Re: fetchmail q
also sprach Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.11.1843 +0200]: > Have you tried the option > mda "/usr/sbin/sendmail -i %T" > ? Interesting. I am going to try that the next time I am on-site. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fetchmail q
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:46:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: | also sprach Jason Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.09.2301 +0200]: | > Doesn't the localdomains example.com mean that those addresses are | > passed onto the smtphost unaltered - as they are supposedly already | > valid addresses on the receiving machine? | | That's what I thought, but it contradicts the examples. If this is | the desired behaviour than all is good and well... | | except I would like a method to get all mail and relay them to the | same user at a different domain. This must be possible... | | But when I leave out localdomains, then *all* mail is delivered to | one user, root in the case of a daemonised process. This can't be... Have you tried the option mda "/usr/sbin/sendmail -i %T" ? It's what I use, mainly because fetchmail doesn't include a complete SMTP implementation. This, instead, uses the simple and well-understood interface of a local pipe and lets all the complexity reside in the full-featured MTA. -D -- There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who do not. http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fetchmail q
also sprach Jason Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.09.2301 +0200]: > Doesn't the localdomains example.com mean that those addresses are > passed onto the smtphost unaltered - as they are supposedly already > valid addresses on the receiving machine? That's what I thought, but it contradicts the examples. If this is the desired behaviour than all is good and well... except I would like a method to get all mail and relay them to the same user at a different domain. This must be possible... But when I leave out localdomains, then *all* mail is delivered to one user, root in the case of a daemonised process. This can't be... -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fetchmail q
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: > i am trying the following with fetchmail: > > poll server > [...] > localdomains example.com > [...] > is * > smtphost localsrv.example.com > smtpaddress office.example.com > > However, smtpaddress is just being ignored, fetchmail passes the > mail straight through without changing the smtp RCPT TO as > smtpaddress should. > > what's going on? > Doesn't the localdomains example.com mean that those addresses are passed onto the smtphost unaltered - as they are supposedly already valid addresses on the receiving machine? -- .''`. Jason Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : Registered linux user #271693 `. `'` `-http://www.debian.org/ - The Universal Operating System pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
