Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc, but can not ping 
the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from the server.
I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
When I clear iptables there is no change.

Any ideas?
Best regards
Jacob Larsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Laurent CARON
Jacob Larsen wrote:
I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc, but can not 
ping the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from the server.
I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
When I clear iptables there is no change.

Any ideas?
Best regards
Jacob Larsen

ifconfig?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc, but can not 
ping the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from the server.
I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
When I clear iptables there is no change.

Any ideas?
ifconfig?
# ifconfig
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
  inet addr:81.7.167.228  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1494 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:12
  TX packets:809 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:21 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:112805 (110.1 KiB)  TX bytes:99044 (96.7 KiB)

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
  inet addr:81.7.167.226  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1037 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6
  TX packets:403 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:11 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:77395 (75.5 KiB)  TX bytes:48278 (47.1 KiB)
  Interrupt:18

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:52
  inet addr:81.7.167.227  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:457 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6
  TX packets:406 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:10 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:35410 (34.5 KiB)  TX bytes:50766 (49.5 KiB)
  Interrupt:19

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:42547 (41.5 KiB)  TX bytes:42547 (41.5 KiB)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
can you ping the ethernet cards within the server?

if you run 
shell~#ifconfig 

what is the output?

and if you run
shell~#route -n

what is the output?


On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:14:51 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc,
 but can not ping 
 the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from
 the server.
 I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
 When I clear iptables there is no change.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Best regards
 Jacob Larsen
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
can you ping your ethernet cards from within the server?

if you run
shell~#ifconfig

what is the output?

if you run
shell~#route -n

what is the output?


On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:14:51 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc,
 but can not ping 
 the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from
 the server.
 I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
 When I clear iptables there is no change.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Best regards
 Jacob Larsen
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 08:47, Jacob Larsen wrote:
  I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc, but can not 
  ping the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from the server.
  I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
  When I clear iptables there is no change.
 
 
 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
inet addr:81.7.167.226  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:1037 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6
TX packets:403 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:11 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:77395 (75.5 KiB)  TX bytes:48278 (47.1 KiB)
Interrupt:18

11100010 -- .226
 -- mask

This gives you 15 addresses. Why is the broadcast address not one of
these 15? The broadcast should be 81.7.167.239 which is the highest
address you have using that netmask. Not?

I really don't know what bond0 is so I may be missing something.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:
can you ping the ethernet cards within the server?
Yes.
if you run 
shell~#ifconfig 
what is the output?
# ifconfig
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
  inet addr:81.7.167.228  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1494 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:12
  TX packets:809 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:21 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:112805 (110.1 KiB)  TX bytes:99044 (96.7 KiB)

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
  inet addr:81.7.167.226  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1037 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6
  TX packets:403 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:11 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:77395 (75.5 KiB)  TX bytes:48278 (47.1 KiB)
  Interrupt:18

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:52
  inet addr:81.7.167.227  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:457 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6
  TX packets:406 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:10 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:35410 (34.5 KiB)  TX bytes:50766 (49.5 KiB)
  Interrupt:19

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:42547 (41.5 KiB)  TX bytes:42547 (41.5 KiB)
and if you run
shell~#route -n
what is the output?
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 eth0
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 eth1
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 
bond0
0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG0  00 
bond0
0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth1
0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:14:51 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:
I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc,
but can not ping 
the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from
the server.
I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
When I clear iptables there is no change.

Any ideas?

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Eric Gaumer wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 08:47, Jacob Larsen wrote:
I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home pc, but can not 
ping the gateway nor another server on the same subnet from the server.
I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
When I clear iptables there is no change.

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
  inet addr:81.7.167.226  Bcast:81.255.255.255 
Mask:255.255.255.240
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1037 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6
  TX packets:403 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:11 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:77395 (75.5 KiB)  TX bytes:48278 (47.1 KiB)
  Interrupt:18

11100010 -- .226
 -- mask
This gives you 15 addresses. Why is the broadcast address not one of
these 15? The broadcast should be 81.7.167.239 which is the highest
address you have using that netmask. Not?
I am a novice in this area.
Could this help:
# cat /etc/network/interfaces
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 81.7.167.226
netmask 255.255.255.240
gateway 81.7.167.225
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 81.7.167.227
netmask 255.255.255.240
gateway 81.7.167.225
auto bond0
iface bond0 inet static
address 81.7.167.228
netmask 255.255.255.240
gateway 81.7.167.225
up ifenslave bond0 eth0
up ifenslave bond0 eth1
post-down ifconfig eth1 down
post-down ifconfig eth0 down
I really don't know what bond0 is so I may be missing something.
bond0 is Bonding. If eth0 is down eth1 takes over...
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:16:20 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  can you ping the ethernet cards within the server?
 
 Yes.
 
  if you run 
  shell~#ifconfig 
  what is the output?
 
 # ifconfig
 bond0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
inet addr:81.7.167.228 
Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST 
 MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:1494 errors:0 dropped:0
 overruns:0 frame:12
TX packets:809 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:21 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:112805 (110.1 KiB)  TX bytes:99044
 (96.7 KiB)
 
 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
inet addr:81.7.167.226 
Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST 
 MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:1037 errors:0 dropped:0
 overruns:0 frame:6
TX packets:403 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:11 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:77395 (75.5 KiB)  TX bytes:48278
 (47.1 KiB)
Interrupt:18
 
 eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:0F:20:7A:7A:52
inet addr:81.7.167.227 
Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST 
 MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:457 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 frame:6
TX packets:406 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:10 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:35410 (34.5 KiB)  TX bytes:50766
 (49.5 KiB)
Interrupt:19
 
 loLink encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
RX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 frame:0
TX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:42547 (41.5 KiB)  TX bytes:42547
 (41.5 KiB)
 
  and if you run
  shell~#route -n
  what is the output?
 
 # route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
 Metric RefUse 
 Iface
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth0
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth1
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 
 bond0
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 
 bond0
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 eth1
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 eth0
 
  On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:14:51 +0200, Jacob Larsen
 wrote:
 I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home
pc,
 but can not ping 
 the gateway nor another server on the same subnet
from
 the server.
 I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
 When I clear iptables there is no change.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 
Which transmit policy are you using ?
Round robin
XOR
Active-backup

 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:
Which transmit policy are you using ?
Round robin
XOR
Active-backup
I have no idea. How can I find out?
# cat /etc/modules
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
# to be loaded at boot time, one per line.  Comments begin with
# a #, and everything on the line after them are ignored.
usb-ohci
input
usbkbd
keybdev
tg3
bonding miimon=250
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:16:20 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  can you ping the ethernet cards within the server?
 
 Yes.
 
  if you run 
  shell~#ifconfig 
  what is the output?
 
 # ifconfig
 bond0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
inet addr:81.7.167.228 
Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST 
 MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:1494 errors:0 dropped:0
 overruns:0 frame:12
TX packets:809 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:21 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:112805 (110.1 KiB)  TX bytes:99044
 (96.7 KiB)
 
 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:0F:20:7A:7A:53
inet addr:81.7.167.226 
Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST 
 MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:1037 errors:0 dropped:0
 overruns:0 frame:6
TX packets:403 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:11 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:77395 (75.5 KiB)  TX bytes:48278
 (47.1 KiB)
Interrupt:18
 
 eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:0F:20:7A:7A:52
inet addr:81.7.167.227 
Bcast:81.255.255.255 
 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST 
 MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:457 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 frame:6
TX packets:406 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:10 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:35410 (34.5 KiB)  TX bytes:50766
 (49.5 KiB)
Interrupt:19
 
 loLink encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
RX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 frame:0
TX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0
 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:42547 (41.5 KiB)  TX bytes:42547
 (41.5 KiB)
 
  and if you run
  shell~#route -n
  what is the output?
 
 # route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
 Metric RefUse 
 Iface
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth0
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth1
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 
 bond0
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 
 bond0
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 eth1
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 eth0

When bonding is set up with the ARP monitor, it is
important that the
slave devices not have routes that supercede routes of
the master (or,
generally, not have routes at all).  For example,
suppose the bonding
device bond0 has two slaves, eth0 and eth1, and the
routing table is
as follows:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags  
MSS Window  irtt Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 40 0  0 eth0
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 40 0  0 eth1
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 40 0  0 bond0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U  
 40 0  0 lo

In this case, the ARP monitor (and ARP itself) may
become confused,
because ARP requests will be sent on one interface
(bond0), but the
corresponding reply will arrive on a different
interface (eth0).  This
reply looks to ARP as an unsolicited ARP reply (because
ARP matches
replies on an interface basis), and is discarded.  This
will likely
still update the receive/transmit times in the driver,
but will lose
packets.

The resolution here is simply to insure that slaves do
not have routes
of their own, and if for some reason they must, those
routes do not
supercede routes of their master.  This should
generally be the case,
but unusual configurations or errant manual or
automatic static route
additions may cause trouble.

From:Linux Ethernet Bonding Driver mini-howto
-
 
  On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:14:51 +0200, Jacob Larsen
 wrote:
 I can ping my server, and the gateway from my home
pc,
 but can not ping 
 the gateway nor another server on the same subnet
from
 the server.
 I use bond0 for eth0 and eth1.
 When I clear iptables there is no change.
 
 Any ideas?

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
Depends on the value that you pass at mode parameter:

mode=1 Active-backup policy, configuration not needed
mode=0, mode=2, mode=3 it does need to be configured
for Round robin, XOR and boradcast policies. 



On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:10:14 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  Which transmit policy are you using ?
  Round robin
  XOR
  Active-backup
 
 I have no idea. How can I find out?
 
 # cat /etc/modules
 # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
 #
 # This file should contain the names of kernel modules
 that are
 # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.  Comments
 begin with
 # a #, and everything on the line after them are
 ignored.
 
 usb-ohci
 input
 usbkbd
 keybdev
 tg3
 bonding miimon=250

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:

When bonding is set up with the ARP monitor, it is
important that the
slave devices not have routes that supercede routes of
the master (or,
generally, not have routes at all).  For example,
suppose the bonding
device bond0 has two slaves, eth0 and eth1, and the
routing table is
as follows:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags  
MSS Window  irtt Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 40 0  0 eth0
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 40 0  0 eth1
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 40 0  0 bond0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U  
 40 0  0 lo

In this case, the ARP monitor (and ARP itself) may
become confused,
because ARP requests will be sent on one interface
(bond0), but the
corresponding reply will arrive on a different
interface (eth0).  This
reply looks to ARP as an unsolicited ARP reply (because
ARP matches
replies on an interface basis), and is discarded.  This
will likely
still update the receive/transmit times in the driver,
but will lose
packets.
The resolution here is simply to insure that slaves do
not have routes
of their own, and if for some reason they must, those
routes do not
supercede routes of their master.  This should
generally be the case,
but unusual configurations or errant manual or
automatic static route
additions may cause trouble.
From:Linux Ethernet Bonding Driver mini-howto
-
So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0 and eth1, but only set 
it for bond0?

Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:
Depends on the value that you pass at mode parameter:
mode=1 Active-backup policy, configuration not needed
mode=0, mode=2, mode=3 it does need to be configured
for Round robin, XOR and boradcast policies. 
Do you know which one is the default?
I remember when I set bonding miimon=250 mode=1 in /etc/modules I 
couldn't make it work.

Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:38:20 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  
  When bonding is set up with the ARP monitor, it is
  important that the
  slave devices not have routes that supercede routes
of
  the master (or,
  generally, not have routes at all).  For example,
  suppose the bonding
  device bond0 has two slaves, eth0 and eth1, and the
  routing table is
  as follows:
  
  Kernel IP routing table
  Destination Gateway Genmask
Flags
  
  MSS Window  irtt Iface
  10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 
  
   40 0  0 eth0
  10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 
  
   40 0  0 eth1
  10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U  
 
  
   40 0  0 bond0
  127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U  
 
  
   40 0  0 lo
  
  In this case, the ARP monitor (and ARP itself) may
  become confused,
  because ARP requests will be sent on one interface
  (bond0), but the
  corresponding reply will arrive on a different
  interface (eth0).  This
  reply looks to ARP as an unsolicited ARP reply
 (because
  ARP matches
  replies on an interface basis), and is discarded. 
 This
  will likely
  still update the receive/transmit times in the
driver,
  but will lose
  packets.
  
  The resolution here is simply to insure that slaves
do
  not have routes
  of their own, and if for some reason they must,
those
  routes do not
  supercede routes of their master.  This should
  generally be the case,
  but unusual configurations or errant manual or
  automatic static route
  additions may cause trouble.
  
  From:Linux Ethernet Bonding Driver mini-howto
 
-
 
 So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0 and
 eth1, but only set 
 it for bond0?
 
 Thanks,
 Jacob

Yes,

But you also could have gw for your eth's cards, but
you must assure that those routes do not supercede the
bond0.

If this do not help you can consult a good doc at:
http://ece.wpi.edu/pit/rowitsch/linux-2.4.21/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt

Kind Regards

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:42:13 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  Depends on the value that you pass at mode
parameter:
  
  mode=1 Active-backup policy, configuration not
needed
  mode=0, mode=2, mode=3 it does need to be configured
  for Round robin, XOR and boradcast policies. 
 
 Do you know which one is the default?
 
 I remember when I set bonding miimon=250 mode=1 in
 /etc/modules I 
 couldn't make it work.
 
 Thanks,
 Jacob

I'm not quite sure but I think is 1.

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0 and
eth1, but only set 
it for bond0?
Yes,
But you also could have gw for your eth's cards, but
you must assure that those routes do not supercede the
bond0.
I am not sure that I understand what you mean by supersede.
The only gateway I have is 81.7.167.225.
Do you mean that I can have a gateway for eth0 and eth1 if it is 
different than that of bond0?

By not setting a gateway for eth0 and eth1 in /etc/network/interfaces it 
still doesn't work.

What should I do?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
Ok, send the 
shell~#route -n 
output...


On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:21:58 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0 and
 eth1, but only set 
 it for bond0?
  
  Yes,
  
  But you also could have gw for your eth's cards, but
  you must assure that those routes do not supercede
the
  bond0.
 
 I am not sure that I understand what you mean by
 supersede.
 The only gateway I have is 81.7.167.225.
 Do you mean that I can have a gateway for eth0 and
eth1
 if it is 
 different than that of bond0?
 
 By not setting a gateway for eth0 and eth1 in
 /etc/network/interfaces it 
 still doesn't work.
 
 What should I do?
 
 Thanks,
 Jacob

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:
Ok, send the 
shell~#route -n 
output...
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 eth0
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 eth1
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 
bond0
0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG0  00 
bond0

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:21:58 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:
So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0 and
eth1, but only set 
it for bond0?
Yes,
But you also could have gw for your eth's cards, but
you must assure that those routes do not supercede
the
bond0.
I am not sure that I understand what you mean by
supersede.
The only gateway I have is 81.7.167.225.
Do you mean that I can have a gateway for eth0 and
eth1
if it is 
different than that of bond0?

By not setting a gateway for eth0 and eth1 in
/etc/network/interfaces it 
still doesn't work.

What should I do?
Thanks,
Jacob

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
move from your routing table, the entries for your
eth's cards.

route del ...
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:15:45 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  Ok, send the 
  shell~#route -n 
  output...
 
 # route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
 Metric RefUse 
 Iface
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth0
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth1
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 
 bond0
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 
 bond0
 
  On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:21:58 +0200, Jacob Larsen
 wrote:
 So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0
and
 eth1, but only set 
 it for bond0?
 
 Yes,
 
 But you also could have gw for your eth's cards,
but
 you must assure that those routes do not supercede
  
  the
  
 bond0.
 
