Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-14 Thread Jim McCloskey
* hanasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

| My nvidia is due in the mail soon. The nvidia packages from
| apt-cache search seem to depend on the 2.4 kernels. Could you walk
| me through the steps to get get the nvidia drivers built/installed
| on kernel 2.6.x? I have built the kernel with make-kpkg. Also, Any
| specific options to choose/not choose in the kernel .config?

There is an excellent Debian-specific HOWTO (clear and detailed) here:

http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/index.html

If you use 2.6.6, there could be issues. In particular, it is
important not to enable the option CONFIG_4KSTACKS, which causes X to
crash when the nvidia driver is used. This option does not exist in
kernels previous to 2.6.6 and so the issue does not arise.

I had the nvidia driver working by this method up as far as 2.6.5. In
2.6.6 I'm still encountering problems. When I try to modprobe the
nvidia module, it fails with the helpful error-message:

version magic `2.6.6 686 gcc-3.3' should be `2.6.6 preempt PENTIUM4
  gcc-3.3' 
  Invalid module format

No-one so far has been able to help with this.

Jim


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-13 Thread welly hartanto
I'm running debian sid 2.6.5-1-686 with Nvidia
GeForce4 MX 440.
I'm not using the driver from NVidia web site, since
I'm too lazy to search for it...;-)
What I did is :
- apt-get install nvidia-kernel-common
- apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source
and I've got my kernel source installed too.
My XF86Config using nv as driver.
And that's enough for me to have a nice smooth display
on my gnome

--welly---

--- Daniel Asarnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Installing the current nvidia gfx drivers in 2.6 is
 actually real simple.  You can download their
 self-installer from nvidia.com's driver section and
 run it with the sh.  It Just Worked for me (well, it
 worked after I found some good workarounds for all
 the lockups my nForce mobo caused).  You may have to
 tell XF86-Config to use the 'nvidia' module, though.
 I do not believe there are any specifics in the
 kernel config to...specify.  You'll probably want to
 turn on VESA 16-bit support, though.
  
 -Daniel
 
 
  --- hanasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   My nvidia is due in the mail soon.  The nvidia
   packages from apt-cache 
   search seem to depend on the 2.4 kernels.  Could
  you
   walk me through the 
   steps to get get the nvidia drivers
  built/installed
   on kernel 2.6.x?  I 
   have built the kernel with make-kpkg.  Also, Any
   specific options to 
   choose/not choose in the kernel .config?
   
   thanks
   
   Were there any package conflicts?
   
   I had an ati card and after using alien to
 convert
   their .rpm to a .deb 
   it installed fine but created mesa depend
  conflicts.
Wondering if the 
   same happens on nvidia?
   
   Kevin Mark wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:46:38AM -0400, Emma
   Jane Hogbin wrote:

   As a warning ... I was getting ready to
 upgrade
  my
   kernel to 2.6. I
   downloaded the new nvidia package. I was
  following
   instructions from
   /usr/share/doc without really thinking and did
 a
   make on the modules
   package. Within seconds I got dumped out of X
  and
   have been unable to
   start it ever since. The error messages I'm
   getting have to do with the
   module versions not matching the kernel
  versions.
   
   I have no idea how to get X back under my old
   kernel, and the new one
   isn't ready to be used yet (basically
 nothing's
   working yet).
   
   So as a warningdo NOT mess around with the
   latest nvidia packages 
   until you know for sure that the rest of the
 2.6
   kernel is going to work. :(
   
   emma
   
   -- 
   Emma Jane Hogbin

Hi Emma,
are you referring to 'make'ing X or the
 kernel?
couldnt you just reinstall what was overriten?
or remove the X packages and install them?
-Kev
   
   
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
 Contact
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 =
 BoxBattle.com - Semper Absurda
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-13 Thread csj
On 13. May 2004 at 4:56AM -0700,
welly hartanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm running debian sid 2.6.5-1-686 with Nvidia
 GeForce4 MX 440.
 I'm not using the driver from NVidia web site, since
 I'm too lazy to search for it...;-)
 What I did is :
 - apt-get install nvidia-kernel-common
 - apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source
 and I've got my kernel source installed too.
 My XF86Config using nv as driver.

Then you're not using the nvidia driver.

 And that's enough for me to have a nice smooth display
 on my gnome

Have you installed any of the 3D games packages, like tuxracer,
armagetron, gltron, chromium?

