Re: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable machine?

2001-11-10 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 09:31:19PM -0600, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:31:29PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:15:44PM -0500, Stan Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
> > wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get abcde to work. Turns out that the version I have
> > > (from progen) is broken. The developers of this package say the
> > > version in testing is fine. Probelm is it depends on one more
> > > package from testing.
> > 
> > File a bug report against stable.
> 
> That depends on how broken it is. Unless it's totally and utterly
> screwed to the point where it's nothing but a waste of space, stable
> won't be updated at this point, so filing bugs you know to be fixed in
> testing doesn't really help.

Filing a bug is still probably the right first step.  The maintainer can
decide (and the bug filer appeal) the severity of the issue.  Without
the bug report, there's no communication of the issue.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Selfhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/   Land of the free
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html


pgp6791zG0bMt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable machine?

2001-11-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:31:29PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:15:44PM -0500, Stan Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to get abcde to work. Turns out that the version I have
> > (from progen) is broken. The developers of this package say the
> > version in testing is fine. Probelm is it depends on one more
> > package from testing.
> 
> File a bug report against stable.

That depends on how broken it is. Unless it's totally and utterly
screwed to the point where it's nothing but a waste of space, stable
won't be updated at this point, so filing bugs you know to be fixed in
testing doesn't really help.

If it *is* totally screwed, then you might be able to persuade the
release manager (via the package maintainer) to let a fixed version in.
However, you (Stan) referred to Progeny above, so I don't know if stable
is broken as well.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable machine?

2001-11-09 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:15:44PM -0500, Stan Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm trying to get abcde to work. Turns out that the version I have (from
> progen) is broken. The developers of this package say the version in testing
> is fine. Probelm is it depends on one more package from testing.

File a bug report against stable.

> Is there a way I can get this to work?

Yes.

> If so, how?

I strongly discourage split stable/unstable or stable/testing systems.
Debian exists largely to resolve package deps.  Suggested alternatives:

  - Upgrade your system(s) to testing or unstable.  For most purposes,
this works well.

  - Get your package source from the direct upstream source.  This
allows Debian to do what it does well:  manage the vast majority of
your system with minimal intervention on your part.

There are various pinning options.  They're relatively new, and I'd
recommend other alternatives in th meantime.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Selfhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/   Land of the free
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html


pgpAy8JfCzEOc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable machine?

2001-11-09 Thread Kris Huber
Stan,

Here's a cut-and-paste-and-slightly-edited version of what I found about
almost the same question I asked on this reflector a week or two ago (see
thread "RE: cproto.deb for potato not available?"):

Scheme using newer version of apt-get than you probably have:
It seems the /etc/apt/preferences file is a feature not yet in the stable
release of apt-get (version 0.3.19).  I found some information about the
preferences file in a how-to document based on version 0.5.3 (chapter 3 of
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/), although I was still a little
unclear about how to selectively upgrade a package using this feature.  My
guess is to use the example in the document for how to downgrade all
packages to the stable release versions, then insert a specific entry for
the latest version of, in my case, cproto.


This is what I did to grab the cproto package from the unstable distribution
(a little lower-level, but not too bad once in awhile).  Hopefully the
upgraded package you'll see in #3 won't be a package that will break other
things it depends on if you upgrade it.
1.  Added following line to sources.list:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
2.  apt-get -s update
The -s (=--dry_run) above seemed to have no effect because the cproto
package *was* found in the next step (without update it is not found).
3.  apt-get -s install cproto
This showed me that apt-get would not upgrade or install any new packages
except for cproto.
4.  apt-get install cproto
This installed the new package.
5.  Commented out the line added in #1 
I did this so that the next 'apt-get upgrade' won't upgrade me to the
unstable release of all the packages I have installed.

-Kris

-Original Message-
From: Stan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable
machine?


I'm trying to get abcde to work. Turns out that the version I have (from
progen) is broken. The developers of this package say the version in testing
is fine. Probelm is it depends on one more package from testing.

Is there a way I can get this to work?

If so, how?

-- 
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
-- 
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit 
company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is
prohibited.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable machine?

2001-11-09 Thread dman
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:15:44PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
| I'm trying to get abcde to work. Turns out that the version I have (from
| progen) is broken. The developers of this package say the version in testing
| is fine. Probelm is it depends on one more package from testing.
| 
| Is there a way I can get this to work?

Yes.

| If so, how?

One of the following :

1)  Point a browser at packages.debian.org and download the desired
packages (and all deps) and run 'dpkg -i'.

2)  edit sources.list to point to woody,
'apt-get update && apt-get install '
put sources.list back
'apt-get update'

3)  get the new apt from woody (using (1) or (2)), then set
apt-preferences and simply 'apt-get install /'
(ie 'apt-get install abcde/testing')

HTH,
-D



Re: Is it possible to install a few testing packages on a stable machine?

2001-11-09 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
You could try changing your /etc/apt/sources.list to include woody, do 
an apt-get update , then a apt-get -s -u install abcde

to see what would happen

An alternative would be to try grip which I like even better than abcde



Stan Brown wrote:


I'm trying to get abcde to work. Turns out that the version I have (from
progen) is broken. The developers of this package say the version in testing
is fine. Probelm is it depends on one more package from testing.

Is there a way I can get this to work?

If so, how?





--
Thomas R. Shemanske
(Mailing Address)  (Office/Internet Information)
Department of Mathematics  203 Choate House
6188 Bradley Hall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dartmouth College  http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~trs/
Hanover, NH 03755-3551 (603) 646 - 3179

Directions:  http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~trs/choatehouse.html
Office hours:  http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~trs/frontmatter/office.html

Fall Term Office Hours:  M,F 3 - 4:30, W 8:30 - 10.