Re: for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

2023-06-12 Thread tomas 
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:53:03PM +0200, Smits Katze wrote:
> >What would be the difference to simply saying
> >
> >  sudo -i
> 
> The effect should be the same (and the command is more concise).
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out.

Thank you for confirmation & sorry for the nitpick :)

Cheers
-- 
t


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

2023-06-12 Thread Smits Katze 
>What would be the difference to simply saying
>
>  sudo -i

The effect should be the same (and the command is more concise).

Thanks for pointing it out.

-- 
PGP: FF815935D964B268656B43DCB8037830D522909E

Re: for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

2023-06-12 Thread tomas 
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:54:40PM +0200, Smits Katze wrote:
> Debian wiki describes how to configure a read-only rootfs and how to
> run apt and unattended-upgrades in such a filesystem:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReadonlyRoot
> 
> I would like to report that I am having considerable success with the
> following simple command sequence:
> 
> sudo su -l

What would be the difference to simply saying

  sudo -i

?

Cheers
-- 
t


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature