Re: A-x not defined in XEmacs
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 03:32:38PM +0100, Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and say xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc > > I am now looking for a place where I can put this command to make it > permanent. On Debian, you don't need the command at all. Just rename ~/.xmodmaprc to ~/.Xmodmap, and the Debian X startup script (/etc/X11/Xsession) will load it for you. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Let us be thankful we have commerce. Buy more. Buy more now. Buy. And be happy." --OMM (THX 1138) pgpetAwu71Oyq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: A-x not defined in XEmacs
Hi Denis! On Die, 15 Feb 2000, schrieb Denis Zaitsev: > By the way, why do you use pc102 as XkbModel and assign all > Xkb... explicitly? I tried some settings. Yesterday I found a workaround with the help of a gnu-newsgroup: I created a file ~/.xmodmaprc: clear mod1 clear mod4 keycode 64 = Meta_L add mod1 = Meta_L add mod4 = Alt_L and say xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc I am now looking for a place where I can put this command to make it permanent. .xinitrc has no effect and .xsession has a fatal effect: no login possible Ciao! juh -- juh's Sudelbuch --- Literatur und Satire per E-Mail http://www.sudelbuch.de Unterstützen Sie das Sudelbuch durch eine Spende. http://www.sudelbuch.de/spende.html
Re: A-x not defined in XEmacs
If Emacs complains that A-x isn't defined, it means that it receives that A-x correctly, but Emacs has nothing assigned to this combination. It seems that there are no problem with X, as well as with Emacs. By the way, why do you use pc102 as XkbModel and assign all Xkb... explicitly?
