Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 17:44, Tim wrote:
 Marc Wilson wrote:
  On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
  
 Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?
  
  
  Buy them in a store. ^_^  You can get 90 minute and 99 minute discs now 
  The 90's usually work in most drives that you can get to do overburn, but
  the 99's are VERY twitchy because not only do they use the run-out area,
  but the spiral is tighter 
 
 So I bought 50 of the 99s a year ago, and read an article a week later 
 which said they can damage the CDRW drive hardware, and I left them in a 
 cupboard.  Can I use them after all?

What if you use them in 700MiB mode?  Maybe that won't hurt them.

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-30 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:44:50PM +, Tim wrote:
 Marc Wilson wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 
 Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?
 
 
 Buy them in a store. ^_^  You can get 90 minute and 99 minute discs now 
 The 90's usually work in most drives that you can get to do overburn, but
 the 99's are VERY twitchy because not only do they use the run-out area,
 but the spiral is tighter 
 
 So I bought 50 of the 99s a year ago, and read an article a week later 
 which said they can damage the CDRW drive hardware, and I left them in a 
 cupboard.  Can I use them after all?

I'd be very surprised if they actually damaged anything. I'd think the
worst you'd get would be that they just didn't work. Articles on
computers (or any other technical field) often receive input from a
lot of non-technical people (which includes the journalists of most
computer magazines) and therefore tend to contain a lot of half-truths
or outright bullshit. It's more reliable to do what you did, and ask
on a medium like this list. Anyone who's blown their drive up with
99-minute CDs will soon tell you.

Where was this article? I could do a plausibility scan on it if you
still have it.

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-30 Thread Tim
Pigeon wrote:

Where was this article? I could do a plausibility scan on it if you
still have it 

Long lost, but I appreciate and agree with your every comment. 
Debian-user is my main source of general PC-knowhow, not just Debian usage.

Tim



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-29 Thread csj
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:08:58 +,
Pigeon wrote:
 
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:47:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:28:16 -0800,
  Marc Wilson wrote:
   
   On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:34:17AM +, Pigeon wrote:
cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z -dao -isosize filename.raw
   
   The hitch was the instruction to cdrecord to write the disc in
   DAO mode.  Many many recorders cannot deal with the CUE sheet
   they're sent in DAO mode unless they're told the total size of
   the image.
  
  What works for me is option -ignsize:
  
  echo burn 800MB ; cdrecord -v dev=lite8 -dao -ignsize cdrom.iso
 
 Hmm, didn't work for me.
 From man cdrecord:
 
-ignsize
   Ignore  the  known size of the medium. This options
   should be used with extreme care,  it  exists  only
   for  debugging purposes don't use it for other rea­
   sons.  It is not needed to write  disks  with  more
   than the nominal capacity.
 Very odd.

The only odd thing is you're probably right. I put that option
in, after all attempts to burn to burn 800 MB cdr's failed (2
consecutive coasters is above my usual cdrecord average). I'll
have to try -isosize when I get my next batch of 800's.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-29 Thread Tim
Marc Wilson wrote:

On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:


Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?



Buy them in a store. ^_^  You can get 90 minute and 99 minute discs now 
The 90's usually work in most drives that you can get to do overburn, but
the 99's are VERY twitchy because not only do they use the run-out area,
but the spiral is tighter 

So I bought 50 of the 99s a year ago, and read an article a week later 
which said they can damage the CDRW drive hardware, and I left them in a 
cupboard.  Can I use them after all?

Tim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-27 Thread csj
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:28:16 -0800,
Marc Wilson wrote:
 
 On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:34:17AM +, Pigeon wrote:
  cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z -dao -isosize filename.raw
 
 The hitch was the instruction to cdrecord to write the disc in
 DAO mode.  Many many recorders cannot deal with the CUE sheet
 they're sent in DAO mode unless they're told the total size of
 the image.

What works for me is option -ignsize:

echo burn 800MB ; cdrecord -v dev=lite8 -dao -ignsize cdrom.iso

 Your original write blew up because the largest disc that can
 be encoded in the ATIP is 700 mb.  Anything larger is an
 overburn, and you're right back to the CUE sheet problem again.
 
 I've got three recorders... one NEC, two LiteOn.  The NEC won't
 overburn no matter what you do, one of the LiteOn's doesn't
 care and just does whatever you tell it, and the other LiteOn
 has the CUE sheet thing.  Frustrating.

I can live with something that behaves predictably.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-27 Thread Pigeon
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:47:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:28:16 -0800,
 Marc Wilson wrote:
  
  On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:34:17AM +, Pigeon wrote:
   cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z -dao -isosize filename.raw
  
  The hitch was the instruction to cdrecord to write the disc in
  DAO mode.  Many many recorders cannot deal with the CUE sheet
  they're sent in DAO mode unless they're told the total size of
  the image.
 
 What works for me is option -ignsize:
 
 echo burn 800MB ; cdrecord -v dev=lite8 -dao -ignsize cdrom.iso

Hmm, didn't work for me.
From man cdrecord:

   -ignsize
  Ignore  the  known size of the medium. This options
  should be used with extreme care,  it  exists  only
  for  debugging purposes don't use it for other rea­
  sons.  It is not needed to write  disks  with  more
  than the nominal capacity.
Very odd.

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-26 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 23:30, Marc Wilson wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
  Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?
 
 Buy them in a store. ^_^  You can get 90 minute and 99 minute discs now.

Silly comments from the Peanut Gallery are *not* appreciated this late
at night...

 The 90's usually work in most drives that you can get to do overburn, but
 the 99's are VERY twitchy because not only do they use the run-out area,
 but the spiral is tighter.

Then I think I'll stick w/ disks that follow the standards.  That's
what Linux is all about, anyway, right?

Besides, when I have more than 700MB to burn, I use That Which One Is
Supposed To Use In This Situation: split(1)!

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-26 Thread Pigeon
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:45:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 23:30, Marc Wilson wrote:
  On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
   Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?
  
  Buy them in a store. ^_^  You can get 90 minute and 99 minute discs now.
 
 Silly comments from the Peanut Gallery are *not* appreciated this late
 at night...

I got them from a stall at a computer fair. The brand is Infiniti
and www.medeainternational.com appears on the label. There are
plenty of other choices. These cost 10 pounds for 25 disks. I'd have
preferred 90s but they only had 99s. They seem to be OK in a Cyber
CW088D CD writer.

  The 90's usually work in most drives that you can get to do overburn, but
  the 99's are VERY twitchy because not only do they use the run-out area,
  but the spiral is tighter.
 
 Then I think I'll stick w/ disks that follow the standards.  That's
 what Linux is all about, anyway, right?
 
 Besides, when I have more than 700MB to burn, I use That Which One Is
 Supposed To Use In This Situation: split(1)!

Hmm.

Dear Messrs Gilmour, Waters, Mason and Wright,
Please could you re-record The Wall at an average tempo 1.5% faster
than the original so I can get it all on one CD without breaking the
standards.
Thanks, Pigeon.

Dear Pigeon,
Sorry, Roger is no longer with us. He's split(1).
PF

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-26 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 08:50, Pigeon wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:45:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 23:30, Marc Wilson wrote:
   On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?
[snip]
  Besides, when I have more than 700MB to burn, I use That Which One Is
  Supposed To Use In This Situation: split(1)!
 
 Hmm.
 
 Dear Messrs Gilmour, Waters, Mason and Wright,
 Please could you re-record The Wall at an average tempo 1.5% faster
 than the original so I can get it all on one CD without breaking the
 standards.
 Thanks, Pigeon.
 
 Dear Pigeon,
 Sorry, Roger is no longer with us. He's split(1).
 PF

Well, you see, if you listened to *good* bands, like the Rolling Stones,
or, better yet, the Bellamy Brothers, or even *better*, Merle Haggard,
you wouldn't have that problem, now would you?

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-25 Thread Pigeon
Hi,

This might help someone who's using cdrecord to write BIG DISKS. I got
a pack of 900Mb CD-Rs recently, and tried to write a large image
according to the cookbook example in man cdrecord:

cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z filename.raw

Didn't work. As soon as it had written 703Mb it barfed with an
'attempt to seek past last sector' or similar. This did work:

cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z -dao -isosize filename.raw

The cookbook example for writing audio CDs does work for CDs larger
than 703Mb. (The main reason I bought those CD-Rs was to get both
albums of The Wall onto one CD. That worked fine... but my hi-fi's CD
player doesn't like it - just about manages to read the TOC, can't
manage to read the rest.)

Hope this helps someone.

Pigeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-25 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 19:34, Pigeon wrote:
 Hi,
 
 This might help someone who's using cdrecord to write BIG DISKS. I got
 a pack of 900Mb CD-Rs recently, and tried to write a large image
 according to the cookbook example in man cdrecord:
 
 cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z filename.raw
 
 Didn't work. As soon as it had written 703Mb it barfed with an
 'attempt to seek past last sector' or similar. This did work:
 
 cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z -dao -isosize filename.raw
 
 The cookbook example for writing audio CDs does work for CDs larger
 than 703Mb. (The main reason I bought those CD-Rs was to get both
 albums of The Wall onto one CD. That worked fine... but my hi-fi's CD
 player doesn't like it - just about manages to read the TOC, can't
 manage to read the rest.)
 
 Hope this helps someone.

Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?

How many minutes of music are they supposed to hold?

The only 2 sizes I've seen are 650MiB (74 min)  700MiB (80 min).

-- 
+---+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|   |
| Fear the Penguin!!  |
+---+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-25 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?

Buy them in a store. ^_^  You can get 90 minute and 99 minute discs now.
The 90's usually work in most drives that you can get to do overburn, but
the 99's are VERY twitchy because not only do they use the run-out area,
but the spiral is tighter.

-- 
 Marc Wilson | It is the theory which decides what can be observed.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Albert Einstein


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-25 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:34:17AM +, Pigeon wrote:
 cdrecord -v -speed=32 dev=x,y,z -dao -isosize filename.raw

The hitch was the instruction to cdrecord to write the disc in DAO mode.
Many many recorders cannot deal with the CUE sheet they're sent in DAO mode
unless they're told the total size of the image.

Your original write blew up because the largest disc that can be encoded in
the ATIP is 700 mb.  Anything larger is an overburn, and you're right back
to the CUE sheet problem again.

I've got three recorders... one NEC, two LiteOn.  The NEC won't overburn no
matter what you do, one of the LiteOn's doesn't care and just does whatever
you tell it, and the other LiteOn has the CUE sheet thing.  Frustrating.

-- 
 Marc Wilson | The older a man gets, the farther he had to walk to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | school as a boy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: cdrecord and BIG DISKS - Might help someone

2003-01-25 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:43:35PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 Where did you get 900MiB CD-Rs?
 
 How many minutes of music are they supposed to hold?
 
 The only 2 sizes I've seen are 650MiB (74 min)  700MiB (80 min).

You can get 90-minute and 99-minute discs from some mail-order places.
80min discs are the largest that actually follow the spec, 90/99min
discs wind the spiral tighter and run it out to the very edge of the
disc. Not all burners can reliably burn them, and some hardware can't
read them either.

-- 
Michael Heironimus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]