Re: kernel 2.2.12

2000-04-27 Thread Vitux
da Bobstopper wrote:
> 
> heya, people
> 
> i've been having some troubles with a linux fileserver i've been maintaining
> regarding seemingly random crashes and freezes. i'm inclined to put it down
> to a hardware problem but i noticed i'd used a 2.2.12 kernel and have since
> heard that 2.2.11-2.2.13 are somewhat problematic. could someone/some people
> give me a list of known problems in the 2.2.12 kernel in order to perhaps
> shed some light on what's going wrong and also for future reference?
> 
> please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] since i'm no longer on
> this mailing list. thank you
> 
> from
> 
> da Bobstopper
> 
> --
Maybe a silly suggestion:
Why not just make a 2.2.14 kernel? My Slink with 2.2.14 is
rock-solid...
;-)
Vitux

-- 
Death comes to us in various guises, 
swiftly changing as a baby's mood...


Debian GNU/Linux
Micro$loth-free Zone


Re: kernel 2.2.12

2000-04-28 Thread kmself
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 12:33:31AM +0800, da Bobstopper wrote:
> heya, people
> 
> i've been having some troubles with a linux fileserver i've been maintaining
> regarding seemingly random crashes and freezes. i'm inclined to put it down
> to a hardware problem but i noticed i'd used a 2.2.12 kernel and have since
> heard that 2.2.11-2.2.13 are somewhat problematic. could someone/some people
> give me a list of known problems in the 2.2.12 kernel in order to perhaps
> shed some light on what's going wrong and also for future reference? 
> 
> please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] since i'm no longer on
> this mailing list. thank you

I've been having endless problems with 2.2.14 on one box I use, the
other runs fine with it.  See posts to the linux kernel mailing list for
details.  I'd suggest you file a bug report, though I don't know whether
or not you'll get a response.

-- 
Karsten M. Selfhttp:/www.netcom.com/~kmself
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595  DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-30 Thread Stavros


On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, William Ono wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Stavros wrote:
> 
> > have anyone faced any problems compiling the 2.2.12 kernel on potato?
> 
> I'm sitting at a potato system running 2.2.12 right now, so it works just
> fine for me..
> 
> Was there a specific problem you were having?
> 
> -- 
> William Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   PGP key: 
> 0x93BA6AFD
>  fingerprint = E3 64 C5 43 3E B3 2D A6  C6 D7 E3 45 90 24 78 DE = fingerprint
> PGP-encrypted mail welcome!   "640k ought to be enough for everybody."
> 
> 


i get alot of errors like this
In file included from init/main.c:26:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/io.h: In function `virt_to_phys':
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/io.h:112: `PAGE_OFFSET_RAW' undeclared (first
use in this function)
and then the compile proccess stops.
(make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1)



Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-30 Thread Laurent Martelli
> "Stavros" == Stavros  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  Stavros> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, William Ono wrote:

  >> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Stavros wrote:
  >> 
  >> > have anyone faced any problems compiling the 2.2.12 kernel on
  >> potato?
  >> 
  >> I'm sitting at a potato system running 2.2.12 right now, so it
  >> works just fine for me..
  >> 
  >> Was there a specific problem you were having?

  Stavros> i get alot of errors like this In file included from
  Stavros> init/main.c:26: /usr/src/linux/include/asm/io.h: In
  Stavros> function `virt_to_phys':
  Stavros> /usr/src/linux/include/asm/io.h:112: `PAGE_OFFSET_RAW'
  Stavros> undeclared (first use in this function) and then the
  Stavros> compile proccess stops.  (make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1)

Did you 'make dep' ? I had something similar when trying to compile
2.2.11. I downloaded the whole 2.2.12, unpacked it in a fresh new
directory, and it compiled fine. 

-- 
Laurent Martelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-30 Thread Ernest Johanson
I just upgraded a potato system to 2.2.12 due to the 2.2.11 memory leak.
The release notes say that the .12 kernel won't compile with gcc 2.95. I
have gcc 2.91.66-2 on that system and it compiled ok, a few warnings but
no errors. System came up with no problem and no memory leak.

Ernest Johanson
Web Systems Administrator
Fuller Theological Seminary


On 30 Aug 1999, Laurent Martelli wrote:

> Date: 30 Aug 1999 20:01:58 +0200
> From: Laurent Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: kernel 2.2.12
> 
> >>>>> "Stavros" == Stavros  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>   Stavros> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, William Ono wrote:
> 
>   >> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Stavros wrote:
>   >> 
>   >> > have anyone faced any problems compiling the 2.2.12 kernel on
>   >> potato?
>   >> 
>   >> I'm sitting at a potato system running 2.2.12 right now, so it
>   >> works just fine for me..
>   >> 
>   >> Was there a specific problem you were having?
> 
>   Stavros> i get alot of errors like this In file included from
>   Stavros> init/main.c:26: /usr/src/linux/include/asm/io.h: In
>   Stavros> function `virt_to_phys':
>   Stavros> /usr/src/linux/include/asm/io.h:112: `PAGE_OFFSET_RAW'
>   Stavros> undeclared (first use in this function) and then the
>   Stavros> compile proccess stops.  (make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1)
> 
> Did you 'make dep' ? I had something similar when trying to compile
> 2.2.11. I downloaded the whole 2.2.12, unpacked it in a fresh new
> directory, and it compiled fine. 
> 
> -- 
> Laurent Martelli
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-31 Thread Stavros
the problem had something to do with the xconfig.
after i did menuconfig, saved and exit everything warked fine.


thnanks everyone.


