Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-02 Thread David Christensen

On 09/02/2018 03:22 PM, mick crane wrote:

On 2018-09-02 19:39, David Christensen wrote:

On 09/02/2018 05:48 AM, mick crane wrote:

On 2018-09-02 13:16, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:


The Firewall Passthrough is set to Allocation Mode set to 'Passthrough
with the Passthrough Mode set to 'DHCPS-dynamic '.

It's my intention to change the Allocation Mode to 'Off', as soon as I
talk to AT Tech Support to make sure that doesn't mess things up.


I'm not quite understanding how one PC is going straight through the 
router to the ISP's network whereas you have other PCs with private 
addresses.


In my case as I understand it the ISP's router redirects from its 
external network to internal private.
PC with say 2 NICS one to the router and one to a switch whereby 
connect the local machines using PC with 2 NICS as gateway doing 
DHCP, firewall and all that.


mick



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewall_pinhole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMZ_(computing)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMZ_(computing)#DMZ_host


The OP appears to have the third option enabled on his gateway.


the ISP router maybe has NAT ( that's what it's called isn't it ) on 
some of the ports that things with the private 192.168 block connect to 
but seems to have a DMZ on one of the ports.

I dunno

mick


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Host_Configuration_Protocol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation


Internet gateways typically provide DHCP and NAT/IP masquerading to 
hosts on a private network (e.g. 192.168.1.0/24).  DMZ hosts are treated 
specially.



David



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-02 Thread mick crane

On 2018-09-02 19:39, David Christensen wrote:

On 09/02/2018 05:48 AM, mick crane wrote:

On 2018-09-02 13:16, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

The Firewall Passthrough is set to Allocation Mode set to 
'Passthrough

with the Passthrough Mode set to 'DHCPS-dynamic '.

It's my intention to change the Allocation Mode to 'Off', as soon as 
I

talk to AT Tech Support to make sure that doesn't mess things up.


I'm not quite understanding how one PC is going straight through the 
router to the ISP's network whereas you have other PCs with private 
addresses.


In my case as I understand it the ISP's router redirects from its 
external network to internal private.
PC with say 2 NICS one to the router and one to a switch whereby 
connect the local machines using PC with 2 NICS as gateway doing DHCP, 
firewall and all that.


mick



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewall_pinhole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMZ_(computing)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMZ_(computing)#DMZ_host


The OP appears to have the third option enabled on his gateway.


the ISP router maybe has NAT ( that's what it's called isn't it ) on 
some of the ports that things with the private 192.168 block connect to 
but seems to have a DMZ on one of the ports.

I dunno

mick


--
Key ID4BFEBB31



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-02 Thread David Christensen

On 09/02/2018 05:48 AM, mick crane wrote:

On 2018-09-02 13:16, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:


The Firewall Passthrough is set to Allocation Mode set to 'Passthrough
with the Passthrough Mode set to 'DHCPS-dynamic '.

It's my intention to change the Allocation Mode to 'Off', as soon as I
talk to AT Tech Support to make sure that doesn't mess things up.


I'm not quite understanding how one PC is going straight through the 
router to the ISP's network whereas you have other PCs with private 
addresses.


In my case as I understand it the ISP's router redirects from its 
external network to internal private.
PC with say 2 NICS one to the router and one to a switch whereby connect 
the local machines using PC with 2 NICS as gateway doing DHCP, firewall 
and all that.


mick



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewall_pinhole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMZ_(computing)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMZ_(computing)#DMZ_host


The OP appears to have the third option enabled on his gateway.


David



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-02 Thread mick crane

On 2018-09-02 13:16, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:


The Firewall Passthrough is set to Allocation Mode set to 'Passthrough
with the Passthrough Mode set to 'DHCPS-dynamic '.

It's my intention to change the Allocation Mode to 'Off', as soon as I
talk to AT Tech Support to make sure that doesn't mess things up.


I'm not quite understanding how one PC is going straight through the 
router to the ISP's network whereas you have other PCs with private 
addresses.


In my case as I understand it the ISP's router redirects from its 
external network to internal private.
PC with say 2 NICS one to the router and one to a switch whereby connect 
the local machines using PC with 2 NICS as gateway doing DHCP, firewall 
and all that.


mick




--
Key ID4BFEBB31



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-02 Thread Stephen P. Molnar




On 09/02/2018 01:37 AM, David Christensen wrote:

On 09/01/2018 04:05 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:



On 08/31/2018 10:41 PM, David Christensen wrote:

On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.

I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing 
anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.


Now:

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ifconfig
enp2s0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
 inet 162.237.98.238  netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 
162.237.99.255

 ether bc:ee:7b:5e:83:36  txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
 RX packets 796401  bytes 529829454 (505.2 MiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 236054  bytes 22520861 (21.4 MiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0 collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
 inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
 loop  txqueuelen 1  (Local Loopback)
 RX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0 collisions 0


It turns out that this ISP, 162.237.98.238 is my ISP, AT here in 
Columbus, Ohio.


The other four nodes on my LAn all have IP's starting with 
192.168.1 - which is what it's supposed to be.


Just what is going on here? I don't have a clue.

I dop have firewalls implemented on both the modem and the computers.

Any insights will be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



Running nslookup(1):

2018-08-31 18:53:21 dpchrist@vstretch ~
$ nslookup 162.237.98.238
Server:192.168.5.1
Address:192.168.5.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpaname = 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.


Authoritative answers can be found from:


Running host(1):

2018-08-31 18:58:15 dpchrist@vstretch ~
$ host 162.237.98.238
238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.



162.237.98.238 appears to be a valid IPv4 public Internet address.


You should have a device provided by your Internet service provider 
(ISP) between their wiring (e.g. telephone service) and your wiring 
(e.g. Ethernet local area network/LAN).  What is the make and model 
of the ISP device?  Please provide a URL to the product support page.



What are the "other four nodes"?


How is everything interconnected?


David



Thanks for your reply.

ISO device is an Arris BGE210-700 Broadband Gateway Release 1.0 from 
AT (http://www.arris.com/Search/?q=Arris+BGE210-700+Broadband+Gateway)


Wired Connections:  2 Desktops,  printer and VOIP telephone

Wireless Connections:  Laptop and two Android Smartphones

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# nslookup
 > nslookup -a
Server:192.168.1.254
Address:192.168.1.254#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:nslookup
Address: 198.105.244.130
Name:nslookup
Address: 104.239.207.44
 >
 > host
Server:192.168.1.254
Address:192.168.1.254#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find host: No answer
 >



It appears that your ISP gateway device is configured to pass through 
it's Internet address (and all incoming packets) to the computer in 
question.  This is a feature that allows a server behind the gateway 
to be visible on the Internet.



Enabling or disabling gateway features is a matter of browsing to the 
gateway's IP address (192.168.1.254?) and operatingthe web control panel.



I have a Pace Plc Model 5268AC, also through AT  The relevant 
control panel page for putting a server on the Internet would seem to 
be Settings -> Firewall -> Applications, Pinholes and DMZ.  I would 
pick a computer and then select "Allow all applications (DMZplus 
mode)" to turn the feature on.  The feature is currently off, so I 
don't know how I would turn it off.



If you can't figure out the control panel for your gateway, contact 
your ISP.



David



Thanks for your reply.

The Firewall Passthrough is set to Allocation Mode set to 'Passthrough 
with the Passthrough Mode set to 'DHCPS-dynamic '.


It's my intention to change the Allocation Mode to 'Off', as soon as I 
talk to AT Tech Support to make sure that doesn't mess things up.


--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
Consultant
www.molecular-modeling.net
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-01 Thread David Christensen

On 09/01/2018 04:05 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:



On 08/31/2018 10:41 PM, David Christensen wrote:

On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.

