RE: Route problem
This worked for me. Thanks. I did not know I had to type the full line like it was put into the routing table. Brian Brian Schramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian www.linuxexpert.org On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote: > > try > route del -host 192.168.0.100 reject > > I just checked it out...it worked here > > -Original Message- > From: Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:59 PM > To: Ian Perry > Cc: 'Brian Schramm'; debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: RE: Route problem > > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote: > > > route del ipnumber > > or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ? > > Hmmm didn't work here: > ~# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse > Iface > 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo > default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 > ~# route add -host 192.168.0.100 reject #no machine on this IP. > ~# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse > Iface > 192.168.0.100 - 255.255.255.255 !H0 -0 - > 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo > default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 > ~# route -v del -host 192.168.0.100 > SIOCDELRT: No such process > ~# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse > Iface > 192.168.0.100 - 255.255.255.255 !H0 -0 - > 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo > default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 > > > I usually use ipchains/iptables because I couldn't workout how to remove the > reject rule. > > Yours Tony. > > /* > * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the > * same level of thinking we were at when we created them." > * --Albert Einstein > */ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
RE: Route problem
try route del -host 192.168.0.100 reject I just checked it out...it worked here -Original Message- From: Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:59 PM To: Ian Perry Cc: 'Brian Schramm'; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: Route problem On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote: > route del ipnumber > or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ? Hmmm didn't work here: ~# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 ~# route add -host 192.168.0.100 reject #no machine on this IP. ~# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.100 - 255.255.255.255 !H0 -0 - 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 ~# route -v del -host 192.168.0.100 SIOCDELRT: No such process ~# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.100 - 255.255.255.255 !H0 -0 - 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 I usually use ipchains/iptables because I couldn't workout how to remove the reject rule. Yours Tony. /* * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the * same level of thinking we were at when we created them." * --Albert Einstein */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Route problem
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote: > route del ipnumber > or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ? Hmmm didn't work here: ~# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 ~# route add -host 192.168.0.100 reject #no machine on this IP. ~# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.100 - 255.255.255.255 !H0 -0 - 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 ~# route -v del -host 192.168.0.100 SIOCDELRT: No such process ~# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.100 - 255.255.255.255 !H0 -0 - 192.168.0.12* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo default gw 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 I usually use ipchains/iptables because I couldn't workout how to remove the reject rule. Yours Tony. /* * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the * same level of thinking we were at when we created them." * --Albert Einstein */
RE: Route problem
route del ipnumber or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ? -Original Message- From: Brian Schramm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:30 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Route problem Is there a way to remove a route from the route table that is set up to reject that ip address? I have tried on several machines with no luck. I am tired of rebooting to clear it. Brian Brian Schramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 104442754 AIM schrammbrian www.linuxexpert.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
