message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze
>From a private message; From: C P Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:30:55 -0400 > Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list > threading? Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message being replied to. In the Web archive, the Follow-Ups and References seem OK. Can anyone tell me what other parameter might be required to "fix" threading as Chuck says? And, yes, I'll document the explanation in http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists. Thanks, ... Peter E. -- Telephone 1 360 450 2132. bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca Shop pages http://carnot.yi.org/ accessible as long as the old drives survive. Personal pages http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/ . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057043.62457.41832@heaviside.invalid
Re: message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze
peasth...@shaw.ca writes: >>From a private message; > From: C P > Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:30:55 -0400 >> Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list >> threading? > > Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message > being replied to. In the Web archive, the Follow-Ups and References > seem OK. Can anyone tell me what other parameter might be required > to "fix" threading as Chuck says? Your threading is displayed fine here with gnus. You don´t seem to have any "References:" headers, and in <171057043.52499.41831@heaviside.invalid>, you have "in-reply-to" instead of "In-Reply-To". The message I´m replying to is correctly displayed as the top of a new thread. If it´s supposed to be part of the thread that starts with <171057043.43873.41829@heaviside.invalid>, your threading is actually broken. Your MUA should get it right automatically by default; what are you using? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uypfn4s@yun.yagibdah.de
Re: message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze
On 06/19/2011 06:15 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: From a private message; From: C P Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:30:55 -0400 Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list threading? Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message being replied to. In the Web archive, the Follow-Ups and References seem OK. Can anyone tell me what other parameter might be required to "fix" threading as Chuck says? And, yes, I'll document the explanation in http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists. Your MUA should do it automatically. Maybe that 8 year ld version of Oberon Mail doesn't have that feature? -- "Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt." Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfe853f.9040...@cox.net
Re: message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:15:57 -0800, peasthope wrote: >> Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list >> threading? > > Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message > being replied to. In the Web archive, the Follow-Ups and References > seem OK. Can anyone tell me what other parameter might be required to > "fix" threading as Chuck says? (...) I see nothing broken :-? http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/06/thrd4.html#01594 Your MUA seems to add an extra (n) number to the subject but it respects the threading. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.06.20.11.38...@gmail.com
Re (2): message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze
From: lee Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:54:27 +0200 > You donA't seem to have any "References:" headers, ... Should the References trace back to the beginning of the thread? In principle, the list processor could copy the References from the referenced message and append the id of that message. I don't know how it actually works. > ... "in-reply-to" instead of "In-Reply-To". RIght oh; according to RFC 5322 the parameter names in the header are case sensitive. > The message IA'm replying to is correctly displayed as the top of a new > thread. Yes, I intended to start a new thread on "message threading". Hence the subject "message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze". Thanks, ... Peter E. -- Telephone 1 360 450 2132. bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca Shop pages http://carnot.yi.org/ accessible as long as the old drives survive. Personal pages http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/ . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057043.68097.41835@heaviside.invalid