I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing 
anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.


Now:

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ifconfig
enp2s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
 inet 162.237.98.238  netmask 255.255.252.0  broadcast 
162.237.99.255

 ether bc:ee:7b:5e:83:36  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
 RX packets 796401  bytes 529829454 (505.2 MiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 236054  bytes 22520861 (21.4 MiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0 collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
 inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
 loop  txqueuelen 1  (Local Loopback)
 RX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0 collisions 0


It turns out that this ISP, 162.237.98.238 is my ISP, AT here in 
Columbus, Ohio.


The other four nodes on my LAn all have IP's starting with 192.168.1 
- which is what it's supposed to be.


Just what is going on here? I don't have a clue.

I dop have firewalls implemented on both the modem and the computers.

Any insights will be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



Running nslookup(1):

    2018-08-31 18:53:21 dpchrist@vstretch ~
    $ nslookup 162.237.98.238
    Server:    192.168.5.1
    Address:    192.168.5.1#53

    Non-authoritative answer:
    238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpa    name = 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.


    Authoritative answers can be found from:


Running host(1):

    2018-08-31 18:58:15 dpchrist@vstretch ~
    $ host 162.237.98.238
    238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.



162.237.98.238 appears to be a valid IPv4 public Internet address.


You should have a device provided by your Internet service provider 
(ISP) between their wiring (e.g. telephone service) and your wiring 
(e.g. Ethernet local area network/LAN).  What is the make and model of 
the ISP device?  Please provide a URL to the product support page.



What are the "other four nodes"?


How is everything interconnected?


David



Thanks for your reply.

ISO device is an Arris BGE210-700 Broadband Gateway Release 1.0 from 
AT (http://www.arris.com/Search/?q=Arris+BGE210-700+Broadband+Gateway)


Wired Connections:  2 Desktops,  printer and VOIP telephone

Wireless Connections:  Laptop and two Android Smartphones

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# nslookup
 > nslookup -a
Server:    192.168.1.254
Address:    192.168.1.254#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    nslookup
Address: 198.105.244.130
Name:    nslookup
Address: 104.239.207.44
 >
 > host
Server:    192.168.1.254
Address:    192.168.1.254#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find host: No answer
 >



It appears that your ISP gateway device is configured to pass through 
it's Internet address (and all incoming packets) to the computer in 
question.  This is a feature that allows a server behind the gateway to 
be visible on the Internet.



Enabling or disabling gateway features is a matter of browsing to the 
gateway's IP address (192.168.1.254?) and operatingthe web control panel.



I have a Pace Plc Model 5268AC, also through AT  The relevant control 
panel page for putting a server on the Internet would seem to be 
Settings -> Firewall -> Applications, Pinholes and DMZ.  I would pick a 
computer and then select "Allow all applications (DMZplus mode)" to turn 
the feature on.  The feature is currently off, so I don't know how I 
would turn it off.



If you can't figure out the control panel for your gateway, contact your 
ISP.



David



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-01 Thread rhkramer
On Saturday, September 01, 2018 11:59:27 AM Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 09/01/2018 08:26 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 01, 2018 07:05:55 AM Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >> On 08/31/2018 10:41 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> >>> On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>  I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.
>  
>  I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing
>  anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.
> >> 
> >> Wired Connections:  2 Desktops,  printer and VOIP telephone
> >> 
> >> Wireless Connections:  Laptop and two Android Smartphones
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, who is your VOIP service provider?
> > 
> > I use ObiHai, and find that it exchanges traffic with its "server"
> > continuously.
> > 
> > I've not recently attempted to check how much, and don't remember any
> > figures, but it wouldn't surprise me if that accounts for some, most,
> > all of the traffic you report.
> > 
> > And, maybe Android smartphones do something similar, especially if they
> > are setup for VOIP or some similar service.
> 
> AT

Hmm, Ok, I don't have any experience with AT VOIP, but, I still suspect that 
is the source of at least some of the traffic you notice when you are not doing 
anything outside your LAN.



