Re: kernel config question(s)

2000-03-29 Thread tjm
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> 

> I have sysctl on my Debian box running potato.  It is only available to root.
> 


Thanks,  I found it in the procps package in unstable,
compiled it on my slink system and it seems to work.




thanks,
-- 
tony mollica
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kernel config question(s)

2000-03-29 Thread Wayne Topa

Subject: kernel config question(s)
Date: Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 03:07:44PM -0800

In reply to:tjm

Quoting tjm([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>| After looking through much documentation, I'm
>| still not sure whether I have the info I need.
>| Going through the config stuff to build a new
>| 2.2.14 kernel (up from 2.2.11) I notice that the
>| previous parameter of 'CONFIG_IP_ALWAYS_DEFRAG'
>| is now missing or not offered in this 2.2.14 
>| kernel config.  I have found that it is in the sysctl
>| docs and directory (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag)
>| and is off by default.  My questions are these:
>| 
>| Is it true that this now needs to be set 'manually'  
>| somewhere in the startup scripts ?
>| 
>| Is there some utility other than 
>|   'echo 1 > /proc/sys/...{etc}' that can be used?
>| 
>| and
>| I may have overlooked the docs for this sysctl  
>| feature.  Where might I find the clearest explanation
>| of how and what parameters are the most important and
>| what the default settings are compared to the previous
>| kernel configs.
>| 

uname -a
Linux mtntop 2.2.14 #10 Wed Mar 22 12:28:34 EST 2000 i586 unknown

rgrep -r ip_always_defrag /usr/src/linux/Doc*/*
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/Configure.help:  Enabling masquerading
automagically enables ip_always_defrag too.

HTH

-- 
Keyboard not connected, press to continue.
___


Re: kernel config question(s)

2000-03-29 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> 
> Also, the firewall configuration tool at
> http://linux-firewall-tools.com/linux/firewall/index.html
> generated a file with lines such as:
> 
> # Enable always defragging Protection
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_always_defrag=1
> 
> The utility states that the firewall will work on
> Redhat boxes.  Is that sysctl line a utility that
> is common only to Redhat?  To use this on Debian I
> would assume that the line changes to
> 
>echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag
> 

I have sysctl on my Debian box running potato.  It is only available to root.

> Is this correct, or am I missing something?  There
> are other config lines like this, not only the 
> ip_always_defrag.
> 
> Overall, I'm just trying to understand what might
> affect my machines after any upgrades, especially
> kernel upgrades.  Wading through all the docs gets
> somewhat tedious at times.  
> 

Frankly I dont play with firewalling.  Perhaps another mail with a more direct
subject will help.  Like "what is ip_always_defrag in the kernel and do I want
it"?  People scan debian-user and respond to subjects that catch their eye. 
The volume here is fairly high.


Re: kernel config question(s)

2000-03-29 Thread tjm
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> 
> Why do you think you need this?  No box I have running 2.2.14 have I had to
> deal with this.


Just curious as to why the ip_always_defrag choice
was removed from configuration list and buried in
the sysctl stuff.  What this means to me I'm not
quite sure.  I picked ip_always_defrag as an
example because the documentation suggests there
is some advantage to having this switched on.

Also, the firewall configuration tool at
http://linux-firewall-tools.com/linux/firewall/index.html
generated a file with lines such as:

# Enable always defragging Protection
sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_always_defrag=1

The utility states that the firewall will work on
Redhat boxes.  Is that sysctl line a utility that
is common only to Redhat?  To use this on Debian I
would assume that the line changes to

   echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag

Is this correct, or am I missing something?  There
are other config lines like this, not only the 
ip_always_defrag.

Overall, I'm just trying to understand what might
affect my machines after any upgrades, especially
kernel upgrades.  Wading through all the docs gets
somewhat tedious at times.  


Thanks for the one and only reply,

-- 
tony mollica
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: kernel config question(s)

2000-03-29 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Why do you think you need this?  No box I have running 2.2.14 have I had to
deal with this.