Re: Re[2]: What's the state of gnome on debian ?
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Joey Hess wrote: > > Hmm since wmaker 0.16 is gnome complient does that mean the gnome pager will > work with it? That'd be useful. > I don't know about wmaker in particular, but in theory I guess the answer is yes. There's a big gap between theory and practice though... ;-) Havoc Pennington http://pobox.com/~hp -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Re: Re[2]: What's the state of gnome on debian ?
Havoc Pennington wrote: > Gnome will work with a non-compliant window manager, it's just that "Gnome > compliance" will eventually give you extra-cool features. Right now it > lets you use the buggy pager applet and some more minor things, so it's > not too exciting. Hmm since wmaker 0.16 is gnome complient does that mean the gnome pager will work with it? That'd be useful. -- see shy jo -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Re: Re[2]: What's the state of gnome on debian ?
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Bob Bernstein wrote: > > Hmmm...I feel like offering a reminder that two of the .20 tarballs will not > compile without surgery: in utils one must get rid of gdiskfree, and in admin > get rid of gxsnmp. At least that's been mine, and several other's experience. > I understand there's a fixed-up version of gxsmnp in the works, and that the > gdiskfree problem is known and may have been fixed in the cvs tree. The latter > however AFAIK, is still not open for anon download. > AnonCVS just came back up; give it a try. You may need to use a new server name, like anoncvs.gnome.org. Do be nice to the server though, it's also the Debian web server and some other stuff. For compilation I recommend make -k. ;-) > I too probably could benefit from reading up on the 'window-manager > compliance' issue. I seem to be runnng the panel here with AfterStep 1.4.5 (I > think that's the version ) with no problems other than the bugginess of > some of the Gnome applets. > Gnome will work with a non-compliant window manager, it's just that "Gnome compliance" will eventually give you extra-cool features. Right now it lets you use the buggy pager applet and some more minor things, so it's not too exciting. Havoc Pennington http://pobox.com/~hp -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Re[2]: What's the state of gnome on debian ?
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current release .20 of GNOME is waiting in Incoming (things seem > slow getting into slink). You can get it from the maintainer's site -- > www.jimpick.com. I package Imlib and it too is waiting in Incoming. > You can get it from www.livenet.net/~shaleh/software. Hmmm...I feel like offering a reminder that two of the .20 tarballs will not compile without surgery: in utils one must get rid of gdiskfree, and in admin get rid of gxsnmp. At least that's been mine, and several other's experience. I understand there's a fixed-up version of gxsmnp in the works, and that the gdiskfree problem is known and may have been fixed in the cvs tree. The latter however AFAIK, is still not open for anon download. I too probably could benefit from reading up on the 'window-manager compliance' issue. I seem to be runnng the panel here with AfterStep 1.4.5 (I think that's the version ) with no problems other than the bugginess of some of the Gnome applets. -n--e--u--t--r--i--n--of--e--v--e--r--! Bob Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.brainiac.com/bernie at Esmond, R.I. ftp://rupturedduck.dyn.ml.org (sometimes) -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
