Re: make-kpkg problem

[Wayne Topa]

Michelle Konzack([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Am 2006-10-03 17:47:26, schrieb Wayne Topa:
> > Hi all
> > 
> >   I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> >   a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> >   these errors:
> 
> 
> 
> > I have also tried different version of the kernel-package.
> > kernel-package_10.047_all.deb  kernel-package_10.052_all.deb
> > kernel-package_10.049_all.deb  kernel-package_10.054_all.deb
> > Without any success so it must be something else.
> 
> Right, you have installed kernel-package from Etch/sid in a Sarge
> System... get the right package from 
> 

On an etch/sid system.  I have been pinned to etch for a long time
now.

Thanks Michelle, I got through the packages and try to figure out what
got installed by (my) mistake.

Beat Regards

Wayne

-- 
C, n.:
  A programming language that is sort of like Pascal except more like assembly 
except that it isn't very much like either one, or anything else.  It is either 
the best language available to the art today, or it isn't.
-- Ray Simard
___


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Michelle Konzack]

Am 2006-10-03 17:47:26, schrieb Wayne Topa:
> Hi all
> 
>   I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
>   a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
>   these errors:



> I have also tried different version of the kernel-package.
> kernel-package_10.047_all.deb  kernel-package_10.052_all.deb
> kernel-package_10.049_all.deb  kernel-package_10.054_all.deb
> Without any success so it must be something else.

Right, you have installed kernel-package from Etch/sid in a Sarge
System... get the right package from 

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
   50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem (Updated info)

[Wayne Topa]

Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi all
> 
>   I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
>   a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
>   these errors:
> 
> VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.17# make-kpkg --revision 
> 1:buddy.2.2.17 --initrd kernel_image
> exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian 
> DEBIAN_REVISION=1:buddy.2.2.17  INITRD=YES
> /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:44: /ruleset/common/archvars.mk: 
> No such file or directory
> /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:45: 
> /ruleset/misc/version_vars.mk: No such file or directory
> /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:46: /ruleset/misc/defaults.mk: 
> No such file or directory
> /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:47: no file name for `-include'
> /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:48: /ruleset/misc/config.mk: No 
> such file or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target `/ruleset/misc/config.mk'.  Stop.
> Failed to create a ./debian directory: No such file or directory at 
> /usr/bin/make-kpkg line 1074.
> 
> THe same thing with 
> make-kpkg --revision 1:buddy.2.2.17 --bzimage kernel_image
> 
> I have also tried different version of the kernel-package.
> kernel-package_10.047_all.deb  kernel-package_10.052_all.deb
> kernel-package_10.049_all.deb  kernel-package_10.054_all.deb
> Without any success so it must be something else.
> 
> The kernels I tried it on are:
> linux-source-2.6.15_2.6.15-8_all.deb
> linux-source-2.6.17_2.6.17-9_all.deb
> 
> As I did not find any mention of this (Google, Debian Bugs, D-U)
> I must be doing something very wrong here.
> 


I tried kernel-package_8.135_all.deb. make-kpkg clean does not give
the above errors. The kernel compiles with --bzimage but fails if I
change to --initrd.

I must have installed some packages from the unstable branch and they
are screwing up kernel-package, somehow.  I hope it will straighten
itself out in a week or so.

Wayne

-- 
Real programmers disdain structured programming.  Structured programming 
is for compulsive neurotics who were prematurely toilet-trained.  They 
wear neckties and carefully line up pencils on otherwise clear desks.
___


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Mumia W..]

On 10/03/2006 09:35 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:

Mumia W..([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:

On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:

Hi all

 I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
 a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
 these errors:
[...]

Quick question: did you do a "make-kpkg clean" first?


Sorry about that. I shhould have mentioned that.

VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean
exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk clean
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:44: /ruleset/common/archvars.mk: 
No such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:45: /ruleset/misc/version_vars.mk: 
No such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:46: /ruleset/misc/defaults.mk: No 
such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:47: no file name for `-include'
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:48: /ruleset/misc/config.mk: No 
such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/ruleset/misc/config.mk'.  Stop.

Wayne



I'm sorry. I can only answer for the stable distribution. My 
/usr/share/kernel-package directory doesn't even have a ruleset directory.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Wayne Topa]

Mumia W..([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> >  I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> >  a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> >  these errors:
> >[...]
> 
> Quick question: did you do a "make-kpkg clean" first?

Sorry about that. I shhould have mentioned that.

VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean
exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk clean
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:44: /ruleset/common/archvars.mk: 
No such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:45: /ruleset/misc/version_vars.mk: 
No such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:46: /ruleset/misc/defaults.mk: No 
such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:47: no file name for `-include'
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:48: /ruleset/misc/config.mk: No 
such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/ruleset/misc/config.mk'.  Stop.

Wayne

-- 
Computers can never replace human stupidity.
___


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Mumia W..]

On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:

Hi all

  I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
  a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
  these errors:
[...]


Quick question: did you do a "make-kpkg clean" first?


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make-kpkg problem

[Wayne Topa]

Hi all

  I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
  a month or so.  I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
  these errors:

VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.17# make-kpkg --revision 
1:buddy.2.2.17 --initrd kernel_image
exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian 
DEBIAN_REVISION=1:buddy.2.2.17  INITRD=YES
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:44: /ruleset/common/archvars.mk: 
No such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:45: /ruleset/misc/version_vars.mk: 
No such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:46: /ruleset/misc/defaults.mk: No 
such file or directory
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:47: no file name for `-include'
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk:48: /ruleset/misc/config.mk: No 
such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/ruleset/misc/config.mk'.  Stop.
Failed to create a ./debian directory: No such file or directory at 
/usr/bin/make-kpkg line 1074.

THe same thing with 
make-kpkg --revision 1:buddy.2.2.17 --bzimage kernel_image

I have also tried different version of the kernel-package.
kernel-package_10.047_all.deb  kernel-package_10.052_all.deb
kernel-package_10.049_all.deb  kernel-package_10.054_all.deb
Without any success so it must be something else.

The kernels I tried it on are:
linux-source-2.6.15_2.6.15-8_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.17_2.6.17-9_all.deb

As I did not find any mention of this (Google, Debian Bugs, D-U)
I must be doing something very wrong here.

Thank God for the old standbys make dep ; make clean ; make etc...

Anyone have any pointers to what I have missed?

TIA

Wayne
-- 
WINDOWS stands for Will Install Needless Data On Whole System.
___


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem And Answer

[CW Harris]

On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:11:28PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Mark F. Mangano wrote:
> >Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3 
> >with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older 
> >gcc-2.95, it compiled fine.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Mark.
> >
> >
> 
> I don't think that was the problem:
> 
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314)
> 
> I have been rolling my own 2.6 kernels for months now,
> and gcc 3.3 hasn't had a single problem.  You may want
> to investigate further.

I also noticed problems akin to this the first time I tried (a stock
kernel.org 2.6.1) 2.6 kernel.  I changed the Makefile to use 2.95 and it
works fine.  Also, the current Documentation/Changes file recommends
2.95 still (although gcc 3.x seems to have progessed since this was last
updated).  FWIW I think it was gcc 3.3-1 that I was using, so not as new
as yours.

(from Documentation/Changes):

The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.x (x >= 3), and it
should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.0.x
instead if you wish, although it may cause problems. Later versions of gcc 
have not received much testing for Linux kernel compilation, and there are 
almost certainly bugs (mainly, but not exclusively, in the kernel) that
will need to be fixed in order to use these compilers. In any case, using
pgcc instead of plain gcc is just asking for trouble.


-- 

Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
GNU/Linux --- The best things in life are free.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem And Answer

[Roberto Sanchez]

Mark F. Mangano wrote:
Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3 
with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older 
gcc-2.95, it compiled fine.

Thanks,
Mark.

I don't think that was the problem:

$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314)
I have been rolling my own 2.6 kernels for months now,
and gcc 3.3 hasn't had a single problem.  You may want
to investigate further.
-Roberto


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem And Answer

[Mark F. Mangano]

Mark F. Mangano wrote:
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of Mark F. Mangano told:


Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:

as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'


Why? The Debaian package kernel-source-2.6.3 is patched with
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3 ;-) The patched can be applied to a
vanilla-kernel from kernel.org.
Try with out patching ;-)
Ciao

Elimar


Tried without patching; same error. Looking at 
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h, the lines in question all refer 
to va_list (actually, error msgs say the error is before va_list):

extern int vsprintf(char *buf, const char *, va_list);
extern int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list 
args);
extern int vsscanf(const char *, const char *, va_list);

This any help??? Again, any help is appreciated,

Mark.


Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3 
with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older 
gcc-2.95, it compiled fine.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem

[Mark F. Mangano]

Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of 
Mark F. Mangano told:


Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:

as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'


Why? The Debaian package kernel-source-2.6.3 is patched with
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3 ;-) The patched can be applied to a
vanilla-kernel from kernel.org.
Try with out patching ;-)
Ciao

Elimar


Tried without patching; same error. Looking at 
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h, the lines in question all refer 
to va_list (actually, error msgs say the error is before va_list):

extern int vsprintf(char *buf, const char *, va_list);
extern int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list args);
extern int vsscanf(const char *, const char *, va_list);
This any help??? Again, any help is appreciated,

Mark.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem

[Elimar Riesebieter]

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of 
Mark F. Mangano told:

> Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:
> 
> as root:
> 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
> 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
> 'cd /usr/src'
> 'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
> 'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'

Why? The Debaian package kernel-source-2.6.3 is patched with
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3 ;-) The patched can be applied to a
vanilla-kernel from kernel.org.
Try with out patching ;-)

Ciao

Elimar


-- 
  It's a good thing we don't get all 
  the government we pay for.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Kernel make-kpkg problem

[Mark F. Mangano]

Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:

as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'
'cp /boot/config-2.6.1.b02082004 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3/.config'
'make-kpkg clean'
'make-kpkg --config=menuconfig --append_to_version=a03132004 kernel_image'
Menuconfig runs, then compiling starts and errors out with:
include /linux/kernel.h:10:20 stdarg.h: no such file or directory
In file included from include/asm/system.h:5,
 from include/asm/processor.h:18,
 from include/linux/prefetch.h:13,
 from include/linux/list.h:7,
 from include/linux/signal.h:4,
 from arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
include/linux/kernel.h:71: error: parse error before "va_list"
include/linux/kernel.h:71: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
include/linux/kernel.h:74: error: parse error before "va_list"
include/linux/kernel.h:74: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
include/linux/kernel.h:78: error: parse error before "va_list"
include/linux/kernel.h:78: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
make[2]: ***[arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[1]: ***[arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3'
make: ***[stamp-kernel-configure] Error 2
I had been able to make-kpkg without problem multiple times as I tweaked 
  my .config over the past few weeks with 2.6.0 2.6.1 and previously 
with the 2.4 kernels. Now if I try to recompile older sources I get 
similar errors, so I'm figuring there's something wrong with make-kpkg.

Any ideas would be vastly appreciated.
Mark.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kernel make-kpkg problem

[Mark F. Mangano]

Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:

as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'
'cp /boot/config-2.6.1.b02082004 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3/.config'
'make-kpkg clean'
'make-kpkg --config=menuconfig --append_to_version=a03132004 kernel_image'
Menuconfig runs, then compiling starts and errors out with:
include /linux/kernel.h:10:20 stdarg.h: no such file or directory
In file included from include/asm/system.h:5,
 from include/asm/processor.h:18,
 from include/linux/prefetch.h:13,
 from include/linux/list.h:7,
 from include/linux/signal.h:4,
 from arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
include/linux/kernel.h:71: error: parse error before "va_list"
include/linux/kernel.h:71: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
include/linux/kernel.h:74: error: parse error before "va_list"
include/linux/kernel.h:74: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
include/linux/kernel.h:78: error: parse error before "va_list"
include/linux/kernel.h:78: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
make[2]: ***[arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[1]: ***[arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3'
make: ***[stamp-kernel-configure] Error 2
I had been able to make-kpkg without problem multiple times as I tweaked 
  my .config over the past few weeks with 2.6.0 2.6.1 and previously 
with the 2.4 kernels. Now if I try to recompile older sources I get 
similar errors, so I'm figuring there's something wrong with make-kpkg.

Any ideas would be vastly appreciated.
Mark.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Steve Mayer]

Ritesh,

  I believe that all this info is held in the stamp-* files in the root
  of the kernel source.  When you do a make-kpkg clean do these files
  get removed?  If not, remove them and try your command again.

Steve

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:28:21AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Thanks for your reply. It was really helpful.
> One more stupid question.
> I hit `make-kpkg kernel_image --initrd`
> later if I hit `make-kpkg kernel_image --initrd
> - --append_to_version=compact` or anything meaningful I get errors like
> this:
> "The changelog says we are creating 2.6.3, but I thought the version is
> 2.6.3compact. make: *** [stamp-debian] Error 1"
> 
> Is it that once the name set we can't change or is there some way. I
> tried `make-kpkg clean` etc but none work. The only solution I find
> presently is to:
> rm -rf $KERNEL_SOURCE_DIR && tar -jxvf $KERNEL_SOURCE_FILE
> 
> Please forgive me if this annoys you people much.
> 
> rrs
> 
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Steve Mayer wrote:
> 
> > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:14:47 -0800
> > From: Steve Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: make-kpkg problem
> > Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:29 -0600 (CST)
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Ritesh,
> >
> >   Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:
> >
> >   do_clean:=No
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:16:50AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >   One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel 
> > > images in .deb . Now everytime the kernel image is created, make-kpkg seems to 
> > > clean up the build directory. If I missed something, I'm supposed to start of 
> > > from the very beginning. Is there any option to pass on to make-kpkg, telling it 
> > > not to clean the build directory while it creates the kernel_image file.
> > >
> > > rrs
> >
> >
> >
> > =
> > Steve Mayer Oracle Corporation
> > Project Lead1211 SW 5th Ave.
> > Portland Development Center Suite 900
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Portland, OR 97204
> > Phone:  503-525-3127
> > =
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf Email: rrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] researchut.com
> Web: http://www.researchut.comPhone: +91-9899655651
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
> 
> iD8DBQFAT4+E4Rhi6gTxMLwRAploAKCFmsZQluCZ1wWbBus+igEQlgqI1QCePpOl
> NJuSQjgl6CGzq/NkfrK+Fv4=
> =zlFn
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 

=
Steve Mayer Oracle Corporation
Project Lead1211 SW 5th Ave.
Portland Development Center Suite 900
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Portland, OR 97204 
Phone:  503-525-3127
=


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for your reply. It was really helpful.
One more stupid question.
I hit `make-kpkg kernel_image --initrd`
later if I hit `make-kpkg kernel_image --initrd
- --append_to_version=compact` or anything meaningful I get errors like
this:
"The changelog says we are creating 2.6.3, but I thought the version is
2.6.3compact. make: *** [stamp-debian] Error 1"

Is it that once the name set we can't change or is there some way. I
tried `make-kpkg clean` etc but none work. The only solution I find
presently is to:
rm -rf $KERNEL_SOURCE_DIR && tar -jxvf $KERNEL_SOURCE_FILE

Please forgive me if this annoys you people much.

rrs

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Steve Mayer wrote:

> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:14:47 -0800
> From: Steve Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: make-kpkg problem
> Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:29 -0600 (CST)
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ritesh,
>
>   Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:
>
>   do_clean:=No
>
> Steve
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:16:50AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel 
> > images in .deb . Now everytime the kernel image is created, make-kpkg seems to 
> > clean up the build directory. If I missed something, I'm supposed to start of from 
> > the very beginning. Is there any option to pass on to make-kpkg, telling it not to 
> > clean the build directory while it creates the kernel_image file.
> >
> > rrs
>
>
>
> =
> Steve Mayer   Oracle Corporation
> Project Lead  1211 SW 5th Ave.
> Portland Development Center   Suite 900
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Portland, OR 97204
> Phone:  503-525-3127
> =
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Ritesh Raj Sarraf   Email: rrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] researchut.com
Web: http://www.researchut.com  Phone: +91-9899655651
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFAT4+E4Rhi6gTxMLwRAploAKCFmsZQluCZ1wWbBus+igEQlgqI1QCePpOl
NJuSQjgl6CGzq/NkfrK+Fv4=
=zlFn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Steve Mayer]

Ritesh,

  Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:

  do_clean:=No

Steve

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:16:50AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
>   One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel 
> images in .deb . Now everytime the kernel image is created, make-kpkg seems to clean 
> up the build directory. If I missed something, I'm supposed to start of from the 
> very beginning. Is there any option to pass on to make-kpkg, telling it not to clean 
> the build directory while it creates the kernel_image file.
> 
> rrs



