Re: apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
Still wrote: Stefano; O nome que vc deu é o kernel compilado. Para pegar o source do kerenel 2.4.18, basta dar um apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18 A menos que eue esteja enganado, não tem como vc baixar o bf2.4. []'s, Still * Musashi corta a msg que Stefano Martins enviou para Still: e ai pessoal da lista tava querendo saber onde eu poderia encontrar o kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4 pra baixar por apt-get que endereço eu colocaria no meu /etc/apt/sources.list ? Dá um apt-cache search kernel-source que vai facilitar bastante o trabalho! ;) []'s -Zeh -- José Oliveira (ZehOliveira) E-mail : oliveira at ofm.com.br Gnu/Linux User #269094 (Debian/Sid) Se não está no Google é por que não existe.
Re: apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
Stefano; O nome que vc deu é o kernel compilado. Para pegar o source do kerenel 2.4.18, basta dar um apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18 A menos que eue esteja enganado, não tem como vc baixar o bf2.4. []'s, Still * Musashi corta a msg que Stefano Martins enviou para Still: e ai pessoal da lista tava querendo saber onde eu poderia encontrar o kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4 pra baixar por apt-get que endereço eu colocaria no meu /etc/apt/sources.list ? -- Nelson Luiz Campos .''`. | I hear; I forget. Engenheiro Eletricista : :' :| I see; I remember. Linux User #89621 UIN 11464303 `. `'` | I do; I understand. gnupgID: 55577339`- | Chinese Proverb signature.asc Description: Digital signature
kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
Czy sa gdzies zrodla kernela-2.4.18-bf2.4? Wszedzie widzialem tylko 2.4.18. Moze jakas latka na 2.4.18 jest? Potrzebuje tylko zrodla, nie chcialbym przekompilowywac calego jajka. pozdro.
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
Dnia sob 22. marzec 2003 14:27, klusek napisał: Czy sa gdzies zrodla kernela-2.4.18-bf2.4? Wszedzie widzialem tylko 2.4.18. Moze jakas latka na 2.4.18 jest? Potrzebuje tylko zrodla, nie chcialbym przekompilowywac calego jajka. pozdro. heh, w zwiazku z ostatnim eploitem na ptrace nie tylko ta latka by ci sie przydala. w bf-2.4 wchodzi sie bez problemu, sprawdzalem ;) pozdrowienia, jacek
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
Juz znalazlem, /boot/config-2.4.18-bf2.4 Wsadzilem jako .config do 2.4.18 skompilowalem i poszlo, a co do dziury to i tak nie mam zewnetrznego IP wiec nie potrzebuje :) - Original Message - From: Jacek Sobczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user-polish@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 5:20 PM Subject: Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4 Dnia sob 22. marzec 2003 14:27, klusek napisał: heh, w zwiazku z ostatnim eploitem na ptrace nie tylko ta latka by ci sie przydala. w bf-2.4 wchodzi sie bez problemu, sprawdzalem ;) pozdrowienia, jacek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
Jacek Sobczak wrote: heh, w zwiazku z ostatnim eploitem na ptrace nie tylko ta latka by ci sie przydala. w bf-2.4 wchodzi sie bez problemu, sprawdzalem No wlasnie, czy jakis debianowiec moze mi wyjasnic jak to jest tak naprawde z security w debianie. Jesli chodzi o pakiety to wszystko jest jasne, jest debian-security-announce, robie apt-get update/upgrade/dist-upgrade i jest ok. NAtomiast co do jadra systemu to - ani sladu jakiejkowiek informacji (tzn. widzialem informacje Alana Cox'a (http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0134.html) i advisory z red hata ale nic na temat debiana). Mam jadro 2.2.22 skompilowane ze zrodel z pakietu kernel-source-2.2.22-1 i jest ono podatne na atak (exploit na http://august.v-lo.krakow.pl/~anszom/km3.c) ale nie ma nowej paczki ze zrodlami (dlaczego???). Czy powinienem recznie zaaplikowac patch'a proponowanego przez Alana? Czy moze sa gdzies (gdzie???) paczki ze zrodlami 2.2.25? pozdrowienia ps. dlaczego na tej liscie reply-to: nie jest ustawione z powrotem na liste? -- Marcin Gryszkalis http://fork.pl
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 08:40:49PM +0100, Marcin Gryszkalis wrote: ps. dlaczego na tej liscie reply-to: nie jest ustawione z powrotem na liste? Taka jest polityka list debianowych. Mozna sie z nia nie zgadzac (jak np. ja), ale zmiana tego jest prawie niemozliwa. Prosciej zatem sie przystosowac i skonfigurowac MUA aby umialo odpowiadac na liste. Wanted
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:26:55AM -0600, Donald Spoon wrote: I have compiled the ALSA modules, and it isn't all that hard IF you know a bit about compiling and are comfortable with the process. The instructions on the ALSA site are pretty clear. The debs cover all the You can also get the 'alsa-source' package and then read /usr/share/doc/alsa-source/README.Debian.gz for setp-by-step instructions :) -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ertius.org/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
Kent West wrote: Donald Spoon wrote: That said, you can install a perfectly workable version of ALSA using apt-get on the pre-compiled debs in the Debian package repository. All you have to do is match the pre-compiled ALSA version with your kernel. Not all available kernels have matching pre-compiled ALSA debs, but the 2.4.19 kernel-image series does. Do you know if this is due to policy? Technical reasons? No one's gotten around to it yet? What? I'm running stock 2.4.20, and there appear to be no alsa deb for that version. Or maybe I'm just not seeing it . . . . Thanks! Dunno I just report what I see, and that is only the 2.4.16 and 2.4.19 kernels have pre-compiled debs. The 2.4.19 kernel is perfectly suitable for my environment my equipment, so I don't have any pressures to go with the 2.4.20 or later kernels. Others with more modern equipment may find it necessary to run a more recent kernel that supports their hardware. I suspect it is just a matter of free time to make the debs, and other things have more priority. There has to be a companion package the each of the various kernel-image offerings. Considering this and the fact there are 11 different