Re: Kernel 2.4 on potato

2000-12-26 Thread Leszek Gerwatowski
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:25:32PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> hi.  not wanting to reinvent the wheel, is it possible to use the kernel
> 2.4 with potato?  if yes then what files, if any, should i get and from
> where?  i've heard people say that it is possible but being the stubborn
> me i like to see it for myself so i'm willing to spend lots of time to
> make it work (if it's possible).
> 

I'm using kernel 2.4 on my potato box without any problems. I've installed
modutils from woody to recognize new directories organization under
/lib/modules/ and ppp package from woody to make ppp work as a module with
such modutils configuration:

alias char-major-108ppp_generic
alias /dev/ppp  ppp_generic
alias tty-ldisc-3   ppp_async
alias tty-ldisc-14  ppp_synctty
alias ppp-compress-21   bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24   ppp_deflate
alias ppp-compress-26   ppp_deflate

With these two modifications everything works just fine. Here you have
official list of needed packages from kernel 2.4.0-test10 source:


o  Gnu C  2.91.66  # gcc --version
o  Gnu make   3.77 # make --version
o  binutils   2.9.1.0.25   # ld -v
o  util-linux 2.10o# kbdrate -v
o  modutils   2.3.18   # insmod -V
o  e2fsprogs  1.19 # tune2fs --version
o  pcmcia-cs  3.1.21   # cardmgr -V
o  PPP2.4.0# pppd --version
o  isdn4k-utils   3.1beta7 # isdnctrl 2>&1|grep version

BTW I use e2fsprogs 1.18 from potato without any problems. Any other newer
packages like pcmcia-cs or isdn4-utils I don't use so I don't care about
them.

-- 
o--o  ___
|Leszek Gerwatowski|_/_|_\
o--o   (o\__/o)=)
"Don't fix it if it isn't broken"



Re: Kernel 2.4 on potato

2000-12-26 Thread John Galt

Not a problem.  You need make, gcc, and binutils at a minimum.  Good
things to have would be libncurses-dev (for menuconfig), TCl/TK (for
xconfig), and kernel-package (makes things a LOT easier...).  Just apt-get
them--if you have apt set up for remote, you're golden: if it's still set
up for CD, you should still be fine: IIRC they're on CD1 or CD2.  It's
possible, but not something to be undertaken lightly: my old 486 took OTO
16 hours to compile a kernel...

On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Rino Mardo wrote:

> hi.  not wanting to reinvent the wheel, is it possible to use the kernel
> 2.4 with potato?  if yes then what files, if any, should i get and from
> where?  i've heard people say that it is possible but being the stubborn
> me i like to see it for myself so i'm willing to spend lots of time to
> make it work (if it's possible).
> 
> 
> cheers
> 

-- 
Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a
damn.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Kernel 2.4 on potato

2000-12-27 Thread Rino Mardo
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:02:39PM +0100 or thereabouts, Leszek Gerwatowski 
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:25:32PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> > hi.  not wanting to reinvent the wheel, is it possible to use the kernel
> > 2.4 with potato?  if yes then what files, if any, should i get and from
> > where?  i've heard people say that it is possible but being the stubborn
> > me i like to see it for myself so i'm willing to spend lots of time to
> > make it work (if it's possible).
> > 
> 
> I'm using kernel 2.4 on my potato box without any problems. I've installed
> modutils from woody to recognize new directories organization under
> /lib/modules/ and ppp package from woody to make ppp work as a module with
> such modutils configuration:
> 
> alias char-major-108ppp_generic
> alias /dev/ppp  ppp_generic
> alias tty-ldisc-3   ppp_async
> alias tty-ldisc-14  ppp_synctty
> alias ppp-compress-21   bsd_comp
> alias ppp-compress-24   ppp_deflate
> alias ppp-compress-26   ppp_deflate
> 
> With these two modifications everything works just fine. Here you have
> official list of needed packages from kernel 2.4.0-test10 source:
> 
> 
> o  Gnu C  2.91.66  # gcc --version
> o  Gnu make   3.77 # make --version
> o  binutils   2.9.1.0.25   # ld -v
> o  util-linux 2.10o# kbdrate -v
> o  modutils   2.3.18   # insmod -V
> o  e2fsprogs  1.19 # tune2fs --version
> o  pcmcia-cs  3.1.21   # cardmgr -V
> o  PPP2.4.0# pppd --version
> o  isdn4k-utils   3.1beta7 # isdnctrl 2>&1|grep version
> 
> BTW I use e2fsprogs 1.18 from potato without any problems. Any other newer
> packages like pcmcia-cs or isdn4-utils I don't use so I don't care about
> them.
> 