=
Steve Mayer Oracle Corporation
Project Lead1211 SW 5th Ave.
Portland Development Center Suite 900
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Portland, OR 97204 
Phone:  503-525-3127
=


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make-kpkg problem

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

Hello all,
One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel 
images in .deb . Now everytime the kernel image is created, make-kpkg seems to clean 
up the build directory. If I missed something, I'm supposed to start of from the very 
beginning. Is there any option to pass on to make-kpkg, telling it not to clean the 
build directory while it creates the kernel_image file.

rrs


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Joel]

Colin Watson wrote:


On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:25:28AM +0800, Joel wrote:
 


Colin Watson wrote:
   


That looks like gcc isn't installed.
 


$ gcc --version
3.0.2

thanks anyway.
   



Do you have the environment variable $CC set to something else? What
does the following print?

 ${CC:-gcc} --print-libgcc-file-name


OK. It was not set.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ $ export CC=gcc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ${CC:-gcc} --print-libgcc-file-name
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0.2/libgcc.a

then I rerun

$ make-kpkg clean

.SAME RESULTS


Having gcc 3.0.2 as the default /usr/bin/gcc suggests you're not using
Debian's normal gcc setup, so something may still be awry.

You are right. I had originally installed potato rev 3. I have a very 
limited and slow internet connection and cannot
do an upgrade via the NET. What I can do is download individual packages 
and sometimes copy somewhere other

than a Debian source(for apt) and install them.
So what I have now installed is

$ dpkg --list | grep gcc

ri gcc 2.95.4-6 The GNU C compiler.
ri gcc-2.95 2.95.4-0.01090 The GNU C compiler.
ii gcc-3.0 3.0.2-0pre0109 The GNU C compiler.
ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0.2-0pre0109 The GNU Compiler Collection (base package).
ri libgcc1 3.0.2-0pre0109 GCC support library.
ri libgcc300 3.0-0pre010403 Shared libgcc.

 and I created a symlink

/usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-3.0

Anyway, this is just an exercise for me(the "mk-kpkg" thing). Thank you 
so much for your patience.


I am never giving up though. Any hints as to solve this is greatly 
appreciated.


Thanks a lot, Colin Watson.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Colin Watson]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:25:28AM +0800, Joel wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >That looks like gcc isn't installed.
> 
> $ gcc --version
> 3.0.2
> 
> thanks anyway.

Do you have the environment variable $CC set to something else? What
does the following print?

  ${CC:-gcc} --print-libgcc-file-name

This is essentially what dpkg does to find the architecture, and the
"not in remapping table" message indicates that that's gone wrong.

Having gcc 3.0.2 as the default /usr/bin/gcc suggests you're not using
Debian's normal gcc setup, so something may still be awry.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Joel]

Colin Watson wrote:


That looks like gcc isn't installed.
 


$ gcc --version
3.0.2

thanks anyway.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Joel]

Ulf Rompe wrote:

Your architecture seems to be misrecognized. 


do you have any idea how do I correct this?

$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386

If you aren't able to


figure out why, you may want to force a correct name by setting it
yourself: 


make-kpkg --arch i386 clean
[x] ulf
 


ok.

but continuing...

$ fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=i386 --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image

[ ... ]
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux'
test -f stamp-configure || /usr/bin/make -f 
/usr/share/kernel-package/rules configure

/usr/bin/make   ARCH=i386   \
   CROSS_COMPILE=i386-linux- bzImage
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux/scripts'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux/scripts'
scripts/split-include include/linux/autoconf.h include/config
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux/init'
i386-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ 
-I/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux/include -Wall 
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe  -march=i686
-DKBUILD_BASENAME=main  -c -o main.o main.c

/bin/sh: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
make[2]: *** [main.o] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux/init'
make[1]: *** [init] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.19/linux'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2

- - - - end


thanks for the help.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Colin Watson]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:51:52PM +0800, Joel wrote:
> i tried to compile package a custom built kernel and encountered this error.
> 
> - - - - - - - start
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux$ make-kpkg clean
> dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
> rm -f modules/modversions.h modules/ksyms.ver debian/files stamp-build 
> stamp-configure stamp-source stamp-image stamp-headers stamp-src stamp-diff 
> stamp-doc stamp-buildpackage stamp-libc-kheaders stamp-debian
> test ! -f .config || cp -pf .config config.precious
> test -f Makefile && /usr/bin/make  ARCH=i386-none distclean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux'
> Makefile:247: arch/i386-none/Makefile: No such file or directory

That looks like gcc isn't installed.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Ulf Rompe]

Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> i tried to compile package a custom built kernel and encountered
> this error.
[...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux$ make-kpkg clean
> dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table

Your architecture seems to be misrecognized. If you aren't able to
figure out why, you may want to force a correct name by setting it
yourself: 

make-kpkg --arch i386 clean

This is normally used for cross compiling. Of course it would be
better to find the real reason for your problem.

[x] ulf

-- 
If at first you don't succeed, try management.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make-kpkg problem

[Joel]

i tried to compile package a custom built kernel and encountered this error.

- - - - - - - start

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux$ make-kpkg clean
dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
rm -f modules/modversions.h modules/ksyms.ver debian/files stamp-build 
stamp-configure stamp-source stamp-image stamp-headers stamp-src stamp-diff 
stamp-doc stamp-buildpackage stamp-libc-kheaders stamp-debian
test ! -f .config || cp -pf .config config.precious
test -f Makefile && /usr/bin/make  ARCH=i386-none distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux'
Makefile:247: arch/i386-none/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `arch/i386-none/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
test ! -f config.precious || mv -f config.precious .config
rm -rf debian/tmp-source debian/tmp-headers debian/tmp-image
test -f stamp-building || test -f debian/official || rm -rf debian

- - - end
$ make-kpkg -version

Version: $Revision: 1.39.2.1 $
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

$ uname -a
Linux platinum 2.5.6 #1 Thu Mar 21 12:51:54 PHT 2002 i686 unknown




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make-kpkg problem?

[Lance Simmons]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 06:31:17PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> 
> try doing a make-kpkg clean and then starting it again.  Remember that
> after a clean you must run it with the --revision switch if you want
> to add a revision (and you do want to add a revision).

Thanks. I had done the make-kpkg clean, but wasn't adding a revision.
The revision gave an error message the reminded me I'd forgotten to
delete the debian/official file.

-- 
Lance Simmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: make-kpkg problem?

[Sean 'Shaleh' Perry]

> 
> Does anyone know what this means? I've been using make-kpkg for over a
> year with no problems, but this started happening a week or so ago.
> 

try doing a make-kpkg clean and then starting it again.  Remember that after a
clean you must run it with the --revision switch if you want to add a revision
(and you do want to add a revision).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make-kpkg problem?

[Lance Simmons]

make-kpkg keeps dying on me. I've tried several different kernel-source
packages, but they all seem to die in pretty much the same way:

When I run

  fakeroot make-kpkg kernel_image

make-kpkg runs through the kernel configuration, and then does this:

  *** End of Linux kernel configuration.
  *** Check the top-level Makefile for additional configuration.
  *** Next, you must run 'make dep'.

  make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.10-2.4.10'
  /usr/bin/make -f ./debian/rules dummy_do_dep
  make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.10-2.4.10'
  make[1]: *** No rule to make target `dummy_do_dep'.  Stop.
  make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.10-2.4.10'
  make: *** [stamp-kernel-configure] Error 2

Does anyone know what this means? I've been using make-kpkg for over a
year with no problems, but this started happening a week or so ago.

-- 
 .~.
 /V\   Lance Simmons
/( )\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^-^^


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make-kpkg problem

[Larry Holish]

I just upgraded from slink to potato rather successfully.  I am having
a problem upgrading my kernel from 2.0.38 to 2.2.17.  I installed
kernel-package, and grabbed the Debian kernel-source-2.2.17 package,
unzipped/untarred it from /usr/src, creating the new directory
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17.  Then ran these commands:

# ln -s kernel-source-2.2.17 linux
# cd linux
# make config
# make-kpkg clean
# make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image

Here is the last few lines of output from the last command:

make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17/arch/i386/lib'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17'
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing \
-o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `include/linux/autoconf.h', \
needed by `include/config/MARKER'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
#

I am using gcc 2.95.2-13, and kernel-package 7.04.potato.3.  I have
read thru the README and Problems files in the kernel-package docs,
but have not found a clue for this.  Any help would be appreciated.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Larry Holish[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

make-kpkg problem

[Larry Holish]

