Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-17 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-03-08 00:05:52, schrieb T:

   $ grep -1 backports /etc/apt/preferences
   Package: *
   Pin: release a=sarge-backports
   Pin-Priority: 200

Why not use:

Package: *
Pin: origin www.backports.org
Pin-Priority: 200

Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
   50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Block

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:

Am 2006-03-08 00:05:52, schrieb T:


$ grep -1 backports /etc/apt/preferences
Package: *
Pin: release a=sarge-backports
Pin-Priority: 200


Why not use:

Package: *
Pin: origin www.backports.org
Pin-Priority: 200


Michelle, that should pin the package in the same way but his problem 
was that the package version he had installed was at priority 100, as it 
was not available in any other archive.


--
Steve Block
http://ev-15.com/
http://steveblock.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-08 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello

T ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 I've been following the Debian Backports - Instructions
 at http://www.backports.org/instructions.html
 to use backports so as to  _deactivate_ all packages from
 backports.org by default.

No. You don't decativate them, you pin them to a lower priority than
500. 500 ist the default priority for packages available from some
repository.

 This is the to-be-wrongly-updated package:
 
  $ apt-cache policy hplip-ppds
  hplip-ppds:
Installed: 0.9.3-3
Candidate: 0.9.7-3bpo1
Version Table:
 0.9.7-3bpo1 0
 200 http://www.backports.org sarge-backports/main Packages
  ^^^
   *** 0.9.3-3 0
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  ^^^
 
 It will be automatically updated from sarge to backport.
 Why?

It is upgraded because the installed version has a lower priority
(100200). It has a lower priority because that version is not
available in any archive. Probably because that version is outdated. By
the way, where did you get it from? It is not part of stable. I
recommend that you either upgrade or pin the installed version to 
200.

best regards
Andreas Janssen

-- 
Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270
Registered Linux User #267976
http://www.andreas-janssen.de/debian-tipps-sarge.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-08 Thread T
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:11:55 +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote:

 It will be automatically updated from sarge to backport. Why?
 
 It is upgraded because the installed version has a lower priority
 (100200). It has a lower priority because that version is not available
 in any archive. Probably because that version is outdated. By the way,
 where did you get it from? It is not part of stable. [...]

Thanks for the explanation. I now feel relieved. FYI, my stable is
downgraded from testing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-07 Thread T
I've been following the Debian Backports - Instructions
at http://www.backports.org/instructions.html
to use backports so as to  _deactivate_ all packages from
backports.org by default. However, I noticed that at least one
package is automatically updated from sarge to backport. 

First of all, I've done all the settings required in the instruction:

$ grep backports /etc/apt/sources.list
# backports
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main

$ grep -1 backports /etc/apt/preferences
Package: *
Pin: release a=sarge-backports
Pin-Priority: 200

This is the to-be-wrongly-updated package:

 $ apt-cache policy hplip-ppds
 hplip-ppds:
   Installed: 0.9.3-3
   Candidate: 0.9.7-3bpo1
   Version Table:
  0.9.7-3bpo1 0
 200 http://www.backports.org sarge-backports/main Packages
  *** 0.9.3-3 0
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

It will be automatically updated from sarge to backport. 
Why? 
How can I prevent it?

thanks

FYI, Its Reverse Depends are:
  hplip-base
  hplip
  hpijs

And none of the above depends will be updated:

$ apt-cache policy hplip-base
hplip-base:
  Installed: 0.9.3-3
  Candidate: 0.9.3-3
  Version Table:
 *** 0.9.3-3 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ apt-cache policy hplip
hplip:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 0.9.2-2
  Version Table:
 0.9.7-3bpo1 0
200 http://www.backports.org sarge-backports/main Packages
 0.9.2-2 0
900 http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Packages

$ apt-cache policy hpijs
hpijs:
  Installed: 2.1.2+0.9.2-2
  Candidate: 2.1.2+0.9.2-2
  Version Table:
 2.1.7+0.9.7-3bpo1 0
200 http://www.backports.org sarge-backports/main Packages
 *** 2.1.2+0.9.2-2 0
900 http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

thanks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]