded my 'base' system to 2.0 beta, and also installed PPP
 2.3.5-2. However, when I did this, ppp stopped working. It will dial, and
 it fails with the message peer refused to authenicate. Obviously this
 didn't happen before...
 
 I've checked pap-secrets  and that looks the same.. in fact everything
 looks the same that it did before.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Chris
 
 please cc me by email
 
 
 --  
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: Problems w/ppp dialup and sending mail: SOLVED!

1998-02-26 Thread David B. Teague
On Sun, 22 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Until recently, that is, when my ISP (campus.mci.net) began bouncing
  outgoing mail that has an unrecognized domain of origin.
[snip] 
 They are trying to look up frodo.cs.wcu.edu as a domain, and failing.  Try
 setting visible_name to their domain:
 
 visible_name=cs.wcu.edu
 
 Smail will stick your login name in front of this and use it in the SMTP
 transaction. It won't end up in your headers, but it might suffice to fool
 your isp.  Worked for me when mine did the same thing last year (that is,
 upgraded sendmail).
 -- 
 John Hasler

John, 

Bingo! That single change Works like a charm. In .pinerc I set
visible_name=cs.wcu.edu, which actually generates an address of a real
account, as I have an a login there. The combination creates a name that
resolves, and campus.mci takes it. 

Is it significant to the success of this that the login generated by my
longin name here and the domain at wcu is a legitimate account? 

Many thanks also to Daniel Gross and James Thomas who replied to this
question.

--David

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]Do with it what you will.
 Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
 Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
 







--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Problems w/ppp dialup and sending mail

1998-02-23 Thread dg
On Sun, 22 Feb 1998, DAVID B. TEAGUE wrote:

 I installed Debian 1.1 and for a year things worked quite well.  I could
 send mail, receive mail via popmail, and use ppp for web access, fpt and
 telnet. Except for some problems getting logged in last Christmas, which
 seem to have been resolved all has been well. 
 
 Until recently, that is, when my ISP (campus.mci.net) began bouncing
 outgoing mail that has an unrecognized domain of origin. 
 
 How in the blazes do i get a valid 'domain' I am assigned an ip number
 each time I log in? 

Try the following:

/etc/smail/routers
smart_host:
driver=smarthost, transport=smtp-rewrite;
path=mail.bingo.baynet.de
--

/etc/smail/transports-
[... other transports ...]

smtp-remap:
driver=tcpsmtp, max_addrs=100, -max_chars, inet,
remove_header=From,
insert_header=From:
${lookup:from:lsearch{maps/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ($from:$fullname)}},
remove_header=Message-ID,
insert_header=Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
insert_header=Sender:
${lookup:from:lsearch{maps/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ($from:$fullname)}};
use_bind, defer_no_connect, -local_mx_okay, defnames
--

/etc/smail/maps/from--
root[EMAIL PROTECTED] (root)
YOURLOCALUSER   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (YOURNAME)
--

Hope this helps.

Bye

Daniel

--
Daniel Gross eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hollarstrasse 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-85053 Ingolstadt, Germany
--

Reporter (to Mahatma Gandhi): Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western
Civilization?
Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Problems w/ppp dialup Kerberos

1998-02-22 Thread Jesus Duran
Greetings all,

OK, the ongoing saga of my ppp dialup continues.  pon now attempts the
connection(my modem is now recognized!).  It dials and then thats it.  We
use Kerberos Authen so i do not know if this is causing the
problem.  The logs show that after the handshake the host(my school) asks
for 4 returns for interactive mode which i'm familiar with from dialing in
with ckermit(a dummy term).  Should ppp take care of that?  Any help is
greatly appreciated, we're almost therethanks to you guys/gals!

Regards,

jd?


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Problems w/ppp dialup Kerberos

1998-02-22 Thread Martin Bialasinski
Jesus Duran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 problem.  The logs show that after the handshake the host(my school) asks
 for 4 returns for interactive mode which i'm familiar with from dialing in
 with ckermit(a dummy term).  Should ppp take care of that?  Any help is

I believe editing /etc/ppp.chatscript to reflect the dialog you do in
ckermit will do the thing. Otherwise post the relevant part of
/var/log/ppp.log after adding debug to /etc/ppp.options_out

Ciao,
Martin


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Problems w/ppp dialup and sending mail

1998-02-22 Thread DAVID B. TEAGUE

Hi Guys

I installed Debian 1.1 and for a year things worked quite well.  I could
send mail, receive mail via popmail, and use ppp for web access, fpt and
telnet. Except for some problems getting logged in last Christmas, which
seem to have been resolved all has been well. 