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-01 Thread Stephen P. Molnar




On 09/01/2018 08:26 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday, September 01, 2018 07:05:55 AM Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

On 08/31/2018 10:41 PM, David Christensen wrote:

On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.

I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing
anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.


Wired Connections:  2 Desktops,  printer and VOIP telephone

Wireless Connections:  Laptop and two Android Smartphones

Out of curiosity, who is your VOIP service provider?

I use ObiHai, and find that it exchanges traffic with its "server" continuously.

I've not recently attempted to check how much, and don't remember any figures,
but it wouldn't surprise me if that accounts for some, most, all of the traffic
you report.

And, maybe Android smartphones do something similar, especially if they are
setup for VOIP or some similar service.



AT

--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
Consultant
www.molecular-modeling.net
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-01 Thread rhkramer
On Saturday, September 01, 2018 07:05:55 AM Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 08/31/2018 10:41 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> > On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >> I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.
> >> 
> >> I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing
> >> anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.
> >> 

> Wired Connections:  2 Desktops,  printer and VOIP telephone
> 
> Wireless Connections:  Laptop and two Android Smartphones

Out of curiosity, who is your VOIP service provider?

I use ObiHai, and find that it exchanges traffic with its "server" continuously.

I've not recently attempted to check how much, and don't remember any figures, 
but it wouldn't surprise me if that accounts for some, most, all of the traffic 
you report.

And, maybe Android smartphones do something similar, especially if they are 
setup for VOIP or some similar service.



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-01 Thread Stephen P. Molnar




On 08/31/2018 10:41 PM, David Christensen wrote:

On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.

I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing 
anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.


Now:

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ifconfig
enp2s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
 inet 162.237.98.238  netmask 255.255.252.0  broadcast 
162.237.99.255

 ether bc:ee:7b:5e:83:36  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
 RX packets 796401  bytes 529829454 (505.2 MiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 236054  bytes 22520861 (21.4 MiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0 collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
 inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
 loop  txqueuelen 1  (Local Loopback)
 RX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0 collisions 0


It turns out that this ISP, 162.237.98.238 is my ISP, AT here in 
Columbus, Ohio.


The other four nodes on my LAn all have IP's starting with 192.168.1 
- which is what it's supposed to be.


Just what is going on here? I don't have a clue.

I dop have firewalls implemented on both the modem and the computers.

Any insights will be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



Running nslookup(1):

2018-08-31 18:53:21 dpchrist@vstretch ~
$ nslookup 162.237.98.238
Server:192.168.5.1
Address:192.168.5.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpaname = 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.


Authoritative answers can be found from:


Running host(1):

2018-08-31 18:58:15 dpchrist@vstretch ~
$ host 162.237.98.238
238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.



162.237.98.238 appears to be a valid IPv4 public Internet address.


You should have a device provided by your Internet service provider 
(ISP) between their wiring (e.g. telephone service) and your wiring 
(e.g. Ethernet local area network/LAN).  What is the make and model of 
the ISP device?  Please provide a URL to the product support page.



What are the "other four nodes"?


How is everything interconnected?


David



Thanks for your reply.

ISO device is an Arris BGE210-700 Broadband Gateway Release 1.0 from 
AT (http://www.arris.com/Search/?q=Arris+BGE210-700+Broadband+Gateway)


Wired Connections:  2 Desktops,  printer and VOIP telephone

Wireless Connections:  Laptop and two Android Smartphones

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# nslookup
> nslookup -a
Server:192.168.1.254
Address:192.168.1.254#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:nslookup
Address: 198.105.244.130
Name:nslookup
Address: 104.239.207.44
>
> host
Server:192.168.1.254
Address:192.168.1.254#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find host: No answer
>

--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
Consultant
www.molecular-modeling.net
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-09-01 Thread mick crane

On 2018-08-31 20:50, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.

