Re: Question about email received

2021-12-31 Thread Charles Curley
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:33:03 +0100
Julius Hamilton  wrote:

> Google would never intentionally send an email like that.

Of course they wouldn't send you an email like that. They have much
better ways of snooping information about you.

-- 
Does anybody read signatures any more?

https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/



Re: Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread Keith Bainbridge



On 31/12/21 12:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:33:03 AM Julius Hamilton wrote:

Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it.
Google would never intentionally send an email like that.


+1



Who would subscribe with a 'noreply' type address?



Re: Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:33:03 AM Julius Hamilton wrote:
> Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it.
> Google would never intentionally send an email like that.

+1



Re: Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread Julius Hamilton
Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it.
Google would never intentionally send an email like that.

Best,
Julius


On Thu 30. Dec 2021 at 17:29,  wrote:

> Hello I received from nore...@google.com the following email in Czech
> (that I translated in english):
>
> "And the value-added tax issuance ①③O③⑦②⑨③O①⑥The emblem is synchronized
> and regular and can be checked. And the invoice emblem is synchronized and
> regular and can be checked." (this was in chinese)
>
> "Confirm that this email address is yours
>
> debian-user@lists.debian.org
> This email address was recently entered to verify your email address.
> You can use this code to confirm that this email address is yours.
> 068212
> If it wasn't you, someone may have entered your email address as a typo or
> mistake. Do not share the code with anyone. There is no need to do anything
> else.
> The Google Accounts Team"
> Do you think it is a spam, not original?
> Thanks for suggestions and have all a Good Year!
> Francesco
>