Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).

2019-05-05 Thread Steve McIntyre 
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 08:07:51AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget 
>the original post -- was it really this widespread?

It's just bullshit trolling. Multiple different From: addresses, all
sent via cock.li. Easily blocked/ignored.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
There's no sensation to compare with this
Suspended animation, A state of bliss

Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).

2019-05-05 Thread rhkramer 
On Sunday, May 05, 2019 12:51:15 AM vsnsdual...@redchan.it wrote:
> Bar rules do not allow lawyers to serve under a non-lawyer
> in
> an organization, and the organization was essentially a pro-bono law
> firm
> (which really needed a attorney in it's ranks...)

That's interesting, but (off the point of this email exchange), it puzzles me 
-- many corporations headed by non-lawyers have lawyers on staff, so I'm 
guessing that the statement you made applies only to organizations like law 
firms, or, the lawyers on the staff of a non-law corporation are in something 
at 
least a little different than the normal employer / employee relationship.

(PS: I stand corrected on Kuhn being a lawyer -- thanks for the correction.)

Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget 
the original post -- was it really this widespread?