I just upgraded from slink to potato rather successfully.  I am having
a problem upgrading my kernel from 2.0.38 to 2.2.17pre6-1.  I
installed kernel-package, and grabbed kernel-source-2.2.17,
unzipped/untarred it from /usr/src, creating the new directory
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17.  Then ran these commands:

# ln -s kernel-source-2.2.17 linux
# cd linux
# make config
# make-kpkg clean
# make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image

Here is the last few lines of output from the last command:

make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17/arch/i386/lib'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17'
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing \
-o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `include/linux/autoconf.h', \
needed by `include/config/MARKER'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
#

I am using gcc 2.95.2-13, and kernel-package 7.04.potato.3.  I have
read thru the README and Problems files in the kernel-package docs,
but have not found a clue for this.  Any help would be appreciated.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Larry Holish[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Manoj Srivastava]

Hi,

Yes, this is th expected behaviour. make-kpkg clean should
 always be done before building a new kernel, and make-kpkg makes sure
 to always re-institute the include/asm link during the build.

make-kpkg dep is not required (it is not a valid argument
 anyway).

Why would one want the asm link any way (apart from while
 building the kernel, which is taken care of)?

manoj
-- 
 It's great to be smart 'cause then you know stuff.
Manoj Srivastava   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mobile, Alabama USAhttp://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: make-kpkg problem

[Buddha Buck]

> 
> I extracted kernel-source-2.0.30_2.0.30-7.deb so that I can home-brew a
> kernel.  There is a problem in that when I do a "make-kpkg clean" it
> actually does a "make mrproper" and amongst other things I lose my
> include/asm link.  A "make clean" works as expected.

What include/asm link?

If you are talking about a link from /usr/include/asm to 
/usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 and from /usr/include/linux to 
/usr/src/linux/include/linux, etc, then the solution is simple:  Those 
links should never have been made in the first place.  The README that 
comes with the kernel sources is in error.

The issue is discussed in the libc5-dev or libc6-dev packages' 
FAQ.Debian file in the /usr/doc hierarchy.  If you have the libc5 or 
libc6 development packages installed, check the FAQ.  Even Linus 
himself now says that while those links were a good idea at one point, 
they no longer are, and with libc6, they are -decidedly- the wrong 
thing to do.

For libc6, the API to the library and the API to the kernel were 
intentionally divided, so that the library could provide support for 
services the kernel doesn't yet have -- but will -- without breaking 
programs that need to use those services (example:  libc6 has support 
for more than 32 signals.  The kernel interface allows only 32 signals. 
 When the kernel allows more than 32 signals, all you have to do is 
update your libc6, not recompile every program in existence because a 
very common, fundamental, data structure changed).  Making those links 
could cause programs compiled under libc6 fail, because they are using 
the wrong interfaces.

If that wasn't the include/asm link you were referring to, I apologize 
for subjecting you to this rant.


If you made those links, you might want to re-install the libc 
development package so the proper
> 
> Is this intended?  I have looked at the code but cannot spot the reason
> for this behaviour.  Using kernel-package_3.35.
> 
> The docs say nothing about "make-kpkg dep".  What is the correct
> procedure here?
> 
> Lindsay
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Lindsay Allen   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Perth, Western Australia
> voice +61 8 9316 2486modem +61 8 9364-9832  32S, 116E
> http:  http://rolf.ece.curtin.edu.au/~lindsay   debian linux
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
> Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
> 

-- 
 Buddha Buck  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our
liberty depends upon the chaos and cacaphony of the unfettered speech
the First Amendment protects."  -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

make-kpkg problem

[Lindsay Allen]

I extracted kernel-source-2.0.30_2.0.30-7.deb so that I can home-brew a
kernel.  There is a problem in that when I do a "make-kpkg clean" it
actually does a "make mrproper" and amongst other things I lose my
include/asm link.  A "make clean" works as expected.

Is this intended?  I have looked at the code but cannot spot the reason
for this behaviour.  Using kernel-package_3.35.

The docs say nothing about "make-kpkg dep".  What is the correct
procedure here?

Lindsay
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lindsay Allen   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Perth, Western Australia
voice +61 8 9316 2486modem +61 8 9364-9832  32S, 116E
http:  http://rolf.ece.curtin.edu.au/~lindsay   debian linux
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .