Re: UVC cameras
Op 12-10-10 18:05, Camaleón schreef: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > >> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: >>> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to >>> use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. >>> >>> Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image >>> in Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled >>> with the camera connected. >>> >>> Can anyone explain this observation or cite pertinent documentation? >>> >>> Thanks, ... Peter E. >> >> Not enough info to help, really, but what about your bandwidth? > > Yep, it's a bit vague description. I would also test the webcam with > another program like Kopete or Ekiga, to discard any issue with Skype. Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe you can fix things. Sjoerd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: UVC cameras
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: >> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to >> use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. >> >> Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image >> in Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled >> with the camera connected. >> >> Can anyone explain this observation or cite pertinent documentation? >> >> Thanks, ... Peter E. > > Not enough info to help, really, but what about your bandwidth? Yep, it's a bit vague description. I would also test the webcam with another program like Kopete or Ekiga, to discard any issue with Skype. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.10.12.16.05...@gmail.com
Re: UVC cameras
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: > Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use > the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. > > Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in > Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled with > the camera connected. > > Can anyone explain this observation or cite pertinent documentation? > > Thanks, ... Peter E. Not enough info to help, really, but what about your bandwidth? Cheers, Eike -- Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE Casilla de Correo 1519 1209 Asuncion / Paraguay Phone: +595-21-578698 FAX: +595-21-578690 Cell-Phone: +595-981-939317 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201010120757.40232.zp6...@gmx.net
