Re: Mutt and NFS (reprise)

1999-09-10 Thread Obi
I fixed that with the nolock options as suggested by Miquel. My problem
was that mutt couldn't lock the file (you see an error 37), so I couldn't
modify the mailbox at all.

graziano

On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:18:09PM +, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira 
wrote:
>   I'm having problems with mutt and NFS too. I mount /var/spool/mail by
> NFS and cant delete mails.
>   How to fix this?
>   Thanks, Paulo Henrique
> Quoting Obi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Thanks! It actually works ... only if I mount that directly but it
> > doesn't work if I use amd specifying nolock! I'll figure it out though.
> > 
> > Thanks again
> > graziano
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 11:51:28PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > Obi  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >I know this topic already showed up on the mailing list but the solutions
> > > >weren't really up to mu case: that is having the file on the local FS!!
> > > >
> > > >The situation is /home NFS mounted and mutt refusing to do anything to
> > > >every file in the home directory because of the dreaded locking
> > > >mechanism. THe server is a Debian stable machine and the client is an
> > > >unstable Debian client. 
> > > >
> > > >What can I do? 
> > > 
> > > If you're running a 2.2 kernel on the NFS client, it tries to do
> > > NFS locking by default. If your server doesn't support that you
> > > have to mount the NFS partition with the option "nolock". That's all.
> > > 
> > > Mike.
> > > -- 
> > > ... somehow I have a feeling the hurting hasn't even begun yet
> > >   -- Bill, "The Terrible Thunderlizards"


Re: Mutt and NFS (reprise)

1999-09-10 Thread Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
I'm having problems with mutt and NFS too. I mount /var/spool/mail by
NFS and cant delete mails.
How to fix this?
Thanks, Paulo Henrique
Quoting Obi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Thanks! It actually works ... only if I mount that directly but it
> doesn't work if I use amd specifying nolock! I'll figure it out though.
> 
> Thanks again
> graziano
> 
> On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 11:51:28PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Obi  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >I know this topic already showed up on the mailing list but the solutions
> > >weren't really up to mu case: that is having the file on the local FS!!
> > >
> > >The situation is /home NFS mounted and mutt refusing to do anything to
> > >every file in the home directory because of the dreaded locking
> > >mechanism. THe server is a Debian stable machine and the client is an
> > >unstable Debian client. 
> > >
> > >What can I do? 
> > 
> > If you're running a 2.2 kernel on the NFS client, it tries to do
> > NFS locking by default. If your server doesn't support that you
> > have to mount the NFS partition with the option "nolock". That's all.
> > 
> > Mike.
> > -- 
> > ... somehow I have a feeling the hurting hasn't even begun yet
> > -- Bill, "The Terrible Thunderlizards"


Re: Mutt and NFS (reprise)

1999-09-10 Thread Obi
Thanks! It actually works ... only if I mount that directly but it
doesn't work if I use amd specifying nolock! I'll figure it out though.

Thanks again
graziano

On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 11:51:28PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Obi  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I know this topic already showed up on the mailing list but the solutions
> >weren't really up to mu case: that is having the file on the local FS!!
> >
> >The situation is /home NFS mounted and mutt refusing to do anything to
> >every file in the home directory because of the dreaded locking
> >mechanism. THe server is a Debian stable machine and the client is an
> >unstable Debian client. 
> >
> >What can I do? 
> 
> If you're running a 2.2 kernel on the NFS client, it tries to do
> NFS locking by default. If your server doesn't support that you
> have to mount the NFS partition with the option "nolock". That's all.
> 
> Mike.
> -- 
> ... somehow I have a feeling the hurting hasn't even begun yet
>   -- Bill, "The Terrible Thunderlizards"


Re: Mutt and NFS (reprise)

1999-09-08 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Obi  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I know this topic already showed up on the mailing list but the solutions
>weren't really up to mu case: that is having the file on the local FS!!
>
>The situation is /home NFS mounted and mutt refusing to do anything to
>every file in the home directory because of the dreaded locking
>mechanism. THe server is a Debian stable machine and the client is an
>unstable Debian client. 
>
>What can I do? 

If you're running a 2.2 kernel on the NFS client, it tries to do
NFS locking by default. If your server doesn't support that you
have to mount the NFS partition with the option "nolock". That's all.

Mike.
-- 
... somehow I have a feeling the hurting hasn't even begun yet
-- Bill, "The Terrible Thunderlizards"