Re: packages being kept back during upgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:10:30AM -0800, Joris Huizer wrote:
 Hello everybody,
 
 I've upgraded my (stable) debian machine some days ago

Um, no, you're not running stable.  Not stock stable, anyway.  Neither
OpenOffice nor GTK2/GNOME2 are in woody.  Where are you getting these
from?  I'm almost certain they're causing the problem here.

[snip]

 Reading Package Lists... Done
 Building Dependency Tree... Done
 The following packages have been kept back
   gconf2 libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common
 libgail-common libgail17
   libgconf2-4 libgnome2-0 libgnomecanvas2-0
 libgnomeui-0 libgnomevfs2-0
   libgnomevfs2-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common
 libgtkhtml2-0
   libpanel-applet2-0 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common
 libwnck4
   openoffice.org-bin openoffice.org-debian-files
 openoffice.org-l10n-en
   xlibmesa-dev yelp 
 3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove
 and 23  not upgraded.
 Need to get 643kB of archives. After unpacking 81.9kB
 will be used.

[snip]

-- 
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ertius.org/


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: packages being kept back during upgrade

2003-02-24 Thread Joris Huizer

--- James Tappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:38:10 -0500
 Josh Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  If so, it probably means that the packages that
 were kept back conflict
  with some other package on your system that would
 need to be removed to
  upgrade these.  To see which one, do
  
  apt-get -s dist-upgrade
  
  the dist-upgrade will remove the necessary
 packages to satisfy the
  conflicts. the -s option makes apt-get pretend to
 do this, so you can
  see what package(s) will be removed.
 
 Alternatively
 apt-get -u dist-upgrade
 Will list the packages to be removed, and those to
 be added as well as
 those to upgrade and then ask whether you want to go
 ahead.
 
 James
 

Well... I tried both ways, but they did not work -
apt-get replied the same again, keeping back those
packages and then telling nothing will be done;

I suspect these packages might in fact be of unstable
- which would be why apt-get refuses to touch them.
Is there a way to check this? - Because I'm not at all
sure of this.

Thanks,

Joris Huizer

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



packages being kept back during upgrade

2003-02-23 Thread Joris Huizer
Hello everybody,

I've upgraded my (stable) debian machine some days ago
- and again to be sure - but it looks like some
packages are allways 'kept back'. This is the exact
output I just got:

--

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
  gconf2 libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common
libgail-common libgail17
  libgconf2-4 libgnome2-0 libgnomecanvas2-0
libgnomeui-0 libgnomevfs2-0
  libgnomevfs2-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common
libgtkhtml2-0
  libpanel-applet2-0 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common
libwnck4
  openoffice.org-bin openoffice.org-debian-files
openoffice.org-l10n-en
  xlibmesa-dev yelp 
3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove
and 23  not upgraded.
Need to get 643kB of archives. After unpacking 81.9kB
will be used.

--

What does it mean - and, should I do something to
solve it ?

Thanks for any input,

Joris Huizer

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: packages being kept back during upgrade

2003-02-23 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:10 am, Joris Huizer wrote:
...
 I've upgraded my (stable) debian machine some days ago
 - and again to be sure - but it looks like some
 packages are allways 'kept back'. This is the exact
 output I just got:

 --

 Reading Package Lists... Done
 Building Dependency Tree... Done
 The following packages have been kept back
   gconf2 libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common
 libgail-common libgail17
   libgconf2-4 libgnome2-0 libgnomecanvas2-0
 libgnomeui-0 libgnomevfs2-0
   libgnomevfs2-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common
 libgtkhtml2-0
   libpanel-applet2-0 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common
 libwnck4
   openoffice.org-bin openoffice.org-debian-files
 openoffice.org-l10n-en
   xlibmesa-dev yelp
 3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove
 and 23  not upgraded.
 Need to get 643kB of archives. After unpacking 81.9kB
 will be used.

 --

 What does it mean - and, should I do something to
 solve it ?

 Thanks for any input,

 Joris Huizer

I assume you did an
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
to get this result.

If so, it probably means that the packages that were kept back conflict with 
some other package on your system that would need to be removed to upgrade 
these.  To see which one, do

apt-get -s dist-upgrade

the dist-upgrade will remove the necessary packages to satisfy the conflicts.
the -s option makes apt-get pretend to do this, so you can see what package(s) 
will be removed.  If you are ok without the packages it wants to remove, go 
ahead and do

apt-get dist-upgrade.

Josh Metzler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: packages being kept back during upgrade

2003-02-23 Thread James Tappin
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:38:10 -0500
Josh Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If so, it probably means that the packages that were kept back conflict
 with some other package on your system that would need to be removed to
 upgrade these.  To see which one, do
 
 apt-get -s dist-upgrade
 
 the dist-upgrade will remove the necessary packages to satisfy the
 conflicts. the -s option makes apt-get pretend to do this, so you can
 see what package(s) will be removed.

Alternatively
apt-get -u dist-upgrade
Will list the packages to be removed, and those to be added as well as
those to upgrade and then ask whether you want to go ahead.

James

-- 
James Tappin, O__  I forget the punishment for using
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   --  \/`Microsoft --- Something lingering
http://www.tappin.me.uk/with data loss in it I fancy  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]