Re: Bug dans l'installateur?
jerome moliere [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : Bonjour tous, l'occasion de mes tests en installant des etch/lenny j'ai pu constater ce qui me semble tre un bug dans l'installateur... Arrivl' tape du setup grub, si on choisit d'installer grub ailleurs que sur le MBR du 1er disque,le menu.lst g n r est incorrect avec une entr e root (hd1) qui est inutile et genante puisqu'elle emp che le boot...Donc en la supprimant temporairement puis en reeditant le fichier manuellement une fois la machine d marr e on fixe le souci... Confirmez vous? Si oui, comment le signaler l' quipe debian?Jamais fait cela avec Debian Pour signaler un problème, voir le manuel de l'installateur Debian : http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/fr.i386/ch05s03.html#problem-report a+ -- Philippe Batailler -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/DebFrFrenchLists Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug ou Erro
Tinti escreveu: Eu coloquei a biblioteca no /ur/lib32/ apesar dela ser 64 salvo me engano entao o erro pode ser por causa disso. Você não tem que colocar nada, em lugar nenhum :-) Remova o arquivo que você colocou manualmente e faça: #aptitude install liblog4cpp5 liblog4cpp5-dev Att, Renato -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug ou Erro
Esta instalado esse pacote? liblog4cpp5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug raccourcis clavier gedit (ctrl+s et ctrl+a)
HS (comment on dit override en français ?) Surcharger ? :) Pour le reste aucune idée. /HS -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/DebFrFrenchLists Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en bind 9? aun sin solucion
amigos sun me siguen rebotando los correos en mi servidor dns esta fué la configuración que le puse ahora y nada . $ttl 3600 @ IN SOA dns1.dominio.cu. root.dominio.cu. ( 2008060359 ; serial 300; refresh (15 minutes) 400; retry (10 minutes) 86400 ; expire (1 day) 3600 ; minimum (1 hour) ) dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS mx3.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS mail1.dominio.cu. *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.82 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.83 mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.2.11 fsn.dominio.cu.IN A 172.16.1.82 mail1.dominio.cu. IN A 172.16.1.82 www.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.hft.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. ht.dominio.cu.IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. - una ayuda me servirá de mucho pues los subdominios no me estan recibiendo correo ni de yahoo españa ni de otros dominios de internet gracias de antemano. El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:14:21 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃÂa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquàsolo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃÂ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃÂ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃÂa nada que ver con tu pregunta. Saludos. -- Manolo DÃÂaz sigo embarcado pues no me ve el subdominio desde yahoo.es mira orry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No MX or A records for subdominioo.pepe.dominio.cu --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Received: from [217.146.182.180] by n33.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [87.248.110.106] by t6.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received:
Re: bug en bind 9 ?
El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havía pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquí solo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sí, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquí.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenía nada que ver con tu pregunta. Saludos. -- Manolo Díaz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en bind 9 ?
El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquà solo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃa nada que ver con tu pregunta. ç si en gran parte me creo que me puede resolver el problema pues me estaba dando un conflicto cuando ponia por ejemplo ese subdominio que lo tengo en una red privada publicado por www en registro mx de ese subdominio desaparecía por completo vere como se ve en estos momentos ademas que no se porque el registro dns se esta demorando tanto en actualizar con los servidores de internet el numero de serie tiene que ver con eso? Saludos. -- Manolo DÃaz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en bind 9 ?
El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:30:40 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquà solo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃa nada que ver con tu pregunta. ç si en gran parte me creo que me puede resolver el problema pues me estaba dando un conflicto cuando ponia por ejemplo ese subdominio que lo tengo en una red privada publicado por www en registro mx de ese subdominio desaparecía por completo vere como se ve en estos momentos ademas que no se porque el registro dns se esta demorando tanto en actualizar con los servidores de internet el numero de serie tiene que ver con eso? El número de serie ha de ser aumentado cada vez que se hace un cambio en los registros DNS. Aún así, los cambios tardan en reflejarse en el resto de servidores DNS del mundo un tiempo máximo igual al TTL, que suele variar entre minutos y un par de días. Para ver si el cambio se ha realizado pregúntale directamente a uno de los servidores de nombre de dominio.cu. Con la herramienta dig sería algo así: dig dominio.cu mx ns1.dominio.cu Saludos. -- Manolo Díaz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en bind 9 sin solucion?
El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquà solo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃa nada que ver con tu pregunta. Saludos. -- Manolo DÃaz sigo embarcado pues no me ve el subdominio desde yahoo.es mira orry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No MX or A records for subdominioo.pepe.dominio.cu --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Received: from [217.146.182.180] by n33.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [87.248.110.106] by t6.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 38168 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; realmente no entiendo porque hace eso aqui esta la config del dns a ver que puedo tener mal puesto - $ttl 38400 @ IN SOA dns1.dominio.cu. root.dominio.cu. ( 2008060358 10800 3600 604800 38400 ) dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS mx3.dominio.cu.cu. *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 hercules.dominio.cu.IN A 172.16.1.3 mail1.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.padrito.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. andresito.dominio.cu.IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. angel.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAMEns1.dominio.cu. webmail.subdominio.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en bind 9 sin solucion?
El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:14:21 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquà solo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃa nada que ver con tu pregunta. Saludos. -- Manolo DÃaz sigo embarcado pues no me ve el subdominio desde yahoo.es mira orry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No MX or A records for subdominioo.pepe.dominio.cu --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Received: from [217.146.182.180] by n33.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [87.248.110.106] by t6.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 38168 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; realmente no entiendo porque hace eso aqui esta la config del dns a ver que puedo tener mal puesto - $ttl 38400 @ IN SOA dns1.dominio.cu. root.dominio.cu. ( 2008060358 10800 3600 604800 38400 ) dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS mx3.dominio.cu.cu. *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 hercules.dominio.cu.IN A 172.16.1.3 mail1.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.padrito.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. andresito.dominio.cu.IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. angel.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAMEns1.dominio.cu. webmail.subdominio.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. Tienes un tiempo de refresco de 3 horas (10800 s) y un tiempo
Re: bug en bind 9 sin solucion?
El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:14:21 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃÂa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquàsolo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃÂ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃÂ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃÂa nada que ver con tu pregunta. Saludos. -- Manolo DÃÂaz sigo embarcado pues no me ve el subdominio desde yahoo.es mira orry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No MX or A records for subdominioo.pepe.dominio.cu --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Received: from [217.146.182.180] by n33.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [87.248.110.106] by t6.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 38168 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; realmente no entiendo porque hace eso aqui esta la config del dns a ver que puedo tener mal puesto - $ttl 38400 @ IN SOA dns1.dominio.cu. root.dominio.cu. ( 2008060358 10800 3600 604800 38400 ) dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS mx3.dominio.cu.cu. *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 hercules.dominio.cu.IN A 172.16.1.3 mail1.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.padrito.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. andresito.dominio.cu.IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. angel.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAMEns1.dominio.cu. webmail.subdominio.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. Tienes un tiempo de refresco de 3 horas (10800 s) y un
Re: bug en bind 9 sin solucion?
socio ya resolví el lío de los mx pero el problema de los registros IN A O IN CNAME me tumba los registros mx del dominio y subdominios El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:14:21 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: El Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:13 -0400 (CDT) Luis Rondon Paz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. minaz.cu escribió: hola amigos me esta ocurriendo lo siguiente en un dns que tengo configurado por aqui pues tengo definido registros mx y registros IN A sucede que cuando pongo registros IN A los registros mx de un subdominio desaparecen automaticamente aqui lespongo un ejemplo de configuracion dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu. IN NS ms3.dominio.cu. * IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. --- cuando trato de resolver a pepe.minaz.cu desde registro mx me dice que *** Can't find pepe.dominio.cu: No answer alguna idea de que puede estar mal en esta configuracion ? o acao eso puede ser un bug ? pues antes no me havÃÂa pasado esto. gracias de antemano La verdad es que no acabo de entender bien tu problema. Por un lado hablas de subdominios, pero aquàsolo veo un dominio: dominio.cu (sÃÂ, ya sé, es un subdominio de cu pero tú solo gestionas -por lo que parece- dominio.cu). Por otro lado, si esta es tu configuración completa, le veo un fallo. Cuando alguien pregunte por loquesea.dominio.cu para tipo de registro mx le responderá con un ns1.dominio.cu, pero cuando sea preguntado por los registros de tipo mx que haya en dominio.cu (como suelen hacer los servidores de correo) no podrá responderle nada. Si cambias tus registros MX por *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. aparecerán ns2 y mx3 como respuestas a la consulta de registros mx a dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre pon_algo_aquÃÂ.dominio.cu. Esta otra *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. Debe responder ns1, ns2 y mx3 a las consultas mx sobre dominio.cu y ns1 a las consultas mx sobre el_nombre_que_se_te_ocurra.dominio.cu No sé si te he ayudado o no tenÃÂa nada que ver con tu pregunta. Saludos. -- Manolo DÃÂaz sigo embarcado pues no me ve el subdominio desde yahoo.es mira orry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No MX or A records for subdominioo.pepe.dominio.cu --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Received: from [217.146.182.180] by n33.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [87.248.110.106] by t6.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 38168 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Aug 2008 16:08:13 - DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; realmente no entiendo porque hace eso aqui esta la config del dns a ver que puedo tener mal puesto - $ttl 38400 @ IN SOA dns1.dominio.cu. root.dominio.cu. ( 2008060358 10800 3600 604800 38400 ) dominio.cu. IN NS ns1.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS ns2.dominio.cu.cu. IN NS mx3.dominio.cu.cu. *IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 1 ns1.dominio.cu.cu. @IN MX 5 ns2.dominio.cu. @IN MX 10 mx3.dominio.cu. mx3.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.1 ns2.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.2 ns1.dominio.cu. A 172.16.1.3 hercules.dominio.cu.IN A 172.16.1.3 mail1.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. www.padrito.dominio.cu. IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. andresito.dominio.cu.IN CNAME ns1.dominio.cu. angel.pepe.dominio.cu. IN CNAME
Re: Bug in module-assistant with alsa-source?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:56:02 +0200, Bernd Kloss wrote: Lenny Hello, trying to build the sounddriver for a Crystal cs46xx with module-assistant -t a-i alsa-source the following error occurs at the end of the process: CC [M] /usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/timer.o /usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/timer.c: In function ‘snd_timer_request’: /usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/timer.c:155: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467421 There does not seem to be an easy fix at the moment. You could compile your own kernel with the necessary module, either from the upstream sources or from the Debian sources after removing the patch that disables the cs46xx module. -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug or normal behaviour with dpkg -S ?
Le dimanche 20 juillet 2008, Osamu Aoki a écrit : Hi, ~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. ~$ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/ctags*' exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ... The behavior change with leading / is different issue from alternative symlinks. It was just sheer luck of matching string which picked /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant. Indeed. To convince myself I did the search with usr/bin/editor and effectively, it doesn't work here, according to manual. Why you say it doesn't work here? It is alternative so following should be shown as expected. $ dpkg -S bin/editor dpkg: *bin/editor* not found. This is corect response per manual: dpkg-query(1). This command will not list extra files created by maintainer scripts, nor will it list alternatives. Yep I understand. That was what I tried to say with it doesn't work here. I should have wrote It doesn't work here as expected according to the manual of dpkg. The last point I don't understand is why it do work with ctags which is an alternative. Is the packaging of this alternative (and firefox) different from those of editor alternative ? They use the same method. But each package comes with different combination of names. When you run ~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags it does substring match with usr/bin/ctags as I said which happens to pick up one of the installed package /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant (and this happen to be alternative but any substring matched installed file name could be picked). Ok, you mean dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags will match *usr/bin/ctags* or something like that. Effectively it's all logical. I don't think enough sometimes. What you are doing here has nothing to do with alternative. No symlinks created by alternative system is printed out by dpkg -S. Yeah I did understand, don't worry but I didn't think about how dpkg -S match the query with the result. ... If you think searching alternatives is important, I guess you need to write tool for it. For installed packges, /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives$ grep ctags * ctags:/usr/bin/ctags ... is what I do to find such. Just to fill gap: I find that /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/ctags has /usr/bin/ctags alternative defined via this acton. For actual alternative setting, you nee to look into: /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/editor /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/ctags Each file define alternative setting. That is how you find alternative. Please read dpkg-query(1) manpage and update-alternatives(8) manpage. Ok, I'll know it for my next search into alternatives. Without this information I would have searched in /etc/alternatives or an update-alternatives command. Osamu Thomas Preud'homme -- Why Debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug or normal behaviour with dpkg -S ?
Le samedi 19 juillet 2008, Osamu Aoki a écrit : On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 01:18:48AM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Le vendredi 18 juillet 2008, Sven Joachim a écrit : On 2008-07-18 19:59 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: A few minutes ago I was reading this list and discovered ctags. I wanted to install it and I try a apt-file ctags | grep bin which didn't show anything. Then I told myself maybe I already had it and tried a tab completion. As I did have this tools I wanted to know which package installed it with dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Here is the output : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. zsh: exit 1 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Yeah, because it's managed via the alternatives system. *but* : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant It's related to the fact /usr/bin/ctags is a double symbolic link as it is an alternative. dpkg -S /usr/bin/firefox correctly answer iceweasel. Is it an expected behaviour because /usr/bin/ctags could be installed by several packages (but *has* been installed by only one package on a given system) ? It is expected because /usr/bin/ctags is not included in _any_ package, so dpkg does not know about it. It's handled via update-alternatives(8). I prefer to ask you here before filling an useless bug report. This is known and the problem is: if any package contains a real file /usr/bin/ctags, dpkg will clobber the symlink created by update-alternatives. See http://bugs.debian.org/25759 and friends. Sven Yes I perfectly understand the point, but if I remove the leading / in my request dpkg -S do find the package which has installed a symlink via alternatives, as you can see with my dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags request. That part is great, because dpkg behave smoothly but so why dpkg doesn't behave exactly the same with a leading / ? Is there a reason, technical or logical ? Yes: ~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. ~$ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/ctags*' exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant See man dpkg-query: Normal shell wildchars are allowed in package-name-pattern. Please note you will probably have to quote package-name-pattern to prevent the shell from performing filename expansion. For example this will list all package names starting with “libc6” ... -S, --search filename-search-pattern... Search for a filename from installed packages. All standard shell wildchars can be used in the pattern. This command will not list extra files created by maintainer scripts, nor will it list alternatives. Tricky part is when started with / it uses full exact match while without leading / it uses partial text match while Yes, thanks for you lights. It's perfectly clear for me now. I insist, I would perfectly understand that dpkg can't say me which package did imply a symlink to an alternative because as you said the symlink is not in the package but result of some postinst script, but as dpkg does, why doesn't he do also when the request include a leading / ? The behavior change with leading / is different issue from alternative symlinks. It was just sheer luck of matching string which picked /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant. Indeed. To convince myself I did the search with usr/bin/editor and effectively, it doesn't work here, according to manual. The last point I don't understand is why it do work with ctags which is an alternative. Is the packaging of this alternative (and firefox) different from those of editor alternative ? If search needs to check alternatives system data, it is much slower and complicated. If you think searching alternatives is important, I guess you need to write tool for it. For installed packges, /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives$ grep ctags * ctags:/usr/bin/ctags ctags:ctags.1.gz ctags:/usr/share/man/man1/ctags.1.gz ctags:/usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ctags:/usr/share/man/man1/ctags-exuberant.1.gz etags:/usr/bin/ctags-exuberant etags:/usr/share/man/man1/ctags-exuberant.1.gz is what I do to find such. Osamu Thank you very much Osamu. Reguards -- Why Debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug or normal behaviour with dpkg -S ?
Hi, ~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. ~$ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/ctags*' exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ... The behavior change with leading / is different issue from alternative symlinks. It was just sheer luck of matching string which picked /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant. Indeed. To convince myself I did the search with usr/bin/editor and effectively, it doesn't work here, according to manual. Why you say it doesn't work here? It is alternative so following should be shown as expected. $ dpkg -S bin/editor dpkg: *bin/editor* not found. This is corect response per manual: dpkg-query(1). This command will not list extra files created by maintainer scripts, nor will it list alternatives. The last point I don't understand is why it do work with ctags which is an alternative. Is the packaging of this alternative (and firefox) different from those of editor alternative ? They use the same method. But each package comes with different combination of names. When you run ~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags it does substring match with usr/bin/ctags as I said which happens to pick up one of the installed package /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant (and this happen to be alternative but any substring matched installed file name could be picked). What you are doing here has nothing to do with alternative. No symlinks created by alternative system is printed out by dpkg -S. ... If you think searching alternatives is important, I guess you need to write tool for it. For installed packges, /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives$ grep ctags * ctags:/usr/bin/ctags ... is what I do to find such. Just to fill gap: I find that /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/ctags has /usr/bin/ctags alternative defined via this acton. For actual alternative setting, you nee to look into: /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/editor /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/ctags Each file define alternative setting. That is how you find alternative. Please read dpkg-query(1) manpage and update-alternatives(8) manpage. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug or normal behaviour with dpkg -S ?
On 2008-07-18 19:59 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: A few minutes ago I was reading this list and discovered ctags. I wanted to install it and I try a apt-file ctags | grep bin which didn't show anything. Then I told myself maybe I already had it and tried a tab completion. As I did have this tools I wanted to know which package installed it with dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Here is the output : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. zsh: exit 1 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Yeah, because it's managed via the alternatives system. *but* : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant It's related to the fact /usr/bin/ctags is a double symbolic link as it is an alternative. dpkg -S /usr/bin/firefox correctly answer iceweasel. Is it an expected behaviour because /usr/bin/ctags could be installed by several packages (but *has* been installed by only one package on a given system) ? It is expected because /usr/bin/ctags is not included in _any_ package, so dpkg does not know about it. It's handled via update-alternatives(8). I prefer to ask you here before filling an useless bug report. This is known and the problem is: if any package contains a real file /usr/bin/ctags, dpkg will clobber the symlink created by update-alternatives. See http://bugs.debian.org/25759 and friends. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug or normal behaviour with dpkg -S ?
Le vendredi 18 juillet 2008, Sven Joachim a écrit : On 2008-07-18 19:59 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: A few minutes ago I was reading this list and discovered ctags. I wanted to install it and I try a apt-file ctags | grep bin which didn't show anything. Then I told myself maybe I already had it and tried a tab completion. As I did have this tools I wanted to know which package installed it with dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Here is the output : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. zsh: exit 1 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Yeah, because it's managed via the alternatives system. *but* : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant It's related to the fact /usr/bin/ctags is a double symbolic link as it is an alternative. dpkg -S /usr/bin/firefox correctly answer iceweasel. Is it an expected behaviour because /usr/bin/ctags could be installed by several packages (but *has* been installed by only one package on a given system) ? It is expected because /usr/bin/ctags is not included in _any_ package, so dpkg does not know about it. It's handled via update-alternatives(8). I prefer to ask you here before filling an useless bug report. This is known and the problem is: if any package contains a real file /usr/bin/ctags, dpkg will clobber the symlink created by update-alternatives. See http://bugs.debian.org/25759 and friends. Sven Yes I perfectly understand the point, but if I remove the leading / in my request dpkg -S do find the package which has installed a symlink via alternatives, as you can see with my dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags request. That part is great, because dpkg behave smoothly but so why dpkg doesn't behave exactly the same with a leading / ? Is there a reason, technical or logical ? I insist, I would perfectly understand that dpkg can't say me which package did imply a symlink to an alternative because as you said the symlink is not in the package but result of some postinst script, but as dpkg does, why doesn't he do also when the request include a leading / ? -- Why Debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug or normal behaviour with dpkg -S ?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 01:18:48AM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Le vendredi 18 juillet 2008, Sven Joachim a écrit : On 2008-07-18 19:59 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: A few minutes ago I was reading this list and discovered ctags. I wanted to install it and I try a apt-file ctags | grep bin which didn't show anything. Then I told myself maybe I already had it and tried a tab completion. As I did have this tools I wanted to know which package installed it with dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Here is the output : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. zsh: exit 1 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags Yeah, because it's managed via the alternatives system. *but* : 19:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% LANG=en_US.UTF-8 dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant It's related to the fact /usr/bin/ctags is a double symbolic link as it is an alternative. dpkg -S /usr/bin/firefox correctly answer iceweasel. Is it an expected behaviour because /usr/bin/ctags could be installed by several packages (but *has* been installed by only one package on a given system) ? It is expected because /usr/bin/ctags is not included in _any_ package, so dpkg does not know about it. It's handled via update-alternatives(8). I prefer to ask you here before filling an useless bug report. This is known and the problem is: if any package contains a real file /usr/bin/ctags, dpkg will clobber the symlink created by update-alternatives. See http://bugs.debian.org/25759 and friends. Sven Yes I perfectly understand the point, but if I remove the leading / in my request dpkg -S do find the package which has installed a symlink via alternatives, as you can see with my dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags request. That part is great, because dpkg behave smoothly but so why dpkg doesn't behave exactly the same with a leading / ? Is there a reason, technical or logical ? Yes: ~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ctags exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/ctags dpkg: /usr/bin/ctags not found. ~$ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/ctags*' exuberant-ctags: /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant See man dpkg-query: Normal shell wildchars are allowed in package-name-pattern. Please note you will probably have to quote package-name-pattern to prevent the shell from performing filename expansion. For example this will list all package names starting with “libc6” ... -S, --search filename-search-pattern... Search for a filename from installed packages. All standard shell wildchars can be used in the pattern. This command will not list extra files created by maintainer scripts, nor will it list alternatives. Tricky part is when started with / it uses full exact match while without leading / it uses partial text match while I insist, I would perfectly understand that dpkg can't say me which package did imply a symlink to an alternative because as you said the symlink is not in the package but result of some postinst script, but as dpkg does, why doesn't he do also when the request include a leading / ? The behavior change with leading / is different issue from alternative symlinks. It was just sheer luck of matching string which picked /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant. If search needs to check alternatives system data, it is much slower and complicated. If you think searching alternatives is important, I guess you need to write tool for it. For installed packges, /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives$ grep ctags * ctags:/usr/bin/ctags ctags:ctags.1.gz ctags:/usr/share/man/man1/ctags.1.gz ctags:/usr/bin/ctags-exuberant ctags:/usr/share/man/man1/ctags-exuberant.1.gz etags:/usr/bin/ctags-exuberant etags:/usr/share/man/man1/ctags-exuberant.1.gz is what I do to find such. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bug in Nautilus
I'm too. Every try acess to my laptop, when a folder start with big letter tha happeined. Subject: Bug in NautilusFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:56:00 +0200 Ciao a tutti, ho un problema nell'accesso ad una condivisione samba.Quanto tento di montarla in nautilus crasha tutto e nautilus si riavvia. Ho segnalato il bug tramite bug-buddy ma pare che sia un bug già stato risolto qui.. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522534Ora il problema è che nonostante io aggiorni sempre la mia lenny, non capisco perchè continua a persistere il problema... Che non sia stato aggiornato il pacchetto in questi mesi???E' possibile applicare una sorta di patch??Grazie, Marco. _ Receba GRÁTIS as mensagens do Messenger no seu celular quando você estiver offline. Conheça o MSN Mobile! http://mobile.live.com/signup/signup2.aspx?lc=pt-br
Re: Bug in Nautilus
On 06/17/2008 01:56 PM, Marco wrote: Ciao a tutti, ho un problema nell'accesso ad una condivisione samba. Quanto tento di montarla in nautilus crasha tutto e nautilus si riavvia. Ho segnalato il bug tramite bug-buddy ma pare che sia un bug già stato risolto qui.. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522534 Ora il problema è che nonostante io aggiorni sempre la mia lenny, non capisco perchè continua a persistere il problema... Che non sia stato aggiornato il pacchetto in questi mesi??? E' possibile applicare una sorta di patch?? Grazie, Marco. Hi Marco This is an English speaking mailing list. For people without Italian skills, here Google[TM] Translation: Hello to all, I have a problem in access to a samba share. As I try to mount in nautilus crasha everything and nautilus restarts. I reported the bug by bug-buddy but it seems that it is a bug already been resolved here .. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522534 Now the problem is that although I always update my lenny not I understand why continues to this problem ... What has not been updated package in recent months? E 'can apply a sort of patch? Thank you, Mark. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug in Nautilus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 João Batista Amorim de oliveira Junior wrote: I'm too. Every try acess to my laptop, when a folder start with big letter tha happeined. Subject: Bug in Nautilus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:56:00 +0200 Ciao a tutti, ho un problema nell'accesso ad una condivisione samba. Quanto tento di montarla in nautilus crasha tutto e nautilus si riavvia. Ho segnalato il bug tramite bug-buddy ma pare che sia un bug già stato risolto qui.. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522534 Ora il problema è che nonostante io aggiorni sempre la mia lenny, non capisco perchè continua a persistere il problema... Che non sia stato aggiornato il pacchetto in questi mesi??? E' possibile applicare una sorta di patch?? Grazie, Marco. Receba GRÁTIS as mensagens do Messenger no seu celular quando você estiver offline. Conheça o MSN Mobile! Crie já o seu! http://mobile.live.com/signup/signup2.aspx?lc=pt-br Hello, Marco. I can suggests you get look on 'smbnetfs' packages to get samba support in any applications that can use file system. - -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIWBWwchorMMFUmYwRAtuJAKC0psd+6L9q5ux9jnTAgR8ULS570QCgnvFp 2vz67cziuBswRaF2Uw8qlZU= =ZMQd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#484834: [Fwd: Bug#484834: console-data: please drop trf (Turkish F layout) in the udeb]
Quoting Recai Oktaş ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): There are actually plenty of trf users in Turkey, especially in the government offices. So I strongly disagree with this proposal. OK, that definitely closes the issue, then. Hopefully, some day, the Turkish Standard Organization would standardize one of those and push harder for adopting it. That would be good as I think it's probably quite an awful nightmare to have two different possible layouts in the same country for computers. What is the most used of both ? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#484834: [Fwd: Bug#484834: console-data: please drop trf (Turkish F layout) in the udeb]
Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Recai Oktaş ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): There are actually plenty of trf users in Turkey, especially in the government offices. So I strongly disagree with this proposal. OK, that definitely closes the issue, then. Hopefully, some day, the Turkish Standard Organization would standardize one of those and push harder for adopting it. That would be good as I think it's probably quite an awful nightmare to have two different possible layouts in the same country for computers. What is the most used of both ? Most used is trq. But many schools teach trf for fast type writing and as Recai mentioned government uses that a lot. -- Skype : devrimesenturk To follow the path: look to the master,follow the master, walk with the master,see through the master, become the master -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BUG: Epiphany and Evolution start in offline mode when I am online wireless
2008/5/31 Peer Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: unknown Version: NN I am connected to the Internet via an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (iwl3945 module). Epiphany and Evolution work fine, but always start in offline mode. To connect to any site resp. receive/send e-mail, I have to uncheck the item Work offline in the Files menu of Epiphany/Evolution. Iceweasel/Firefox behaves different and starts in online mode. Lynx and ping also work fine from the start. Perhaphs its a bug in Gnome: When I am connected wireless the network manager always shows the not connected icon, even when I am online. Connecting wired via eth0 cures the problem. Perhaps Gnome notifies all Gnome-native apps that I am offline when I am using wlan0 (because eth0 is dead). I am using Debian GNU/Linux Lenny (testing), kernel 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP, and Gnome 2.22.1. Has the same problem a while ago. I solved it with sledgehammer approach and got rid of Network Manager. If you need to use NM I'd suggest installing gconf-editor and see if you can find any settings related to your issue. rob http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=82BS4ZCMFR1
Re: BUG: Epiphany and Evolution start in offline mode when I am online wireless
As for epiphany, you should turn off (using gconf-editor) apps/epiphany/general/managed_network. I'm not sure, but I beleive it was allready mentioned on the list( I saw it somewhere). It was annoying for me to. I do not use Evolution much, but I can see apps/evolution/shell/start_offline in gconf-editor. Looks that Network Manager thinks you are offline unless interfaces are in roaming mode and connected. That means that even if interfaces are properly configured trough /etc/network/interfaces and connected, NM thinks you are offline. There is bug #415891 reported as I can see, and things are going to improve in newer versions of NM. On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Peer Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: unknown Version: NN I am connected to the Internet via an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (iwl3945 module). Epiphany and Evolution work fine, but always start in offline mode. To connect to any site resp. receive/send e-mail, I have to uncheck the item Work offline in the Files menu of Epiphany/Evolution. Iceweasel/Firefox behaves different and starts in online mode. Lynx and ping also work fine from the start. Perhaphs its a bug in Gnome: When I am connected wireless the network manager always shows the not connected icon, even when I am online. Connecting wired via eth0 cures the problem. Perhaps Gnome notifies all Gnome-native apps that I am offline when I am using wlan0 (because eth0 is dead). I am using Debian GNU/Linux Lenny (testing), kernel 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP, and Gnome 2.22.1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug à la génération de thumbnails dans nautilus
KRS, mardi 6 mai 2008, 09:09:03 CEST Bonjour, ’jour, Je suis sous Ubuntu 8.04 et Nautilus refuse de generer certaines miniatures de fichiers vidéos qui sont pourtant lisibles dans Totem-Gstreamer. Ce sont des .mkv et des .ogm, certains de ces fichiers sont miniaturisés d'autres pas(et ça ne semble pas en rapport avec le codec vidéo), tout mes .avi le sont par contre. Sauriez-vous comment lancer une génération de thumbnails depuis la ligne de commande afin de constater les éventuels messages d'erreur? Ce ne serait pas simplement dû à la taille des fichiers ? (P.ex. KDE ne fait pas de miniature pour des fichiers plus gros que 1 ou 2 Mio (c’est une option).) -- Sylvain Sauvage -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/DebFrFrenchLists Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#477197: Dead ~
(CC'ed to -spanish mailing lists. Please DON'T CC the list in answers) (I dislike the current momentum of me too about this bug. I suspect something popped into a -user mailing list of Spanish users but, hey ladies and gentlment, I think the maintainers of this package got the point. Spanish users don't like the behaviour change for AltGr+4, no need to make a metoo-contest) Quoting Tako Schotanus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I don't like the dead tilde either because it really is useless in spanish. But if we change it we should maybe think about the dead ^ as well? Because it's just as useless, it's never used in spanish but quite a bit in programming/regular expressions etc And if we're busy anyway, why not change the dead back quote? (`) Spanish does not use them either, only the forward quote. Don't. Please don't change keyboard mappings randomly. There are standards for many keymaps and these should be respected as much as possible *and keep the established practices*. This is why I think the dead_tilde change should be reverted even if it conforms to a standard (I didn't check but that's very possible because of that being the behaviour in MS Windows). This is *established practice*. But this is also why I think that *no other* behaviour should be changed! If the circumflex is a dead key on Spanish keymap, then leave it as it is. Also, please all think that Spanish keymaps are not only used for Castellano, but also for Catalan, Galician, Basque (limiting /self to languages for which an important l10n effort happens in FLOSS), so the needs for these languages should be also considered. Catalan uses grave accents, for instance. And, well, being able to type correct French with a Spanish keyboard is not that stupid, right? :-) Dunno, maybe it would be possible to have two diferent key maps? One where only the ´ is dead while all others aren't and one that conforms to what is the norm on other sytems? I sincerely hope that xkb maintainers will *never* make the mistake that has been done with console keymaps where dozens of various funky keymaps are floating all around, adding a lot to confusion. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402 From that page: Tags: moreinfo; [snip] Works for me. [snip] Of course, if we *do* find out which package is at fault we should fix OOos dependencies, but... Which means that the reporter and the mantainer have no idea of where the problem could really be. In particoular, the mantainer could not reproduce the problem. Linkname: Debian -- Debian BTS -- developer info URL: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags I don't see how you know this person is the maintainer. Are you just assuming? I was looking for one of open forwarded pending fixed done statuses. Regards Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote: On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote: How do I do that - where do I look? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] That gives me the following reply: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote server after RCPT command: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43]: 550 unknown user So I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] but that hasn't responded at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
On 2008-04-14 11:19 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote: Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote: On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote: How do I do that - where do I look? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] That gives me the following reply: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote server after RCPT command: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43]: 550 unknown user Obviously you need to substitute the actual number of the bug, as you have found out. So I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] but that hasn't responded at all. You should retrieve a notification mail after some time (it usually takes ~10 minutes, but may also take hours sometimes). You will probably not receive a friendly response from the package maintainer if you send empty messages (it just appeared on the web: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402#27). Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27:02AM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote: NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402 Tags: moreinfo; I don't see how you know this person is the maintainer. Are you just assuming? I assumed that the tag moreinfo was set by a maintainer of the debian package (I am not able to see any other reasonable possibility). Also, check the link in that page: http://people.debian.org/~rene/ In any case, apt-cache show openoffice.org|grep ^Maintainer Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then go to the first hit in the google search Linkname: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rene - Google Search URL: http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]btnG=Searchhl=enie=ISO-8859-1 -- Chi usa software non libero avvelena anche te. Digli di smettere. Informatica=arsenico: minime dosi in rari casi patologici, altrimenti letale. Informatica=bomba: intelligente solo per gli stupidi che ci credono. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
Sven Joachim on 14/04/08 10:51, wrote: On 2008-04-14 11:19 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote: Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote: On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote: How do I do that - where do I look? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] That gives me the following reply: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote server after RCPT command: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43]: 550 unknown user Obviously you need to substitute the actual number of the bug, as you have found out. So I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] but that hasn't responded at all. You should retrieve a notification mail after some time (it usually takes ~10 minutes, but may also take hours sometimes). You will probably not receive a friendly response from the package maintainer if you send empty messages (it just appeared on the web: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402#27). Oh! I thought the previous poster suggested I should email that address to receive a status report a la majordomo mailing list commands. Sorry about that! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
NN_il_Confusionario on 14/04/08 11:55, wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27:02AM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote: NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402 Tags: moreinfo; I don't see how you know this person is the maintainer. Are you just assuming? I assumed that the tag moreinfo was set by a maintainer of the debian package (I am not able to see any other reasonable possibility). Also, check the link in that page: http://people.debian.org/~rene/ In any case, apt-cache show openoffice.org|grep ^Maintainer Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then go to the first hit in the google search Linkname: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rene - Google Search URL: http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]btnG=Searchhl=enie=ISO-8859-1 Sorry I didn't mean to give the impression that I'm helpless. My main line of inquiry is actually to find out how to ascertain all this stuff myself with the ease that I'm used to from many other software that have web-based issue trackers. I guess in this case, putting that data into a field on the bug report is a nice-to-have for the future. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402 From that page: Tags: moreinfo; [snip] Works for me. [snip] Of course, if we *do* find out which package is at fault we should fix OOos dependencies, but... Which means that the reporter and the mantainer have no idea of where the problem could really be. In particoular, the mantainer could not reproduce the problem. Linkname: Debian -- Debian BTS -- developer info URL: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags -- Chi usa software non libero avvelena anche te. Digli di smettere. Informatica=arsenico: minime dosi in rari casi patologici, altrimenti letale. Informatica=bomba: intelligente solo per gli stupidi che ci credono. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
Adam Hardy wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402 I can do bugreport emails, but I really would like to find out more about this bug in openoffice, mainly whether it's fixed. How do I do that - where do I look? Look at the picture on the right hand side which tells you which versions of the package have this bug (reddish ovals) and in which versions it has been fixed (greenish rectangles). From the picture, it looks like the bug was reported on openoffice.org/1:2.3-1.3 and presumed to be present in openoffice.org/1:2.4.0-3 hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug tracking, especially openoffice
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote: How do I do that - where do I look? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug#468103: DISPLAY variable not set in ssh session
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 19:40:56 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote: It looks like the xterm package needs to depend on the xauth package -- or at least recommend it. No, this has nothing to do with xterm. openssh-server already suggests xauth (or actually xbase-clients), and documents why in README.Debian. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#468161: Please increase the severity of this bug...
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Rick Thomas wrote: In light of the reply to bug #469919 (quoted below) from Robert Lemmen, the maintainer of zsync, it seems that this bug report should be interpreted as Either fix the problem on the cdimage side, or stop using zsync to distribute Debian cdimages. If Robert can't fix the bug on his side, and it can't be fixed on the cdimage side, there's little point in going to the effort of creating useless .zsync files. Additional data that may be helpful from bug #444159 is also quoted below. It may be appropriate to merge the three bug reports #468161, #444159, and #469919. I'm not familiar enough with the Debian BTS to know... For information on how cdimage.d.o works: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/about/ The redirects are _temporary_ and changes over time (order of days to weeks), so there is no way of updating the .zsync to reflect the new location. If zsync can't and won't follow http redirects, we might as well stop generating them since they are indeed useless. /Mattias Wadenstein ==reply to bug # 469919 by Robert Lemmen From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Bug#469919: zsync fails Date: March 11, 2008 8:13:33 AM EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] this is the same as bug #444159, zsync does not support HTTP redirects in the moment. It is questionable if it is actually a good idea to support them, as this would mean going through the whole redirect chain for every microscopic request (zsync send *many* of them). in the case of the debian isos, the .zsync files should be updated to reflect the new position of the isos... regards robert On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:43:33PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote: Package: zsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zsync http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily- builds/sid_d-i/20080307-1/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc- businesscard.iso.zsync 100.0% 114.7 kBps DONE No relevent local data found - I will be downloading the whole file. If that's not what you want, CTRL-C out. You should specify the local file is the old version of the file to download with -i (you might have to decompress it with gzip -d first). Or perhaps you just have no data that helps download the file downloading from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d- i/20080307-1/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso: 0.0%bad status code 302 0.0% 0.0 kBps aborted failed to retrieve from debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso Aborting, download available in debian-testing-powerpc- businesscard.iso.part verifying download... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ This is on Debian Lenny on PowerPC Macintosh What's a bad status code 302 mean? Rick -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com ===relevant excerpt from bug #444159 HTTP error 302 is Found, aka The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. This means that zsync-assisted downloads are currently failing for Debian daily test images. Looking into the zsync source code, I can see it's using its own local HTTP code rather than using libcurl or any of the other readily-available HTTP client libraries. That does seem like a bit of a design bug, to say the least. I wouldn't be surprised at all if there were multiple security bugs in there just waiting to be found. = -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug ?! (System bootup in progress - please wait)
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:44:34PM -0800, Hadi Nejati wrote: Newly I understand Our Sarge servers doesn't allow user connect via ssh except root. After inspecting the problem I found something strange. In /etc/nologin (I didn't create this file) there is something like that System bootup in progress - please wait.I think there is the bug in my servers (I use these kernels: 2.4.27-2-386 and 2.6.8-2-686 ).If you know what is the problem exactly let me know. During boot, the initscripts create the nologin file. The contents are printed to the screen if someone attempts to login between the time that the getty's are started and the script which removes nologin runs to remove it. Once the system is running, you should be able to log in as root (despite the nologin file) and then remove the file. This should allow logins. Reboot asap (I understand that it is a server) and see what happens. Ensure that you have backups just in case. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#465608: education has made my debian mentally challenged
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Tyler MacDonald wrote: No such luck :-( A (hopefully final) fix for the problem was tested yesterday by Fabrice Lorrain [EMAIL PROTECTED] successfully. The packages versioned 0.826 just hit incoming and should be propagated to unstable soon. Sorry for the inconvience and thanks for testing and patience Andreas. PS: I don't think that debian-user is an apropriate list to discuss problems of packages in unstable but once you are CCing this list That would certainly cut the traffic down. :-) [Wondering which list is apropriate to discuss problems of packages in unstable.] -- Chris. == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#465608: education has made my debian mentally challenged
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Tyler MacDonald wrote: No such luck :-( A (hopefully final) fix for the problem was tested yesterday by Fabrice Lorrain [EMAIL PROTECTED] successfully. The packages versioned 0.826 just hit incoming and should be propagated to unstable soon. Sorry for the inconvience and thanks for testing and patience Andreas. PS: I don't think that debian-user is an apropriate list to discuss problems of packages in unstable but once you are CCing this list I'm answering there as well. Please try to avoid flooding more than one list with the same mail if possible. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#456796: getopt and parameters with spaces
T o n g:
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.13-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
I seem to have found a bug of getopt from the util-linux
package. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I believe that the suggested way to call getopt is
eval set -- `getopt -o options -- $@`
But I found that it can't handle parameters with spaces well:
$ set -- -t 'test p 1' 2
$ getopt -o t: -- $@
-t 'test p 1' -- '2'
Ok, so far so good, but:
$ eval set -- `getopt -o t: -- $@`
There is nothing wrong with getopt. As you use command
substitution (`...`) without double quotes, the output of getopt
is scanned for word splitting, thus passing the following
argument list to the eval command (I use «...» here to denote the
distinct arguments):
«set» «--» «-t» «'test» «p» «1'» «--» «'2'»
eval concatenates its arguments into a single string yielding
set -- -t 'test p 1' -- '2'
This string is then read and executed by the shell.
$ echo '$2'
'test p 1'
I.e., the parameter passed is test p 1, but after the
parameter parsing, it becomes test p 1 -- one space missing
before '1'.
This is what you requested by word splitting and reconcatenation
as shown above.
$ eval set -- `getopt -o t: -- $@`
or
$ eval set -- `getopt -o t: -- $@`
or
$ eval 'set -- '`getopt -o t: -- $@`
and so on are the right thing.
Comment?
Write 100 times
I won't any more use parameter invocation (${name}) and
command substitution (`...` or $(...)) without double quotes
(...), unless I really want word splitting or pathname
expansion.
(But don't use cut and paste! (:-))
I wish eval would only accept exactly one argument string; then
your mistake would have shown up as something like:
eval: superfluous arguments specified
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bitte in die Adressierung auch meinen |Please put my full name also into
Vor- u. Nachnamen stellen z.B.|the recipient like
Friedhelm Waitzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], (Friedhelm Waitzmann) [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
Waitzmann, Friedhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug no nagios 3.0b7?
Execute o Nagios de modo que ele confira os arquivos de configuração, com a opção '-v'. nagios -v -c /usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg E veja no resultado do comando o que está causando o erro. Em 06/12/07, Rogério Nunes[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Boa tarde Galera! Estou instalando o Nagios versão 3.0b7, mas ao habilitar no nagios.cfg a opção cfg_file=/usr/local/nagios/etc/objects/windows.cfg que já vem pré configurada no arquivo (apenas comentada), ao descomentar esta opção e dar um restart no nagios o mesmo apresenta mensagem de erro: Running configuration check... CONFIG ERROR! Restart aborted. Check your Nagios configuration Alguém já passou por isso? será que é um bug? -- .~. / v \ /( )\ GNU/Debian/Linux ^ ^
Re: [Bug wget ?] wget : Fichier « 274.swf » est déjà là; pas de récupération.
Le mercredi 10 octobre 2007 14:47, Bulot Grégory a écrit : bon je crois avoir le fin mot de l'histoire (réponse demain surement) en fait il manquait des informations (j'ai voulu être trop 'épuré) Pendant son execution mon script se trouve (pwd) là : /home/user/LeRepertoireDeTravail le script lance un wget : wget -nc http://monserver.com/274.swf; -O /home/user/FichierTempRecu/274.swf suite à un plantage le mois dernier, j'avais récupérer 'a la main dans /home/user/LeRepertoireDeTravail : wget -nc http://monserver.com/274.swf; puis j'avais copié ce fichier dans FichierTempRecu/. Visiblement ne veut pas charger un fichier MonFichier si dans son répertoire courant ce même fichier existe et ce si la destination (-O) est ailleurs !! est-ce reproductible chez vous, dans ce cas ptet un bug a remonter, non ? # wget -V | head -1 ; dpkg -l wget | grep ii GNU Wget 1.10.2 ii wget 1.10.2-2 retrieves files from the web
Re: [Bug wget ?] wget : Fichier « 274.swf » est déjà là; pas de récupérat ion.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bulot Grégory a écrit : Le mercredi 10 octobre 2007 14:47, Bulot Grégory a écrit : [...] Visiblement ne veut pas charger un fichier MonFichier si dans son répertoire courant ce même fichier existe et ce si la destination (-O) est ailleurs !! est-ce reproductible chez vous, dans ce cas ptet un bug a remonter, non ? On dirait (je suis sous Sid) : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ mkdir wget [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ wget -nc www.debian.org - --09:44:25-- http://www.debian.org/ = `index.html' Résolution de www.debian.org... 194.109.137.218 Connexion vers www.debian.org|194.109.137.218|:80...connecté. requête HTTP transmise, en attente de la réponse...200 OK Longueur: 14 248 (14K) [text/html] 100%[] 14 24826.56K/s 09:44:26 (26.51 KB/s) - « index.html » sauvegardé [14248/14248] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ wget -nc www.debian.org -O wget/index.html Fichier « index.html » est déjà là; pas de récupération. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ rm index.html [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ wget -nc www.debian.org -O wget/index.html - --09:46:31-- http://www.debian.org/ = `wget/index.html' Résolution de www.debian.org... 194.109.137.218 Connexion vers www.debian.org|194.109.137.218|:80...connecté. requête HTTP transmise, en attente de la réponse...200 OK Longueur: 14 248 (14K) [text/html] 100%[] 14 24830.47K/s 09:46:33 (30.38 KB/s) - « wget/index.html » sauvegardé [14248/14248] Amicalement David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHDNgW18/WetbTC/oRAg0WAJ9UxehTc4m5uqvxkVIj+lhvkRHnrgCggw3g dHSIDfW1ihNLhZXSN93ItgQ= =RToM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#444234: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Brightness buttons not working on notebook with Radeon Mobility M6 LY
Version: 1:6.7.194-1 Nick Hastings wrote: I installed this too and it also returns the function of the brightness hot keys. So it seems whatever problems were introduced with the 6.7.193 driver have now been fixed. Good to know, marking as fixed in 6.7.194 then. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug-Reporting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [redirect to debian-user-german. Request for asking smart questions.] Ralph Rupprich wrote: Hallo liebe Leute, Hallo Ralph, wir haben auf der englischsprachigen Debian-user-Mailingliste deinen Eintrag gefunden, der sich dort nicht zuordnen lässt, weil er dort nicht hingehört. Bitte wende dich an [1] oder schreibe auf Englisch. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/ Bevor du das tust, solltest du dir überlegen, wie du deine Frage kleverer formulieren kannst. Der Betreff deiner Nachricht hat nichts mit deren Inhalt zu tun. Suche auch nach relevanten Fehlermeldungen. Falls du englisch verstehst hilft dir hier vermutlich [2] weiter. [2] http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Hoffe, dies hilft, Johannes ich hab an meinem Notebook einen Fehler und kann den nicht zuordnen. Nach willkürlicher Laufzeit schaltet sich der USB-Controller oder der interne USB-Hub einfach ab, aber nicht komplett. Geräte, die zum Abschaltzeitpunkt noch angesteckt sind, haben zwar noch Strom, bekommen aber keine Daten mehr und werden vom BS auch nicht mehr erkannt. Geräte, die neu angesteckt werden, bekommen auch keinen Strom mehr (klar, der wird ja beim Anstecken durch die erkennung erst initiiert). Notebook: Toshiba Satellite A100-512 (PSAA2E), aktuelles BIOS (2.20 - trat aber unter der BIOS-Version 1.40 auch auf). Ideen ?? Oder doch 'n Bug ?? Gürsse, Ralph Rupprich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG97p0C1NzPRl9qEURAr8xAJ0WB/nTzJte/Kx7KlCgik+BQ71vfQCfYAdk Naw0G1VwS6sqQiwG801ipWM= =iQcj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug Debian sur TR en UTF8
On 2007-09-05 17:55:02 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Curieusement, perl a le même problème : echo eee | perl -pe 'tr /e/é/' Pas en utilisant les bonnes options: vin:~ locale charmap UTF-8 vin:~ echo eee | perl -C -pe 'use utf8; tr/e/é/' ééé -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en aptitude ?
Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo escribió: ¿Ven bien las opciones en la página man de aptitude de debian _estable_? man aptitude ... \fBinstall\fR ... \fB+\fR ... \fBremove\fR, \fBpurge\fR, \fBhold\fR, \fBunhold\fR, \fBkeep\fR, \fBreinstall\fR ... LANG=C man aptitude lo mismo LANG=en man aptitude lo mismo ¿a alguien más, o soy el único? me mosquea porque me pasa en varias máquinas. Saludos Debian 4.0 stable man aptitude Identica respuesta: The following actions are available: \fBinstall\fR Install one or more packages. The packages should be listed after
Re: Bug Debian sur TR en UTF8
Le Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:39:01AM +0200, Tony GALMICHE a écrit : Bonjour, Je viens de tomber sur un bug de la commande tr sous Debian en UTF8 : - http://lists.asyd.net/pipermail/shell/2007-February/001104.html Par exemple, cette commande ne fonctionne pas si les locales sont en UFT8, mais elle fonctionne si je suis en ISO : - echo eee | tr e é Curieusement, perl a le même problème : echo eee | perl -pe 'tr /e/é/' J'aimerais savoir s'il y a un moyen de contourner ce bug car cela me bloque pour convertir des fichiers. echo eee | perl -pe 's/e/é/g' Bonne chance, -- Charles -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug Debian sur TR en UTF8
Charles Plessy a écrit : Le Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:39:01AM +0200, Tony GALMICHE a écrit : Bonjour, Je viens de tomber sur un bug de la commande tr sous Debian en UTF8 : - http://lists.asyd.net/pipermail/shell/2007-February/001104.html Par exemple, cette commande ne fonctionne pas si les locales sont en UFT8, mais elle fonctionne si je suis en ISO : - echo eee | tr e é Curieusement, perl a le même problème : echo eee | perl -pe 'tr /e/é/' J'aimerais savoir s'il y a un moyen de contourner ce bug car cela me bloque pour convertir des fichiers. echo eee | perl -pe 's/e/é/g' Je viens de résoudre mon problème en utilisant la sed qui est capable de faire la même chose sans les bugs :-) : - echo ae | sed -e 'y/ae/àé/' Merci pour la réponse. Tony -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bug en aptitude ?
-Mensaje original- De: Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 4 de Septiembre de 2007 21:02 Para: Lista Debian Asunto: bug en aptitude ? ¿Ven bien las opciones en la página man de aptitude de debian _estable_? man aptitude ... \fBinstall\fR ... \fB+\fR ... \fBremove\fR, \fBpurge\fR, \fBhold\fR, \fBunhold\fR, \fBkeep\fR, \fBreinstall\fR ... LANG=C man aptitude lo mismo LANG=en man aptitude lo mismo ¿a alguien más, o soy el único? me mosquea porque me pasa en varias máquinas. Saludos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] A mi me pasa lo mismo. Por ej: package\fB+\fR Install package. \fBforbid-version\fR ding \fB=version\fR t Saludos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en aptitude ?
El mar, 04-09-2007 a las 19:36 -0500, Marcos Delgado escribió: No eres el único, recuerdo que ese problema estaba también en la versión inestable, pero ya lo solucionaron. Lo acabo de verificar en la versión de pruebas (la que estoy usando en este momento) y también esta solucionado. Saludos. Marcos Delgado. Gracias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug en aptitude ?
El 4/09/07, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: ¿Ven bien las opciones en la página man de aptitude de debian _estable_? man aptitude ... \fBinstall\fR ... \fB+\fR ... \fBremove\fR, \fBpurge\fR, \fBhold\fR, \fBunhold\fR, \fBkeep\fR, \fBreinstall\fR ... LANG=C man aptitude lo mismo LANG=en man aptitude lo mismo ¿a alguien más, o soy el único? me mosquea porque me pasa en varias máquinas. Saludos No eres el único, recuerdo que ese problema estaba también en la versión inestable, pero ya lo solucionaron. Lo acabo de verificar en la versión de pruebas (la que estoy usando en este momento) y también esta solucionado. Saludos. Marcos Delgado.
Re: ¿bug? Email que mata el servidor X
On 8/29/07, bayrouni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: El MiÃ(c)rcoles, 29 de Agosto de 2007, Carlos Zuniga escribió: He tratado de abrirlo desde Firefox, Galeon, Utilizan Firefox como motor, prueba con otro navegador como Konqueror, Opera... Utilizo firefox tambien y to he tenido ningun problema. Bien he probado también con konqueror y sucede lo mismo. Sin embargo he probado en un ubuntu y no pasa nada. También lo reenvié a unos amigos que utilizan suse, gentoo y debian unstable y a ellos no les sucede nada raro. Supongo que es un caso aislado. Saludos -- Linux Registered User # 386081 A menudo unas pocas horas de Prueba y error podrán ahorrarte minutos de leer manuales.
Re: ¿bug? Email que mata el servidor X
El Miércoles, 29 de Agosto de 2007, Carlos Zuniga escribió: He tratado de abrirlo desde Firefox, Galeon, Utilizan Firefox como motor, prueba con otro navegador como Konqueror, Opera... -- Iñaki Baz Castillo
Re: ¿bug? Email que mata el servido r X
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: El Miércoles, 29 de Agosto de 2007, Carlos Zuniga escribió: He tratado de abrirlo desde Firefox, Galeon, Utilizan Firefox como motor, prueba con otro navegador como Konqueror, Opera... Utilizo firefox tambien y to he tenido ningun problema. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug sur Xfce?
David Kremer a écrit : Zuthos a écrit : Il faut utiliser l'application reportbug (aptitude install reportbug) en mode console, qui va utiliser le mta (mail transport agent) installe sur le systeme. Merci Dans le rapport de bug, il faut donner le maximum d'information (dans la mesure du possible) , et le bug doit etre reproductible je crois. Mince, je n'arrive pas a le reproduire. Je vais chercher la cause exact. J'en profite pour répondre à bernard.schoena: bonjour, est il possible de donner la liste des paquets installés par rapport à xfce4 ? ensuite, quel est le shell employé avec le terminal x11 Directement en mode texte ( CTRLALTF1 ) # dpkg --get-selections|grep xfce4 libxfce4mcs-client3 install libxfce4mcs-manager3install libxfce4util4 install xfce4 install xfce4-icon-themeinstall xfce4-mailwatch-plugin install xfce4-mcs-manager install xfce4-mcs-plugins install xfce4-mixer install xfce4-mixer-alsainstall xfce4-mount-plugin install xfce4-panel install xfce4-session install xfce4-terminal install xfce4-utils instal -- Le pluriel d'un maréchal, c'est des maraîchers. Le pluriel d'un général, c'est des générés. Boris Vian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug sur Xfce?
Zuthos a écrit : J'ai un comportement bizare de xfce. SI j'ouvre une session avec xfce, que je passe en mode console puis, que je lance muut. Xfce plante et gdm redemare. Je précise que j'ai essayé avec E17 et la pas de soucis. Voila, je ne sais pas d'ou cela peut provenir, n'y comment ont fait pour ouvrir un rapport de Bug sur un bug de cette nature. Merci d'avance de m'indiquer la démarche a suivre. Il faut utiliser l'application reportbug (aptitude install reportbug) en mode console, qui va utiliser le mta (mail transport agent) installe sur le systeme. Dans le rapport de bug, il faut donner le maximum d'information (dans la mesure du possible) , et le bug doit etre reproductible je crois. Voila un lien qui indique comment avoir une trace gdb avec le paquet que tu crois reponsable, car le mainteneur peut te demander de donner une trace GDB : http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace En tous les cas : reportbug -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug apt / preferences (problèmes de priorité)
Bonjour, Le (on) jeudi 09 août 2007 10:00, David BERCOT a écrit (wrote) : Et mon fichier preferences : # Priorité de 100 pour les paquets de 'experimental' Package: * Pin: release a=experimental Pin-Priority: 100 Euh, tu es sûr qu'on commente avec # dans son /etc/apt/ptrferences ? Chez moi, je fais (par exemple) : Explanation: testing avec les paquets de marillat Explanation: --- Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=testing,l=Debian-Security Pin-Priority: 980 Package: * Pin: release o=Unofficial Multimedia Packages,a=testing,l=Unofficial Multimedia Packages Pin-Priority: 970 Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=testing,l=Debian Pin-Priority: 960 Package: * Pin: release a=testing Pin-Priority: 910 et ça marche©®... Et maintenant, si je fais par exemple : apt-cache policy apache2, il me Note que pour ce que tu veux faire, tu peux te contenter de taper apt-cache policy et tu vois les priorités de chaque dépôt. Auriez-vous un comportement similaire ? Une piste de résolution ? Cf ci-dessus. Manuel. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug apt / preferences (problèmes de priorité)
Le Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:42:29 +0200, mpg [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Euh, tu es sûr qu'on commente avec # dans son /etc/apt/ptrferences ? Chez moi, je fais (par exemple) : Explanation: testing avec les paquets de marillat Explanation: --- Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=testing,l=Debian-Security Pin-Priority: 980 et ça marche©®... En tous cas, j'ai toujours fait comme ça jusqu'à hier et ça marchait très bien... Maintenant, je viens de modifier mon fichier et le voici : Explanation: Priorité de 100 pour les paquets de 'experimental' Explanation: -- Package: * Pin: release a=experimental Pin-Priority: 100 Explanation: Priorité de 500 pour les paquets de 'unstable' Explanation: -- Package: * Pin: release a=unstable Pin-Priority: 500 Explanation: Priorité de 900 pour les paquets de 'testing' Explanation: - Package: * Pin: release a=testing Pin-Priority: 900 Explanation: Priorité de 950 pour les paquets de 'pok3D' (pour le jeu) Explanation: - Package: * Pin: origin pok3d.net Pin-Priority: 950 Explanation: Priorité de 400 pour les paquets de 'kernel-archive.buildserver.net' (noyaux) Explanation: - Package: * Pin: origin kernel-archive.buildserver.net Pin-Priority: 400 Mais si je fais un apt-cache policy, j'obtiens toujours : Fichiers du paquet : 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status release a=now 400 http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net trunk/main Packages release o=Debian-Kernel archive,a=kernel-dists-trunk,l=Debian-Kernel archive,c=main origin kernel-archive.buildserver.net 500 http://pok3d.net ./ Packages origin pok3d.net 500 http://pok3d.net ./ Packages origin pok3d.net 500 http://oss.oracle.com unstable/non-free Packages release o=Oracle,a=unstable,l=Oracle,c=non-free origin oss.oracle.com 500 http://oss.oracle.com unstable/main Packages release o=Oracle,a=unstable,l=Oracle,c=main origin oss.oracle.com 500 http://dl.google.com stable/non-free Packages release v=1.0,o=Google, Inc.,a=stable,l=Google,c=non-free origin dl.google.com 500 http://snapshots.ekiga.net sid/main Packages release o=Buildserver,a=voip-snapshots-debian-sid,l=Buildserver,c=main origin snapshots.ekiga.net 500 http://www.joomart.de etch/main Packages release v=4.0 joo,o=Joo Unofficial Packages,a=stable,l=Joo Unofficial Packages,c=main origin www.joomart.de 500 http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing/main Packages release o=Unofficial Multimedia Packages,a=testing,l=Unofficial Multimedia Packages,c=main origin www.debian-multimedia.org 500 http://rarewares.org ./ Packages release o=xmixahlx,l=xmixahlx_rarewares-unstable,c= origin rarewares.org 500 http://packages.kirya.net unstable/non-free Packages release v=4.0,o=Kirya,a=unstable,l=Kirya unofficial packages,c=non-free origin packages.kirya.net 500 http://packages.kirya.net unstable/contrib Packages release v=4.0,o=Kirya,a=unstable,l=Kirya unofficial packages,c=contrib origin packages.kirya.net 500 http://packages.kirya.net unstable/main Packages release v=4.0,o=Kirya,a=unstable,l=Kirya unofficial packages,c=main origin packages.kirya.net 1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/non-free Packages release o=Debian,a=experimental,l=Debian,c=non-free origin ftp.fr.debian.org 1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/contrib Packages release o=Debian,a=experimental,l=Debian,c=contrib origin ftp.fr.debian.org 1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/main Packages release o=Debian,a=experimental,l=Debian,c=main origin ftp.fr.debian.org 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages release o=Debian,a=unstable,l=Debian,c=non-free origin ftp.fr.debian.org 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages release o=Debian,a=unstable,l=Debian,c=contrib origin ftp.fr.debian.org 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Translation-fr 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages release o=Debian,a=unstable,l=Debian,c=main origin ftp.fr.debian.org 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org testing/non-free Packages release o=Debian,a=testing,l=Debian,c=non-free origin ftp.fr.debian.org 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org testing/contrib Packages release o=Debian,a=testing,l=Debian,c=contrib origin ftp.fr.debian.org 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org testing/main Packages release o=Debian,a=testing,l=Debian,c=main origin ftp.fr.debian.org Donc, je pense qu'il y a autre chose... David. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[Résolu] Re: Bug apt / preferences (pr oblèmes de priorité)
Finalement, pour tester, je n'ai laissé que les 2 lignes testing et unstable dans 'preferences'. Et là, ça marche : j'ai les bonnes priorités pour les paquets. Donc, j'ai un conflit avec d'autres lignes... Je vais creuser, mais le problème vient de là... Merci pour votre aide. David. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug apt / preferences (problèmes de priorité)
Le 09/08/07, mpg[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Bonjour, Le (on) jeudi 09 août 2007 10:00, David BERCOT a écrit (wrote) : Et mon fichier preferences : # Priorité de 100 pour les paquets de 'experimental' Package: * Pin: release a=experimental Pin-Priority: 100 Euh, tu es sûr qu'on commente avec #dans son /etc/apt/ptrferences ? Chez moi, je fais (par exemple): Explanation: testing avec les paquets de marillat Explanation: --- Et voilà, la réponse est aussi donnée dans man apt_preferences. Cdlt.
Re: Bug apt / preferences (problèmes de priorité)
Le (on) jeudi 09 août 2007 15:00, David BERCOT a écrit (wrote) : Explanation: Priorité de 400 pour les paquets de 'kernel-archive.buildserver.net' (noyaux) Explanation: - Package: * Pin: origin kernel-archive.buildserver.net Pin-Priority: 400 [...] Mais si je fais un apt-cache policy, j'obtiens toujours : Fichiers du paquet : 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status release a=now 400 http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net trunk/main Packages Donc seul le dernière entrée a compté. Je voudrais pas dire de bêtises, mais je crois qu'il faut séparer les entrées par des lignes vides sinon apt mélange tout. D'ailleurs ça serait pas mal qu'il y ait un outil pour vérifier si notre apt/preferences est bien écrit. De façon générale, les fichiers de conf en texte brut c'est le Bien, mais avec en plus des outils pour les vérifier ça serait le Bien Absolu. Manuel. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#436057: less, exit but left content on screen
Tong Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So having a keyboard command 'x' or something can allows me, ... I don't know if this is possible. Less normally allows you to change command-line options from within a less session (just type - followed by the option...). However, they seem to have intentionally disabled this feature with the -X option. I think the reason probably is that once you're inside the less session, it's too late to change -- the terminal init command has already been sent (or not sent), and if a program has sent the terminal init command, technically it _has_ to send the terminal deinit command when it exits, otherwise the terminal will be left in a potentially screwed up state. [E.g., at least one 'terminal init I've seen (in the past -- I don't know if xterm works this way) moved the display window to the beginning of the scrollback buffer; terminal deinit would then move the display window back to the end of the scrollback buffer. If deinit isn't sent, things would be weird once the terminal starts scrolling again -- not only would new output overwrite the scrollback buffer from the beginning, but new lines that appeared at the bottom when the terminal scrolled would not be blank!] For this reason, probably a x command _is_ impossible (or at least, would often yield screwy results when you used it). -Miles -- Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug ktechlab en Etch
Miguel Montiel Martinez wrote: Pues bien no creo que se deba al tipo de pc pues tambien lo instalé en mi laptop una celeron M a 1.3Ghz con 512 ram y dd de 40Gb y pues generó el mismo error, ahora, tampoco creo que se deba a el entorno pues lo mismo me hace en gnome, kde u otro tipo de gestor de ventanas, anteriormente lo tenia en ubuntu freeze badger (algo así creo :p ) y trabajao bien hasta que le hice dist upgrade en otra pc que taba por ahi mal puesta jejeje, espero no haberlo cansado con tanto rollo, y espero que me puedan ayudar, muchas gracias, pues ya busque en el GOOGLE y solo me arroja un fallo que no es el que busco. Gracias Umm, pues esto me huele a un bug no específico a tus máquinas, deberías reportarlo con un email a [EMAIL PROTECTED] y en el texto colocar package: ktechlab y luego el contenido, por favor, escríbelo en inglés. Saludos, Jose Luis. -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' x86_64-SMP - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug ou não?
Davi, agradeço sua resposta. Instalei vi apt-get e o serviço foi adicionado ao runlevel padrão no momento da instalação, vide abaixo: mail:~# ls /etc/rc2.d/ S19slapd mail:~# ls /etc/rc3.d/ S19slapd mail:~# ls /etc/rc4.d/ S19slapd mail:~# ls /etc/rc5.d/ S19slapd Quando o serviços estão sendo carregados é exbida a mensagem Starting OpenLDAP: slapd., porem assim que me logo executo o comando pgrep slapd e não retorna o pid. Ai executo o comando slapd e em sequida pgrep slapd o resultado é 3294. Obrigado pela sugestão de leitura, mas só quero fique claro que não estou afirmando que encontrei um bug, muito pelo contrário estou apenas perguntando e pedindo opniões de outros colegas, de fato exisite uma falha que pode ser até mesmo alguma incompatibilidade com outro aplicativo instalado. Atenciosamente, Julio. - Mensagem original De: Davi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Enviadas: Domingo, 1 de Julho de 2007 21:06:36 Assunto: Re: Bug ou não? Em Domingo 01 Julho 2007 20:39, Julio Gimenes escreveu: fiz a instalação em uma VM do Debian 4.0 e JeguePanel para testes, porem toda vez que reinicio o servidor ldap não faz o start automatico. Tento iniciar o serviço pelo comando /etc/init.d/slapd start e nenhum erro é apresentado, porem o mesmo não inicia, para que ele funcione tenho que iniciar manualmente executando o comando slapd. Viu fazer um script para solucionar esta falha, mas tenho dúvidas se devo reportar isso como bug ou não? O que vcs acham é BUG? Eu _acho_ que você não adicionou o serviço ao nível de execução (runlevel) padrão... http://www.istf.com.br/?page=perguntas#notabug Não diga que você encontrou um bug Quanto você estiver com problemas em um determinado trecho do software, não diga que você encontrou um bug a não ser que esteja completamente certo disso. Dica: a menos que você possa fornecer um patch que resolva o problema, ou um teste de regressão contra uma versão anterior que demonstre o comportamento estranho, você provavelmente não tem certeza o suficiente. Isto se aplica também a páginas web e a documentação; se você encontrou um “bug” na documentação, você deve fornecer um texto para substituição e em quais páginas a correção deve ser feita. Lembre-se, existem muitos outros usuários que não estão passando pelo mesmo problema que você. Do contrário você teria notado isso lendo a documentação ou pesquisando na Web (você já fez isso, não fez?). Isso significa que é muito provável que é você quem está fazendo algo de errado, não o software. O pessoal que escreveu o software se dedicou muito para fazer o melhor possível. Se você diz que encontrou um bug, isto significa que eles fizeram algo de errado, e você quase sempre irá ofendê-los – mesmo que você esteja certo. Não é nada diplomático gritar “bug” no assunto da mensagem. Ao escrever sua mensagem, é melhor escrever imaginando que você fez algo de errado, mesmo que intimamente você saiba que encontrou um bug. Se for mesmo um bug, você vai ouvir isso na resposta. Faça dessa maneira e os desenvolvedores irão se desculpar com você no caso de um bug, ao invés de você ter que se desculpar com eles caso você tenha bagunçado as coisas. HTH, -- Davi Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion, ideology, resources, land, spite, love or just because... No matter how pathetic the reason, it's enough to start a war. Por favor não faça top-posting, coloque a sua resposta abaixo desta linha. Please don't do top-posting, put your reply below the following line. Novo Yahoo! Cadê? - Experimente uma nova busca. http://yahoo.com.br/oqueeuganhocomisso
Re: Bug ou não?
Em Segunda 02 Julho 2007 08:34, Julio Gimenes escreveu: Davi, agradeço sua resposta. [...] De nada. Quando o serviços estão sendo carregados é exbida a mensagem Starting OpenLDAP: slapd., porem assim que me logo executo o comando pgrep slapd e não retorna o pid. Ai executo o comando slapd e em sequida pgrep slapd o resultado é 3294. Legal... :-) E o ps aux? Não fede nem cheira? Obrigado pela sugestão de leitura, mas só quero fique claro que não estou afirmando que encontrei um bug, muito pelo contrário estou apenas perguntando e pedindo opniões de outros colegas, de fato exisite uma falha que pode ser até mesmo alguma incompatibilidade com outro aplicativo instalado. De nada. :-) Mas se você leu o e-mail que eu mandei, você entendeu que _não_ deve fazer isso... :-) Se é alguma incompatibilidade com outro aplicativo, não é um bug. É uma incompatibilidade... Ou seja: é um problema teu. Isolar o problema é sempre uma boa antes de sair correndo da banheira gritando pela praça Bug! Bug!... :-) (Desculpem a paródia... :-P ) -- Davi Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion, ideology, resources, land, spite, love or just because... No matter how pathetic the reason, it's enough to start a war. Por favor não faça top-posting, coloque a sua resposta abaixo desta linha. Please don't do top-posting, put your reply below the following line. pgpkBX93jFPOe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug ou não?
Davi, Mais uma vez obrigado. Eu tenho como corrigir este problema editando o script de inicialização ou fazendo um script própio, minha intenção era apenas saber se alguem mais passou por esse problema, mas pelo jeito acredito que ninguem ou seja não é um poblema isolado de minhas instalações. - Mensagem original De: Davi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 2 de Julho de 2007 9:59:53 Assunto: Re: Bug ou não? Em Segunda 02 Julho 2007 08:34, Julio Gimenes escreveu: Davi, agradeço sua resposta. [...] De nada. Quando o serviços estão sendo carregados é exbida a mensagem Starting OpenLDAP: slapd., porem assim que me logo executo o comando pgrep slapd e não retorna o pid. Ai executo o comando slapd e em sequida pgrep slapd o resultado é 3294. Legal... :-) E o ps aux? Não fede nem cheira? Nem fede nem cheira se eu não executar o comando o slapd manualmente. Obrigado pela sugestão de leitura, mas só quero fique claro que não estou afirmando que encontrei um bug, muito pelo contrário estou apenas perguntando e pedindo opniões de outros colegas, de fato exisite uma falha que pode ser até mesmo alguma incompatibilidade com outro aplicativo instalado. De nada. :-) Mas se você leu o e-mail que eu mandei, você entendeu que _não_ deve fazer isso... :-) Se é alguma incompatibilidade com outro aplicativo, não é um bug. É uma incompatibilidade... Ou seja: é um problema teu. Isolar o problema é sempre uma boa antes de sair correndo da banheira gritando pela praça Bug! Bug!... :-) (Desculpem a paródia... :-P ) -- Davi Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion, ideology, resources, land, spite, love or just because... No matter how pathetic the reason, it's enough to start a war. Por favor não faça top-posting, coloque a sua resposta abaixo desta linha. Please don't do top-posting, put your reply below the following line. Novo Yahoo! Cadê? - Experimente uma nova busca. http://yahoo.com.br/oqueeuganhocomisso
Re: Bug ou não?
Em Domingo 01 Julho 2007 20:39, Julio Gimenes escreveu: fiz a instalação em uma VM do Debian 4.0 e JeguePanel para testes, porem toda vez que reinicio o servidor ldap não faz o start automatico. Tento iniciar o serviço pelo comando /etc/init.d/slapd start e nenhum erro é apresentado, porem o mesmo não inicia, para que ele funcione tenho que iniciar manualmente executando o comando slapd. Viu fazer um script para solucionar esta falha, mas tenho dúvidas se devo reportar isso como bug ou não? O que vcs acham é BUG? Eu _acho_ que você não adicionou o serviço ao nível de execução (runlevel) padrão... http://www.istf.com.br/?page=perguntas#notabug Não diga que você encontrou um bug Quanto você estiver com problemas em um determinado trecho do software, não diga que você encontrou um bug a não ser que esteja completamente certo disso. Dica: a menos que você possa fornecer um patch que resolva o problema, ou um teste de regressão contra uma versão anterior que demonstre o comportamento estranho, você provavelmente não tem certeza o suficiente. Isto se aplica também a páginas web e a documentação; se você encontrou um “bug” na documentação, você deve fornecer um texto para substituição e em quais páginas a correção deve ser feita. Lembre-se, existem muitos outros usuários que não estão passando pelo mesmo problema que você. Do contrário você teria notado isso lendo a documentação ou pesquisando na Web (você já fez isso, não fez?). Isso significa que é muito provável que é você quem está fazendo algo de errado, não o software. O pessoal que escreveu o software se dedicou muito para fazer o melhor possível. Se você diz que encontrou um bug, isto significa que eles fizeram algo de errado, e você quase sempre irá ofendê-los – mesmo que você esteja certo. Não é nada diplomático gritar “bug” no assunto da mensagem. Ao escrever sua mensagem, é melhor escrever imaginando que você fez algo de errado, mesmo que intimamente você saiba que encontrou um bug. Se for mesmo um bug, você vai ouvir isso na resposta. Faça dessa maneira e os desenvolvedores irão se desculpar com você no caso de um bug, ao invés de você ter que se desculpar com eles caso você tenha bagunçado as coisas. HTH, -- Davi Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion, ideology, resources, land, spite, love or just because... No matter how pathetic the reason, it's enough to start a war. Por favor não faça top-posting, coloque a sua resposta abaixo desta linha. Please don't do top-posting, put your reply below the following line. pgpJDcYM1UGMl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bug no pacote python-gdata?
On 6/15/07, Bruno Schneider wrote: Se o gdata precisa desse elementtree, acho que deveria existir uma dependência nos pacotes, não? Como é que eu descubro qual pacote tem esse módulo? Bom, eu descobri que o elementtree fica no pacote python-elementtree (dãh!). Também descobri uma versão melhorada do script em: http://code.google.com/p/upload2picasa/ Esse script parece ter sido feito para Ubuntu e o pacote gdata parece ser um diferentes no Debian. Melhor dizendo, parece que a versão do original do Google foi alterada no pacote Debian. Mandei um e-mail para o mantenedor do pacote para entender melhor mas ainda espero uma resposta. Também fiz um bug report a respeito da dependência. Algum programador Python faria a caridade de experimentar esse upload2picasa e produzir uma versão que funcione no Debian? -- Bruno Schneider http://www.dcc.ufla.br/~bruno/
Re: bug - don't know which prog
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:50:16AM -0400, Thane Poore wrote: Have just upgraded from Ubuntu 6.06 to Ubuntu 7.04 as instructed on their pages via installing Ubuntu 6.10 first. All seems well except for a shutdown problem. I had Sylpheed Claws GTK2 running with ClamAV [snip description of a problem with Ubuntu] Welcome to Linux, Thane. Since this is a Ubuntu problem, you may get help on the Ubuntu list/forum. This is the Debian-user list. While *buntus are based on Debian, they make significant changes so unless we were to run Ubuntu we probably can't help. If we did run Ubuntu and interested in helping others who do, we'd probably lurk on their lists/fora. Good luck, Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in Console
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I've hit a bug in the code that handles character mode traffic and I'd be grateful if someone could confirm the correct element under which to file said bug. 'Console' is not recognised in the bug reporting system kernels prior to 2.6.18-x-686. i.e. 2.6.17-2-686 still works fine Your email just answered its own question. File a bug on the kernel package. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug in Console
Joey Hess wrote: Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I've hit a bug in the code that handles character mode traffic and I'd be grateful if someone could confirm the correct element under which to file said bug. 'Console' is not recognised in the bug reporting system kernels prior to 2.6.18-x-686. i.e. 2.6.17-2-686 still works fine Your email just answered its own question. File a bug on the kernel package. Yes, thanks. I assumed that the granularity in the kernel would allow for a smaller unit of code. Peter HB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug???
piter_p_92 wrote in Article [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx Is it a bug, or is that particular controller or hard drive not supported or requires some special method? http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id270918 What evidence do you have for your claim of bug? Hint: unless you can provide a source-code patch that fixes the problem, or a regression test against a previous version that demonstrates incorrect behavior, you are probably not sure enough. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug???
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 piter_p_92 escribió: Hello! I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx Hey, whick is your kernel? What kind of HDD are you using? Model? Maker?? MoBo? Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGTQu4OKCtW8rKsRgRAq4fAJ9mempDC2rlYWFiOD+xiAYmPZhXYACfRQ/S 1Cm99zIGhmKnvjt+Q/qoG6s= =iqiV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug???
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:14:34AM +0200, piter_p_92 wrote: Hello! I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx PS sorry for my english:P What type of hard drive do you have? Is it internal or external? And on what date did you download the .iso? -- http://digital-haze.net/~pobega/ - My Website If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs. - Richard Stallman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Bug???
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:00 +0200, piter_p_92 wrote: Wiadomość Oryginalna Od: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do: DebianUser List debian-user@lists.debian.org Kopia do: piter_p_92 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: 16 maja 2007 7:47 Temat: Re: Bug??? On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 07:14 +0200, piter_p_92 wrote: Hello! I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx PS sorry for my english:P English is fine. When was this testing version of Debian downloaded? do you have a specific date? Is this Etch? Or Lenny? We need to know more info than testing as it is a very fast moving target. It's Lenny, and i think it was downloaded 11 may... Okay, now. We need to know information about the machine he was putting it on. Make and Model (like a Dell, HP or Lenovo. Something like that). Or if it is a hand built machine, we need to know the make and models of: Motherboard, Processor, Video card, DVD/CD drive, NIC, etc... Also, please reply to the LIST next time. Not directly to me. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug???
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 07:14 +0200, piter_p_92 wrote: Hello! I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx PS sorry for my english:P English is fine. When was this testing version of Debian downloaded? do you have a specific date? Is this Etch? Or Lenny? We need to know more info than testing as it is a very fast moving target. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#420464: Delete key acts like backspace key in trq and tralt keymaps
severity 420464 normal tags 420464 patch confirmed pending thanks Quoting situert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: console-data Version: 2:1.01-7 Severity: Important Hello, In the trq.kmap.gz and tralt.kmap.gz keymaps, the Delete key acts like a backspace key. This occurs because the files /usr/share/keymaps/i386/qwerty/trq.kmap.gz /usr/share/keymaps/i386/qwerty/tralt.kmap.gz contain the following lines (near the beginning): plain keycode 111 = Delete alt keycode 111 = Meta_Delete To fix this problem, the mentioned lines should be removed from the mentioned files or one should use Remove instead of Delete for the keycode 111. I am using Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r0 on an i686 machine. I confirm this. Patch attached and committed to the SVN. Before we upload a fixed version, are there any reason for which this was intentional. Having Delete act as Backspace is really unusual in Linux environments but there are maybe some historical reasons that should prevent us from fixing this. Asking to the Debian Turkish users mailing list. Please respect Reply-To. --- console-data-1.01/keymaps/i386/qwerty/trq.kmap.old 2007-04-22 18:49:17.608439154 +0200 +++ console-data-1.01/keymaps/i386/qwerty/trq.kmap 2007-04-22 18:51:09.405325831 +0200 @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ charset iso-8859-9 keymaps 0-6,8-9,12 include linux-with-alt-and-altgr - plain keycode 111 = Delete - alt keycode 111 = Meta_Delete strings as usual keycode 1 = Escape --- console-data-1.01/keymaps/i386/qwerty/tralt.kmap.old2007-04-22 18:49:29.216531225 +0200 +++ console-data-1.01/keymaps/i386/qwerty/tralt.kmap2007-04-22 18:51:18.573398538 +0200 @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ # [EMAIL PROTECTED] charset iso-8859-9 include linux-with-alt-and-altgr - plain keycode 111 = Delete - alt keycode 111 = Meta_Delete strings as usual keycode 1 = Escape signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#420464: Delete key acts like backspace key in trq and tralt keymaps
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 420464 normal Bug#420464: Delete key acts like backspace key in trq and tralt keymaps Severity set to `normal' from `important' tags 420464 patch confirmed pending Bug#420464: Delete key acts like backspace key in trq and tralt keymaps There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, confirmed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:44, Colin Watson wrote: Personally I also feel that all possible solutions effectively make /etc/fstab unreadable and unmaintainable. The approach we took in Ubuntu was to put comments above each UUID entry in /etc/fstab documenting which traditional device name they corresponded to at the point of installation. Of course this can get out of date, but I don't think there's really any sensible way around that. My main point is not that the UUID itself is not readable, but rather that the lines get way too long and, depending on your editor (settings), either get wrapped or disappear off screen. You loose the easy overview of what's in fstab. /etc/fstab used to be fairly maintainable because the info could be kept in columns fairly easily for most cases and because the info would mostly fit on one line [1]. IMO with a switch to UUIDs we are going to need an fstab editor (console based) that: - does the translation to the normal device names on the fly (and thus does always reflect the actual situation) - provides different 'views' of what's in fstab - allows to select what representation for the file system should be used in the fstab (traditional, path, uuid, id, ...) - allows to set mount point, type, mount options, etc. - sorts partitions into a logical order - maybe knows about removable devices - has a simple interface to add new entries for e.g. USB sticks - ... [1] Yeah, I know this is not true for NFS volumes and if a lot of options are used, but in general it was true. If you're going to all the trouble of a smart fstab editor, why not simply define a more modern format (e.g. like that of dhcpd.conf) for the information that can accommodate line breaks and nesting. Change the name to something else, don't call it fstab; if the new file doesn't exist the mount command (and the rest of them that currently read fstab) will default to /etc/fstab if present. The biggest problem will be identifying all the places where fstab is currently *assumed* to be present and making them all use the new file. A library is probably needed that does the deciding of which format to use. Are there POSIX/LSB/etc ramifications? just a thought, Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
Mike McCarty wrote: Joe Hart wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I can't print in the forward direction until I quit the program and restart it. What happens when you use ghostview to print the same pdf? Or KPDF if you use KDE? Those are _supported_ pdf viewers, while acroread is proprietary. Perhaps you should take this up with Adobe, since they are the only ones that can fix it. Amazing. OT threads covering abortion, religion, politics etc. ad nauseum persist for weeks with hardly a complaint, and this guy asks a question which is actually more or less on topic, and he gets chastized. I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions with google for it while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in my opinion, is 'C'. Hugo In answer, I have not noticed that. Normally, if I select reverse order print, then I want it to stay that way, and have not as a consequence had that problem. I'm doing some stuff which precludes trying a test right now, but when I've got some time I'll give it a try. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Mike McCarty wrote: Joe Hart wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I can't print in the forward direction until I quit the program and restart it. What happens when you use ghostview to print the same pdf? Or KPDF if you use KDE? Those are _supported_ pdf viewers, while acroread is proprietary. Perhaps you should take this up with Adobe, since they are the only ones that can fix it. Amazing. OT threads covering abortion, religion, politics etc. ad nauseum persist for weeks with hardly a complaint, and this guy asks a question which is actually more or less on topic, and he gets chastized. I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions with google for it while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in my opinion, is 'C'. Hugo I've already clarified my position earlier in this thread, but I will do it again for you. How is it chastising to ask a user what happens with other tools? Or to point them to the proper support channel for the question they are asking? I never said to use google, nor did I condemn him for using the software that he choses to use. From what I know about Debian, and the Linux world in general, the freedom to choose which programs or distributions we use is our right, and nobody should be condemning anyone else for them choosing something other than what they chose. So many flame wars are started because This is better better than that type of messages. My intention was not to start a flame war, nor was it to insult the original poster. Please read the whole thread before making comments like that. As for your comment about the list itself, if you don't like the list, then don't subscribe to it. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF9+SRiXBCVWpc5J4RAtPVAJ9SmoVwSVe+IJ1BU2V7vPwpa8iIRQCeNYqK hC+bFIX+EHStX5V6qr8mt14= =xmU0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:30:52PM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:12:39 -0400 Juergen Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] For documents on the web I have this inelegant and heinous trick: I google for them. If a doc is in PDF format, Google will give you the option to view it as HTML. The converted version is not always pretty, but more often than not sufficient to get the information I need. Obviously doesn't work all the time, but it has helped me out occasionally. Why not just use a software pdf to text / html / whatever converter, such as pdftotext (in xpdf-utils)? Celejar I typically only use Google on computers that don't belong to me and that don't have a PDF reader installed - and most of those don't have xpdf-utils installed, either. --j signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:58:49 +0100 Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Celejar wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:23:27 +0100 Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] As for acroread goes, it has turned into a huge package. The version in my apt-cache shows 7.0.9, which is not the newest version, and it's a whopping 22911748 bytes. I imagine that 8.0 is even bigger. While KPDF may not be as feature rich, it does the job, and weighs in at 742592 bytes, and can embed nicely into konqueror. Don't forget that kpdf is based on xpdf (which is what I use). Ah the hidden dependencies. xpdf is a dummy package, that pulls in xpdf-reader and xpdf-utils and xpdf-common. Adding those up comes quite close to what acroread uses, so I guess my comparison is pretty useless. Um, no. Compressed Size:Uncompressed Size xpdf-common 60.9258 xpdf-reader 769 1937 xpdf-utils 13933543 total .9 5738 acroread22.9M 56M So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf). I guess it is almost like comparing different types of apples. The one thing to remember though is that all of the above mentioned files are open source except for acroread. For people that are dfsg purists, they would balk at the idea of installing it. I'm not a hard-line purist, but enough of one to strongly prefer the dfsg option barring a compelling reason otherwise. Personally, I have no problem with proprietary software, if there is no viable alternative. For example, I use the nvidia (9755) drivers because the open source version is pitifully slow on this system, and it can't support beryl. Madwifi is one of the only non-free bits I use, and it is really in the spirit of freedom. Celejar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:11:36 -0400 Juergen Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:30:52PM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:12:39 -0400 Juergen Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] For documents on the web I have this inelegant and heinous trick: I google for them. If a doc is in PDF format, Google will give you the option to view it as HTML. The converted version is not always pretty, but more often than not sufficient to get the information I need. Obviously doesn't work all the time, but it has helped me out occasionally. Why not just use a software pdf to text / html / whatever converter, such as pdftotext (in xpdf-utils)? Celejar I typically only use Google on computers that don't belong to me and that don't have a PDF reader installed - and most of those don't have xpdf-utils installed, either. Of course. I also use google's view as HTML in such situations; waiting for Acrobat (plus its boatload of default plugins) to load can be agonizing, especially on an older machine. Celejar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:35:07 -0600 Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions with google for it while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in my opinion, is 'C'. How should we grade? On a curve against other lists / fora? Some objective measure? Celejar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
Celejar wrote: So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf). Isn't Acroread statically linked? -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Celejar wrote: Ah the hidden dependencies. xpdf is a dummy package, that pulls in xpdf-reader and xpdf-utils and xpdf-common. Adding those up comes quite close to what acroread uses, so I guess my comparison is pretty useless. Um, no. Compressed Size:Uncompressed Size xpdf-common 60.9258 xpdf-reader 769 1937 xpdf-utils13933543 total .9 5738 acroread 22.9M 56M So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf). gtk2 perhaps? That's a big one. Of course a lot of apps need that one. Not my KDE ones though. I'm not a hard-line purist, but enough of one to strongly prefer the dfsg option barring a compelling reason otherwise. I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+BYMiXBCVWpc5J4RAug0AJwOKqprUhh7xDK7B1Z+kb1VS64mLgCdGlSw tibPYIk1AWov07R5QGlK5Xw= =e7NU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 04:35 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: [snip] I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions with google for it while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in my opinion, is 'C'. However, your grading of a C falls squarely on your ability to ask full qualified and briefed questions that we understand. Your history of questions isn't all that and a bag of chips you realize. Now, I am not starting a fight here, just that smartly asked questions and properly briefed ones at that (meaning all info needed to make an assessment and proper determination of the actual problem) seem to be your issue with the things you are doing. You do have to admit, you are not doing typical Debian User stuff with your setups. I know I am not. I grade your topical question asking a D in some instances and at best for initial questions a B. Though you do ask A graded question on a regular basis. And no, Hugo, this is not really aimed at you, just that a swathing grade like you just gave D-U needs a swathing back. It shows that many need to ask smarter and more informative questions before we can answer them. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:16 -0500, John Hasler wrote: Celejar wrote: So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf). Isn't Acroread statically linked? Yes, and as a rule, Debian frowns heavily on those kinds of things. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 04:35 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: [snip] I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions with google for it while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in my opinion, is 'C'. However, your grading of a C falls squarely on your ability to ask full qualified and briefed questions that we understand. Your history of questions isn't all that and a bag of chips you realize. Now, I am not starting a fight here, just that smartly asked questions and properly briefed ones at that (meaning all info needed to make an assessment and proper determination of the actual problem) seem to be your issue with the things you are doing. You do have to admit, you are not doing typical Debian User stuff with your setups. I know I am not. I grade your topical question asking a D in some instances and at best for initial questions a B. Though you do ask A graded question on a regular basis. And no, Hugo, this is not really aimed at you, just that a swathing grade like you just gave D-U needs a swathing back. It shows that many need to ask smarter and more informative questions before we can answer them. Greg, you're spot on. I think this calls for the infamous: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Maybe then we can get good questions instead of the: It doesn't work when I do this, how can I make it work? type of questions. - From what I've seen from this mailing list, it's not the type of place where people shout RTFM and STFW, but gosh darn people should. The man and info pages are there for a reason. And thanks go out to the people who defend my position on dfsg. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+C6PiXBCVWpc5J4RAgn8AKCamwPejjLvHMUzkqsn+oIq+KJovQCfcF3S 44j6INQTpIZsh6i2KB+EaQc= =y48H -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/14/07 10:34, Joe Hart wrote: Celejar wrote: [snip] I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure. Can you post a link (from the archives) to the post in which you think you were chastised? I've been following this link and never got the impression that you were chastised. Joe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF+D9kS9HxQb37XmcRAugjAKCD9aOY+JNddiVESdXSCkQaV0AWZQCfYuS7 T4K60rTEHaZGbXhACDcrV7o= =cYsl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Johnson wrote: On 03/14/07 10:34, Joe Hart wrote: Celejar wrote: [snip] I agree, yet I get when I point out that Debian does not support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure. Can you post a link (from the archives) to the post in which you think you were chastised? I've been following this link and never got the impression that you were chastised. Joe It's in this thread. Link I found contains messages from 2 people who found fault with my original reply to the OP. I didn't say I was being chastised, I said berated, which I define as scolded. Mike McCarty claims that I am doing the chastising. We already know he doesn't like Unix or Debian, we don't know which, and Hugo Vanwoerkom who thinks this list is mediocre at helping people. It appears that both of them think I was not being helpful and stated it in not so polite terms. Here's the link: http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20070314.103507.be5da96a.en.html I am just trying to be helpful, and when someone complains about a bug in software that doesn't comply with the dfsg, I suggested that they try supported software or take their problem upstream. I don't see a problem with my answer. Since the original post, we have discussed the bloat of acroread and the alternative pdf viewers, and never once did I think this was off topic to this mailing list. I still don't. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+Eb6iXBCVWpc5J4RAmT2AKDIKf80CC2qimYs4T2zhqsUwrzDXgCgrgxh ZiMV8FvudLv4QU1Y7/CtT5E= =TqYs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 16:34:36 +0100, Joe Hart wrote: [...] I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure. It is probably not worth to harp on this much longer, but as far as I remember it you received some slight criticism because the OP of this thread asked something like I am using Adobe reader and I have this problem, does anybody else see this? and you reacted with It is proprietary, so how can we support it? Go talk to Adobe!. I also found this a bit inappropriate, considering that the OP had not asked you (or anybody else) for support, but he just wanted to check if it is a known general problem or if it would make sense for him to look in more detail at his specific configuration. -- Regards, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:16 -0500, John Hasler wrote: Celejar wrote: So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf). Isn't Acroread statically linked? Yes, and as a rule, Debian frowns heavily on those kinds of things. Oh! $ ldd /usr/lib/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000) libBIB.so = not found libACE.so = not found libAGM.so = not found libCoolType.so = not found libAXE16SharedExpat.so = not found libJP2K.so = not found libResAccess.so = not found libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7f08000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb7efa000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7e0d000) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7de8000) libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 (0xb7dd9000) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xb7aef000) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xb7a6e000) libatk-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0xb7a54000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0xb7a3d000) libpangox-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0 (0xb7a32000) libpango-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xb79f8000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xb79be000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xb79bb000) libglib-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xb7929000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb77f6000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xb77e4000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f2e000) libXau.so.6 = /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xb77e1000) libXdmcp.so.6 = /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0xb77dc000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0xb77d4000) libcairo.so.2 = /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0xb7771000) libfontconfig.so.1 = /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xb7746000) libXrender.so.1 = /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xb773e000) libXinerama.so.1 = /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xb773b000) libXi.so.6 = /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xb7733000) libXrandr.so.2 = /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xb773) libXcursor.so.1 = /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xb7726000) libXfixes.so.3 = /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0xb7721000) librt.so.1 = /lib/tls/librt.so.1 (0xb7719000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0xb76ee000) libfreetype.so.6 = /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xb7684000) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb766f000) libpng12.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb764c000) libexpat.so.1 = /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xb762c000) $ - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+Ea+u4tRirKTPYwRAgeqAJoDi8zzakQ30Z64tqnHdKvKgWaOLQCffgMK te/plgsg0loR68BoyTRLcqM= =QMnf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florian Kulzer wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 16:34:36 +0100, Joe Hart wrote: [...] I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure. It is probably not worth to harp on this much longer, but as far as I remember it you received some slight criticism because the OP of this thread asked something like I am using Adobe reader and I have this problem, does anybody else see this? and you reacted with It is proprietary, so how can we support it? Go talk to Adobe!. I also found this a bit inappropriate, considering that the OP had not asked you (or anybody else) for support, but he just wanted to check if it is a known general problem or if it would make sense for him to look in more detail at his specific configuration. I was all prepared to forget it until Hugo spoke up. I used much kinder wording that that, but yes, that's basically what I said. I already pointed out my reasoning and my dislike for the company in question. Incidently, only one person confirmed the behavior, it seems the majority of people that replied in the thread use xpdf based tools so I am not alone. Matter dropped. Thread closed for me. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+EttiXBCVWpc5J4RAvWRAKC68Mc+qByrL1ibOPOfNPwlX6eLQQCff6PT rd7N5/ZbU2rw2EV7ZBW0sRA= =ctVl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in acroread?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/14/07 14:03, Joe Hart wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 03/14/07 10:34, Joe Hart wrote: Celejar wrote: [snip] I agree, yet I get when I point out that Debian does not support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure. Can you post a link (from the archives) to the post in which you think you were chastised? I've been following this link and never got the impression that you were chastised. Joe It's in this thread. Link I found contains messages from 2 people who found fault with my original reply to the OP. I didn't say I was being chastised, I said berated, which I define as scolded. Mike McCarty claims that I am doing the chastising. We already know he doesn't like Unix or Debian, we don't know which, and Hugo Vanwoerkom who thinks this list is mediocre at helping people. It appears that both of them think I was not being helpful and stated it in not so polite terms. Here's the link: http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20070314.103507.be5da96a.en.html I am just trying to be helpful, and when someone complains about a bug in software that doesn't comply with the dfsg, I suggested that they try supported software or take their problem upstream. I don't see a problem with my answer. That's what I thought. However, I didn't read take this up with Adobe, since they are the only ones that can fix it. as chastisement, since Adobe really is the only place that can fix a bug in acroread. OTOH, I can see where it would be interpreted as a curt or dismissive response, even if it wasn't meant to be. Since the original post, we have discussed the bloat of acroread and the alternative pdf viewers, and never once did I think this was off topic to this mailing list. I still don't. Joe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF+FCKS9HxQb37XmcRAnwvAKDV1VVvHezqwxr+ox5R8PbYlxz6UgCeOO5A K0YqNBKH3Bkzr/r2S4vvgMw= =2kCD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
