Re: BLAS library?

1999-04-30 Thread Gary L. Hennigan 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary L. Hennigan) writes:
| "Thomas Gebhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| | > Is there still not a package available that contains the BLAS library?
| | > The fact that LAPACK is there is great, but I need BLAS too. I realize 
| | > there's an optimized PPro version of the BLAS library, but this is for 
| | > light development work on an old 486 and I'm not even sure the PPro
| | > optimized version would work.
| | 
| | Doesn't Lapack provide the blas libs?
| 
| No, I don't believe so. LAPACK uses BLAS a lot though.

Sorry to reply to my own message, but there is a BLAS library in
lapack-dev that will suit my needs perfectly.

Gary

Re: BLAS library?

1999-04-30 Thread Gary L. Hennigan 
"Thomas Gebhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Is there still not a package available that contains the BLAS library?
| > The fact that LAPACK is there is great, but I need BLAS too. I realize 
| > there's an optimized PPro version of the BLAS library, but this is for 
| > light development work on an old 486 and I'm not even sure the PPro
| > optimized version would work.
| 
| Doesn't Lapack provide the blas libs?

No, I don't believe so. LAPACK uses BLAS a lot though.

Gary

Re: BLAS library?

1999-04-30 Thread Thomas Gebhardt 
Hi,

> Is there still not a package available that contains the BLAS library?
> The fact that LAPACK is there is great, but I need BLAS too. I realize 
> there's an optimized PPro version of the BLAS library, but this is for 
> light development work on an old 486 and I'm not even sure the PPro
> optimized version would work.

Doesn't Lapack provide the blas libs?

Thomas