Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 13.05.2011 04:57, schrieb Aldyth Maharsha: I'm sorry i'm late for reply, yes it is old server but still used. I don't install any desktop and xserver, it is pure CLI because i'm install from debian netinst. No problem, i also have to sleep ;) Did you found any sleep or energy save or standby options in BIOS? To recover the data from your broken disk, please use a tool like parted magic (Ultimate boot cd), partimage, or clonezille to create a 1:1 clone of the broken disk to a new disk. On the new one, you can run fsck without pain or use one of the recovery tools on ultimate boot cd. Markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcccb15.6040...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
On 5/12/2011 4:49 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Am 12.05.2011 11:41, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: It's becoming very clear you've not been in the SA game very long... SA? System Administration Two mirrored would be better, so $400-1200 USD. This would yield 50,000 seeks/second vs the 300 he has now, and ~250MB/s bandwidth, vs the ~160MB/s he currently has. Never use a single drive for important data. Dont tell this idea to other people please! Apparently you don't read thoroughly either. Note my words Two mirrored above. would be better here means: maybe we can do this, but without its also ok. 95% of all financial bosses will choose cheapest solution, and this is often not the better solution. SSDs are inherently many times more reliable than [1]SRDs as they have no moving parts and dissipate very little heat. They are electronic devices and thus can eventually fail, but the probability of this happening during a standard server's deployed 3-6 year lifespan is many times lower than with SRDs. Backup/restore from/to SSDs using D2D systems or a tape library is many times faster than with RAIDED SRDs making mirroring/RAID less attractive with SSDs. Using mirroring/RAID with SSDs can save you some downtime vs a restore, but that doesn't make it mandatory. Ultimately, the decision to mirror/RAID SSDs (or SRDs for that matter) is left to the SA, based on his knowledge level of the technology, his risk analysis, his budget, etc. [1] SRD - Spinning Rust Disk - antiquated magnetic storage devices that will likely disappear from the face of the earth in 20 years (or less). -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dccce96.1010...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
On 5/12/2011 5:05 AM, Lisi wrote: On Thursday 12 May 2011 10:20:44 Stan Hoeppner wrote: ~$20k can buy you a 2 socket 24 core AMD Magny Cours HP server with 32GB RAM, quad GbE ports, a 10 GbE PCIe x4/x8 NIC, LSI's top of the line PCIe x8 RAID HBA with 1GB BBWC and 2 SFF8088 SAS ports, two LSI 24 drive 2.5 chainable SAS enclosures w/ internal expanders and 48 SAS drives of 300GB capacity and 15k spindle speed. There is an important omission in this statement. The sentence should begin In the USA., as should any discussions by USA residents of the cost of hardware. The omission is yours Lisi. You cut the immediately preceding paragraph which set the context for the remainder of that post: This typically holds true in the US where the total cost of labor is far greater than hardware. This is definitely not the case in 'developing' countries, where the acquisition cost of a single tier 1 server may very well be greater than an SA's yearly salary. Not all of us can buy our hardware in the USA, even if we can afford the hardware, and prices outside the USA can be (in my experience usually are) significantly higher. You've just repeated the exact point I made in the email which you (wrongly) attempted to critique... -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dccd3bf.4050...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
I'm not yet check my server because user still access it in office hour. Tonight i'm checking my BIOS, thank you for advice about data recovery, i have rebuild recovery server using bacula backup system and now running in my production system. If i'm still have problem, i post my problem again, i'm from indonesian and cost for infrastructure like server, NAS, switch almost two times more expensive than in US. But my company will migrate the system to new server and i'm now setting up Xen CP for virtualization and using glusterfs for distributed replicate storage. Very big thank you all help in the list, i'm wanna try the advice and i hope this works. :-) best regards, Aldyth M
Re: Help About Squeeze
Markus Neviadomski wrote: of the broken disk to a new disk. On the new one, you can run fsck without pain or use one of the recovery tools on ultimate boot cd. dd is your friend: dd if=/dev/sdxx of=disk.image bs=250M I always had good luck using that tool to recover bad disks and/or transfer images to new disks. -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcce1e8.6010...@mompl.net
Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 13.05.2011 09:46, schrieb Jeroen van Aart: Markus Neviadomski wrote: of the broken disk to a new disk. On the new one, you can run fsck without pain or use one of the recovery tools on ultimate boot cd. dd is your friend: dd if=/dev/sdxx of=disk.image bs=250M I always had good luck using that tool to recover bad disks and/or transfer images to new disks. dd is for bitbyte junkies ;) Mostly all other tools based on linux use dd, thats why you could also use a tool with a friendly UI without problems. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcce7af.1000...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