 I am not sure that I understand what you mean by
 supersede.
 The only gateway I have is 81.7.167.225.
 Do you mean that I can have a gateway for eth0 and
  
  eth1
  
 if it is 
 different than that of bond0?
 
 By not setting a gateway for eth0 and eth1 in
 /etc/network/interfaces it 
 still doesn't work.
 
 What should I do?
 
 Thanks,
 Jacob
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:
move from your routing table, the entries for your
eth's cards.
route del ...
I am not sure I know what to do. If I do something wrong I have to drive 
60km to fix it :)

# route del ?
Please help.
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
ok, 

#route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
eth0

#route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
eth1

then run
#route -n 

and the output should not have the eth's entries.

#ip neigh show

and send the output

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:19:03 -0700 (PDT), Sergio
Basurto wrote:

 
 move from your routing table, the entries for your
 eth's cards.
 
 route del ...
 On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:15:45 +0200, Jacob Larsen
wrote:
 
  
  Sergio Basurto wrote:
   Ok, send the 
   shell~#route -n 
   output...
  
  # route -n
  Kernel IP routing table
  Destination Gateway Genmask
Flags
  Metric RefUse 
  Iface
  81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U  
 
 
   00 eth0
  81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U  
 
 
   00 eth1
  81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U  
 
 
   00 
  bond0
  0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG 
 
 
   00 
  bond0
  
   On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:21:58 +0200, Jacob Larsen
  wrote:
  So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0
 and
  eth1, but only set 
  it for bond0?
  
  Yes,
  
  But you also could have gw for your eth's cards,
 but
  you must assure that those routes do not
supercede
   
   the
   
  bond0.
  
  I am not sure that I understand what you mean by
  supersede.
  The only gateway I have is 81.7.167.225.
  Do you mean that I can have a gateway for eth0 and
   
   eth1
   
  if it is 
  different than that of bond0?
  
  By not setting a gateway for eth0 and eth1 in
  /etc/network/interfaces it 
  still doesn't work.
  
  What should I do?
  
  Thanks,
  Jacob
  
  
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
 Tel: 04455-85322945
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
This is what I got. Which package do I need for ip neigh show?
# route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 eth0
SIOCDELRT: No such process
# route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 eth1
SIOCDELRT: No such process
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 eth0
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 eth1
81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00 
bond0
0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG0  00 
bond0

Sergio Basurto wrote:
ok, 

#route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
eth0
#route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
eth1
then run
#route -n 

and the output should not have the eth's entries.
#ip neigh show
and send the output

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Sergio Basurto
iproute2 under debian : #apt-get install iproute

and try
#route del -host 87.7.167.224 eth0
#route del -host 87.7.167.224 eth1

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:02:29 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote:

 
 This is what I got. Which package do I need for ip
 neigh show?
 

 # route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
 eth0
 SIOCDELRT: No such process 

 # route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
 eth1
 SIOCDELRT: No such process
 # route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
 Metric RefUse 
 Iface
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth0
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 eth1
 81.7.167.2240.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U

  00 
 bond0
 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.2250.0.0.0 UG   

  00 
 bond0
 
 Sergio Basurto wrote:
  ok, 
  
  #route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
  eth0
  
  #route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240
  eth1
  
  then run
  #route -n 
  
  and the output should not have the eth's entries.
  
  #ip neigh show
  
  and send the output

Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez
Tel: 04455-85322945


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unable to ping gateway

2004-09-20 Thread Jacob Larsen
Sergio Basurto wrote:
#route del -host 87.7.167.224 eth0
#route del -host 87.7.167.224 eth1
# route del -host 87.7.167.224 eth0
SIOCDELRT: No such process
# route del -host 87.7.167.224 eth1
SIOCDELRT: No such process
# ip neigh show
81.7.167.225 dev bond0 lladdr 00:d0:00:e4:fc:0a nud reachable
I wish I could be more helpfull.
Thanks for your help so far!
Best regards, Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]