Re: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/mo
On 22-Oct-99 Martin Fluch wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pollywog wrote: > >> > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote: >> >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on >> >> this. >> > >> > Where is this bugs page? >> >> I could not find it either, though I did find one that seemed to be related >> to >> this. > > search for the package you are interestet for at > > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > and after you got (for example for modutils/unstable) to the page > > http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/base/modutils.html > > there is at the end of the page a link to 'View the bug report' > > An other place is > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs I did see those pages but I was unable to fix the problem from there. thanks -- Andrew
Re: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/mo
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pollywog wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote: > >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on > >> this. > > > > Where is this bugs page? > > I could not find it either, though I did find one that seemed to be related to > this. search for the package you are interestet for at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages and after you got (for example for modutils/unstable) to the page http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/base/modutils.html there is at the end of the page a link to 'View the bug report' An other place is http://www.debian.org/Bugs Martin -- If the box says 'Windows 95 or better', it should run on Linux, right? - anonymous For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/mo
On 22-Oct-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the prompt reply. > I have a few more questions if you are willing to answer them. > > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote: >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on >> this. > > Where is this bugs page? I could not find it either, though I did find one that seemed to be related to this. -- Andrew