CPU types, this represents a LOT of debs to compile! I have compiled the ALSA modules, and it isn't all that hard IF you know a bit about compiling and are comfortable with the process. The instructions on the ALSA site are pretty clear. The debs cover all the possible sound cards from what I see, while the instructions I used was oriented towards just compiling the modules you needed for your card. One is a generic approach, while the other is specific to your card(s). This all may become moot when ASLA gets embedded into the kernel. I hear that it is in the 2.5.XX developemental kernels now and will be part of the 2.6.X series when it is released. I also have observed that for most sound cards I have used, the OSS drivers built into the stock kernels work just as well as ALSA. I really don't see any advantages to ALSA (for me) at this time. It all boils down to working through the configuration of each type/method, and each way has its advantages and disadvantages, IMHO. Cheers, -Don Spoon- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
Hi all, Something tells me this is a question that has already been asked, and that I'll probably be flamed for it, so, flame away! :-) Anyways - could anyone tell me where I could find the source for kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4? I've checked in Debian's archives, as well as kernel.org and on Google. Scary thing - Google either says it doesn't exist, or (more likely) I don't know where to begin to look. I'm looking to install ALSA and a (pirated) copy of VMWare, so if you can think of a better kernel for those (that has a source and image available), I could do with any help I can get. Thanks. Kris Kerwin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
Kris Kerwin wrote: Hi all, Something tells me this is a question that has already been asked, and that I'll probably be flamed for it, so, flame away! :-) Anyways - could anyone tell me where I could find the source for kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4? I've checked in Debian's archives, as well as kernel.org and on Google. Scary thing - Google either says it doesn't exist, or (more likely) I don't know where to begin to look. maybe here: http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/kernel-source-2.4.18.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:30:47PM -0600, Kris Kerwin wrote: Hi all, Something tells me this is a question that has already been asked, and that I'll probably be flamed for it, so, flame away! :-) Anyways - could anyone tell me where I could find the source for kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4? I've checked in Debian's archives, as well as kernel.org and on Google. Scary thing - Google either says it doesn't exist, or (more likely) I don't know where to begin to look. I'm looking to install ALSA and a (pirated) copy of VMWare, so if you can think of a better kernel for those (that has a source and image available), I could do with any help I can get. Thanks. 2.4.blah-bf2.4 is the install kernel. The install guide talks more about that. You want to get a 'proper' kernel-image-2.4.18-arch package, firstly. As for the source sid, you usually only need the approriate kernel headers, which can be found in the 'kernel-headers-2.4.18-bleh' package. I think ALSA is an exception to this general rule, though; have a look in the alsa-source package's README.Debian. No idea about VMWare, sorry. -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ertius.org/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
Kris Kerwin wrote: Hi all, Something tells me this is a question that has already been asked, and that I'll probably be flamed for it, so, flame away! :-) Anyways - could anyone tell me where I could find the source for kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4? I've checked in Debian's archives, as well as kernel.org and on Google. Scary thing - Google either says it doesn't exist, or (more likely) I don't know where to begin to look. I'm looking to install ALSA and a (pirated) copy of VMWare, so if you can think of a better kernel for those (that has a source and image available), I could do with any help I can get. Thanks. Kris Kerwin There is only one kernel-source for the 2.4.18 kernels, or for any kernel tree for that matter. All the variations you see in pre-compiled binaries are made at compile time via the specific .config file used. Therefore to get ANY version you want, you just d/l the kernel-source package for the 2.4.18 kernel, and apply the .config file you want. For the bf2.4 kernel you can find this file in /boot/config-2.4.18-bf2.4, if you are already running the 2.4.18-bf4 pre-compiled kernel. Other pre-compiled kernels (the kernel-image packages) keep their .config file in the same place and named in a similar manner. That said, you can install a perfectly workable version of ALSA using apt-get on the pre-compiled debs in the Debian package repository. All you have to do is match the pre-compiled ALSA version with your kernel. Not all available kernels have matching pre-compiled ALSA debs, but the 2.4.19 kernel-image series does. That is what I use here. I would recommend you upgrade to the 2.4.19 kernel for your machine and install the matching ALSA debs as the path of least resistance. Compiling kernels and ALSA can be a pain if you haven't done this before. Can't say anything about VMWare, but the kernel version you use shouldn't matter. Cheers, -Don Spoon- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel-source-2.4.18-bf2.4?
Donald Spoon wrote: That said, you can install a perfectly workable version of ALSA using apt-get on the pre-compiled debs in the Debian package repository. All you have to do is match the pre-compiled ALSA version with your kernel. Not all available kernels have matching pre-compiled ALSA debs, but the 2.4.19 kernel-image series does. Do you know if this is due to policy? Technical reasons? No one's gotten around to it yet? What? I'm running stock 2.4.20, and there appear to be no alsa deb for that version. Or maybe I'm just not seeing it . . . . Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