[...]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and NVIDIA kernel

2004-05-13 Thread welly hartanto
well
I realized that I had not installed any games ( except
gnome games ) at all...
I did find some slow performance to play tuxracer,
chromium, etc...
So, I should installed NVidia driver then. Last night
I installed the driver and thank God I'm
successfull...
Here's what I did :

debian box sid 2.6.5 and
NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run. Doing :

-   ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run
--extract-only
-   cd NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336.pkg1
-   as root doing : make install
-   edit /etc/inittab and change default runlevel to
1.
-   reboot
-   cd to the directory where the NVIDIA...pkg1.run is
 extracted.
-   ./nvidia-installer
-   the installer suggest to change runlevel to 3.
in my case, I didn't do what it suggest and go on 
 with runlevel 1 by answering 'No'.
-   the installer said that there's no kernel 
 interfaces and suggest to download...say 'NO' !
-   the installer than built its own kernel interface 
 for 2.6.5, just wait and see untill all process  
  done.
-   change runlevel via /etc/inittab to 5 ( or
whatever you wish )
-   reboot.

Have a nice tuxrace. ;-)


--welly---






__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and NVIDIA kernel ( FINAL )

2004-05-13 Thread welly hartanto

--- welly hartanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 well
 I realized that I had not installed any games (
 except
 gnome games ) at all...
 I did find some slow performance to play tuxracer,
 chromium, etc...
 So, I should installed NVidia driver then. Last
 night
 I installed the driver and thank God I'm
 successfull...
 Here's what I did :
 
 debian box sid 2.6.5 and
 NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run. Doing :
 
 -   ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run
 --extract-only
 -   cd NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336.pkg1
 -   as root doing : make install
 -   edit /etc/inittab and change default runlevel to
 1.
 -   reboot
 -   cd to the directory where the NVIDIA...pkg1.run
 is extracted.
 -   ./nvidia-installer
 -   the installer suggest to change runlevel to 3.
 in my case, I didn't do what it suggest and go
 on with runlevel 1 by answering 'No'.
 -   the installer said that there's no kernel   
 interfaces and suggest to download...say 'NO' !
 -   the installer than built its own kernel
 interface for 2.6.5, just wait and see untill all
  process done.
 -   change runlevel via /etc/inittab to 5 ( or
 whatever you wish )
 -   reboot.

DON'T FORGET : edit the XFree config file as discribe
in README. ( add Load glx remove Load dri and
GLcore, change driver nvidia )
 Have a nice tuxrace. ;-)
 
 
 --welly---
 
 
 
 
   
   
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'

http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861
 
 





__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-11 Thread Daniel Asarnow
Installing the current nvidia gfx drivers in 2.6 is
actually real simple.  You can download their
self-installer from nvidia.com's driver section and
run it with the sh.  It Just Worked for me (well, it
worked after I found some good workarounds for all
the lockups my nForce mobo caused).  You may have to
tell XF86-Config to use the 'nvidia' module, though.
I do not believe there are any specifics in the
kernel config to...specify.  You'll probably want to
turn on VESA 16-bit support, though.
 
-Daniel


 --- hanasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  My nvidia is due in the mail soon.  The nvidia
  packages from apt-cache 
  search seem to depend on the 2.4 kernels.  Could
 you
  walk me through the 
  steps to get get the nvidia drivers
 built/installed
  on kernel 2.6.x?  I 
  have built the kernel with make-kpkg.  Also, Any
  specific options to 
  choose/not choose in the kernel .config?
  
  thanks
  
  Were there any package conflicts?
  
  I had an ati card and after using alien to convert
  their .rpm to a .deb 
  it installed fine but created mesa depend
 conflicts.
   Wondering if the 
  same happens on nvidia?
  
  Kevin Mark wrote:
   On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:46:38AM -0400, Emma
  Jane Hogbin wrote:
   
  As a warning ... I was getting ready to upgrade
 my
  kernel to 2.6. I
  downloaded the new nvidia package. I was
 following
  instructions from
  /usr/share/doc without really thinking and did a
  make on the modules
  package. Within seconds I got dumped out of X
 and
  have been unable to
  start it ever since. The error messages I'm
  getting have to do with the
  module versions not matching the kernel
 versions.
  
  I have no idea how to get X back under my old
  kernel, and the new one
  isn't ready to be used yet (basically nothing's
  working yet).
  