Until recently, that is, when my ISP (campus.mci.net) began bouncing
outgoing mail that has an unrecognized domain of origin. 

How in the blazes do i get a valid 'domain' I am assigned an ip number
each time I log in? 

I include typical mail message and error that I get when
attempting to send from home:


From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 22 15:22:30 1998
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 98 15:23 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mail failed, returning to sender

|- Failed addresses follow: -|
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... transport smtp: 551 Unrecognized domain
'frodo.cs.wcu.edu' 
|- Message text follows: |
Received: by frodo.cs.wcu.edu
id m0y1E3q-000hZ9C
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.37); Sat, 7 Feb 98 12:29 EST
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: dbt (David B. Teague)
Subject: Ch5,6,7 notes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 12:29:02 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 10874 



I include exerpts (I hope appropriate exerpts, I hope you will tell me
if you need more): 

hosts:
127.0.0.1   localhost
152.30.5.51 frodo.cs.wcu.edufrodo


The 152.30.5.51 is bogus at home, as is the cs.wcu.edu. It is set this
way so I can take the machine to work to connect to the net for serious
upgrades. 33K is to durned slow.  Any of this except 'frodo' is mutable.
'frodo' is my machine's name, I'd very much like to keep that. 


/etc/smail/config
 
# This is the main Smail configuration file.

visible_name=frodo.cs.wcu.edu 
-domains
hostnames=frodo.cs.wcu.edu:frodo:frodo.cs

The rest of the conf file is 'out of the box'.

I tried changing the host name, the mailer still picks up the
visible name here or some other place, and mci bounces the mail.

For example
hostnames=wcu.campus.mci.net

gets me nothing. 

I tried several variations on settings of hosts and host naes in config
files, but I do not seem to be able to get mci to allow me to send mail
with any domain name I can guess. 

I have appended the headers from an earlier successful mail message sent
from home to a machine at work in hope that some knowledgable person can
see what this ISP requires. 

Help, please!

--David   ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])



Appendix: Full headers from an ealier message successfully
sent 2 Dec 1997:

Received: from aus-e.mp.campus.mci.net (aus-e.mp.campus.mci.net
[208.140.84.25]) 
by elentari.cs.wcu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA23910
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:32:05 -0500
Received: from frodo.cs.wcu.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[208.140.81.233]) 
by aus-e.mp.campus.mci.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA11107;
Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:23:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: by frodo.cs.wcu.edu
id m0xcv26-000hZ9C
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.37); Tue, 2 Dec 97 11:18 EST
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David B. Teague)
Subject: Exercises on subsitution and Translation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:18:46 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit







--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Problems w/ppp dialup and sending mail

1998-02-22 Thread David Stern
On Sun, 22 Feb 1998 16:04:21 EST, DAVID B. TEAGUE wrote:
 
 Hi Guys
 
 I installed Debian 1.1 and for a year things worked quite well.  I could
 send mail, receive mail via popmail, and use ppp for web access, fpt and
 telnet. Except for some problems getting logged in last Christmas, which
 seem to have been resolved all has been well. 
 
 Until recently, that is, when my ISP (campus.mci.net) began bouncing
 outgoing mail that has an unrecognized domain of origin. 
 
 How in the blazes do i get a valid 'domain' I am assigned an ip number
 each time I log in?

If I understand what you're asking and know what I'm talking about, you 
need to rewrite the Sender: line in your email header; i.e.: the 
Sender: line should correspond to your actual (isp) email address.  (As 
to why it matters if the domain in your Sender: line is resolvable by 
the DNS, I have no idea, and I'd also like to know.)

There are varying ways to do this, depending on, among other things, 
your email client.  I see you'll be using elm, which I don't currently 
have installed, however I believe I've heard people discuss on this 
that elm has a built-in facility to rewrite the Sender: line.  Perhaps 
you can do some research, or maybe an elm user will tell you.

Some email clients pass along outgoing delivery service to the MTA 
(smail), and others do not.  If elm does not, then elm will be the only 
place you can rewrite your Sender: line, however if elm passes along 
outgoing mail deliver to your MTA, then you may be able to rewrite the 
sender line by configuring your MTA.  By configuring your MTA to 
rewrite your email header, all email clients which use the MTA for 
outgoing mail delivery will be properly configured, but it may require 
more effort to set up, and as has proven for, to maintain.  Other ways 
to rewrite email headers also exist, but these seem to be the most 
common.
-- 
David Stern  
--
 http://weber.u.washington.edu/~kotsya
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .