RE: Route problem

2001-06-13 Thread Brian Schramm
This worked for me.  Thanks.  I did not know I had to type the full line
like it was put into the routing table.

Brian

Brian Schramm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 104442754  AIM schrammbrian
www.linuxexpert.org

   
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote:

> 
> try
> route del -host 192.168.0.100 reject
> 
> I just checked it out...it worked here
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: Ian Perry
> Cc: 'Brian Schramm'; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Route problem
> 
> 
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote:
> 
> > route del ipnumber
> > or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ?
> 
> Hmmm didn't work here:
> ~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
> 192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
> 127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
> ~# route add -host 192.168.0.100 reject  #no machine on this IP.
> ~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 192.168.0.100   -   255.255.255.255 !H0  -0 -
> 192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
> 192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
> 127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
> ~# route -v del -host 192.168.0.100
> SIOCDELRT: No such process
> ~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 192.168.0.100   -   255.255.255.255 !H0  -0 -
> 192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
> 192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
> 127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
> 
> 
> I usually use ipchains/iptables because I couldn't workout how to remove the
> reject rule.
> 
> Yours Tony.
> 
> /*
>  * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the
>  * same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
>  * --Albert Einstein
>  */
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



RE: Route problem

2001-06-12 Thread Ian Perry

try
route del -host 192.168.0.100 reject

I just checked it out...it worked here

-Original Message-
From: Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:59 PM
To: Ian Perry
Cc: 'Brian Schramm'; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Route problem


On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote:

> route del ipnumber
> or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ?

Hmmm didn't work here:
~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
~# route add -host 192.168.0.100 reject  #no machine on this IP.
~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
192.168.0.100   -   255.255.255.255 !H0  -0 -
192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
~# route -v del -host 192.168.0.100
SIOCDELRT: No such process
~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
192.168.0.100   -   255.255.255.255 !H0  -0 -
192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0


I usually use ipchains/iptables because I couldn't workout how to remove the
reject rule.

Yours Tony.

/*
 * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the
 * same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
 * --Albert Einstein
 */


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Route problem

2001-06-12 Thread Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Ian Perry wrote:

> route del ipnumber
> or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ?

Hmmm didn't work here:
~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
~# route add -host 192.168.0.100 reject  #no machine on this IP.
~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.0.100   -   255.255.255.255 !H0  -0 -
192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
~# route -v del -host 192.168.0.100
SIOCDELRT: No such process
~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.0.100   -   255.255.255.255 !H0  -0 -
192.168.0.12*   255.255.255.255 UH0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default gw  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0


I usually use ipchains/iptables because I couldn't workout how to remove the
reject rule.

Yours Tony.

/*
 * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the
 * same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
 * --Albert Einstein
 */



RE: Route problem

2001-06-12 Thread Ian Perry
route del ipnumber
or are you talking about the ipfwadm or ipchains ?

-Original Message-
From: Brian Schramm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:30 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Route problem


Is there a way to remove a route from the route table that is set up to
reject that ip address?  I have tried on several machines with no luck.  I
am tired of rebooting to clear it.

Brian

Brian Schramm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 104442754  AIM schrammbrian
www.linuxexpert.org




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Route problem

2001-06-12 Thread Brian Schramm
Is there a way to remove a route from the route table that is set up to
reject that ip address?  I have tried on several machines with no luck.  I
am tired of rebooting to clear it.

Brian

Brian Schramm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 104442754  AIM schrammbrian
www.linuxexpert.org

   



Re: PPP route problem?

1998-11-05 Thread Paul Miller
John Maheu wrote:
> Here is the output from
> 
> ROOT:/root>route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
> 207.34.68.254   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0  00 ppp0
> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  01 lo
> 0.0.0.0 207.34.68.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 ppp0
 
[snip]

> ppp0  Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
>   inet addr:207.34.68.2  P-t-P:207.34.68.254  Mask:255.255.255.0
>   UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:15 errors:1 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   Collisions:0
>   Memory:384f038-384fc04
> 
> I can't seem to add the gateway address
> 
> ROOT:/root>route add default gw 199.45.65.1
> SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
> 
The IP (199.45.65.1) given as the gateway will not work as it is not on
your network (207.34.68.0). Your gateway is 207.34.68.254 from your
routing table. This gets added automatically by pppd.

The fact that you can ftp and ping outside your network means that
routing is setup properly for you (for the most part). Does telnet not
work for any hosts or just one in particular? You can use the traceroute
command to see how far you get before getting host unreachable.

Don't know what else to tell you, but I hope this helps you get closer
to a solution.

-- 
Paul Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: PPP route problem?

1998-11-05 Thread John Maheu
On 4 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> John Maheu writes:
> > Any idea on how to fix this?  ftp, and ping work fine.
> 
> Can you telnet from Windows?  Could your isp be blocking telnet?
> -- 
> John Hasler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI
> 
I don't have Windows and no the isp doesn't block telnet. 
However, I can ssh login. I also have a gateway
parameter, but I'm not sure where to put it in the ppp scripts. I did add
the netmask address 255.255.255.0 to /etc/ppp/peer/provider

Here is the output from 

ROOT:/root>route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
207.34.68.254   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0  00 ppp0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  01 lo
0.0.0.0 207.34.68.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 ppp0


ROOT:/etc/ppp>ifconfig
loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
  RX packets:58 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:58 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  Collisions:0

ppp0  Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
  inet addr:207.34.68.2  P-t-P:207.34.68.254  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:15 errors:1 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  Collisions:0
  Memory:384f038-384fc04


I can't seem to add the gateway address

ROOT:/root>route add default gw 199.45.65.1
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable

The OS was installed (originally) with a static ip address on a
LAN. 

Any suggestions?
Thanks
John


Re: PPP route problem?

1998-11-05 Thread john
John Maheu writes:
> Any idea on how to fix this?  ftp, and ping work fine.

Can you telnet from Windows?  Could your isp be blocking telnet?
-- 
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI


PPP route problem?

1998-11-04 Thread John Maheu
Having just installed pppd and configured pppd with pppconfig I get the
following when I try to telnet to a valid address through my ISP,

trying 
 Unable to connect to romote host: No route to host

Any idea on how to fix this?  ftp, and ping work fine.


Thanks
John

John Maheuphone  (403) 492-2049
University of Alberta email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Economics
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T6G 2H4