I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing
anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.

Now:

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ifconfig
enp2s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
inet 162.237.98.238  netmask 255.255.252.0  broadcast 
162.237.99.255

ether bc:ee:7b:5e:83:36  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
RX packets 796401  bytes 529829454 (505.2 MiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 236054  bytes 22520861 (21.4 MiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
loop  txqueuelen 1  (Local Loopback)
RX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0


It turns out that this ISP, 162.237.98.238 is my ISP, AT here in
Columbus, Ohio.

The other four nodes on my LAn all have IP's starting with 192.168.1 -
which is what it's supposed to be.

Just what is going on here? I don't have a clue.

I dop have firewalls implemented on both the modem and the computers.

Any insights will be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.


well ifconfig should report the internal private address of its NIC but 
seems to be showing the external address range of the router. Could this 
be anything to do with the router being in bridge mode which is 
something I'm not entirely clear about.


mick


--
Key ID4BFEBB31



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-08-31 Thread David Christensen

On 08/31/2018 12:50 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.

I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing anything 
outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.


Now:

root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ifconfig
enp2s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
     inet 162.237.98.238  netmask 255.255.252.0  broadcast 
162.237.99.255

     ether bc:ee:7b:5e:83:36  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
     RX packets 796401  bytes 529829454 (505.2 MiB)
     RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
     TX packets 236054  bytes 22520861 (21.4 MiB)
     TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
     inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
     loop  txqueuelen 1  (Local Loopback)
     RX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
     RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
     TX packets 399  bytes 42360 (41.3 KiB)
     TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0


It turns out that this ISP, 162.237.98.238 is my ISP, AT here in 
Columbus, Ohio.


The other four nodes on my LAn all have IP's starting with 192.168.1 - 
which is what it's supposed to be.


Just what is going on here? I don't have a clue.

I dop have firewalls implemented on both the modem and the computers.

Any insights will be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



Running nslookup(1):

2018-08-31 18:53:21 dpchrist@vstretch ~
$ nslookup 162.237.98.238
Server: 192.168.5.1
Address:192.168.5.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpa	name = 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.


Authoritative answers can be found from:


Running host(1):

2018-08-31 18:58:15 dpchrist@vstretch ~
$ host 162.237.98.238
238.98.237.162.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
162-237-98-238.lightspeed.clmboh.sbcglobal.net.



162.237.98.238 appears to be a valid IPv4 public Internet address.


You should have a device provided by your Internet service provider 
(ISP) between their wiring (e.g. telephone service) and your wiring 
(e.g. Ethernet local area network/LAN).  What is the make and model of 
the ISP device?  Please provide a URL to the product support page.



What are the "other four nodes"?


How is everything interconnected?


David



Re: Strange Network Problem

2018-08-31 Thread Dan Purgert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I am running Debian Stretch on my Linux platform.
>
> I have noticed low internet traffic when I have not been doing
> anything outside of my LAN.  This has made me a tad suspicious.
>
>
> It turns out that this ISP, 162.237.98.238 is my ISP, AT here in 
> Columbus, Ohio.

Is this pc perhaps set up to be in the dmz?


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAluJst4ACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooFfegf/UD2Fcat+GG27VWk8w9FdCDmrNwWLHX0jHXa6/0HNQYVKRBYK6x2CXvtk
98XaXDbKAp/cPrMquK9az0po9bC/M97/Ou+/ul1CiTeL9qKN065x+LuLGkEC5Ow/
f4hhqhVCzawQi4A5NcqF14asM2S3FcDQGfSpPIsP1RsA8cSO6ZykQfyLR+s0cs6K
mVfhE/1/+OdJms4Fa2tbRzgP2O7nnvKTrnZjLVTSkhVsaonL7K7USpH8bQ6jYW+N
t/o6kd4R3LLT/cpw0c6oX7835MRT4SPpmBFCbQfRxSjW4UMxpo6yZav6NwQhNEbN
owdR+fRHrLkYanSaKz4k8m3tesLgJQ==
=DK7D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
|_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281