thanks for the supply of information.  much appreciated.

i've done the check and one thing i would like to confirm is the
following:

Gnu C   2.95.2
Gnu make3.79.1
binutils2.9.5

this are the versions on my potato box.  comparing to your listing would
it matter if i use them with kernel-2.4.0-test12 (or whatever is the
latest)?

-- 



Key fingerprint = 9DE1 5825 77B4 FF45 7485  D3EB DCCF DE48 09B6 4426


"Who's watching the watchmen?"


pgpMqaJ7log7F.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Kernel 2.4 on potato

2000-12-27 Thread Leszek Gerwatowski
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:28:33PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> > 
> > I'm using kernel 2.4 on my potato box without any problems. I've installed
> > modutils from woody to recognize new directories organization under
> > /lib/modules/ and ppp package from woody to make ppp work as a module with
> > such modutils configuration:
> > 
> > alias char-major-108ppp_generic
> > alias /dev/ppp  ppp_generic
> > alias tty-ldisc-3   ppp_async
> > alias tty-ldisc-14  ppp_synctty
> > alias ppp-compress-21   bsd_comp
> > alias ppp-compress-24   ppp_deflate
> > alias ppp-compress-26   ppp_deflate
> > 
> > With these two modifications everything works just fine. Here you have
> > official list of needed packages from kernel 2.4.0-test10 source:
> > 
> > 
> > o  Gnu C  2.91.66  # gcc --version
> > o  Gnu make   3.77 # make --version
> > o  binutils   2.9.1.0.25   # ld -v
> > o  util-linux 2.10o# kbdrate -v
> > o  modutils   2.3.18   # insmod -V
> > o  e2fsprogs  1.19 # tune2fs --version
> > o  pcmcia-cs  3.1.21   # cardmgr -V
> > o  PPP2.4.0# pppd --version
> > o  isdn4k-utils   3.1beta7 # isdnctrl 2>&1|grep version
> > 
> > BTW I use e2fsprogs 1.18 from potato without any problems. Any other newer
> > packages like pcmcia-cs or isdn4-utils I don't use so I don't care about
> > them.
> > 
> 
> thanks for the supply of information.  much appreciated.
> 
> i've done the check and one thing i would like to confirm is the
> following:
> 
> Gnu C 2.95.2
> Gnu make  3.79.1
> binutils  2.9.5
> 

I use exactly the same versions - versions from potato distribution. List
above is from original /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes file and in
most cases lists MINIMAL versions of programs needed. So it's not a
problem for most programs when you have higher version.

> this are the versions on my potato box.  comparing to your listing would
> it matter if i use them with kernel-2.4.0-test12 (or whatever is the
> latest)?
> 

List of required packages for kernel 2.4.0-test12 is exactly the same
(I've checked patches 2.4.0-test11 and 2.4.0-test12 and don't see any
changes to the list above). I've compiled 2.4.0-test12 without problems
but this kernel is weird for me - it has problems with dosemu and with
ReiserFS, which I need, so I decided to stay with -test10 version and wait
for final 2.4.0. But this was bad for me - if you don't use dosemu and
ReiserFS just give it a try, without them it works just fine.

Good Luck and remember - you can always return to normal stable 2.2.x so
you risk not so much ;-)

-- 
o--o  ___
|Leszek Gerwatowski|_/_|_\
o--o   (o\__/o)=)
"Don't fix it if it isn't broken"