I''m sorry i have using dd for long time ago, my data not corrupted just why my server like sleep..thanks for your advise..:-) On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Markus Neviadomski li...@dieitexperten.dewrote: Am 13.05.2011 09:46, schrieb Jeroen van Aart: Markus Neviadomski wrote: of the broken disk to a new disk. On the new one, you can run fsck without pain or use one of the recovery tools on ultimate boot cd. dd is your friend: dd if=/dev/sdxx of=disk.image bs=250M I always had good luck using that tool to recover bad disks and/or transfer images to new disks. dd is for bitbyte junkies ;) Mostly all other tools based on linux use dd, thats why you could also use a tool with a friendly UI without problems. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcce7af.1000...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
Dne, 13. 05. 2011 11:58:43 je Aldyth Maharsha napisal(a): I''m sorry i have using dd for long time ago, my data not corrupted You said you had a partition error in your original post? just why my server like sleep..thanks for your advise..:-) Like others have said, it's probably a setting in your BIOS that's doing it. Update it if need be, and check the BIOS Power management, especially the Power settings (APM/ACPI) and disable *all* power-saving features. If that solves nothing, perhaps you have some hardware failure? -- Cheerio, Klistvud http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com Certifiable Loonix User #481801 Please reply to the list, not to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1305293591.31550.0@compax
Re: Help About Squeeze
Hi, Thats sound like a fake, sorry. A single-core CPU with a some piece of RAM as file server for 200 users? No... Buy a new hardware with 4 or 6 cores, 16GB RAM and a raid controller and some disks. Then copy your data from the old system on the new raid system and everything is fine. Am 12.05.2011 04:17, schrieb Aldyth Maharsha: Hi list i'm sorry if my english too bad :-) I'm using debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP running in machine AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+ with 1GB DDR I'm having trouble, my debian squeeze i'm using for samba file sharing and 200 user access that. My user using server for data sharing, myob, etc. My trouble is my server like sleep and if it's sleep i cannot ping, ssh and anything from another computer, to wakeup my server i must hit any button in the keyboard(server keyboard) and i can ping again and after 10-15 minutes it is sleep again. I'm using two harddisk, 80GB(system and home partition but system and home partition located at different partition), 160GB(user data sharing like office file, accounting file). At second harddisk(160GB) have partition error but i can't using fsck because if i'm running fsck force it is can delete the important data because my backup server not running(down) and i must backup manually. My log file like syslog and kern.log did not show any error, it is running like my system is normal, i'm check with lsof +D /var/log my ryslogd runs well. My question is what causes my debian squeeze act like it?, i'm using debian from sarge, etch, lenny and i have never encountered this problem and i'm believe debian still best linux distribution i'm ever have..:-) Any idea list?, thanks before for helping Best Regards, Aldyth M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcb88e8.4010...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
On Thursday 12 May 2011 09:14:48 Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, Thats sound like a fake, sorry. A single-core CPU with a some piece of RAM as file server for 200 users? No... Buy a new hardware with 4 or 6 cores, 16GB RAM and a raid controller and some disks. Then copy your data from the old system on the new raid system and everything is fine. Big help you are giving here! Maybe money is not the most common thing in Aldyth's country, and resources are used to their last extend. So, Aldyth, are you running any desktop like kde, gnome? On my pc kde power managment set up itself by default to put everything to sleep after some time. I had to reset everything to previous setting. By the way, I think there is way for reporting a bug against powermanagment because it reset the settings every time it is updated. Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105120940.20407.tchate...@free.fr
Re: Help About Squeeze
Markus Neviadomski wrote: Thats sound like a fake, sorry. A single-core CPU with a some piece of RAM as file server for 200 users? No... I think a 2800 Sempron will have no trouble serving files, even to 200 people. Unless they all simultaneously started copying 10+ GB of data around on the server itself. But in my experience typical file server activity is sporadic with occasional bursts. Besides the bottleneck with a file server normally is not CPU performance but network performance. You'd likely saturate the network bandwidth before you'd ever hog the CPU. Am 12.05.2011 04:17, schrieb Aldyth Maharsha: My trouble is my server like sleep and if it's sleep i cannot ping, ssh and anything from another computer, to wakeup my server i must Sounds like you have some power manager that's configured to put the system to sleep. I assume you have some desktop environment running on it. Try to access its power management configuration editor and turn off anything that makes it sleep after a certain time. In gnome it's called power management in the debian-system-preferences menu. Greetings, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcb9268.3040...@mompl.net
Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 12.05.2011 09:40, schrieb Thierry Chatelet: On Thursday 12 May 2011 09:14:48 Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, Thats sound like a fake, sorry. A single-core CPU with a some piece of RAM as file server for 200 users? No... Buy a new hardware with 4 or 6 cores, 16GB RAM and a raid controller and some disks. Then copy your data from the old system on the new raid system and everything is fine. Big help you are giving here! Maybe money is not the most common thing in Aldyth's country, and resources are used to their last extend. He wrote something about a partly broken harddisk or file system. However, he has to buy some new disks. And by that, he could establish a small software raid or use the big solution, a hardware raid controller. Fileserver w/o backup and w/o working raid cause sleepless nights. And the costs of hardware could be igored, if you have to recover broken or lost data w/o raid or backup! regards, Markus So, Aldyth, are you running any desktop like kde, gnome? On my pc kde power managment set up itself by default to put everything to sleep after some time. I had to reset everything to previous setting. By the way, I think there is way for reporting a bug against powermanagment because it reset the settings every time it is updated. Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcb9a62.6060...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
On 5/12/2011 2:14 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, Thats sound like a fake, sorry. A single-core CPU with a some piece of RAM as file server for 200 users? No... Buy a new hardware with 4 or 6 cores, 16GB RAM and a raid controller and some disks. Then copy your data from the old system on the new raid system and everything is fine. You didn't answer the OP's question. And your upgrade recommendation is complete overkill. A modern ~2Ghz Sempron can easily saturate a GbE pipe without using jumbo frames. 1GB of RAM is plenty for serving 200 office environment Samba clients--512MB would even be sufficient. If he's lacking performance it's due to insufficient head seeks bandwidth. He didn't mention a capacity shortage and he currently has ~250GB of disk. A single 250GB SSD would solve that problem instantly for $400-600 USD with an MLC drive. Two mirrored would be better, so $400-1200 USD. This would yield 50,000 seeks/second vs the 300 he has now, and ~250MB/s bandwidth, vs the ~160MB/s he currently has. Am 12.05.2011 04:17, schrieb Aldyth Maharsha: Hi list i'm sorry if my english too bad :-) I'm using debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP running in machine AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+ with 1GB DDR I'm having trouble, my debian squeeze i'm using for samba file sharing and 200 user access that. My user using server for data sharing, myob, etc. My trouble is my server like sleep and if it's sleep i cannot ping, ssh and anything from another computer, to wakeup my server i must hit any button in the keyboard(server keyboard) and i can ping again and after 10-15 minutes it is sleep again. I'm using two harddisk, 80GB(system and home partition but system and home partition located at different partition), 160GB(user data sharing like office file, accounting file). At second harddisk(160GB) have partition error but i can't using fsck because if i'm running fsck force it is can delete the important data because my backup server not running(down) and i must backup manually. My log file like syslog and kern.log did not show any error, it is running like my system is normal, i'm check with lsof +D /var/log my ryslogd runs well. My question is what causes my debian squeeze act like it?, i'm using debian from sarge, etch, lenny and i have never encountered this problem and i'm believe debian still best linux distribution i'm ever have..:-) Any idea list?, thanks before for helping Yes. Turn off all power saving features in the system BIOS. A headless installation has no power saving by default AFAIK, so apparently you're running a GUI desktop. Find the power management application in one of the control panels and disable all power saving features. They only cause headaches on servers, as you've discovered. Unless you truly *need* a GUI on your server console, get rid of it. If you need a GUI to manage a Linux server then I'd say you really need to sharpen your admin skill set. Best of luck. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcba149.1080...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
On 5/12/2011 3:29 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: And the costs of hardware could be igored, if you have to recover broken or lost data w/o raid or backup! This typically holds true in the US where the total cost of labor is far greater than hardware. This is definitely not the case in 'developing' countries, where the acquisition cost of a single tier 1 server may very well be greater than an SA's yearly salary. ~$20k can buy you a 2 socket 24 core AMD Magny Cours HP server with 32GB RAM, quad GbE ports, a 10 GbE PCIe x4/x8 NIC, LSI's top of the line PCIe x8 RAID HBA with 1GB BBWC and 2 SFF8088 SAS ports, two LSI 24 drive 2.5 chainable SAS enclosures w/ internal expanders and 48 SAS drives of 300GB capacity and 15k spindle speed. The cost of this system, in many parts of the world, may be double (or more) the yearly salary of the SA managing it. In the US this system's price tag will equal about 1/4 to 1/6th the SA's total yearly compensation package, depending on the SA's state/city. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcba66c.6020...