Re: Strange network problem

2008-01-29 Thread Jude DaShiell
To download a web page with lynx hit the (p) key and you'll be presented 
with a menu of built-in choices.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Strange network problem

2008-01-29 Thread Robin
On 28/01/2008, hce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 I bought a new ADSL2+ modem and connected to my debian PC. I used DHCP
 to get IP address, I can ping www.google.com or any domain name, but
 my browser could not see www.google.com or any web site. Any
 explanations of why I could ping www.google.com (which means the DNS
 and route worked fine), but the brower could not download web pages
 (browser does not any problem if using other network connections)?
 I've disabled all firewall and service block in the ADSL modem. My
 debian system does not have any problem if connects to other network.
 Could it be the modem problem?

 Thank you.

 Jim

 This may be a silly question but prior to getting your new modem was your
browser set up to use a proxy?

-- 
rob


http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=82BS4ZCMFR1


Re: Strange network problem

2008-01-28 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:48:28 +1100
hce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I bought a new ADSL2+ modem and connected to my debian PC. I used DHCP
 to get IP address, I can ping www.google.com or any domain name, but
 my browser could not see www.google.com or any web site. Any
 explanations of why I could ping www.google.com (which means the DNS
 and route worked fine), but the brower could not download web pages
 (browser does not any problem if using other network connections)?
 I've disabled all firewall and service block in the ADSL modem. My
 debian system does not have any problem if connects to other network.
 Could it be the modem problem?

Have you tried more than one browser?  What about other protocols, such
as telnet, ssh, SMTP/POP/IMAP?

 Thank you.
 
 Jim

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Strange network problem

2008-01-28 Thread hce
On Jan 29, 2008 12:26 PM, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:48:28 +1100
 hce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I bought a new ADSL2+ modem and connected to my debian PC. I used DHCP
  to get IP address, I can ping www.google.com or any domain name, but
  my browser could not see www.google.com or any web site. Any
  explanations of why I could ping www.google.com (which means the DNS
  and route worked fine), but the brower could not download web pages
  (browser does not any problem if using other network connections)?
  I've disabled all firewall and service block in the ADSL modem. My
  debian system does not have any problem if connects to other network.
  Could it be the modem problem?

 Have you tried more than one browser?  What about other protocols, such
 as telnet, ssh, SMTP/POP/IMAP?

I tried lynx, it did display with www.google.com and other web pages,
but I have never played with lynx before, not sure it worked fine or
not.

The mail had problem as well, it could not connect to gmail pop server
in most time, but I could ping that. The mail did connecte to pop
gmail server sometime. The other thing I have to mention that ping
time was about 200ms - 800ms, not sure that would cause the brower and
mail problem or not?

Thank you.

Jim
  Thank you.
 
  Jim

 Celejar
 --
 mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
 ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Strange Network problem

1998-03-25 Thread Martin Bialasinski
Greg Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 machine since it is not acting as the router.  Also, when I add a
 certain host to my Debian /etc/hosts file.the access is great.  The

 I can also flood the machines on the network with ping -f and not lose
 any packets

 pop server = qpopper (2.2).one-reocurring 110 error ( connot get
 canonical name of  ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) in /var/adm/messages...I think
 this particular machine is just configured wrong in its email setup.

I think this is a DNS problem. Your linuxbox has trouble resolving the
names of the machines in your LAN.

Do you have a line nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in your /etc/resolv.conf ?

I had a similar problem today. I deleted the nameserver lines and couldn't
connect with telnet and ftp timed-out after one statusline. Other services
worked as well, as long as they didn't try to resolv a name. Ping worked
just right. 

In my case, the tcp wrapper wanted to use 0.0.0.0 as address for a
nameserver when it didn't find an entry in resolv.conf .

Hope this helps.

Ciao,
Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]