  So as a warningdo NOT mess around with the
  latest nvidia packages 
  until you know for sure that the rest of the 2.6
  kernel is going to work. :(
  
  emma
  
  -- 
  Emma Jane Hogbin
   
   Hi Emma,
   are you referring to 'make'ing X or the kernel?
   couldnt you just reinstall what was overriten?
   or remove the X packages and install them?
   -Kev
  
  
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



=
BoxBattle.com - Semper Absurda


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread hanasaki
My nvidia is due in the mail soon.  The nvidia packages from apt-cache 
search seem to depend on the 2.4 kernels.  Could you walk me through the 
steps to get get the nvidia drivers built/installed on kernel 2.6.x?  I 
have built the kernel with make-kpkg.  Also, Any specific options to 
choose/not choose in the kernel .config?

thanks

Were there any package conflicts?

I had an ati card and after using alien to convert their .rpm to a .deb 
it installed fine but created mesa depend conflicts.  Wondering if the 
same happens on nvidia?

Kevin Mark wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:46:38AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:

As a warning ... I was getting ready to upgrade my kernel to 2.6. I
downloaded the new nvidia package. I was following instructions from
/usr/share/doc without really thinking and did a make on the modules
package. Within seconds I got dumped out of X and have been unable to
start it ever since. The error messages I'm getting have to do with the
module versions not matching the kernel versions.
I have no idea how to get X back under my old kernel, and the new one
isn't ready to be used yet (basically nothing's working yet).
So as a warningdo NOT mess around with the latest nvidia packages 
until you know for sure that the rest of the 2.6 kernel is going to work. :(

emma

--
Emma Jane Hogbin
Hi Emma,
are you referring to 'make'ing X or the kernel?
couldnt you just reinstall what was overriten?
or remove the X packages and install them?
-Kev


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Bill Kalebaugh




Kevin Mark wrote:

  On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:46:38AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
  
  
As a warning ... I was getting ready to upgrade my kernel to 2.6. I
downloaded the new nvidia package. I was following instructions from
/usr/share/doc without really thinking and did a "make" on the modules
package. Within seconds I got dumped out of X and have been unable to
start it ever since. The error messages I'm getting have to do with the
module versions not matching the kernel versions.

I have no idea how to get X back under my old kernel, and the new one
isn't ready to be used yet (basically nothing's working yet).

So as a warningdo NOT mess around with the latest nvidia packages 
until you know for sure that the rest of the 2.6 kernel is going to work. :(

emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin

  
  Hi Emma,
are you referring to 'make'ing X or the kernel?
couldnt you just reinstall what was overriten?
or remove the X packages and install them?
-Kev
  

Had the same problem with 2.6.5 and had to go back to 2.6.1 to get it
all working again.

Bill K




Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 03:33, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
 On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
  that works. (What's the new stuff in the kernel that has to do with screen
  resolution? I probably messed up somewhere around there...when I did my
  make oldconfig)

Here is my Odyssey of 2.6.x:

It actually started with me installing 2.6.0-test(something) and udev
quite a while ago (in internet terms a while ago). Every Freaking time I
installed udev, everything just died.

udev went bye-bye every-time I tried it, mainly cause I didn't have time
to mess with it.

So, here I go and actually build an exact replica of the Herbert Xu
Debian Kernel 2.6.5-1(2.6.5-4 revision) .deb and headers.deb and an
nvidia-modules.deb (1.0-5336). (I rather like to do this :) I can post
my madness^Wmethods for everyone to see, if anyone cares to see it.

I installed the kernel, nvidia, udev and VMware I was determined to make
it work. As neither the nvidia or vmware modules put info in the sysfs 

BTW put this into your fstab:

  sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
  none /sys/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0

It is needed to really make the whole process work better. I still am
using hotplug, so I removed discover(1 and 2) as hotplug and discover
overlap something fierce.

Well, I ended up having to add nvidia and ide-cd to /etc/modules and
make a script that created the udev nodes every-time (as neither nvidia
or VMware) to function properly.

here are the scripts:

/etc/init.d/mknvdev
Begin
#!/bin/sh
 
if [ -e /dev/.udev.tdb ]; then
  for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7; do
  node=/dev/nvidia$i
  rm -f $node
  mknod $node c 195 $i || error mknod \$node\
  chmod 0666 $node || error chmod \$node\
  done
  node=/dev/nvidiactl
  rm -f $node
  mknod $node c 195 255|| error mknod \$node\
  chmod 0666 $node || error chmod \$node\
fi
 
exit 0
End


/etc/init.d/mkvmdev
Begin
#!/bin/sh
 
if [ -e /dev/.udev.tdb ]; then
  for i in 0 1 2 3; do
  node=/dev/parport$i
  rm -f $node
  mknod $node c 99 $i || error mknod \$node\
  chmod 0600 $node|| error chmod \$node\
  done
  for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
  node=/dev/vmnet$i
  rm -f $node
  mknod $node c 119 $i || error mknod \$node\
  chmod 0600 $node || error chmod \$node\
  done
  node=/dev/vmmon
  rm -f $node
  mknod $node c 10 165|| error mknod \$node\
  chmod 0660 $node|| error chmod \$node\
fi
 
exit 0
End

(don't forget to flag them executable and owned by root.root)

I then created symbolic links in /etc/rcS.d/ as

  S26mknvdev - ../init.d/mknvdev
  S26mkvmdev - ../init.d/mkvmdev


Which is right after devmapper starts and way after udev starts.

That is how I have taken care of my problems... might not be proper,
but then again it does work... EVERY-TIME!

ciao! Good luck!
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry

Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's
Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive
product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at
the playfield. -- Thane Walkup


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
I've now got the nvidia modules loading under 2.6.5 (hurrah!). This is
what I did (in order), although I'm not sure which are the important
parts:

apt-get install udev
/etc/init.d/nvidia-glx start
cd /lib/modules/2.6.5.dilbert/nvidia
modprobe nvidia

I must say...the touch pad is WAY more sensitive now. I'm not sure if I 
like it or not I'm going to have to relearn how to drive the cursor.
;)

emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Benedict Verheyen


Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
 I've now got the nvidia modules loading under 2.6.5 (hurrah!). This is
 what I did (in order), although I'm not sure which are the important
 parts:

 apt-get install udev
 /etc/init.d/nvidia-glx start
 cd /lib/modules/2.6.5.dilbert/nvidia
 modprobe nvidia

 I must say...the touch pad is WAY more sensitive now. I'm not sure if
 I like it or not I'm going to have to relearn how to drive the
 cursor. ;)

 emma

Try adding something like this to Section InputDevice of the
XF86Config file:

Option Resolution 256
You can then change the number to affect the speed of the
mouse.

or you can use xset m 4 1 in your  /.xinitrc where
4 is the mouse acceleration as compared to the default speed
and 1 is the threshold (1 means disable the threshold)
More in the man page of xset

Regards,
Benedict



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Mal Beaton


Kevin Mark wrote:

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:46:38AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:

As a warning ... I was getting ready to upgrade my kernel to 2.6. I
downloaded the new nvidia package. I was following instructions from
/usr/share/doc without really thinking and did a make on the modules
package. Within seconds I got dumped out of X and have been unable to
start it ever since. The error messages I'm getting have to do with the
module versions not matching the kernel versions.
I have no idea how to get X back under my old kernel, and the new one
isn't ready to be used yet (basically nothing's working yet).
So as a warningdo NOT mess around with the latest nvidia packages 
until you know for sure that the rest of the 2.6 kernel is going to work. :(

emma

--
Emma Jane Hogbin
Hi Emma,
are you referring to 'make'ing X or the kernel?
couldnt you just reinstall what was overriten?
or remove the X packages and install them?
-Kev
I used the nvidia installer and I use  a 2.6.5 kernel

didnt miss a beat



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:07:05PM +1000, Mal Beaton wrote:
 I used the nvidia installer and I use  a 2.6.5 kernel
 didnt miss a beat

You're lucky then! The problem I ran into has actually been documented. Do
a google search for, nvidia debian 2.6 and hit the I feel lucky
button. Then under Troubleshooting you'll see the problem I ran
into--not sure how to copy and paste the URL from the console, sorry. In
any case, I installed nvidia-glx before I should have and that's why I ran
into problems. I appear to now be committed to my mistakewhich would
be fine if I could figure out why X says that I no longer have a screen
that works. (What's the new stuff in the kernel that has to do with screen
resolution? I probably messed up somewhere around there...when I did my
make oldconfig)

I've got everything compiled now for the 2.6.5 (except my wireless isn't
working yet, not sure why though). But X is still throwing up errors and
my nvidia module isn't listed under lsmod. It's there under
/lib/modules/[etc]/nvidia.ko, but I can't probe it (why is everything .ko
now instead of .o?). I do have module-init-tools, and there are other 
modules loaded, so I'm not sure why nvidia's refusing to play nicely.

emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
 that works. (What's the new stuff in the kernel that has to do with screen
 resolution? I probably messed up somewhere around there...when I did my
 make oldconfig)

Here's my XFree86 log file...note does not seem to be getting the modules 
loaded:
www.xtrinsic.com/geek/config/xfree.log.txt
and then my dmesgs are at:
www.xtrinsic.com/geek/config/boot.2.6.txt
www.xtrinsic.com/geek/config/boot.2.4.txt

Please let me know which other log files might be useful...

thanks for any suggestions!
emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
 On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:07:05PM +1000, Mal Beaton wrote:
  I used the nvidia installer and I use  a 2.6.5 kernel
  didnt miss a beat
 
 You're lucky then! The problem I ran into has actually been documented. Do
 a google search for, nvidia debian 2.6 and hit the I feel lucky
 button. Then under Troubleshooting you'll see the problem I ran
 into--not sure how to copy and paste the URL from the console, sorry. In
 any case, I installed nvidia-glx before I should have and that's why I ran
 into problems. I appear to now be committed to my mistakewhich would
 be fine if I could figure out why X says that I no longer have a screen
 that works. (What's the new stuff in the kernel that has to do with screen
 resolution? I probably messed up somewhere around there...when I did my
 make oldconfig)
 
 I've got everything compiled now for the 2.6.5 (except my wireless isn't
 working yet, not sure why though). But X is still throwing up errors and
 my nvidia module isn't listed under lsmod. It's there under
 /lib/modules/[etc]/nvidia.ko, but I can't probe it (why is everything .ko
 now instead of .o?). I do have module-init-tools, and there are other 
 modules loaded, so I'm not sure why nvidia's refusing to play nicely.
Hi Emma,
from my basic guess, they changed the extension for 2.6. .o was object,
now in 2.6 .ko means kernel object.

Just a thought, I use a precompiled 2.6.4 kernel and I used the
nvidia-kernel-source package and it worked for me!(tm). Is that what you
used? I'm confused.
-Kev


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:33:36AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
 On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
  that works. (What's the new stuff in the kernel that has to do with screen
  resolution? I probably messed up somewhere around there...when I did my
  make oldconfig)
 
 Here's my XFree86 log file...note does not seem to be getting the modules 
 loaded:
   www.xtrinsic.com/geek/config/xfree.log.txt
 and then my dmesgs are at:
   www.xtrinsic.com/geek/config/boot.2.6.txt
   www.xtrinsic.com/geek/config/boot.2.4.txt
 
 Please let me know which other log files might be useful...
 
 thanks for any suggestions!
 emma
Hi Emma,
my Xfree config has the busid section. have you tried that?
Section Device
   Identifier  Card1
   Driver  nvidia
   VendorName  ATI
   BoardName   Mach64 VU
   BusID   PCI:1:0:0
EndSection
didnt see anything useful in boot logs.

in my /etc/modules I include agpgart and nvidia for 2.6.
And just for a sanity check, can you throw a knoppix in the cd to make
sure that the card still works and you are not barking up the wrong tree
x-)
HTH
-Kev


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:03:18AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:

 Just a thought, I use a precompiled 2.6.4 kernel and I used the
 nvidia-kernel-source package and it worked for me!(tm). Is that what you
 used? I'm confused.
 -Kev

Using the kernel-package means is highly recommended - I think Emma
built the package using nvidia's supplied instructions.


-- 
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



copy and paste from console (was Re: 2.6 and nvidia)

2004-05-10 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:

 ...   not sure how to copy and paste the URL from the console, sorry. 

Install the `screen' package. This provides many useful features for
console work, not least of which is a copy-and-paste facility

^A [ - start copy mode
space  - select start and end of region to copy
^A ] - paste

-- 
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6 and nvidia

2004-05-10 Thread Kent West
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:

 [Compiled nVidia drivers and now X ix broken.]

not sure how to copy and paste the URL from the console, sorry.

Which is one of the reasons I have gpm installed, gpm being the mouse 
driver for the console. Then just highlight to copy and middle-click to 
paste.

In any case, I installed nvidia-glx before I should have and that's why I ran
into problems. I appear to now be committed to my mistakewhich would
be fine if I could figure out why X says that I no longer have a screen
that works. (What's the new stuff in the kernel that has to do with screen
resolution? I probably messed up somewhere around there...when I did my
make oldconfig)
But X is still throwing up errors and
my nvidia module isn't listed under lsmod. It's there under
/lib/modules/[etc]/nvidia.ko, but I can't probe it (why is everything .ko
now instead of .o?). I do have module-init-tools, and there are other 
modules loaded, so I'm not sure why nvidia's refusing to play nicely.
 

Just temporarily, you might use the nv or vesa or vga driver to 
get back into X. That'll give you a sense of okay, back in GUI-land, 
whew, even if it's not quite what you want long-run.

--
Kent


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]