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 12.05.2011 10:58, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: On 5/12/2011 2:14 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, Thats sound like a fake, sorry. A single-core CPU with a some piece of RAM as file server for 200 users? No... Buy a new hardware with 4 or 6 cores, 16GB RAM and a raid controller and some disks. Then copy your data from the old system on the new raid system and everything is fine. You didn't answer the OP's question. I did. The OP should get a hardware without errors (its the best time to upgrade the hardware to a new one, but any old one is also ok) and do a correct data recovery from his old disks to a new raid system. He has 200 users behind his server. Nobody could do any work until the OP is testing some BIOS settings or system configs without sleep mode, recovering the file system and so on. Because of his question, the OP is not very confident dealing with hard- and software, a new setup is the best way with the fewest possible errors. And your upgrade recommendation is complete overkill. A modern ~2Ghz Sempron can easily saturate a GbE pipe without using jumbo frames. 1GB of RAM is plenty for serving 200 office environment Samba clients--512MB would even be sufficient. If he's lacking performance it's due to insufficient head seeks bandwidth. He didn't mention a capacity shortage and he currently has ~250GB of disk. A single 250GB SSD would solve that problem instantly for $400-600 USD with an MLC drive. Two mirrored would be better, so $400-1200 USD. This would yield 50,000 seeks/second vs the 300 he has now, and ~250MB/s bandwidth, vs the ~160MB/s he currently has. Never use a single drive for important data. Dont tell this idea to other people please! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcba71c.2060...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 12.05.2011 11:20, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: On 5/12/2011 3:29 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: And the costs of hardware could be igored, if you have to recover broken or lost data w/o raid or backup! This typically holds true in the US where the total cost of labor is far greater than hardware. This is definitely not the case in 'developing' countries, where the acquisition cost of a single tier 1 server may very well be greater than an SA's yearly salary. I know about that. But lost data couldnt be recovered, only rewritten. There admin costs will get zero, if 200 users has to be rewrite all there documents. The admin will need a grave! ~$20k can buy you a 2 socket 24 core AMD Magny Cours HP server with 32GB RAM, quad GbE ports, a 10 GbE PCIe x4/x8 NIC, LSI's top of the line PCIe x8 RAID HBA with 1GB BBWC and 2 SFF8088 SAS ports, two LSI 24 drive 2.5 chainable SAS enclosures w/ internal expanders and 48 SAS drives of 300GB capacity and 15k spindle speed. You are right...but, read my first post. I wrote about 4-6 cores. This is a typical sandy bridge system with core i7. No real server hardware, but fast enough for the OP, when his Sempron is working until today! 16GB Ram are possible and cheap enough for development countrys servers. The cost of this system, in many parts of the world, may be double (or more) the yearly salary of the SA managing it. In the US this system's price tag will equal about 1/4 to 1/6th the SA's total yearly compensation package, depending on the SA's state/city. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcba9a6.9030...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
On 5/12/2011 4:23 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Am 12.05.2011 10:58, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: a new setup is the best way with the fewest possible errors. It's becoming very clear you've not been in the SA game very long... Two mirrored would be better, so $400-1200 USD. This would yield 50,000 seeks/second vs the 300 he has now, and ~250MB/s bandwidth, vs the ~160MB/s he currently has. Never use a single drive for important data. Dont tell this idea to other people please! Apparently you don't read thoroughly either. Note my words Two mirrored above. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcbab2e.9060...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 12.05.2011 11:41, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: On 5/12/2011 4:23 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Am 12.05.2011 10:58, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: a new setup is the best way with the fewest possible errors. It's becoming very clear you've not been in the SA game very long... SA? Two mirrored would be better, so $400-1200 USD. This would yield 50,000 seeks/second vs the 300 he has now, and ~250MB/s bandwidth, vs the ~160MB/s he currently has. Never use a single drive for important data. Dont tell this idea to other people please! Apparently you don't read thoroughly either. Note my words Two mirrored above. would be better here means: maybe we can do this, but without its also ok. 95% of all financial bosses will choose cheapest solution, and this is often not the better solution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcbad3f.9030...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
On 5/12/2011 4:34 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: You are right...but, read my first post. I wrote about 4-6 cores. This is a typical sandy bridge system with core i7. No real server hardware, but fast enough for the OP, when his Sempron is working until today! 16GB Ram are possible and cheap enough for development countrys servers. The OP doesn't need more performance. If so, he didn't state it here. He simply asked how to turn off the sleep mode. He didn't ask how to fix his storage device issue. It's probably safe to assume that the OP's storage device issues are due to reasons other than his skills as an SA. Most likely, as we've seen this scenario before, he's stuck with a Sempron machine with only two small disks for 200 people because of a lack of funding. If he had the funding, do you think he'd still be using such a machine as a server, even if it is adequate for his performance needs? If I were him I'd likely find your comments a bit insulting, as you have implied he doesn't know how to manage his server upgrades or recover from a disk problem. Again, note that he didn't ask for help with these basic issues that pretty much everyone on this list knows how to handle. The only hardware he apparently *needs* right now is a disk or two, not a new server. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcbae22.9090...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
