Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-11 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Jo, 10 mar 11, 16:21:24, Paul E Condon wrote:
 
 Dual boot has gotten somewhat messy, IMHO, since the introduction of
 UUIDs in /etc/fstab. When one boots into the old installation, the
 /etc/fstab is incapable of mounting the newer installation because
 the old UUID on that root partition has been clobbered. 
 
 At least I haven't figured out a convenient way to switch back and
 forth. Any suggestions?

Re-formating a partition will generate a new UUID. If you want to write 
a stable fstab just use LABELs instead and make sure you assign the 
same label every time you reformat the partition.

(You can set the UUID at re-formating as well, but LABELs are easier to 
handle in such a scenario)

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-10 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:13:17 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:

 I'd especially like to hear from those of you who are Linux consultants
 or sysadmins.  This is a timely topic given that Debian Squeeze moved
 from the testing branch to the stable branch.
 
 Which do you prefer: Upgrading the old OS or doing a fresh installation?
  I learn towards a fresh installation.

(...)

A fresh/new install, if possible, in parallel.

I always avoid removing something that is currently working if it's in 
production. I prefer installing apart, test the new system, check for any 
problem and then decide with confidence.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.03.10.15.26...@gmail.com



Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-10 Thread Klistvud

Dne, 10. 03. 2011 16:26:02 je Camaleón napisal(a):


A fresh/new install, if possible, in parallel.

I always avoid removing something that is currently working if it's in
production. I prefer installing apart, test the new system, check for  
any

problem and then decide with confidence.

Greetings,

--
Camaleón


+1

The advantage of having the old system available in parallel is in that  
you can easily copy all your specific/modified configuration files over  
to the new install, or at least use them as reference.


--
Cheerio,

Klistvud  
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Certifiable Loonix User #481801  Please reply to the list, not to  
me.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299772269.5452.1@compax



Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:26:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
 On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:13:17 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:
 
  I'd especially like to hear from those of you who are Linux consultants
  or sysadmins.  This is a timely topic given that Debian Squeeze moved
  from the testing branch to the stable branch.
  
  Which do you prefer: Upgrading the old OS or doing a fresh installation?
   I learn towards a fresh installation.
 
 (...)
 
 A fresh/new install, if possible, in parallel.

+1 too
YES!
 
 I always avoid removing something that is currently working if it's in 
 production. I prefer installing apart, test the new system, check for any 
 problem and then decide with confidence.

1. back up critical information
2. fresh/new install to the different partition
3. copy cofig from the old to the new system
4. enjoy your new system
5. upgrade the old installation to the new one by upgrade per release-note
6. file bug :-)

Having dual boot saves your life when you do stupid things ...

Osamu



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110310160314.ga27...@debian.org



Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-10 Thread David Christensen

On 03/10/2011 08:03 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:26:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:

On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:13:17 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:

  I learn towards a fresh installation.

A fresh/new install, if possible, in parallel.

+1 too


+1


Having dual boot saves your life when you do stupid things ...


So does having a spare machine, using hard drive mobile docks, and/or 
using drive imaging software.



David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7920b1.6030...@holgerdanske.com



Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-10 Thread Paul E Condon
On 20110310_110417, David Christensen wrote:
 On 03/10/2011 08:03 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:26:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
 On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:13:17 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:
   I learn towards a fresh installation.
 A fresh/new install, if possible, in parallel.
 +1 too
 
 +1
 
 Having dual boot saves your life when you do stupid things ...

Dual boot has gotten somewhat messy, IMHO, since the introduction of
UUIDs in /etc/fstab. When one boots into the old installation, the
/etc/fstab is incapable of mounting the newer installation because
the old UUID on that root partition has been clobbered. 

At least I haven't figured out a convenient way to switch back and
forth. Any suggestions?


-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110310232124.ga3...@big.lan.gnu



Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-10 Thread Greg Madden


On Thursday 10 March 2011 02:21:24 pm Paul E Condon wrote:
 Dual boot has gotten somewhat messy, IMHO, since the introduction of
 UUIDs in /etc/fstab. When one boots into the old installation, the
 /etc/fstab is incapable of mounting the newer installation because
 the old UUID on that root partition has been clobbered.

 At least I haven't figured out a convenient way to switch back and
 forth. Any suggestions?

On one box I  changed my Lenny install fstab to use uuid's early on. I have not 
experienced the 'clobbered uuid' issue when I installed a second root partition.

Maybe all you need to do is run 'blkid' again and make sure grub and the 
fstab(s) 
agree.
-- 
Peace,

Greg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103101630.26688.gomadtr...@gci.net



Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-09 Thread Jason Hsu
I'd especially like to hear from those of you who are Linux consultants or 
sysadmins.  This is a timely topic given that Debian Squeeze moved from the 
testing branch to the stable branch.

Which do you prefer: Upgrading the old OS or doing a fresh installation?  I 
learn towards a fresh installation.

One the one hand, upgrading the old OS is fast and requires no downtime IF 
everything goes well.  Of course, that is one big IF, and I'm not sure if 
things have ever gone perfectly in the entire history of the world.  Some 
things change from one version of Debian to the next, and what worked in the 
old version won't work at all in the new version, especially in the area of 
configuration files.  The more packages you have installed, the more problems 
you'll have.

On the other hand, a fresh installation bypasses the upgrade issues.  You can 
always just repeat the installation procedure from the previous version of 
Debian and make adjustments when appropriate.  You need to properly back up the 
personal/company files in this case, but you'd have to do that anyway as a 
precaution if you use the upgrade route.

What do you think?

-- 
Jason Hsu jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110309171317.41bb9188.jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com



Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-09 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In 20110309171317.41bb9188.jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com, Jason Hsu wrote:
Which do you prefer: Upgrading the old OS or doing a fresh installation?  I
learn towards a fresh installation.

Upgrade.  Always.

I've heard others swear by New install.  Always. though.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Upgrading the old OS vs. fresh installation of the new OS

2011-03-09 Thread Greg Madden


On Wednesday 09 March 2011 02:13:17 pm Jason Hsu wrote:
 I'd especially like to hear from those of you who are Linux consultants or
 sysadmins.  This is a timely topic given that Debian Squeeze moved from the
 testing branch to the stable branch.

 Which do you prefer: Upgrading the old OS or doing a fresh installation?  I
 learn towards a fresh installation.

 One the one hand, upgrading the old OS is fast and requires no downtime IF
 everything goes well.  Of course, that is one big IF, and I'm not sure if
 things have ever gone perfectly in the entire history of the world.  Some
 things change from one version of Debian to the next, and what worked in
 the old version won't work at all in the new version, especially in the
 area of configuration files.  The more packages you have installed, the
 more problems you'll have.

 On the other hand, a fresh installation bypasses the upgrade issues.  You
 can always just repeat the installation procedure from the previous version
 of Debian and make adjustments when appropriate.  You need to properly back
 up the personal/company files in this case, but you'd have to do that
 anyway as a precaution if you use the upgrade route.

 What do you think?

 --
 Jason Hsu jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com

 I find that upgrades work very well for workstations. My workstation has a few 
services running, apache, samba, nfs, multi-head xorg file, multiple hard 
drives 
(fstab) I like that I don't have to start over configuring stuff to get back to 
where I was. It might depend on how complicated your setup us.

I do like separate partitions/hd for /home, /usr/local  /pub/mirrors. A fresh 
would not be a complete disaster.

In my experience upgrades have gone well as long as I read the release note, I 
also following this list for heads up on issues.

-- 
Peace,

Greg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103091703.35815.gomadtr...@gci.net