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-31 Thread Phillip Deackes
Ernest Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just upgraded a potato system to 2.2.12 due to the 2.2.11 memory
> leak.
> The release notes say that the .12 kernel won't compile with gcc 2.95.
> I
> have gcc 2.91.66-2 on that system and it compiled ok, a few warnings
> but
> no errors. System came up with no problem and no memory leak.
 
I have the latest unstable system, with gcc 2.95.1-0pre2. Kernel 2.2.12
compiled fine and I have been using if for a couple of days now.

I must admit, I went away and did something else while it was compiling
so maybe it did throw up some errors. It works OK, so what the heck!


--
Phillip Deackes
Debian Linux (Potato) 


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-31 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Stavros wrote:
> 
> the problem had something to do with the xconfig.
> after i did menuconfig, saved and exit everything warked fine.
> 
> thnanks everyone.
> 
Hi,

thanks for this hint. I had that same error message (PAGE_OFFSET_RAW'
undeclared).
I had copied my .config from a 2.2.10 kernel source, used 'make xconfig'
and compiling failed. I then tried 'make oldconfig' and it asked me:

Maximum Physical Memory (1GB, 2GB) [1GB] (NEW)

Obviously, 'make xconfig' fails to set this parameter. Or is use of
'make oldconfig' mandatory, when using an old .config? 


Heinrich Rebehn
"Have Disk - will travel"
University of Bremen
Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering
- Department of Telecommunications -

E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone : +49/421/218-4664
Fax   :-3341


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-08-31 Thread Andreas Piesk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

on Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Ernest Johanson wrote:
> I just upgraded a potato system to 2.2.12 due to the 2.2.11 memory leak.
> The release notes say that the .12 kernel won't compile with gcc 2.95. I
> have gcc 2.91.66-2 on that system and it compiled ok, a few warnings but
> no errors. System came up with no problem and no memory leak.
>

hiho,

i compiled 2.2.12 with gcc 2.95 without any problems.
i think -fno-strict-aliasing must be set.
no problems so far.

ciao -ap
___

 Andreas Piesk   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IT Manager BFW GmbH Leipzig
 pgp fingerprint: 23CB A7E2 2E53 373C  DBCD 8EFC  61C1
___

What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
___


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: moRRTxEGV9465ugZKlFYNrKHRixkTGIM

iQEVAwUBN80zLWFk4I9f3qPhAQEPmAf+PE6Y5VLo/LvzNKSJUTL2nLu27IQSIaTs
o2HTkVLykh12a+RqVL9poZiILpj/l+FUy+mbefxDSgFtNDxQu90KcR0E8VpCMcmE
pwGI8lDlCSDGtIVHByoto5A2QkrWkq8RkrS6jgxa47LAU7R7x32afgvHPrnen6FI
OUhtKiuqlK9VUqsJnb0QXq1fYYaMXa00TKoJBQe45lt6cXYcSBcaHD+Dxf7tinse
7VnE8+HMcaSkL5mLg0JJy1cAQUuN2++YEvX2y0SRpHDO4+g88hQxHzn02WzVzf+C
m57XoaejExfZU7h4ki832Oun1yq0dMNn1/4avGohk0pgAn6KE5gM6g==
=WFYb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: kernel 2.2.12

1999-09-01 Thread Mirek Kwasniak
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 04:04:21PM +0200, Andreas Piesk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> on Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Ernest Johanson wrote:
> > I just upgraded a potato system to 2.2.12 due to the 2.2.11 memory leak.
> > The release notes say that the .12 kernel won't compile with gcc 2.95. I
> > have gcc 2.91.66-2 on that system and it compiled ok, a few warnings but
> > no errors. System came up with no problem and no memory leak.
> >
> 
> hiho,
> 
> i compiled 2.2.12 with gcc 2.95 without any problems.
> i think -fno-strict-aliasing must be set.
> no problems so far.

2.2.12 Makefile has now this setting:


CFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer

# use '-fno-strict-aliasing', but only if the compiler can take it
CFLAGS += $(shell if $(CC) -fno-strict-aliasing -S -o /dev/null -xc
/dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo "-fno-strict-aliasing"; fi)


Mirek