Re: nm-applet reports 802.11 connected, but can't actually communicate over network?
In case anyone finds this thread in an archive search later: I got home from work today and WiFi was connected correctly. I have no idea why. -- Carl Fink ca...@li-con.org Chair, LI-CON, March 29-30, 2014, Rockville Centre, NY Con Site: http://li-con.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140215033020.ga24...@panix.com
Re: nm-applet reports 802.11 connected, but can't actually communicate over network?
Carl Fink, 10.02.2014: I'm trying to use my Testing system with a Realtek rtl8188ce 802.11 adapter. I use Gnome's nm-applet to connect to the wireless access point, and it accepts the passphrase and connects, fine. However, all attempts to do anything over the network fail, e.g. ping, traceroute, attempts to open a web page all time out with no result. My first thought was name resolution but I get the same thing with an IP address. My Windows 8.1 ultrabook connects to this network fine. So does my Android phone. So does my (company-issue) iPad. Why is the Debian system failing? I do have the Realtek nonfree firmware installed and this system worked OK in another building using a different WiFi router. Did that router use the same kind of encryption as this one? Or are there any other differences you can think of? Output of ifconfig: loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1 RX packets:4151 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4151 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:883087 (862.3 KiB) TX bytes:883087 (862.3 KiB) wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:e0:4c:a1:07:a5 inet addr:192.168.1.109 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:4cff:fea1:7a5/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:796 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:828 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:251403 (245.5 KiB) TX bytes:103301 (100.8 KiB) Output of route: -v Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 wlan0 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 wlan0 Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide. Any chance you need to register your MAC address for this network? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140211201814.gc13...@cs.utexas.edu
Re: nm-applet reports 802.11 connected, but can't actually communicate over network?
On 11/02/2014 15:18, Selim T. Erdogan wrote: Carl Fink, 10.02.2014: [...] Output of route: -v Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 wlan0 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 wlan0 Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide. Any chance you need to register your MAC address for this network? Or that you've set wlan0 to use a static IP, which is now incorrect? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52fa8c52.9050...@djph.net
Re: nm-applet reports 802.11 connected, but can't actually communicate over network?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:18:14PM -0600, Selim T. Erdogan wrote: Any chance you need to register your MAC address for this network? No. If so, I would have had to register the ultrabook, iPad, and phone also. -- Carl Fink ca...@li-con.org Chair, LI-CON, March 29-30, 2014, Rockville Centre, NY Con Site: http://li-con.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140211215817.ga25...@panix.com
Re: nm-applet reports 802.11 connected, but can't actually communicate over network?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:47:14PM -0500, Dan Purgert wrote: Or that you've set wlan0 to use a static IP, which is now incorrect? Nope. DHCP only. -- Carl Fink ca...@li-con.org Chair, LI-CON, March 29-30, 2014, Rockville Centre, NY Con Site: http://li-con.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140212051644.ga2...@panix.com
