Re: How to enable flash plugin in Chromium

2016-04-21 Thread Yuwen Dai
Hi Thank you very much!  It works.

2016-04-20 14:51 GMT+08:00 Markus Schönhaber <
debian-u...@list-post.mks-mail.de>:

> Yuwen Dai, Mi 20 Apr 2016 07:51:01 CEST:
>
> > I use the chromium browser in Debina 7(wheezy).  To enable Adobe Flash
> > plugin, I download the plugin for debian, and copy the
> "libflashplayer.so"
> > to ~/.config/chromium/Default/Extensions.  But flash is still disabled.
> > chrome://version shows flash is disable, and chrom://plugins shows
> there's
> > no flash plugin.  Any suggestion?   Thanks.
>
> Chromium doesn't support Netscape-style plugins anymore. Use pepper
> flash instead:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer/Installing
>
> --
> Regards
>   mks
>
>


Re: How to enable flash plugin in Chromium

2016-04-19 Thread Markus Schönhaber
Yuwen Dai, Mi 20 Apr 2016 07:51:01 CEST:

> I use the chromium browser in Debina 7(wheezy).  To enable Adobe Flash
> plugin, I download the plugin for debian, and copy the "libflashplayer.so"
> to ~/.config/chromium/Default/Extensions.  But flash is still disabled.
> chrome://version shows flash is disable, and chrom://plugins shows there's
> no flash plugin.  Any suggestion?   Thanks.

Chromium doesn't support Netscape-style plugins anymore. Use pepper
flash instead:

https://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer/Installing

-- 
Regards
  mks



How to enable flash plugin in Chromium

2016-04-19 Thread Yuwen Dai
Dear all,

I use the chromium browser in Debina 7(wheezy).  To enable Adobe Flash
plugin, I download the plugin for debian, and copy the "libflashplayer.so"
to ~/.config/chromium/Default/Extensions.  But flash is still disabled.
chrome://version shows flash is disable, and chrom://plugins shows there's
no flash plugin.  Any suggestion?   Thanks.

Yuwen


Re: Debian Jessie / Flash plugin / Version: 11.2.202.425

2014-12-26 Thread Frederic Robert
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 01:59:03AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> update-flashplugin-nonfree --install

Dear Andrei & the list,

It's done. Thank you.

Greetings,

-- 
Frederic Robert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141226172946.ga28...@ottmar.fredericrobert.be



Re: Debian Jessie / Flash plugin / Version: 11.2.202.425

2014-12-25 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 25 dec 14, 22:26:08, Frederic Robert wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> How are you? I'm using Debian Jessie, when will be the update 
> (Version: 11.2.202.425)  available?

Try

update-flashplugin-nonfree --install

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Debian Jessie / Flash plugin / Version: 11.2.202.425

2014-12-25 Thread Frederic Robert
Hello,

How are you? I'm using Debian Jessie, when will be the update (Version: 
11.2.202.425)  available?

Greetings,

-- 
Frederic Robert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141225222608.ga26...@ottmar.fredericrobert.be



Outdated flash plugin

2014-10-18 Thread Rob van der Putten

Hi there


update-flashplugin-nonfree downloads old version;
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765457

For i386 that's;
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/pdc/11.2.202.411/install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz


Regards,
Rob


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m1teer$ke1$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: [OT] Thoughts on Adobe (was Flash plugin not working in Epiphany)

2012-06-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
> P.S. Ralf, I like to see deviations from the main subject but consider in 
> tagging your replies as such.

Apologize for not adding OT to the subject.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1339940931.5361.76.camel@precise



[OT] Thoughts on Adobe (was Flash plugin not working in Epiphany)

2012-06-17 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:24:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:11 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> deficient company
> 
> deficient + company = unfortunately a tautology nowadays There's no
> reason for even market economy to be evil. Of course, there's a small
> border between social market and "vanilla market economy".

The problem is that Adobe does nothing well while other companies _do_ 
and this remains true not only for their linux apps but also for their 
windows product line so this is not a casualty, something fails within 
Adobe.

P.S. Ralf, I like to see deviations from the main subject but consider in 
tagging your replies as such.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrkmdc$f0n$1...@dough.gmane.org



Re: Flash plugin not working in Epiphany

2012-06-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:11 +, Camaleón wrote:
> deficient company

deficient + company = unfortunately a tautology nowadays
There's no reason for even market economy to be evil. Of course, there's
a small border between social market and "vanilla market economy".


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1339939445.5361.69.camel@precise



Re: Flash plugin not working in Epiphany

2012-06-17 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:55:46 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote:

> Camaleón  writes:

>> Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based
>> in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2
>> based so it needs "nspluginwrapper". I wonder if this really the
>> problem here :-?
> 
> Hmmm ... I've found this post[1]. 

So finally it seems the above holds true, how bad :-(

> It signals the same issue I'm having. I guess I would have to install
> the 32 bit version of libflashplayer.so; it looks weird to have a
> functional 64 bit version for Iceweasel/Midori but a nspluginwrapper
> -endorsed 32 bit version for Epiphany.

Yup... and the worst thing is that "nspluginwrapper" used to be quite 
problematic (leading to browser freeze) or at least that's what I recall 
when we had to use it because no native flash player plugin was available 
for 64 bits.

I wonder if Adobe is going to do something right any time. What a 
deficient company, gosh...
 
> [1] http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=77934

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrkl1v$f0n$9...@dough.gmane.org



Re: Flash plugin not working in Epiphany

2012-06-17 Thread Razvan Deaconescu
Camaleón  writes:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:10 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote:
>
>> I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4,
>> flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and
>> Midori but not under Epiphany.
>> 
>> I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success.
>> 
>> Could you please point me to a solution to this issue?
>
> First, ensure the "about:plugins" lists the Adobe Flash plugin.

It is listed. It prints the same value as Iceweasel.

> Then run this command an send here the output:
>
> update-alternatives --display flash-mozilla.so

$ update-alternatives --display flash-mozilla.so
flash-mozilla.so - auto mode
  link currently points to /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so
/usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so - priority 10
Current 'best' version is
'/usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so'

>> [1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/epiphany-and-flashplayer
>
> Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based 
> in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2 based 
> so it needs "nspluginwrapper". I wonder if this really the problem 
> here :-?

Hmmm ... I've found this post[1]. It signals the same issue I'm
having. I guess I would have to install the 32 bit version of
libflashplayer.so; it looks weird to have a functional 64 bit version
for Iceweasel/Midori but a nspluginwrapper-endorsed 32 bit version for Epiphany.

[1] http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=77934

Razvan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nqagkrx@einherjar.cs.pub.ro



Re: Flash plugin not working in Epiphany

2012-06-17 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:10 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote:

> I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4,
> flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and
> Midori but not under Epiphany.
> 
> I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success.
> 
> Could you please point me to a solution to this issue?

First, ensure the "about:plugins" lists the Adobe Flash plugin.

Then run this command an send here the output:

update-alternatives --display flash-mozilla.so

> [1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/epiphany-and-flashplayer

Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based 
in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2 based 
so it needs "nspluginwrapper". I wonder if this really the problem 
here :-?

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrkhk9$f0n$8...@dough.gmane.org



Flash plugin not working in Epiphany

2012-06-17 Thread Razvan Deaconescu
Hi!

I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4,
flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and
Midori but not under Epiphany.

I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success.

Could you please point me to a solution to this issue?

[1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/epiphany-and-flashplayer

Razvan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3z6zb31@einherjar.cs.pub.ro



Re: Flash plugin not producing sound

2012-02-23 Thread Sian Mountbatten

On 02/19/2012 03:20 PM, Florian Kulzer wrote:

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 14:07:02 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:



That all looks OK; the problem with flashplayer is that it blindly uses
alsa card 0 to play its sound, regardless of how you configured your
desktop environment and/or pulseaudio. This means that you have to
reorder the cards (as far as alsa is concerned) if you want flashplayer
to use the CA0106. Try this sequence of commands as root or with sudo:

   modprobe -r snd_intel8x0
   modprobe -r snd_ca0106
   modprobe snd_ca0106 index=0
   modprobe snd_intel8x0 index=1




The ordering of the cards can be made persistent across reboots by
creating a file in /etc/modprobe.d/ with the following content (three
lines):

# added by Sian on 2012-02-19 to ensure that CA0106 is card 0
options snd_ca0106 index=0
options snd_intel8x0 index=1

The first line with the comment is optional, of course. The file itself
should have the same owner (root:root) and permissions (-rw-r--r--) as
the rest of the files in /etc/modprobe.d/. The name of the file is up to
you, as long as it ends in ".conf"; I myself would use choose a name
like "local-reorder-alsa-cards.conf" to immediately identify the file as
a local (non-Debian) configuration file and provide a hint about its
purpose. The idea behind creating separate files for your custom module
options is to protect your settings from being overwritten during
package upgrades.



A very useful answer and I have implemented it entirely. Now I get 
sound. At last.

--
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ji5bjr$67e$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: Flash plugin not producing sound

2012-02-19 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 14:07:02 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:01:02 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> >>Hello All
> >>
> >>I have the flashplugin-nonfree package installed on my system
> >>(version 1:2.8.3)

 [...]

> >Please post the output of:
> >
> >   lspci -knn | grep -iA2 audio
> >   cat /proc/asound/cards
> >   lsmod | awk '/snd/{print $1}'
> >
> The first command gives:
> 
> 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation
> 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:24d5] (rev 02)
> Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P4P800 Mainboard [1043:80f3]
> Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0
> --
> 03:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Creative Labs CA0106
> Soundblaster [1102:0007]
> Subsystem: Creative Labs SB0570 [SB Audigy SE] [1102:100a]
> Kernel driver in use: snd_ca0106
> 
> The second command gives:
>  0 [ICH5   ]: ICH4 - Intel ICH5
>   Intel ICH5 with AD1985 at irq 17
>  1 [CA0106 ]: CA0106 - CA0106
>   Audigy SE [SB0570] at 0xdf80 irq 23
> 
> The lsmod command gives:
> snd_ca0106
> snd_intel8x0

 [...]

> So as you can see, sound reproduction modules are loaded, and I
> really do have two sound cards.

That all looks OK; the problem with flashplayer is that it blindly uses
alsa card 0 to play its sound, regardless of how you configured your
desktop environment and/or pulseaudio. This means that you have to
reorder the cards (as far as alsa is concerned) if you want flashplayer
to use the CA0106. Try this sequence of commands as root or with sudo:

  modprobe -r snd_intel8x0
  modprobe -r snd_ca0106
  modprobe snd_ca0106 index=0
  modprobe snd_intel8x0 index=1

If there are any errors with the first two commands ("FATAL: Module
snd_XXX is in use.") then you have to log out from your desktop
environment and issue the commands on a VT. The four modprobe commands
will unload the drivers of both soundcards and then reload them with an
explicit assignment of card index 0 to the CA0106. You can check if this
has worked with "cat /proc/asound/cards" and then try flashplayer again.

The ordering of the cards can be made persistent across reboots by
creating a file in /etc/modprobe.d/ with the following content (three
lines):

# added by Sian on 2012-02-19 to ensure that CA0106 is card 0
options snd_ca0106 index=0
options snd_intel8x0 index=1

The first line with the comment is optional, of course. The file itself
should have the same owner (root:root) and permissions (-rw-r--r--) as
the rest of the files in /etc/modprobe.d/. The name of the file is up to
you, as long as it ends in ".conf"; I myself would use choose a name
like "local-reorder-alsa-cards.conf" to immediately identify the file as
a local (non-Debian) configuration file and provide a hint about its
purpose. The idea behind creating separate files for your custom module
options is to protect your settings from being overwritten during
package upgrades.

-- 
Regards,|
  Florian   | http://www.florian-kulzer.eu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120219151708.GB22766@isar.localhost



Re: Flash plugin not producing sound

2012-02-19 Thread Sian Mountbatten

Florian Kulzer wrote:

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:01:02 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:

Hello All

I have the flashplugin-nonfree package installed on my system
(version 1:2.8.3)


That suggests that you are on Wheezy (testing) or Sid (unstable); which
one is it exactly? Is it fully up-to-date?


so I can get the video clips working in my
browser. Unfortunately, I am not getting any sound. The video clips
without sound are not much use.

So what do I do to get sound working? I have two sound cards on my
computer only one of which is connected to loudspeakers (the
CA0106). The Intel sound card is part of my motherboard, but I do
not have it connected to any speakers.

Any help would be appreciated.


Please post the output of:

   lspci -knn | grep -iA2 audio
   cat /proc/asound/cards
   lsmod | awk '/snd/{print $1}'


The first command gives:

00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:24d5] (rev 02)

Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P4P800 Mainboard [1043:80f3]
Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0
--
03:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Creative Labs CA0106 
Soundblaster [1102:0007]

Subsystem: Creative Labs SB0570 [SB Audigy SE] [1102:100a]
Kernel driver in use: snd_ca0106

The second command gives:
 0 [ICH5   ]: ICH4 - Intel ICH5
  Intel ICH5 with AD1985 at irq 17
 1 [CA0106 ]: CA0106 - CA0106
  Audigy SE [SB0570] at 0xdf80 irq 23

The lsmod command gives:
snd_ca0106
snd_intel8x0
snd_ac97_codec
ac97_bus
snd_pcm_oss
snd_mixer_oss
snd_pcm
snd_seq_midi
snd_rawmidi
snd_seq_midi_event
snd_seq
snd_timer
snd_seq_device
snd
soundcore
snd_page_alloc

So as you can see, sound reproduction modules are loaded, and I really 
do have two sound cards.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jhqvm4$ren$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: Flash plugin not producing sound

2012-02-19 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:01:02 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Hello All
> 
> I have the flashplugin-nonfree package installed on my system
> (version 1:2.8.3)

That suggests that you are on Wheezy (testing) or Sid (unstable); which
one is it exactly? Is it fully up-to-date?

> so I can get the video clips working in my
> browser. Unfortunately, I am not getting any sound. The video clips
> without sound are not much use.
> 
> So what do I do to get sound working? I have two sound cards on my
> computer only one of which is connected to loudspeakers (the
> CA0106). The Intel sound card is part of my motherboard, but I do
> not have it connected to any speakers.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.

Please post the output of:

  lspci -knn | grep -iA2 audio
  cat /proc/asound/cards
  lsmod | awk '/snd/{print $1}'

-- 
Regards,|
  Florian   | http://www.florian-kulzer.eu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120219133556.GA21025@isar.localhost



Flash plugin not producing sound

2012-02-19 Thread Sian Mountbatten

Hello All

I have the flashplugin-nonfree package installed on my system (version 
1:2.8.3) so I can get the video clips working in my browser. 
Unfortunately, I am not getting any sound. The video clips without sound 
are not much use.


So what do I do to get sound working? I have two sound cards on my 
computer only one of which is connected to loudspeakers (the CA0106). 
The Intel sound card is part of my motherboard, but I do not have it 
connected to any speakers.


Any help would be appreciated.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jhqo9s$9ve$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: flash plugin for firefox and chrome

2011-11-10 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom

J. Bakshi wrote:

On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:43:26 -0300
David Roguin  wrote:


On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:22 PM, J. Bakshi  wrote:


On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:59:19 +0100
Lorenzo Sutton  wrote:


On 10/11/11 16:53, J. Bakshi wrote:

Hello list,

What packages should I install in debian so that firefox and chrome can
play flash?

If you want an Open Source flash player implementation try gnash
otherwise the flashplugin-nonfree will basically download and install
the player from Adobe.

Lorenzo.


Thanks.. which one should I install for the better performance ?

I don't really know about performance, but for compatibility you should

install flashplayer-nonfree


Found one more interesting.  browser-plugin-lightspark



The proof of the pudding: does it work in "listen" here:
http://www.npr.org/?refresh=true

Hugo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/j9h1j0$3bv$1...@dough.gmane.org



Re: flash plugin for firefox and chrome

2011-11-10 Thread J. Bakshi
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:43:26 -0300
David Roguin  wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:22 PM, J. Bakshi  wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:59:19 +0100
> > Lorenzo Sutton  wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/11/11 16:53, J. Bakshi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello list,
> > > >
> > > > What packages should I install in debian so that firefox and chrome can
> > > > play flash?
> > >
> > > If you want an Open Source flash player implementation try gnash
> > > otherwise the flashplugin-nonfree will basically download and install
> > > the player from Adobe.
> > >
> > > Lorenzo.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.. which one should I install for the better performance ?
> >
> > I don't really know about performance, but for compatibility you should
> install flashplayer-nonfree
> 
Found one more interesting.  browser-plugin-lightspark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010222545.606df...@shiva.selfip.org



Re: flash plugin for firefox and chrome

2011-11-10 Thread David Roguin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:22 PM, J. Bakshi  wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:59:19 +0100
> Lorenzo Sutton  wrote:
>
> > On 10/11/11 16:53, J. Bakshi wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > What packages should I install in debian so that firefox and chrome can
> > > play flash?
> >
> > If you want an Open Source flash player implementation try gnash
> > otherwise the flashplugin-nonfree will basically download and install
> > the player from Adobe.
> >
> > Lorenzo.
> >
>
> Thanks.. which one should I install for the better performance ?
>
> I don't really know about performance, but for compatibility you should
install flashplayer-nonfree


-- 
David


Re: flash plugin for firefox and chrome

2011-11-10 Thread J. Bakshi
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:59:19 +0100
Lorenzo Sutton  wrote:

> On 10/11/11 16:53, J. Bakshi wrote:
> >
> > Hello list,
> >
> > What packages should I install in debian so that firefox and chrome can
> > play flash?
> 
> If you want an Open Source flash player implementation try gnash 
> otherwise the flashplugin-nonfree will basically download and install 
> the player from Adobe.
> 
> Lorenzo.
> 

Thanks.. which one should I install for the better performance ?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010215243.50ab7...@shiva.selfip.org



Re: flash plugin for firefox and chrome

2011-11-10 Thread Lorenzo Sutton

On 10/11/11 16:53, J. Bakshi wrote:


Hello list,

What packages should I install in debian so that firefox and chrome can
play flash?


If you want an Open Source flash player implementation try gnash 
otherwise the flashplugin-nonfree will basically download and install 
the player from Adobe.


Lorenzo.

--
** NOTE **: This gmail address is my new email.
I will still be reading my libero.it email, but please use this new one 
for any further email.

Thanks you for understanding.
** NOTA **: Questo indirizzo gmail è la mia nuova email.
Continuerò a leggere la posta libero.it ancora per un po' ma vi prego di 
usare questa nuova da ora in poi.

Grazie per la comprensione.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ebbf4d7.8090...@gmail.com



flash plugin for firefox and chrome

2011-11-10 Thread J. Bakshi

Hello list,

What packages should I install in debian so that firefox and chrome can
play flash?  It is already there in ububtu. Don't know the name though
of those packages in ubuntu.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010212318.52130...@shiva.selfip.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-30 Thread Tyler Smith
Cameron Hutchison  writes:

> Cameron Hutchison  writes:
>>Tyler Smith  writes:
>>>Cameron Hutchison  writes:
>
>>>> Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
>>>> (flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?
>
>>>Yes, I'm having the same problem you described (below) on testing on a
>>>32 bit machine. We're not alone, when I tried to trouble shoot this I
>>>found a bunch of forum posts
>>>( http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=650257 ) detailing the
>>>issue.
>
>>I forgot to read that before my last reply. Seems other's have traced it
>>back to the WM too.
>
> A workaround that seems to fix the problem for me is to add the
> following to ~/.mozilla/firefox/rc, or /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc for a
> global setting:
>
> ---
> # This is to fix flash where left-clicks dont work:
> # See 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/410407
> GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1
> export GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS
> ---

Wow, that's great, thanks. That works for me here on fluxbox (should
have mentioned I'm using fluxbox earlier).

Tyler

>
> Thanks for you help, Tyler.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-30 Thread Cameron Hutchison
Cameron Hutchison  writes:
>Tyler Smith  writes:
>>Cameron Hutchison  writes:

>>> Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
>>> (flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

>>Yes, I'm having the same problem you described (below) on testing on a
>>32 bit machine. We're not alone, when I tried to trouble shoot this I
>>found a bunch of forum posts
>>( http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=650257 ) detailing the
>>issue.

>I forgot to read that before my last reply. Seems other's have traced it
>back to the WM too.

A workaround that seems to fix the problem for me is to add the
following to ~/.mozilla/firefox/rc, or /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc for a
global setting:

---
# This is to fix flash where left-clicks dont work:
# See 
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/410407
GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1
export GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS
---

Thanks for you help, Tyler.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-29 Thread Cameron Hutchison
Tyler Smith  writes:

>Cameron Hutchison  writes:

>> Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
>> (flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

>Yes, I'm having the same problem you described (below) on testing on a
>32 bit machine. We're not alone, when I tried to trouble shoot this I
>found a bunch of forum posts
>( http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=650257 ) detailing the
>issue.

I forgot to read that before my last reply. Seems other's have traced it
back to the WM too.

>A 'fix' that works for me is to right-click on the flash screen, then
>double-left click on the flash button (play, pause, full-screen etc).
>This works on Hulu, the only way I can view videos full screen.

I incorrectly attributed this fix to Camaleón in my last reply. Sorry.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-29 Thread Cameron Hutchison
Cameron Hutchison  writes:

>Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
>(flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

>On some sites, the flash videos load but the plugin seems to ignore my
>mouse clicks so I can't start the video playing. This does not happen on
>all sites - snotr.com works ok, but the video on this page:

>http://www.heatbeads.com.au/bbq-tips/44-bbq-tips/149-how-to-light-weber-bbq-heat-beads.html

>does not work. I cannot interact with the player at all. All my clicks
>are ignored. I can right click to get the context menu, but if I select
>"Settings..." I get a dialog that I cannot interact with.

I forgot to mention that I am using Iceweasel, although that was
probably assumed.

Thanks to the info reported by Kumar, Camaleón and Tyler, I've isolated
the problem to my window manager - fvwm2.

If I start a gnome session with metacity, the flash plugin works
properly. When running with fvwm2, I get the problems described above.

Camaleón's workaround works for me too - that is, right click for the
context menu, then double left-click on the button you want to activate.

Why a left-click seems to go "through" the window, but a right-click
does not is beyond me. I'll fiddle with my fvwm config and see if I can
make a difference.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-29 Thread Tyler Smith
Cameron Hutchison  writes:

> Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
> (flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

Yes, I'm having the same problem you described (below) on testing on a
32 bit machine. We're not alone, when I tried to trouble shoot this I
found a bunch of forum posts
( http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=650257 ) detailing the
issue.

A 'fix' that works for me is to right-click on the flash screen, then
double-left click on the flash button (play, pause, full-screen etc).
This works on Hulu, the only way I can view videos full screen.

Hopefully this will be resolved in the next version of the flash plugin
or gtk, but I don't understand the details.

Cheers,

Tyler


>
> On some sites, the flash videos load but the plugin seems to ignore my
> mouse clicks so I can't start the video playing. This does not happen on
> all sites - snotr.com works ok, but the video on this page:
>
> http://www.heatbeads.com.au/bbq-tips/44-bbq-tips/149-how-to-light-weber-bbq-heat-beads.html
>
> does not work. I cannot interact with the player at all. All my clicks
> are ignored. I can right click to get the context menu, but if I select
> "Settings..." I get a dialog that I cannot interact with.
>
> This started happening not so long ago (sometime in the last month I
> guess, but I dont use flash sites much so I dont know exactly).
>
> I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling flashplugin-nonfree but that
> made no difference.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-29 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:21:44 +, Cameron Hutchison wrote:

> Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
> (flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

It runs fine (all the "fine" flashpayer can run) under Lenny.
 
> On some sites, the flash videos load but the plugin seems to ignore my
> mouse clicks so I can't start the video playing. This does not happen on
> all sites - snotr.com works ok, but the video on this page:
> 
> http://www.heatbeads.com.au/bbq-tips/44-bbq-tips/149-how-to-light-weber-
bbq-heat-beads.html
> 
> does not work. I cannot interact with the player at all. All my clicks
> are ignored. I can right click to get the context menu, but if I select
> "Settings..." I get a dialog that I cannot interact with.

That site is working here. The "play" button starts the movie.
 
> This started happening not so long ago (sometime in the last month I
> guess, but I dont use flash sites much so I dont know exactly).
> 
> I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling flashplugin-nonfree but that
> made no difference.

Have you seen any warning message logged in the Iceweasel "console error" 
once you click in the play button? Maybe your problem comes from browser 
(and javacript), and not from flashplayer plugin itself.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-28 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:21:44PM -, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
> (flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

I have faced several problems; non-free software is often not so
reliable.

> On some sites, the flash videos load but the plugin seems to ignore my
> mouse clicks so I can't start the video playing. This does not happen on
> all sites - snotr.com works ok, but the video on this page:
> 
> http://www.heatbeads.com.au/bbq-tips/44-bbq-tips/149-how-to-light-weber-bbq-heat-beads.html
> 
> does not work. I cannot interact with the player at all. All my clicks
> are ignored. I can right click to get the context menu, but if I select
> "Settings..." I get a dialog that I cannot interact with.
> 
> This started happening not so long ago (sometime in the last month I
> guess, but I dont use flash sites much so I dont know exactly).
> 
> I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling flashplugin-nonfree but that
> made no difference.

I am able to play that video; I am using Adobe Labs' amd64 Flash
plugin (a web search will get you the plugin). However, do note that
that plugin does not work well with Lenny, due to some issues with the
minimum required versions libraries it is linked with.

Sorry for not being much help.

Kumar

-- 
==-- _ / /  \
---==---(_)__  __   __/ / /\ \
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   / /_/\ \ \
-=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\  /__\ \ \
A proud member of TeamLinux \_\/
-- CHaley (HAC), ha...@unm.edu, ch008...@pi.lanl.gov)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Flash plugin problem - cant click - amd64 unstable

2009-11-28 Thread Cameron Hutchison
Is anyone else having problems with the flash plugin
(flashplugin-nonfree) on unstable on a 64-bit platform?

On some sites, the flash videos load but the plugin seems to ignore my
mouse clicks so I can't start the video playing. This does not happen on
all sites - snotr.com works ok, but the video on this page:

http://www.heatbeads.com.au/bbq-tips/44-bbq-tips/149-how-to-light-weber-bbq-heat-beads.html

does not work. I cannot interact with the player at all. All my clicks
are ignored. I can right click to get the context menu, but if I select
"Settings..." I get a dialog that I cannot interact with.

This started happening not so long ago (sometime in the last month I
guess, but I dont use flash sites much so I dont know exactly).

I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling flashplugin-nonfree but that
made no difference.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



adobe flash plugin, missing dependencies

2009-08-30 Thread Peter Mueller
Hi Debian fellows,

is it possible that you can add two more dependencies to synaptic to
make the Adobe flash plugin from the  debian (non free) repo proper
running? (tested with Lenny x386 32 Bits)

libnspr4-dev
libnss3-dev


background: tested with manual install of the Adobe flash player
file that was directly obtained from Adobe after deinstalling of flash
with syaptic

# dpkg -i install_flash_player_10_linux.deb 
(Reading database ... 183405
files and directories currently installed.) 
Unpacking adobe-flashplugin (from
install_flash_player_10_linux.deb) ... 
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of adobe-flashplugin:
adobe-flashplugin depends on libnspr4-dev; however: Package
libnspr4-dev is not installed. 
adobe-flashplugin depends on libnss3-dev; however: Package libnss3-dev
is not installed.


Best regards and keep on rocking

peter



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: using mplayer instead of flash plugin for Iceweasel

2009-08-02 Thread Rob Owens
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:20:57PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-07-28 21:12, Rob Owens wrote:
>> I've replaced the Iceweasel flash plugin on some of my systems with mplayer
>> by using the Greasemonkey extension with the following script:
>>
>> http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/24999
>>
>> It works nicely, uses less CPU, and sound works on my LTSP thin clients (a
>> big plus).  
>>
>> Can anybody suggest how to make this a default for all users?  I'm not sure
>> how to handle it since the extension and the script get installed in the
>> user's $HOME directory by default.
>
> I'm just guessing, but because Unix loves text files, it might be as  
> simple as:
>
> $ sudo cp blah ~some_other_user/.some_directory
> $ sudo chown -R ~some_other_user/.some_directory
>
It's slightly trickier than that, because the mozilla apps create a
random profile directory for each user.  Mine looks like this:
2mcnlajk.default

That makes it tricky to cp to all users at once, and makes it damn hard
to include in /etc/skel.  I'll keep working on it though...

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: using mplayer instead of flash plugin for Iceweasel

2009-07-28 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2009-07-28 21:12, Rob Owens wrote:

I've replaced the Iceweasel flash plugin on some of my systems with mplayer
by using the Greasemonkey extension with the following script:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/24999

It works nicely, uses less CPU, and sound works on my LTSP thin clients (a
big plus).  


Can anybody suggest how to make this a default for all users?  I'm not sure
how to handle it since the extension and the script get installed in the
user's $HOME directory by default.


I'm just guessing, but because Unix loves text files, it might be as 
simple as:


$ sudo cp blah ~some_other_user/.some_directory
$ sudo chown -R ~some_other_user/.some_directory

--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




using mplayer instead of flash plugin for Iceweasel

2009-07-28 Thread Rob Owens
I've replaced the Iceweasel flash plugin on some of my systems with mplayer
by using the Greasemonkey extension with the following script:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/24999

It works nicely, uses less CPU, and sound works on my LTSP thin clients (a
big plus).  

Can anybody suggest how to make this a default for all users?  I'm not sure
how to handle it since the extension and the script get installed in the
user's $HOME directory by default.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: The Flash plugin is NOT installed.

2008-11-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this keeps coming up when trying to install flash plugin to epiphany

flashplugin-nonfree was removed from Debian Etch[1].  There are packages
available from backports.org if you wish to install it.

Regards,
Ansgar

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/458550
[2] http://backports.org/
[3] http://backports.org/debian/pool/contrib/f/flashplugin-nonfree/

-- 
PGP: 1024D/595FAD19  739E 2D09 0969 BEA9 9797  B055 DDB0 2FF7 595F AD19


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



The Flash plugin is NOT installed.

2008-11-02 Thread admin
Hi,

this keeps coming up when trying to install flash plugin to epiphany

Please advise, TIA


debian:/home/adminsupport# apt-get update
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1
20080102-13:19] etch Release.gpg
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1
20080102-13:19] etch Release
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1
20080102-13:19] etch/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1
20080102-13:19] etch/main Packages/DiffIndex
Get: 1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release.gpg [386B]
Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release
Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Sources/DiffIndex
Get: 2 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Packages
Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch/main Sources
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources/DiffIndex
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources
Fetched 2B in 0s (2B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
debian:/home/adminsupport# apt-get --reinstall install
flashplugin-nonfree
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/13.2kB of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 77729 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.115.0.1~etch1
(using .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.115.0.1~etch1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement flashplugin-nonfree ...
Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.115.0.1~etch1) ...
Downloading...
--08:56:17--
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
   => `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz'
Resolving fpdownload.macromedia.com... 88.221.178.70
Connecting to fpdownload.macromedia.com|88.221.178.70|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3,044,538 (2.9M) [application/x-gzip]

0K .. .. .. .. ..  1%
363.64 KB/s
   50K .. .. .. .. ..  3%
354.46 KB/s
  100K .. .. .. .. ..  5%
345.04 KB/s
  150K .. .. .. .. ..  6%
357.39 KB/s
  200K .. .. .. .. ..  8%
354.01 KB/s
  250K .. .. .. .. .. 10%
342.95 KB/s
  300K .. .. .. .. .. 11%
354.03 KB/s
  350K .. .. .. .. .. 13%
351.16 KB/s
  400K .. .. .. .. .. 15%
352.23 KB/s
  450K .. .. .. .. .. 16%
353.22 KB/s
  500K .. .. .. .. .. 18%
341.42 KB/s
  550K .. .. .. .. .. 20%
351.39 KB/s
  600K .. .. .. .. .. 21%
354.15 KB/s
  650K .. .. .. .. .. 23%
353.18 KB/s
  700K .. .. .. .. .. 25%
342.16 KB/s
  750K .. .. .. .. .. 26%
351.33 KB/s
  800K .. .. .. .. .. 28%
352.33 KB/s
  850K .. .. .. .. .. 30%
352.96 KB/s
  900K .. .. .. .. .. 31%
353.66 KB/s
  950K .. .. .. .. .. 33%
340.88 KB/s
 1000K .. .. .. .. .. 35%
352.33 KB/s
 1050K .. .. .. .. .. 36%
352.96 KB/s
 1100K .. .. .. .. .. 38%
352.59 KB/s
 1150K .. .. .. .. .. 40%
351.72 KB/s
 1200K .. .. .. .. .. 42%
249.79 KB/s
 1250K .. .. .. .. .. 43%
573.22 KB/s
 1300K .. .. .. .. .. 45%
351.66 KB/s
 1350K .. .. .. .. .. 47%
348.99 KB/s
 1400K .. .. .. .. .. 48%
355.82 KB/s
 1450K .. .. .. .. .. 50%
342.12 KB/

Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-07-01 Thread Bob Cox
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 16:08:43 +0800, Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 

> Thanks, there is really a button to switch between rich and plain
> format, now I tried the plain format, hope it works. :)

It worked perfectly.  Well done and many thanks.

-- 
Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-07-01 Thread Star Liu
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Bob Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 15:47:30 +0800, Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Thank you very much! If I make any mistake in the future, please be kind to
> > tell me, I will correct. :)
>
> Thank you and well done.  The only small problem remaining is that you are
> still posting in html (that is, in plain text and also in html).
>
> In gmail, is there not something to click to select "plain text" or
> deselect "rich text formatting" or similar?

Thanks, there is really a button to switch between rich and plain
format, now I tried the plain format, hope it works. :)

>
> --
> Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
> Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/
>

--
Regards!
Star
http://starliu.9966.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-07-01 Thread Bob Cox
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 15:47:30 +0800, Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 

> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 01:49:40PM +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> > > Thanks, I now understand what top post mean.
> >
> > Thank you for your efforts (I mean it!). If you would like to read some
> > more on the topic here are some links:
> >
> > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
> >
> > and the all-time-favorites
> >
> > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >
> > I have read them myself when I started posting to this list and still
> > revisit (some of) them from time to time.
> 
> 
> Thank you very much! If I make any mistake in the future, please be kind to
> tell me, I will correct. :)

Thank you and well done.  The only small problem remaining is that you are
still posting in html (that is, in plain text and also in html).

In gmail, is there not something to click to select "plain text" or
deselect "rich text formatting" or similar?

-- 
Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-07-01 Thread Star Liu
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 01:49:40PM +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> > Thanks, I now understand what top post mean.
>
> Thank you for your efforts (I mean it!). If you would like to read some
> more on the topic here are some links:
>
> http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
> and the all-time-favorites
>
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> I have read them myself when I started posting to this list and still
> revisit (some of) them from time to time.


Thank you very much! If I make any mistake in the future, please be kind to
tell me, I will correct. :)


>
> Regards,
> Andrei
> --
> If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
> (Albert Einstein)
>

-- 
http://starliu.9966.org


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-07-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 01:49:40PM +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Brian Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Star Liu,
> >
> > This is top posting. It means writing your reply *above* what you are
> > replying to, instead of *below*. People are asking you to stop doing
> > that; finding out how to turn off HTML mail *does* depend on which
> > e-mail provider you use, but top posting *doesn't*!
> 
> 
> Thanks, I now understand what top post mean.

Thank you for your efforts (I mean it!). If you would like to read some 
more on the topic here are some links:

http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

and the all-time-favorites

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

I have read them myself when I started posting to this list and still 
revisit (some of) them from time to time.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Star Liu
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Brian Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dear Star Liu,
>
> This is top posting. It means writing your reply *above* what you are
> replying to, instead of *below*. People are asking you to stop doing
> that; finding out how to turn off HTML mail *does* depend on which
> e-mail provider you use, but top posting *doesn't*!


Thanks, I now understand what top post mean.


>
> Also, please don't send your debian-user messages to list servers other
> than lists.debian.org! If you do, and we hit "reply to sender" in our
> e-mail clients, we can't be certain it will get to debian-users. Plus,
> it gets such a high volume of messages that some of us have filters to
> send messages from it to a special folder; sending to anything but
> debian-user@lists.debian.org can defeat such filters (it did for me)!


Thanks, but I'm confused why that other mail list come into this thread, i
hope that's just an accident.

>
>
> On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 17:31 +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> > In fact, I didn't do anything else, I just reply it in gmail, I don't
> > know why it's top posted, or in html format.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Bob Cox
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 16:55:31 +0800, Star Liu
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it,
> > its effect is to
> > > close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then
> > purged it. :)
> > > does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, michael
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems
> > nothing changes,
> > > >> iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
> > > >> thank you!
> > > >>
> > > > please don't top post
> > > > my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32
> > bit) flash plugin.
> >
> > Which bit of "please don't top post" don't you understand?
> >
> > It really does make it very difficult for other people reading
> > this
> > thread.
> >
> > Also, it is best if you use plain text only.  Please lose the
> > html part.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
> > read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> >
> > --
> > Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
> > Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter -
> > http://counter.li.org/
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> -
> > Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
> > GNU/Linux Lenny AMD64, UEFI/BIOS
> >
> -
>
> - Brian Wells
>
> And now for something completely off-topic:
>
> I'm sorry if the correct way of doing things offends you.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
-
Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
GNU/Linux Lenny AMD64, UEFI/BIOS
-


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Brian Wells
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 21:54 -0700, Brian Wells wrote:
> Dear Star Liu,
> 
> This is top posting. It means writing your reply *above* what you are
> replying to, instead of *below*. People are asking you to stop doing
> that; finding out how to turn off HTML mail *does* depend on which
> e-mail provider you use, but top posting *doesn't*!
> 
> Also, please don't send your debian-user messages to list servers other
> than lists.debian.org! If you do, and we hit "reply to sender" in our
> e-mail clients, we can't be certain it will get to debian-users. Plus,
> it gets such a high volume of messages that some of us have filters to
> send messages from it to a special folder; sending to anything but
> debian-user@lists.debian.org can defeat such filters (it did for me)!



Er, I meant "reply to recipients". It's actually labeled Reply to All in
Evolution, so I got confused. :/

- Brian Wells

And now for something completely off-topic:

You ain't learning nothing when you're talking.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Brian Wells
Dear Star Liu,

This is top posting. It means writing your reply *above* what you are
replying to, instead of *below*. People are asking you to stop doing
that; finding out how to turn off HTML mail *does* depend on which
e-mail provider you use, but top posting *doesn't*!

Also, please don't send your debian-user messages to list servers other
than lists.debian.org! If you do, and we hit "reply to sender" in our
e-mail clients, we can't be certain it will get to debian-users. Plus,
it gets such a high volume of messages that some of us have filters to
send messages from it to a special folder; sending to anything but
debian-user@lists.debian.org can defeat such filters (it did for me)!

On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 17:31 +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> In fact, I didn't do anything else, I just reply it in gmail, I don't
> know why it's top posted, or in html format.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Bob Cox
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 16:55:31 +0800, Star Liu
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> > yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it,
> its effect is to
> > close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then
> purged it. :)
> > does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, michael
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:
> > >
> > >  I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems
> nothing changes,
> > >> iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
> > >> thank you!
> > >>
> > > please don't top post
> > > my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32
> bit) flash plugin.
> 
> Which bit of "please don't top post" don't you understand?
> 
> It really does make it very difficult for other people reading
> this
> thread.
> 
> Also, it is best if you use plain text only.  Please lose the
> html part.
> Thank you.
> 
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
> read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> 
> --
> Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
> Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter -
> http://counter.li.org/
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -
> Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
> GNU/Linux Lenny AMD64, UEFI/BIOS
> -

- Brian Wells

And now for something completely off-topic:

I'm sorry if the correct way of doing things offends you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Star Liu
good news! i installed  mozilla-plugin-gnash, it's in the main pool,
pool/main/g/gnash/mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.2-2+b1_amd64.deb, and it works!
:)

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:16 AM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 16:55 +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> > yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it, its effect
> > is to close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then
> > purged it. :) does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?
>
> try flashplugin-nonfree (contrib/web)
>
>


-- 
-
Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
GNU/Linux Lenny AMD64, UEFI/BIOS
-


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread michael
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 16:55 +0800, Star Liu wrote:
> yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it, its effect
> is to close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then
> purged it. :) does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?

try flashplugin-nonfree (contrib/web)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Senthil Kumar M
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Star Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, I didn't do anything else, I just reply it in gmail, I don't know
> why it's top posted, or in html format.
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Bob Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 16:55:31 +0800, Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> wrote:
>>
>> > yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it, its effect
>> > is to
>> > close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then purged it.
>> > :)
>> > does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, michael
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:
>> > >
>> > >  I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems nothing
>> > > changes,
>> > >> iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
>> > >> thank you!
>> > >>
>> > > please don't top post
>> > > my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32 bit) flash
>> > > plugin.
>>
>> Which bit of "please don't top post" don't you understand?
>>
>> It really does make it very difficult for other people reading this
>> thread.
>>
>> Also, it is best if you use plain text only.  Please lose the html part.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>


I use gmail too and this message is neither a top post nor in html format :)

Senthil


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Star Liu
In fact, I didn't do anything else, I just reply it in gmail, I don't know
why it's top posted, or in html format.

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Bob Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 16:55:31 +0800, Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it, its effect is
> to
> > close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then purged it.
> :)
> > does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:
> > >
> > >  I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems nothing
> changes,
> > >> iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
> > >> thank you!
> > >>
> > > please don't top post
> > > my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32 bit) flash
> plugin.
>
> Which bit of "please don't top post" don't you understand?
>
> It really does make it very difficult for other people reading this
> thread.
>
> Also, it is best if you use plain text only.  Please lose the html part.
> Thank you.
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
> --
> Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
> Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
-
Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
GNU/Linux Lenny AMD64, UEFI/BIOS
-


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Bob Cox
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 16:55:31 +0800, Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 

> yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it, its effect is to
> close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then purged it. :)
> does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?
> 
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:
> >
> >  I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems nothing changes,
> >> iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
> >> thank you!
> >>
> > please don't top post
> > my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32 bit) flash plugin.

Which bit of "please don't top post" don't you understand?

It really does make it very difficult for other people reading this
thread.

Also, it is best if you use plain text only.  Please lose the html part.
Thank you.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

-- 
Bob Cox.  Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread Star Liu
yes, there is libflash-mozplugin, i have just installed it, its effect is to
close iceweasel when there is a flash on the page, so i then purged it. :)
does it mean this solution won't work for amd64?

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:
>
>  I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems nothing changes,
>> iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
>> thank you!
>>
> please don't top post
> my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32 bit) flash plugin.
> my AMD64 Debian isn't booted but it would be something like
> libflash-mozplugin
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
> subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
-
Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
GNU/Linux Lenny AMD64, UEFI/BIOS
-


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-30 Thread michael


On 30 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Star Liu wrote:

I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems nothing  
changes, iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.

thank you!

please don't top post
my original suggestion had one more step - install (a 32 bit) flash  
plugin. my AMD64 Debian isn't booted but it would be something like  
libflash-mozplugin 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: how to install flash plugin for

2008-06-30 Thread Mumia W..

On 06/29/2008 11:53 PM, Jonathan Jacobs wrote:

[...]
Ps. On a second note similar to the first.  The reason why I am going to
www.lexmark.com is to download an updated driver for my printer.  I have
a lex T630 printer and the box recognizes it as such.  But, when I try
to pick out the driver for it.  The numbers do not match with what I
have.  I go do the site and download the latest.  The box still does not
have the correct numbers.  Before I try lex support, I thought I would
try you wonderful people lol.


I don't know quite what you mean when you say "the numbers do not 
match," but this may help you: 
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=site%3Alexmark.com+T630+driver&ei=UTF-8&fr=moz2


Click the first link. Lexmark's website is "suboptimal" at both 
searching and finding relevant information, but Yahoo does "search" for 
a living.


http://downloads.lexmark.com/cgi-perl/downloads.cgi?ccs=229:1:0:359:0:0&searchLang=en&os_group=DebianGNU&target=

I certainly hope this helps. BTW, I went to www.lexmark.com with both 
Javascript and Flash turned off.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: how to install flash plugin for

2008-06-29 Thread Jonathan Jacobs
> 
> 
> >  Forwarded Message 
> > From: Star Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Debian Linux , Debian邮件列表(简
> > 体中文) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?
> > Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 06:49:11 +0800
> > 
> > On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but
> > result in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > -- 
> > -
> > Buddha Debian GNU/Linux UEFI/BIOS
> > Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org
> > -

I have a similar problem, but I go to a few sites (namely
www.lexmark.com) and there is the icon about "Click here to download
plugins".  I have clicked on it and nothing happens.  No errors or
anything.  I figure it is java or some plugin like that.  I go to that
site and try to download its browser plugins.  I am using "GNOME Web
Browser 2.14.3" (Epiphany) with "Using “gecko-1.8” backend"

Ps. On a second note similar to the first.  The reason why I am going to
www.lexmark.com is to download an updated driver for my printer.  I have
a lex T630 printer and the box recognizes it as such.  But, when I try
to pick out the driver for it.  The numbers do not match with what I
have.  I go do the site and download the latest.  The box still does not
have the correct numbers.  Before I try lex support, I thought I would
try you wonderful people lol.
-- 
Jonathan Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-29 Thread Star Liu
I installed ia32-libs, then nspluginwrapper, but it seems nothing changes,
iceweasel still says no suitable plugin found for flash.
thank you!

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 7:38 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> On 28 Jun 2008, at 13:00, Star Liu wrote:
>
>  I'm afraid ia32 libs won't support amd64, i heard that no solution
>> provided for x86_64 cpus, but not sure.
>>
>
> From the Debian packages web page, ia32-libs
>
> This package contains runtime libraries for the ia32/i386 architecture,
> configured for use on an amd64 or ia64 Debian system running a 64-bit
> kernel.
>
> (I did say check the package names! It is ia32-lins not libs for IA32 (?))
>
> M
>
>
>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:06 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Jun 2008, at 23:49, Star Liu wrote:
>>
>> On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but result
>> in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?
>> Thanks!
>>
>> For etch, (from memory so check the package names) I downloaded some ia32
>> libs and nspluginwrapper and then the flash plugin
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
>> subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> 
>> Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
>> GNU/Linux, UEFI/BIOS
>>
>> 
>>
>
>


-- 

Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
GNU/Linux, UEFI/BIOS



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-29 Thread michael


On 28 Jun 2008, at 13:00, Star Liu wrote:

I'm afraid ia32 libs won't support amd64, i heard that no solution  
provided for x86_64 cpus, but not sure.


From the Debian packages web page, ia32-libs

This package contains runtime libraries for the ia32/i386  
architecture, configured for use on an amd64 or ia64 Debian system  
running a 64-bit kernel.


(I did say check the package names! It is ia32-lins not libs for IA32  
(?))


M





On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:06 PM, michael  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 27 Jun 2008, at 23:49, Star Liu wrote:

On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but  
result in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?

Thanks!

For etch, (from memory so check the package names) I downloaded  
some ia32 libs and nspluginwrapper and then the flash plugin



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a  
subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
-- 
--
Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian  
GNU/Linux, UEFI/BIOS
-- 
--



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-28 Thread Mark Grieveson
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:28:09 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but
> result in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?
> Thanks!

Do you have the multimedia repository in your sources.list?  If not,
add 

deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org lenny main

to your sources.list (/etc/apt/sources.list).  Then, after
updating, install flashplugin-nonfree.  That should work.  If not, you
could also install the flashplayer-mozilla package.

Mark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-28 Thread Star Liu
I'm afraid ia32 libs won't support amd64, i heard that no solution provided
for x86_64 cpus, but not sure.

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:06 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> On 27 Jun 2008, at 23:49, Star Liu wrote:
>
>  On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but result
>> in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> For etch, (from memory so check the package names) I downloaded some ia32
> libs and nspluginwrapper and then the flash plugin
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
> subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 

Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org, about Buddha, x86_64 CPU, Debian
GNU/Linux, UEFI/BIOS



Re: how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-28 Thread michael


On 27 Jun 2008, at 23:49, Star Liu wrote:

On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but  
result in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?

Thanks!


For etch, (from memory so check the package names) I downloaded some  
ia32 libs and nspluginwrapper and then the flash plugin



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




how to install flash plugin for iceweasel on leny amd64?

2008-06-27 Thread Star Liu
On lenny amd64, I often get the prompt to install flash plugin, but result
in "unknown plugin... x-shockwave-flash", how could i fix it?
Thanks!

-- 
-
Buddha Debian GNU/Linux UEFI/BIOS
Homepage: http://starliu.9966.org
-


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-15 Thread Alan Ianson
On Thu February 15 2007 09:12, Niels Rasmussen wrote:

> ERROR: Your architecture, \'x86_64\', is not supported by the
>Adobe Flash Player installer.

There is no flash player for 64 bit anything, at least not yet. I read that 
the folks at macromedia/adobe were working on it but nothing yet. It's been a 
long time coming, must be something perplexing about getting 64 bit support 
into the flash player.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-15 Thread Niels Rasmussen
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Bob McGowan wrote:
>> I've got iceweasel installed and the installed files list shows a
>> directory called 'plugins', located here:
>>
>> /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins
>>
>> This is where I'd look to put the Flash files, if I wanted them to be
>> globally active (for all possible users of the system).  But, you can
>> have a private plugin directory, for your account.  Put the files in
>> $HOME/.mozilla/plugins, which does *not* exist by default, so you need
>> to create it.
>>
>> The system plugin directory will always exist.  Both Iceweasel and
>> Firefox have default plugins that are part of the base package and are
>> installed there.
>>
>> I just downloaded a new plugin, for testing purposes, and put the .so
>> file in my .mozilla/plugins directory, and it loaded and ran
>> perfectly.  In this case, the plugin loaded and worked without a
>> restart of the browser, but you may find it's necessary to exit and
>> restart the browser before some plugins work.
>>
>> Bob
>>
> 
> I downloaded the new plugin from the Adobe page + created
> $HOME/.mozilla/plugins.
> Untarred the tarball as user and ran ./flashplayer-installer.
> 
> It told me:
> NOTE: Please ask your administrator to remove the xpti.dat from the
>   components directory of the Mozilla or Netscape browser.
> 
> which I did. Then about:plugins in iceweasel shows:
> 
> ...
> Shockwave Flash
> 
> File name: libflashplayer.so
> Shockwave Flash 9.0 r31
> 
> Shockwave Flash
> 
> File name: libflashplayer.so
> Shockwave Flash 7.0 r63
> ...
> 
> which is correct because the global installation still has 7.0 and my
> private installation has 9.0.

Well, still no can do!

But found the answer anyway:

ERROR: Your architecture, \'x86_64\', is not supported by the
   Adobe Flash Player installer.

:-(


-- 
/Niels
Registred Linux user #133791
Get counted at http://counter.li.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-15 Thread Freddy Freeloader

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:

Bob McGowan wrote:
I've got iceweasel installed and the installed files list shows a 
directory called 'plugins', located here:


/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins

This is where I'd look to put the Flash files, if I wanted them to be 
globally active (for all possible users of the system).  But, you can 
have a private plugin directory, for your account.  Put the files in 
$HOME/.mozilla/plugins, which does *not* exist by default, so you 
need to create it.


The system plugin directory will always exist.  Both Iceweasel and 
Firefox have default plugins that are part of the base package and 
are installed there.


I just downloaded a new plugin, for testing purposes, and put the .so 
file in my .mozilla/plugins directory, and it loaded and ran 
perfectly.  In this case, the plugin loaded and worked without a 
restart of the browser, but you may find it's necessary to exit and 
restart the browser before some plugins work.


Bob



I downloaded the new plugin from the Adobe page + created 
$HOME/.mozilla/plugins.

Untarred the tarball as user and ran ./flashplayer-installer.

It told me:
NOTE: Please ask your administrator to remove the xpti.dat from the
  components directory of the Mozilla or Netscape browser.

which I did. Then about:plugins in iceweasel shows:

...
Shockwave Flash

File name: libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 9.0 r31

Shockwave Flash

File name: libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 7.0 r63
...

which is correct because the global installation still has 7.0 and my 
private installation has 9.0.


However, when I go here:
http://www.latimes.com/
it still tells me I don't have the latest plugin.

Anybody else see that?

Hugo



Niels Rasmussen wrote:

Jonathan Kaye wrote:

Just get the tarball directly from Adobe. You can find it here:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&promoid=BIOW 

The installation instructions are on this link but I just manually 
stick the

two files in ~/.mozilla/plugins. The files are flashplayer.xpt and
libflashplayer.so. I'm running Firefox and this is where it wants 
them.


Are you sure ?? (I had to create the plugins dir maually).

It doesn't work here :-/

I'm running debian testing (etch)

Could you please share some more info on this ?




I had the problem of having the correct flash player version show up 
when I first switched too.  I did my install manually, but made it 
global as there are multiple accounts on this computer.  What I did to 
cure this was run "locate libflashplayer.so, or whatever the correct 
name of that file is,  and then copy the new flash player .so file to 
those locations over-writing the old version. 


It cured the problem for me.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: flash plugin

2007-02-15 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom

Bob McGowan wrote:
I've got iceweasel installed and the installed files list shows a 
directory called 'plugins', located here:


/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins

This is where I'd look to put the Flash files, if I wanted them to be 
globally active (for all possible users of the system).  But, you can 
have a private plugin directory, for your account.  Put the files in 
$HOME/.mozilla/plugins, which does *not* exist by default, so you need 
to create it.


The system plugin directory will always exist.  Both Iceweasel and 
Firefox have default plugins that are part of the base package and are 
installed there.


I just downloaded a new plugin, for testing purposes, and put the .so 
file in my .mozilla/plugins directory, and it loaded and ran perfectly. 
 In this case, the plugin loaded and worked without a restart of the 
browser, but you may find it's necessary to exit and restart the browser 
before some plugins work.


Bob



I downloaded the new plugin from the Adobe page + created 
$HOME/.mozilla/plugins.

Untarred the tarball as user and ran ./flashplayer-installer.

It told me:
NOTE: Please ask your administrator to remove the xpti.dat from the
  components directory of the Mozilla or Netscape browser.

which I did. Then about:plugins in iceweasel shows:

...
Shockwave Flash

File name: libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 9.0 r31

Shockwave Flash

File name: libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 7.0 r63
...

which is correct because the global installation still has 7.0 and my 
private installation has 9.0.


However, when I go here:
http://www.latimes.com/
it still tells me I don't have the latest plugin.

Anybody else see that?

Hugo



Niels Rasmussen wrote:

Jonathan Kaye wrote:

Just get the tarball directly from Adobe. You can find it here:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&promoid=BIOW 

The installation instructions are on this link but I just manually 
stick the

two files in ~/.mozilla/plugins. The files are flashplayer.xpt and
libflashplayer.so. I'm running Firefox and this is where it wants them.


Are you sure ?? (I had to create the plugins dir maually).

It doesn't work here :-/

I'm running debian testing (etch)

Could you please share some more info on this ?




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Mark Grieveson
> I think you should. The current version is 9.0.31.0.1. Your version is
> trying to fetch a file which is no longer hosted by Adobe.

Thanks.  My sources were in fact the problem.  I changed the sources to: 

deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free 

and then I updated it, and the problem was solved.  It installed the flash 
plugin perfectly after that.

Mark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:12:45PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> 
> Glad to hear it.  I'm still running Etch, but most likely will be
> running sid in the near future.  Etch is getting boring.  It's too stable :)
> 

heh. well, sorry to burst your bubble, but sid's not all that
thrilling either. At least day-to-day. What is thrilling is digging
through 16,000 packages looking for something you've not seen
before. I do that a lot with wm's on occaision. sometimes apt-cache
rdepends  can be fun too.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:31:41PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show flashplugin-nonfree
>> Package: flashplugin-nonfree
>> Priority: optional
>> Section: contrib/web
>> Installed-Size: 124
>> Maintainer: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Architecture: i386
>> Version: 9.0.31.0.1
> 
> for the record, it now seems to work fine in sid. I'd assume so in
> etch.
> 
> A

Glad to hear it.  I'm still running Etch, but most likely will be
running sid in the near future.  Etch is getting boring.  It's too stable :)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF018tiXBCVWpc5J4RAuBpAJ9+C0JTjHo6ewcy/AaofjNCich5JgCdGsZP
wMSFf6xZSKosjWRtn5vGjXQ=
=vDjP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Bob McGowan
I've got iceweasel installed and the installed files list shows a 
directory called 'plugins', located here:


/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins

This is where I'd look to put the Flash files, if I wanted them to be 
globally active (for all possible users of the system).  But, you can 
have a private plugin directory, for your account.  Put the files in 
$HOME/.mozilla/plugins, which does *not* exist by default, so you need 
to create it.


The system plugin directory will always exist.  Both Iceweasel and 
Firefox have default plugins that are part of the base package and are 
installed there.


I just downloaded a new plugin, for testing purposes, and put the .so 
file in my .mozilla/plugins directory, and it loaded and ran perfectly. 
 In this case, the plugin loaded and worked without a restart of the 
browser, but you may find it's necessary to exit and restart the browser 
before some plugins work.


Bob

Niels Rasmussen wrote:

Jonathan Kaye wrote:

Just get the tarball directly from Adobe. You can find it here:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&promoid=BIOW
The installation instructions are on this link but I just manually stick the
two files in ~/.mozilla/plugins. The files are flashplayer.xpt and
libflashplayer.so. I'm running Firefox and this is where it wants them.


Are you sure ?? (I had to create the plugins dir maually).

It doesn't work here :-/

I'm running debian testing (etch)

Could you please share some more info on this ?



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:31:41PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show flashplugin-nonfree
> Package: flashplugin-nonfree
> Priority: optional
> Section: contrib/web
> Installed-Size: 124
> Maintainer: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Architecture: i386
> Version: 9.0.31.0.1

for the record, it now seems to work fine in sid. I'd assume so in
etch.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:38 -0500
Mark Grieveson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > What version of flashplugin-nonfree is installed? I ask because your
> > machine is trying to fetch a beta version of Flash. It should be
> > looking for Flash 9 final. Have done an 'apt-get update && apt-get
> > upgrade' recently?
> 
> > -- 
> 
> > Liam
> 
> Hi.  I use aptitude, and yes, I have run both aptitude update, and
> aptitude dist-upgrade recently.  The mirrors I use are:
> 
> deb http://debian.mirrors.tds.net/debian/ etch main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://debian.mirrors.tds.net/debian/ etch main contrib
> non-free # multimedia
> deb http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/Linux/distributions/debian-multimedia
> testing main
> 
> I tried running aptitude update, and aptitude upgrade, just now, and
> nothing.  I then tried apt-get update, followed by apt-get upgrade,
> and nothing changed.  The version of flashplugin-nonfree is
> 9.0.21.78.3.  I'll check and see if this is the same as the version I
> have at work.  Perhaps I should change my sources.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 

I think you should. The current version is 9.0.31.0.1. Your version is
trying to fetch a file which is no longer hosted by Adobe.

-- 

Liam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Niels Rasmussen
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Just get the tarball directly from Adobe. You can find it here:
> http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&promoid=BIOW
> The installation instructions are on this link but I just manually stick the
> two files in ~/.mozilla/plugins. The files are flashplayer.xpt and
> libflashplayer.so. I'm running Firefox and this is where it wants them.

Are you sure ?? (I had to create the plugins dir maually).

It doesn't work here :-/

I'm running debian testing (etch)

Could you please share some more info on this ?

-- 
/Niels
Registred Linux user #133791
Get counted at http://counter.li.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:17:49PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>> as has already been mentioned, just grab the tarball and install it
>>> yourself.
>>>
>>> But, you have reminded me... the release went final but the debian
>>> package hasn't been updated so it 1) can't find the file for download
>>> and 2) if you manually download it and rename it, it can't install
>>> because the md5 sum doesn't match... I'm off to check the bug reports
>>> and file one if needed.
>>>
>>> A
>> Why are you all making such a big deal of this?  If you're using
>> IceWeasel, all you have to do it hit any webpage that uses flash
>> (http://distrowatch.com for example) and click on the install missing
>> plugin icon.  It will install Flash 9.0... at least it did for me.
>>
> 
> because if someone wants to set up a shiny new etch machine for
> mom/wife*/kid/whoever they want to install as much of that stuff as
> possible up front to minimise later "help-desk" calls. And if
> installing flash doesn't work out the door, then they have to jump
> through more hoops to make it work. Not to mention -- debian rocks and
> we hate to see anything tarnish its reputation! :)
> 
> A

I can understand that.  I have all of the above, and yes have to answer
help desk calls.  I wish I had installed Debian on my mother-in-law's
box because I had to spend an hour with her on the phone to walk her
through installing an update to her anti-virus package on Windows.

According to my apt-cache, it's there.  See

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show flashplugin-nonfree
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Priority: optional
Section: contrib/web
Installed-Size: 124
Maintainer: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 9.0.31.0.1
Replaces: flashplugin (<< 6)
Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0, wget, libgtk2.0-0, fontconfig, libxt6,
libxext6, libatk1.0-0, libc6, libcairo2, libexpat1, libfontconfig1,
libfreetype6, libglib2.0-0, libice6, libpango1.0-0, libpng12-0, libsm6,
libx11-6, libxau6, libxcursor1, libxdmcp6, libxfixes3, libxi6,
libxinerama1, libxrandr2, libxrender1, zlib1g
Recommends: xfs (>= 1:1.0.1-5)
Suggests: iceweasel, konqueror-nsplugins, x-ttcidfont-conf,
msttcorefonts, ttf-bitstream-vera | ttf-dejavu, ttf-xfree86-nonfree
Conflicts: flashplugin (<< 6), xfs (<< 1:1.0.1-5), flashplayer-mozilla
Filename:
pool/contrib/f/flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.31.0.1_i386.deb
Size: 13252
MD5sum: 66a42bc6b91f4aabb534535ff9afc264
SHA1: 304130034afadc13a8766413835fb2fd2ab507dd
SHA256: bec4feba8e30b7e771bf23d1720ba8ba15010ee92ead6c2e4e540689460a6040
Description: Adobe Flash Player plugin installer
 This package will download the Flash Player from Adobe.
 It is useful for mozilla browser variants like Iceweasel.
 .
 WARNING: Installing this Debian package causes the Adobe flash plugin to be
 downloaded from www.adobe.com.  The distribution license of the Adobe flash
 plugin is available at www.adobe.com.  Installing this Debian package
implies
 that you have accepted the terms of that license.
 .
  Homepage: http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer
Tag: suite::mozilla, use::browsing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF00d9iXBCVWpc5J4RAk5HAJ9zZ0oboVTsZgVHp5io+tS+d9EUsACeMR+b
vyz8Smk+R6Td9vPf2u/J+4c=
=CRpd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:17:49PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > 
> > as has already been mentioned, just grab the tarball and install it
> > yourself.
> > 
> > But, you have reminded me... the release went final but the debian
> > package hasn't been updated so it 1) can't find the file for download
> > and 2) if you manually download it and rename it, it can't install
> > because the md5 sum doesn't match... I'm off to check the bug reports
> > and file one if needed.
> > 
> > A
> 
> Why are you all making such a big deal of this?  If you're using
> IceWeasel, all you have to do it hit any webpage that uses flash
> (http://distrowatch.com for example) and click on the install missing
> plugin icon.  It will install Flash 9.0... at least it did for me.
> 

because if someone wants to set up a shiny new etch machine for
mom/wife*/kid/whoever they want to install as much of that stuff as
possible up front to minimise later "help-desk" calls. And if
installing flash doesn't work out the door, then they have to jump
through more hoops to make it work. Not to mention -- debian rocks and
we hate to see anything tarnish its reputation! :)

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:15:52AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/14/07 10:27, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:30:52AM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> [snip]
> > But, you have reminded me... the release went final but the debian
> > package hasn't been updated so it 1) can't find the file for download
> > and 2) if you manually download it and rename it, it can't install
> > because the md5 sum doesn't match... I'm off to check the bug reports
> > and file one if needed.
> 
> In etch or Sid?  Sid has had "release" 9.0 for a few weeks.

etch. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:30:52AM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
>> Hello.  I'm having problems with the flashplugin-nonfree package.  Both 
>> installing it, and trying to reconfigure it, fail.  It attempts to download 
>> an older file that does not exist.  I then downloaded the recent file from 
>> the adobe site, but the flashplugin-nonfree package did not recognize it.  
>>
>> Here is a printout of the error I get when I try to reconfigure it:
>>
>> debian:/home/mark# dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
>> Downloading...
>> --00:17:57--  
>> http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer9_update/FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz
>>=> `./FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz'
>> Resolving download.macromedia.com... 72.246.35.191
>> Connecting to download.macromedia.com|72.246.35.191|:80... connected.
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
>> 404 Not Found
>> 00:19:58 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>
>> download failed
>> The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
>>
>>
>> If anyone has any tips on how I can fix this, I would appreciate it.  I did 
>> manage, on another computer at my work, to get flash installed with this 
>> package; so, why it won't work on my home computer is a mystery.  I'm using 
>> Etch.
>>
> 
> as has already been mentioned, just grab the tarball and install it
> yourself.
> 
> But, you have reminded me... the release went final but the debian
> package hasn't been updated so it 1) can't find the file for download
> and 2) if you manually download it and rename it, it can't install
> because the md5 sum doesn't match... I'm off to check the bug reports
> and file one if needed.
> 
> A

Why are you all making such a big deal of this?  If you're using
IceWeasel, all you have to do it hit any webpage that uses flash
(http://distrowatch.com for example) and click on the install missing
plugin icon.  It will install Flash 9.0... at least it did for me.

Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF0zYtiXBCVWpc5J4RAgwYAJ9xoE+HephnF5oBVwdNQWKLzwyERwCdFBLx
hfQnez6XjxAYbMi+t9JNuCg=
=lLQl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/14/07 10:27, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:30:52AM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
[snip]
> But, you have reminded me... the release went final but the debian
> package hasn't been updated so it 1) can't find the file for download
> and 2) if you manually download it and rename it, it can't install
> because the md5 sum doesn't match... I'm off to check the bug reports
> and file one if needed.

In etch or Sid?  Sid has had "release" 9.0 for a few weeks.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF00PHS9HxQb37XmcRAhvfAJ9vOX8VZ1bMsPplB/+hccw3LLCcYQCfQt8R
UfLK8s/KIbAg9OgqmHXfrYA=
=dyOk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:30:52AM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> Hello.  I'm having problems with the flashplugin-nonfree package.  Both 
> installing it, and trying to reconfigure it, fail.  It attempts to download 
> an older file that does not exist.  I then downloaded the recent file from 
> the adobe site, but the flashplugin-nonfree package did not recognize it.  
> 
> Here is a printout of the error I get when I try to reconfigure it:
> 
> debian:/home/mark# dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
> Downloading...
> --00:17:57--  
> http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer9_update/FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz
>=> `./FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz'
> Resolving download.macromedia.com... 72.246.35.191
> Connecting to download.macromedia.com|72.246.35.191|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
> 404 Not Found
> 00:19:58 ERROR 404: Not Found.
> 
> download failed
> The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
> 
> 
> If anyone has any tips on how I can fix this, I would appreciate it.  I did 
> manage, on another computer at my work, to get flash installed with this 
> package; so, why it won't work on my home computer is a mystery.  I'm using 
> Etch.
> 

as has already been mentioned, just grab the tarball and install it
yourself.

But, you have reminded me... the release went final but the debian
package hasn't been updated so it 1) can't find the file for download
and 2) if you manually download it and rename it, it can't install
because the md5 sum doesn't match... I'm off to check the bug reports
and file one if needed.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: flash plugin

2007-02-14 Thread Mark Grieveson
> What version of flashplugin-nonfree is installed? I ask because your
> machine is trying to fetch a beta version of Flash. It should be
> looking for Flash 9 final. Have done an 'apt-get update && apt-get
> upgrade' recently?

> -- 

> Liam

Hi.  I use aptitude, and yes, I have run both aptitude update, and aptitude 
dist-upgrade recently.  The mirrors I use are:

deb http://debian.mirrors.tds.net/debian/ etch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://debian.mirrors.tds.net/debian/ etch main contrib non-free
# multimedia
deb http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/Linux/distributions/debian-multimedia testing 
main

I tried running aptitude update, and aptitude upgrade, just now, and nothing.  
I then tried apt-get update, followed by apt-get upgrade, and nothing changed.  
The version of flashplugin-nonfree is 9.0.21.78.3.  I'll check and see if this 
is the same as the version I have at work.  Perhaps I should change my sources.

Mark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-13 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:30:52 -0500
Mark Grieveson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello.  I'm having problems with the flashplugin-nonfree package.
> Both installing it, and trying to reconfigure it, fail.  It attempts
> to download an older file that does not exist.  I then downloaded the
> recent file from the adobe site, but the flashplugin-nonfree package
> did not recognize it.  
> 
> Here is a printout of the error I get when I try to reconfigure it:
> 
> debian:/home/mark# dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
> Downloading...
> --00:17:57--
> http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer9_update/FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz
> => `./FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz' Resolving
> download.macromedia.com... 72.246.35.191 Connecting to
> download.macromedia.com|72.246.35.191|:80... connected. HTTP request
> sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
> 00:19:58 ERROR 404: Not Found.
> 
> download failed
> The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
> 
> 
> If anyone has any tips on how I can fix this, I would appreciate it.
> I did manage, on another computer at my work, to get flash installed
> with this package; so, why it won't work on my home computer is a
> mystery.  I'm using Etch.
> 
> Mark
> 
>

What version of flashplugin-nonfree is installed? I ask because your
machine is trying to fetch a beta version of Flash. It should be
looking for Flash 9 final. Have done an 'apt-get update && apt-get
upgrade' recently?

-- 

Liam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: flash plugin

2007-02-13 Thread Jonathan Kaye
Mark Grieveson wrote:

> Hello.  I'm having problems with the flashplugin-nonfree package.  Both
> installing it, and trying to reconfigure it, fail.  It attempts to
> download an older file that does not exist.  I then downloaded the recent
> file from the adobe site, but the flashplugin-nonfree package did not
> recognize it.
> 
> Here is a printout of the error I get when I try to reconfigure it:
> 
> debian:/home/mark# dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
> Downloading...
> --00:17:57-- 
>
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer9_update/FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz
>=> `./FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz'
> Resolving download.macromedia.com... 72.246.35.191
> Connecting to download.macromedia.com|72.246.35.191|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
> 404 Not Found
> 00:19:58 ERROR 404: Not Found.
> 
> download failed
> The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
> 
> 
> If anyone has any tips on how I can fix this, I would appreciate it.  I
> did manage, on another computer at my work, to get flash installed with
> this package; so, why it won't work on my home computer is a mystery.  I'm
> using Etch.
> 
> Mark
Hi Mark,
Just get the tarball directly from Adobe. You can find it here:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&promoid=BIOW
The installation instructions are on this link but I just manually stick the
two files in ~/.mozilla/plugins. The files are flashplayer.xpt and
libflashplayer.so. I'm running Firefox and this is where it wants them.
Cheers,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



flash plugin

2007-02-13 Thread Mark Grieveson
Hello.  I'm having problems with the flashplugin-nonfree package.  Both 
installing it, and trying to reconfigure it, fail.  It attempts to download an 
older file that does not exist.  I then downloaded the recent file from the 
adobe site, but the flashplugin-nonfree package did not recognize it.  

Here is a printout of the error I get when I try to reconfigure it:

debian:/home/mark# dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
Downloading...
--00:17:57--  
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer9_update/FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz
   => `./FP9_plugin_beta_112006.tar.gz'
Resolving download.macromedia.com... 72.246.35.191
Connecting to download.macromedia.com|72.246.35.191|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
404 Not Found
00:19:58 ERROR 404: Not Found.

download failed
The Flash plugin is NOT installed.


If anyone has any tips on how I can fix this, I would appreciate it.  I did 
manage, on another computer at my work, to get flash installed with this 
package; so, why it won't work on my home computer is a mystery.  I'm using 
Etch.

Mark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



flash plugin and audio output

2006-08-02 Thread LeVA
Hi!

Is there any way I can tell macromedia's (adobe's :) mozilla flash 
plugin to output sound to hw:0,2 instead of default?
(if this is possible with the libflash-mozplugin package, please tell me 
about that instead :)

Thanks!

Daniel

-- 
LeVA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-03 Thread David Thompson
Hi there,

I had the same problem.  The only thing I could figure was the
obvious.  I downloaded the file from macromedia and installed
following their instructions. It works fine.

Good luck



On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:08:12AM +0100, Doofus wrote:
> 
> I've downloaded "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz" from 
> macromedia.com, installed Takuo's "flashplugin-nonfree" package with 
> dependecies (ruby, debconf), then ran the "update-flashplugin" script. 
> All as root.
> 
> 
> Nothing...
> 
> The firefox browser reports "No plug-ins are installed".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Tearing my hair out trying to get this to work. Can't understand it 
> because I got it working fine a couple of weeks ago on a similar machine.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Use the link below to report this message as spam.
> https://www.nerdshack.com/apps/teacher?sig=174795&key=716452752
> 
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-03 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:09AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
   > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:38 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
   > > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:42PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
   > >> 
   > >> Not here.  Running Sarge and stock Debian kernel 2.6.8-2-k7.
   > >> 
   > > I am running the same with some packages from backports and the kernel
   > > is 2.6.16. Would that matter?
   > >
   > >> I was having the same problems as the others.  I just installed 
Opera 
   > >> 8.52 from the Opera site and installed flashplayer-mozilla from 
nerim.  
   > >> My apt-cache policy outputs are now identical to those above, but 
the 
   > >> problem with the menus on toyota.com remains.  I am also unable to 
type 
   > >> in my zip-code under the 'Build and Price Your Toyota' option.  
This 
   > >> goes for both Firefox 1.0.4 and Opera 8.52.
   > >> 
   > > To add some more info: I just checked the site under firefox and
   > > epiphany under ubuntu dapper flight-6. The zip code field comes up fine
   > > and takes the input correctlu in both the browsers. 
   > 
   > And the versions of FF, epi & flash on dapper flight-6 are...
   > 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
Password: 
brahman:/home/mas# mount /dev/hda10 /mnt/
brahman:/home/mas# cd /mnt/
brahman:/mnt# chroot /mnt/
brahman:/# apt-cache policy firefox epiphany flashplayer-mozilla
firefox:
  Installed: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1ubuntu10
  Candidate: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1ubuntu10
  Version table:
 *** 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1ubuntu10 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com dapper/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
epiphany:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 0.5.1-1build3
  Version table:
 0.5.1-1build3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com dapper/universe Packages
flashplayer-mozilla:
  Installed: 7.0.63.0-0.0
  Candidate: 7.0.63.0-0.0
  Version table:
 *** 7.0.63.0-0.0 0
500 ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Regards,

-- 
Sridhar M.A. GPG KeyID : F6A35935
  Fingerprint: D172 22C4 7CDC D9CD 62B5  55C1 2A69 D5D8 F6A3 5935

BOFH excuse #69:

knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-03 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:38 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:42PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>> 
>> Not here.  Running Sarge and stock Debian kernel 2.6.8-2-k7.
>> 
> I am running the same with some packages from backports and the kernel
> is 2.6.16. Would that matter?
>
>> I was having the same problems as the others.  I just installed Opera 
>> 8.52 from the Opera site and installed flashplayer-mozilla from nerim.  
>> My apt-cache policy outputs are now identical to those above, but the 
>> problem with the menus on toyota.com remains.  I am also unable to type 
>> in my zip-code under the 'Build and Price Your Toyota' option.  This 
>> goes for both Firefox 1.0.4 and Opera 8.52.
>> 
> To add some more info: I just checked the site under firefox and
> epiphany under ubuntu dapper flight-6. The zip code field comes up fine
> and takes the input correctlu in both the browsers. 

And the versions of FF, epi & flash on dapper flight-6 are...

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

"In politics you can't be true to all of your friends all of the
time."
Perry S. Heath (RNC secretary, 1900-04)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-03 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:42PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
   > 
   > Not here.  Running Sarge and stock Debian kernel 2.6.8-2-k7.
   > 
I am running the same with some packages from backports and the kernel
is 2.6.16. Would that matter?
   
   > I was having the same problems as the others.  I just installed Opera 
   > 8.52 from the Opera site and installed flashplayer-mozilla from nerim.  
   > My apt-cache policy outputs are now identical to those above, but the 
   > problem with the menus on toyota.com remains.  I am also unable to type 
   > in my zip-code under the 'Build and Price Your Toyota' option.  This 
   > goes for both Firefox 1.0.4 and Opera 8.52.
   > 
To add some more info: I just checked the site under firefox and
epiphany under ubuntu dapper flight-6. The zip code field comes up fine
and takes the input correctlu in both the browsers. 

Regards,
   
-- 
Sridhar M.A. GPG KeyID : F6A35935
  Fingerprint: D172 22C4 7CDC D9CD 62B5  55C1 2A69 D5D8 F6A3 5935

Keep cool; process promptly.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Marc Shapiro

Sridhar M.A. wrote:

The site works cleanly with Opera on my sarge system. 

$ apt-cache policy opera 
opera:

 Installed: 8.52-20060201.5
 Candidate: 8.52-20060201.5
 Version table:
*** 8.52-20060201.5 0
   100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla
flashplayer-mozilla:
 Installed: 7.0.63.0-0.0
 Candidate: 7.0.63.0-0.0
 Version table:
*** 7.0.63.0-0.0 0
   900 ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge/main Packages
   100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Opera deb is from the opera site. I keep it around which behave badly
under FF :-(

Regards,

 


Not here.  Running Sarge and stock Debian kernel 2.6.8-2-k7.

I was having the same problems as the others.  I just installed Opera 
8.52 from the Opera site and installed flashplayer-mozilla from nerim.  
My apt-cache policy outputs are now identical to those above, but the 
problem with the menus on toyota.com remains.  I am also unable to type 
in my zip-code under the 'Build and Price Your Toyota' option.  This 
goes for both Firefox 1.0.4 and Opera 8.52.


--
Marc Shapiro

No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.
What?! Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here.
Boom. Sooner or later ... boom!

- Susan Ivanova: B5 - Grail


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Unstable FF+FP (was Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?)

2006-04-02 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Ron Johnson wrote:
> 
> Since you're Etch, though, you'll either have to get it from mozilla,
> or suffer until 1.5 makes it's way to Etch.
> 

It's already been hinted and should be migrating to Etch soon.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 03:18:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
   > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:22 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
   > > >>
   > > It doesn't work perfectly for me. Either installing the software direct 
   > > from macromedia, or from the above mentioned method. I still have 
   > > trouble with sites like Toyota.com or Pier1.com. The drop down lists 
   > > don't show, or they half show behind the current graphic. Could not  
   > > build a car because the zip code filed remains empty after trying to 
   > > enter any number numerous times.
   > > 
   > > I have trouble with other sites as well. I still can't figure out if 
   > > something is misconfigured or the Linux package is just buggy. Could 
   > > someone humor me and please try the  (the USA) www.toyota.com website?
   > 
   > I see the same problems you describe at toyota.com.
   > 
   > flash 7.0.63.1 from neris.
   > firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-4
   > 
The site works cleanly with Opera on my sarge system. 

$ apt-cache policy opera 
opera:
  Installed: 8.52-20060201.5
  Candidate: 8.52-20060201.5
  Version table:
 *** 8.52-20060201.5 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla
flashplayer-mozilla:
  Installed: 7.0.63.0-0.0
  Candidate: 7.0.63.0-0.0
  Version table:
 *** 7.0.63.0-0.0 0
900 ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Opera deb is from the opera site. I keep it around which behave badly
under FF :-(

Regards,

-- 
Sridhar M.A. GPG KeyID : F6A35935
  Fingerprint: D172 22C4 7CDC D9CD 62B5  55C1 2A69 D5D8 F6A3 5935

"The voters have spoken, the bastards..."
-- unknown


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Unstable FF+FP (was Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?)

2006-04-02 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 18:29 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On 4/2/06, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> 
> [...] 
[snip]
> 
> Damn!  I visited pier1 to see if I could reproduce the symptoms, and
> not only do the drop-down menus not work properly (they hide behind
> the flashy graphic) but closing the tab crashed firefox!  (1.0.7 on
> etch.)  And I just "upgraded" from the Marillat site yesterday.

I too found that FP7 would regularly crash FF 1.0.x.  FF 1.5, though,
is highly stable with FP7.

Since you're Etch, though, you'll either have to get it from mozilla,
or suffer until 1.5 makes it's way to Etch.

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

"Guidelines for Bureaucrats: 1. When in charge, ponder. 2. When
in trouble, delegate. 3. When in doubt, mumble."
James H. Borden


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 4/2/06, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
[...] 
> pier1.com (your wife made you go there, right???) worked fine, with
> the little testing I tried.  What exact problem(s) are you having> with it?>>Same problem with th drop list: on the the main page the "shop" dropdown list is hidden?/doesn't drop down.

Damn!  I visited pier1 to see if I could reproduce the symptoms,
and not only do the drop-down menus not work properly (they hide behind
the flashy graphic) but closing the tab crashed firefox!  (1.0.7
on etch.)  And I just "upgraded" from the Marillat site yesterday.

Patrick


Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Nick Lidakis

Ron Johnson wrote:

On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:22 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
  
Sridhar M.A. wrote:  


Put this in your sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sid main

Adjust for sid or testing as to your system needs.
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree

You'll get flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.63.1 that works perfectly.
 


It doesn't work perfectly for me. Either installing the software direct 
from macromedia, or from the above mentioned method. I still have 
trouble with sites like Toyota.com or Pier1.com. The drop down lists 
don't show, or they half show behind the current graphic. Could not  
build a car because the zip code filed remains empty after trying to 
enter any number numerous times.


I have trouble with other sites as well. I still can't figure out if 
something is misconfigured or the Linux package is just buggy. Could 
someone humor me and please try the  (the USA) www.toyota.com website?



I see the same problems you describe at toyota.com.

flash 7.0.63.1 from neris.
firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-4

In Win2k, using FF 1.5.0.1 and Flash 8.0r24, it works fine.

pier1.com (your wife made you go there, right???) worked fine, with
the little testing I tried.  What exact problem(s) are you having 
with it?


  
Same problem with th drop list: on the the main page the "shop" drop 
down list is hidden?/doesn't drop down. I don't dual boot or have 
immediate access to a windows machine when I am home, but using Firefox 
on winXP on a friends laptop, all seems to work fine. The Toyota site 
doesn't even have an option for a non-flash site.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:22 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Sridhar M.A. wrote:  
> >>
> >> Put this in your sources.list:
> >> deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sid main
> >>
> >> Adjust for sid or testing as to your system needs.
> >> # apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree
> >>
> >> You'll get flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.63.1 that works perfectly.
> >>  
> >>
> It doesn't work perfectly for me. Either installing the software direct 
> from macromedia, or from the above mentioned method. I still have 
> trouble with sites like Toyota.com or Pier1.com. The drop down lists 
> don't show, or they half show behind the current graphic. Could not  
> build a car because the zip code filed remains empty after trying to 
> enter any number numerous times.
> 
> I have trouble with other sites as well. I still can't figure out if 
> something is misconfigured or the Linux package is just buggy. Could 
> someone humor me and please try the  (the USA) www.toyota.com website?

I see the same problems you describe at toyota.com.

flash 7.0.63.1 from neris.
firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-4

In Win2k, using FF 1.5.0.1 and Flash 8.0r24, it works fine.

pier1.com (your wife made you go there, right???) worked fine, with
the little testing I tried.  What exact problem(s) are you having 
with it?

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

"The British Constitution has always been puzzling and always
will be."
Queen Elizabeth II


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Nick Lidakis
Sridhar M.A. wrote:  


Put this in your sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sid main

Adjust for sid or testing as to your system needs.
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree

You'll get flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.63.1 that works perfectly.
 

It doesn't work perfectly for me. Either installing the software direct 
from macromedia, or from the above mentioned method. I still have 
trouble with sites like Toyota.com or Pier1.com. The drop down lists 
don't show, or they half show behind the current graphic. Could not  
build a car because the zip code filed remains empty after trying to 
enter any number numerous times.


I have trouble with other sites as well. I still can't figure out if 
something is misconfigured or the Linux package is just buggy. Could 
someone humor me and please try the  (the USA) www.toyota.com website?




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Doofus

Ron Johnson wrote:


On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 12:10 +0100, Doofus wrote:
 


Sridhar M.A. wrote:

   


On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Doofus wrote:
 > 
 > >
 > >I've downloaded "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz" from 
 > >macromedia.com, installed Takuo's "flashplugin-nonfree" package with 
 > >dependecies (ruby, debconf), then ran the "update-flashplugin" script. 
 > >All as root.

 > >
 > >
 > >Nothing...
 > >
 > >The firefox browser reports "No plug-ins are installed".


 


 > Sorry I didn't finish properly.
 > 
 > I'm running sarge. The during installation aptitude and 
 > update-flashplugin report:
 > 
 >Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.25-5) ...

 >I: checking http://macromedis.rediris.es/tarball/debian/ ...
 >No new version is detected. ( = Not installed)
 > 
 > And the actual plugin file isn't on the machine anywhere.
 > 
 > 
 > I'm mystified because I got this working fine a couple of weeks ago on a 
 > similar machine.

 > Can anyone please advise?


 


Not exactly an answer, but why don't you install
flashplayer-mozilla_7.0.61.0-0.1_i386.deb from ftp.nerim.net. That sets
up things correctly.

 

Not at all the answer I wanted but still much appreciated. After 
removing "flashplugin-nonfree", which conflicted, that works perfectly.


I'd love to understand why the debian system method doesn't work though. 
Clearly it'd be nicer to have a script you can run occasionally that 
checks for and installs updated plugins with little interaction. The 
output message above from the update-flashplugin script suggests it's 
decided there's already a flash player installed, but this is a newly 
built machine with virtually nothing done to it yet except a newly built 
kernel, X and WindowMaker.
   



Put this in your sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sid main

Adjust for sid or testing as to your system needs.
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree

You'll get flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.63.1 that works perfectly.

 



That's what I'm running now, but I pulled the deb package down and 
installed it manually. I run sarge stable, and am nervous about adding 
third party testing or unstable entries to my sources list. Is this even 
advisable?


Both you and Mr Sridhar have suggested exactly the same thing, which 
implies to me that the sarge flashplugin-nonfree package is known to be 
faulty - is that the case?


Thanks for your help.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 12:10 +0100, Doofus wrote:
> Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Doofus wrote:
> >   > 
> >   > >
> >   > >I've downloaded "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz" from 
> >   > >macromedia.com, installed Takuo's "flashplugin-nonfree" package with 
> >   > >dependecies (ruby, debconf), then ran the "update-flashplugin" script. 
> >   > >All as root.
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > >Nothing...
> >   > >
> >   > >The firefox browser reports "No plug-ins are installed".
> >  
> >
> 
> >   > Sorry I didn't finish properly.
> >   > 
> >   > I'm running sarge. The during installation aptitude and 
> >   > update-flashplugin report:
> >   > 
> >   >Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.25-5) ...
> >   >I: checking http://macromedis.rediris.es/tarball/debian/ ...
> >   >No new version is detected. ( = Not installed)
> >   > 
> >   > And the actual plugin file isn't on the machine anywhere.
> >   > 
> >   > 
> >   > I'm mystified because I got this working fine a couple of weeks ago on 
> > a 
> >   > similar machine.
> >   > Can anyone please advise?
> >  
> >
> 
> >Not exactly an answer, but why don't you install
> >flashplayer-mozilla_7.0.61.0-0.1_i386.deb from ftp.nerim.net. That sets
> >up things correctly.
> >
> 
> Not at all the answer I wanted but still much appreciated. After 
> removing "flashplugin-nonfree", which conflicted, that works perfectly.
> 
> I'd love to understand why the debian system method doesn't work though. 
> Clearly it'd be nicer to have a script you can run occasionally that 
> checks for and installs updated plugins with little interaction. The 
> output message above from the update-flashplugin script suggests it's 
> decided there's already a flash player installed, but this is a newly 
> built machine with virtually nothing done to it yet except a newly built 
> kernel, X and WindowMaker.

Put this in your sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sid main

Adjust for sid or testing as to your system needs.
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree

You'll get flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.63.1 that works perfectly.

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

"Sometime they'll give a war and nobody will come."
Carl Sandburg
Oh, come on. Sure they will. That's what testosterone is for...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Doofus

Sridhar M.A. wrote:


On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Doofus wrote:
  > 
  > >
  > >I've downloaded "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz" from 
  > >macromedia.com, installed Takuo's "flashplugin-nonfree" package with 
  > >dependecies (ruby, debconf), then ran the "update-flashplugin" script. 
  > >All as root.

  > >
  > >
  > >Nothing...
  > >
  > >The firefox browser reports "No plug-ins are installed".
 




  > Sorry I didn't finish properly.
  > 
  > I'm running sarge. The during installation aptitude and 
  > update-flashplugin report:
  > 
  >Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.25-5) ...

  >I: checking http://macromedis.rediris.es/tarball/debian/ ...
  >No new version is detected. ( = Not installed)
  > 
  > And the actual plugin file isn't on the machine anywhere.
  > 
  > 
  > I'm mystified because I got this working fine a couple of weeks ago on a 
  > similar machine.

  > Can anyone please advise?
 




Not exactly an answer, but why don't you install
flashplayer-mozilla_7.0.61.0-0.1_i386.deb from ftp.nerim.net. That sets
up things correctly.



Not at all the answer I wanted but still much appreciated. After 
removing "flashplugin-nonfree", which conflicted, that works perfectly.


I'd love to understand why the debian system method doesn't work though. 
Clearly it'd be nicer to have a script you can run occasionally that 
checks for and installs updated plugins with little interaction. The 
output message above from the update-flashplugin script suggests it's 
decided there's already a flash player installed, but this is a newly 
built machine with virtually nothing done to it yet except a newly built 
kernel, X and WindowMaker.


Thanks again.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: macromedia flash plugin for firefox?

2006-04-02 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Doofus wrote:
   > 
   > >
   > >I've downloaded "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz" from 
   > >macromedia.com, installed Takuo's "flashplugin-nonfree" package with 
   > >dependecies (ruby, debconf), then ran the "update-flashplugin" script. 
   > >All as root.
   > >
   > >
   > >Nothing...
   > >
   > >The firefox browser reports "No plug-ins are installed".
   > 
   > 
   > Sorry I didn't finish properly.
   > 
   > I'm running sarge. The during installation aptitude and 
   > update-flashplugin report:
   > 
   >Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.25-5) ...
   >I: checking http://macromedis.rediris.es/tarball/debian/ ...
   >No new version is detected. ( = Not installed)
   > 
   > And the actual plugin file isn't on the machine anywhere.
   > 
   > 
   > I'm mystified because I got this working fine a couple of weeks ago on a 
   > similar machine.
   > Can anyone please advise?
   > 
Not exactly an answer, but why don't you install
flashplayer-mozilla_7.0.61.0-0.1_i386.deb from ftp.nerim.net. That sets
up things correctly.

HTH,

Regards,

-- 
Sridhar M.A. GPG KeyID : F6A35935
  Fingerprint: D172 22C4 7CDC D9CD 62B5  55C1 2A69 D5D8 F6A3 5935

Should I get locked in the PRINCICAL'S OFFICE today -- or have a VASECTOMY??


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


  1   2   >