On Thursday 12 May 2011 10:20:44 Stan Hoeppner wrote: ~$20k can buy you a 2 socket 24 core AMD Magny Cours HP server with 32GB RAM, quad GbE ports, a 10 GbE PCIe x4/x8 NIC, LSI's top of the line PCIe x8 RAID HBA with 1GB BBWC and 2 SFF8088 SAS ports, two LSI 24 drive 2.5 chainable SAS enclosures w/ internal expanders and 48 SAS drives of 300GB capacity and 15k spindle speed. There is an important omission in this statement. The sentence should begin In the USA., as should any discussions by USA residents of the cost of hardware. Not all of us can buy our hardware in the USA, even if we can afford the hardware, and prices outside the USA can be (in my experience usually are) significantly higher. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105121105.07292.lisi.re...@gmail.com
Re: Help About Squeeze
Am 12.05.2011 11:53, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: On 5/12/2011 4:34 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: You are right...but, read my first post. I wrote about 4-6 cores. This is a typical sandy bridge system with core i7. No real server hardware, but fast enough for the OP, when his Sempron is working until today! 16GB Ram are possible and cheap enough for development countrys servers. The OP doesn't need more performance. If so, he didn't state it here. He simply asked how to turn off the sleep mode. He didn't ask how to fix his storage device issue. It's probably safe to assume that the OP's storage device issues are due to reasons other than his skills as an SA. Most likely, as we've seen this scenario before, he's stuck with a Sempron machine with only two small disks for 200 people because of a lack of funding. If he had the funding, do you think he'd still be using such a machine as a server, even if it is adequate for his performance needs? Nobody assumed that the op has performance issues. In the past, mostly all issues with sempron systems are caused by partly broken mainboards oper power supplies. His system description sounds like an old sempron, not a new AM3-one. You may do trialerror which such a crappy system, i offer an other solution. If the OP could not by hardware, he may write this. If I were him I'd likely find your comments a bit insulting, as you have implied he doesn't know how to manage his server upgrades or recover from a disk problem. Again, note that he didn't ask for help with these basic issues that pretty much everyone on this list knows how to handle. Knowledge about sleep mode is a basic knowledge, admins should have. The OP doesnt have these knowledge i thought. Maybe he needs help on other topics too. A good supporter offer help not only for the problem, the customer askes for. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcbb304.4070...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
I'm sorry i'm late for reply, yes it is old server but still used. I don't install any desktop and xserver, it is pure CLI because i'm install from debian netinst. On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Markus Neviadomski li...@dieitexperten.dewrote: Am 12.05.2011 11:53, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: On 5/12/2011 4:34 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: You are right...but, read my first post. I wrote about 4-6 cores. This is a typical sandy bridge system with core i7. No real server hardware, but fast enough for the OP, when his Sempron is working until today! 16GB Ram are possible and cheap enough for development countrys servers. The OP doesn't need more performance. If so, he didn't state it here. He simply asked how to turn off the sleep mode. He didn't ask how to fix his storage device issue. It's probably safe to assume that the OP's storage device issues are due to reasons other than his skills as an SA. Most likely, as we've seen this scenario before, he's stuck with a Sempron machine with only two small disks for 200 people because of a lack of funding. If he had the funding, do you think he'd still be using such a machine as a server, even if it is adequate for his performance needs? Nobody assumed that the op has performance issues. In the past, mostly all issues with sempron systems are caused by partly broken mainboards oper power supplies. His system description sounds like an old sempron, not a new AM3-one. You may do trialerror which such a crappy system, i offer an other solution. If the OP could not by hardware, he may write this. If I were him I'd likely find your comments a bit insulting, as you have implied he doesn't know how to manage his server upgrades or recover from a disk problem. Again, note that he didn't ask for help with these basic issues that pretty much everyone on this list knows how to handle. Knowledge about sleep mode is a basic knowledge, admins should have. The OP doesnt have these knowledge i thought. Maybe he needs help on other topics too. A good supporter offer help not only for the problem, the customer askes for. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcbb304.4070...@dieitexperten.de
Re: Help About Squeeze
I'm sorry i'm late for reply, yes it is old server but still used. I don't install any desktop and xserver, it is pure CLI because i'm install from debian netinst.
