Re (4): name - address resolution

2010-03-03 Thread peasthope
Andrei,

*   Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:07:09 +0200 you wrote,
 Try adding a line like
 
 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx   joule.invalid   joule

Right oh.  That works.

pe...@joule:~$ cat /etc/hosts | grep 172.23.3.1
172.23.3.1  joule.invalid   joule
pe...@joule:~$ host joule
joule has address 172.23.3.1
pe...@joule:~$ host joule.invalid
joule.invalid has address 172.23.3.1

But until about a month back that was unnecessary.
host joule would report the address which DHCP 
had assigned to the interface connected to the ISP.
Is this a new normal behaviour?  Is something broken?

 I don't recall your network topology

In case anyone is interested.
  http://carnot.yi.org/NetworksPage.html
A diagram is cited there.

Thanks,  ... Peter E.






-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056419.36372.353...@cantor.invalid



Re: Re (2): name - address resolution

2010-02-23 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,22.Feb.10, 09:56:36, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
 Andrei,
 
 Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:35:43 +0200 andreimpope...@gmail.co wrote,
  What does your /etc/hosts file look like?
 
 Now visible.
   http://carnot.yi.org/joule.hosts
 With the link to the ISP configured by dhcp, 
 the only address for joule is the good old 127.0.0.1.  

Try adding a line like

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx joule.invalid   joule

with the proper IP (sorry, I don't recall you network topology) and 
restart dnsmasq. This works for me on several machines with dnsmasq as 
DNS cacher/DHCP server.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re (2): name - address resolution

2010-02-22 Thread peasthope
Andrei,

Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:35:43 +0200 andreimpope...@gmail.co wrote,
 What does your /etc/hosts file look like?

Now visible.
  http://carnot.yi.org/joule.hosts
With the link to the ISP configured by dhcp, 
the only address for joule is the good old 127.0.0.1.  

Incidentally, is there a reason for 127.0.0.1 
to be in /etc/hosts rather than in a *.h file?

Regards,... Peter E.


-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056406.40484.374...@heaviside.invalid



name - address resolution

2010-02-20 Thread peasthope
I'm reposting this question with answers to questions 
from Alex Samad organized better.  This problem 
appeared after an update of Squeeze on 
February 7 or 8.  

Joule is a router with network access by a 
dhcp configured link.  dnsmasq and resolvconf 
worked for months with no problem.  Now the 
machine doesn't resolve its own name.  Other 
names inside and outside the LAN are still 
resolved.  

  pe...@joule:~$ cat /etc/hostname
  joule
  pe...@joule:~$ host joule
  Host joule not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
  pe...@joule:~$ host joule.invalid
  Host joule.invalid not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
  pe...@joule:~$ host dalton
  dalton has address 142.103.107.137

This is the last message to the console at startup.

  apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain 
name,
  using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName

Also I wonder whether a problem with qpopper 
derives from this name-address problem.

Results are the same with kernels 2.6.30-2-686 
and 2.6.32-trunk-686.

Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:04:53 +1100, Alex Samad wrote,
as I presume you are on joule and it has dnsmasq + resolvconf installed on it.

Yes. 

as can you 
as cat /etc/resolv.conf*

  pe...@joule:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf*
  # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
  # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
  nameserver 127.0.0.1
  search pi.shawcable.net

as kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof dnsmasq) ; tail -n 40 /var/log/syslog | grep 
  dnsmas | tail -n 4

  joule:/home/peter# kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof dnsmasq) ; tail -n 40 
/var/log/syslog |
grep dnsmas | tail -n 4
  Feb 20 16:01:31 joule dnsmasq[2070]: queries forwarded 29, queries answered 
loca
lly 24
  Feb 20 16:01:31 joule dnsmasq[2070]: server 64.59.160.13#53: queries sent 12, 
re
tried or failed 0
  Feb 20 16:01:31 joule dnsmasq[2070]: server 64.59.160.15#53: queries sent 26, 
re
tried or failed 0
  Feb 20 16:01:31 joule dnsmasq[2070]: server 64.59.144.19#53: queries sent 15, 
re
tried or failed 0

as and maybe cat dnsmasq.conf

Visible here.
  http://carnot.yi.org/joule.dnsmasq.conf
It's the installed default with a few comment lines added.

Any further ideas?

Thanks,  ... Peter E.


-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056404.70261.629...@heaviside.invalid



Re: name - address resolution

2010-02-20 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sat,20.Feb.10, 17:09:53, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
 I'm reposting this question with answers to questions 
 from Alex Samad organized better.  This problem 
 appeared after an update of Squeeze on 
 February 7 or 8.  
 
 Joule is a router with network access by a 
 dhcp configured link.  dnsmasq and resolvconf 
 worked for months with no problem.  Now the 
 machine doesn't resolve its own name.  Other 
 names inside and outside the LAN are still 
 resolved.  
 
What does your /etc/hosts file look like?

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re (2): name - address resolution

2010-02-16 Thread peasthope
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:04:53 +1100, Alex Samad wrote,
as I presume you are on joule and it has dnsmasq + resolvconf installed on it.

Yes.  In this instance, telneted to Joule via an openvpn tunnel.

as can you 
as cat /etc/resolv.conf*

Last login: Mon Feb 15 17:23:57 PST 2010 on tty1
Linux joule 2.6.32-trunk-686 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 06:32:16 UTC 2010 i686
   ...
joule:/home/peter# cat /etc/resolv.conf*
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search pi.shawcable.net

as kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof dnsmasq) ; tail -n 40 /var/log/syslog | grep 
  dnsmas | tail -n 4

joule:/home/peter# kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof dnsmasq) ; tail -n 40 /var/log/syslog 
|  grep dnsmas | tail -n 4
Feb 16 15:54:38 joule dnsmasq[1843]: queries forwarded 1939, queries answered 
locally 1832
Feb 16 15:54:38 joule dnsmasq[1843]: server 64.59.160.13#53: queries sent 1907, 
retried or failed 3
Feb 16 15:54:38 joule dnsmasq[1843]: server 64.59.160.15#53: queries sent 1915, 
retried or failed 3
Feb 16 15:54:38 joule dnsmasq[1843]: server 64.59.144.19#53: queries sent 1879, 
retried or failed 0

as and maybe cat dnsmasq.conf

joule:/home/peter# cat dnsmasq.conf
cat: dnsmasq.conf: No such file or directory
joule:/home/peter# 

The failed queries could be Joule asking for his own address; 
but this should not happen.

Thanks,   ... Peter E.


-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056400.66350.640...@cantor.invalid



correction for dnsmasq.conf; was Re (2): name - address resolution

2010-02-16 Thread peasthope
Alex,

as ... and maybe cat dnsmasq.conf

Sorry; I was halucinating in the previous reply.  The dnsmasq.conf 
on Joule is now visible here.
http://carnot.yi.org/joule.dnsmasq.conf

Regards,... Peter E.


-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056400.71032.697...@cantor.invalid



name - address resolution

2010-02-15 Thread peasthope
This is another problem which appeared after an 
update of Squeeze on February 7 or 8.  

Joule is a router.  dnsmasq and resolvconf 
have worked for months with no problem.  
Now the machine doesn't recognize its local 
name.  Other names inside and outside the 
LAN are still resolved.  For example, 
  telnet://pe...@172.23.5.1
and 
  telnet://pe...@joule.yi.org
work but 
  telnet://pe...@joule
and 
  telnet://pe...@joule.invalid
fail.

telnet://pe...@172.23.5.1 gets these lines in the syslog.
Feb 15 12:47:10 joule in.telnetd[2885]: connect from 172.23.5.2 (172.23.5.2)
Feb 15 12:47:10 joule telnetd[2885]: doit: getaddrinfo: Name or service not 
known

This is the last message to the console at startup.
apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name,
using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName

Also I wonder whether a problem with qpopper 
derives from this name problem.

Results are the same with kernels 2.6.30-2-686 
and 2.6.32-trunk-686.

/etc/hosts has the name of the machine.  
Where is the domain name recorded?  
Why does this problem appear now?

Thanks,   ... Peter E.





-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056399.62578.567...@heaviside.invalid



correction, Re: name - address resolution

2010-02-15 Thread peasthope
The third to last sentence should have been,
/etc/hostname has the name of the machine.

... Peter E.


-- 
Google pathology workshop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171056399.63286.567...@heaviside.invalid



Re: name - address resolution

2010-02-15 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:17:50PM -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
 This is another problem which appeared after an 
 update of Squeeze on February 7 or 8.  
 
 Joule is a router.  dnsmasq and resolvconf 
 have worked for months with no problem.  
 Now the machine doesn't recognize its local 
 name.  Other names inside and outside the 
 LAN are still resolved.  For example, 
   telnet://pe...@172.23.5.1
 and 
   telnet://pe...@joule.yi.org
 work but 
   telnet://pe...@joule
 and 
   telnet://pe...@joule.invalid
 fail.
 
 telnet://pe...@172.23.5.1 gets these lines in the syslog.
 Feb 15 12:47:10 joule in.telnetd[2885]: connect from 172.23.5.2 (172.23.5.2)
 Feb 15 12:47:10 joule telnetd[2885]: doit: getaddrinfo: Name or service not 
 known
 
 This is the last message to the console at startup.
 apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain 
 name,
 using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
 
 Also I wonder whether a problem with qpopper 
 derives from this name problem.
 
 Results are the same with kernels 2.6.30-2-686 
 and 2.6.32-trunk-686.
 
 /etc/hosts has the name of the machine.  
 Where is the domain name recorded?  
 Why does this problem appear now?


I presume you are on joule and it has dnsmasq + resolvconf installed on
it.

can you 
cat /etc/resolv.conf*

kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof dnsmasq) ; tail -n 40 /var/log/syslog | grep
dnsmas | tail -n 4

and maybe cat dnsmasq.conf

 
 Thanks,   ... Peter E.
 
 
 
 
 

-- 
The United States and Russia are in the midst of transformationed relationship 
that will yield peace and progress.

- George W. Bush
11/13/2001
Washington, DC


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature