Re: gcc-doc in stretch
Thanks for clarifying. On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Christian Seilerwrote: > On 08/06/2016 04:08 PM, Steven Tan wrote: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gcc-doc; > searchon=names=all=all > > It looks like the package gcc-doc is not provided in stretch, not even in > > contrib or non-free, but the package is provided in jessie and sid. > > > > Is this a bug or intended? > > Well, it's a bug, but in gcc-doc. It currently fails to build > from source, and the maintainer hasn't fixed it yet, so it > was autoremoved from testing a month or so ago: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825320 > https://tracker.debian.org/news/782354 > > Once that bug is fixed, it can reenter testing. (Assuming no > other RC bug is filed in the mean time.) > > Regards, > Christian >
Re: gcc-doc in stretch
On 08/06/2016 04:08 PM, Steven Tan wrote: > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gcc-doc=names=all=all > It looks like the package gcc-doc is not provided in stretch, not even in > contrib or non-free, but the package is provided in jessie and sid. > > Is this a bug or intended? Well, it's a bug, but in gcc-doc. It currently fails to build from source, and the maintainer hasn't fixed it yet, so it was autoremoved from testing a month or so ago: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825320 https://tracker.debian.org/news/782354 Once that bug is fixed, it can reenter testing. (Assuming no other RC bug is filed in the mean time.) Regards, Christian
gcc-doc in stretch
Hi, https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gcc-doc=names=all=all It looks like the package gcc-doc is not provided in stretch, not even in contrib or non-free, but the package is provided in jessie and sid. Is this a bug or intended? Thank you.