problem mounting NT share
My university just switched from Novell servers to NT. There are two servers containing discs to which I have access. One of them gave me no trouble at all. I used this command to mount the shared drive: smbmount //server1/shared /mountpoint. However, I could not get the drive on the other server mounted. My username and password are identical for both, and I can mount both easily from Windows98. The sysadmin knows nothing of linux, but did suggest one possible difference between the two servers that might be causing the problem. He said the first server, which I don't have trouble with, is a domain hosted server, or something like that. While the one that I am having trouble with is a stand alone server, or something like that. Sorry, but I know absolutely nothing about Windows NT. He also suggested that I explicitly pass my username and that I use GROUPNAME/USERNAME as my username rather then simply USERNAME. That didn't work, but I thought it might give you a better idea of what he thinks the problem is. Any ideas? Thanks. -- Brian J. Stults Doctoral Candidate Department of Sociology University at Albany - SUNY Phone: (518) 442-4652 Fax: (518) 442-4936 Web: http://www.albany.edu/~bs7452
Re: problem mounting NT share
Here is how I do it: smbmount-2.1.x //machine/drive -U username -W networkname -c 'mount /mntpoint -u 1000 -g 1000' My university is onu.edu so for network name I use onu. This works. There may be other ways of getting it to work too. The W is for the workgroup. You will have to know what the workgroup is. Hope this helps Sebastian Canagaratna Department of Chemistry Ohio Northern University Ada, OH 45810 My university just switched from Novell servers to NT. There are two servers containing discs to which I have access. One of them gave me no trouble at all. I used this command to mount the shared drive: smbmount //server1/shared /mountpoint. However, I could not get the drive on the other server mounted. My username and password are identical for both, and I can mount both easily from Windows98. The sysadmin knows nothing of linux, but did suggest one possible difference between the two servers that might be causing the problem. He said the first server, which I don't have trouble with, is a domain hosted server, or something like that. While the one that I am having trouble with is a stand alone server, or something like that. Sorry, but I know absolutely nothing about Windows NT. He also suggested that I explicitly pass my username and that I use GROUPNAME/USERNAME as my username rather then simply USERNAME. That didn't work, but I thought it might give you a better idea of what he thinks the problem is. Any ideas? Thanks. -- Brian J. Stults Doctoral Candidate Department of Sociology University at Albany - SUNY Phone: (518) 442-4652 Fax: (518) 442-4936 Web: http://www.albany.edu/~bs7452 -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Re: problem mounting NT share
turn up debugging in samba and include it in your post it makes it VERY difficult to debug with just it wont work in the email. nate On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Brian J. Stults wrote: bs7452 My university just switched from Novell servers to NT. There are two bs7452 servers containing discs to which I have access. One of them gave me no bs7452 trouble at all. I used this command to mount the shared drive: bs7452 bs7452 smbmount //server1/shared /mountpoint. bs7452 bs7452 However, I could not get the drive on the other server mounted. My bs7452 username and password are identical for both, and I can mount both bs7452 easily from Windows98. The sysadmin knows nothing of linux, but did bs7452 suggest one possible difference between the two servers that might be bs7452 causing the problem. He said the first server, which I don't have bs7452 trouble with, is a domain hosted server, or something like that. bs7452 While the one that I am having trouble with is a stand alone server, bs7452 or something like that. Sorry, but I know absolutely nothing about bs7452 Windows NT. He also suggested that I explicitly pass my username and bs7452 that I use GROUPNAME/USERNAME as my username rather then simply bs7452 USERNAME. That didn't work, but I thought it might give you a better bs7452 idea of what he thinks the problem is. bs7452 bs7452 Any ideas? Thanks. bs7452 -- bs7452 bs7452 Brian J. Stults bs7452 Doctoral Candidate bs7452 Department of Sociology bs7452 University at Albany - SUNY bs7452 Phone: (518) 442-4652 Fax: (518) 442-4936 bs7452 Web: http://www.albany.edu/~bs7452 bs7452 bs7452 bs7452 -- bs7452 Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null bs7452 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 8:33am up 195 days, 20:57, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 1.08, 1.06
Re: problem mounting NT share
I've attached the debugging information... Not sure what to include, so I'm including everything. s2.txt is debugging for the share that I can mount, and s3.txt is the debugging info for the share I cannot mount. The response I get is: session setup failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.) SMB connection failed What seems strange to me is that from Windows98 both shares are mount without problems using the same username and password. Thanks again. -- Brian J. Stults Doctoral Candidate Department of Sociology University at Albany - SUNY Phone: (518) 442-4652 Fax: (518) 442-4936 Web: http://www.albany.edu/~bs7452 aphro wrote: turn up debugging in samba and include it in your post it makes it VERY difficult to debug with just it wont work in the email. nate On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Brian J. Stults wrote: bs7452 My university just switched from Novell servers to NT. There are two bs7452 servers containing discs to which I have access. One of them gave me no bs7452 trouble at all. I used this command to mount the shared drive: bs7452 bs7452 smbmount //server1/shared /mountpoint. bs7452 bs7452 However, I could not get the drive on the other server mounted. My bs7452 username and password are identical for both, and I can mount both bs7452 easily from Windows98. The sysadmin knows nothing of linux, but did bs7452 suggest one possible difference between the two servers that might be bs7452 causing the problem. He said the first server, which I don't have bs7452 trouble with, is a domain hosted server, or something like that. bs7452 While the one that I am having trouble with is a stand alone server, bs7452 or something like that. Sorry, but I know absolutely nothing about bs7452 Windows NT. He also suggested that I explicitly pass my username and bs7452 that I use GROUPNAME/USERNAME as my username rather then simply bs7452 USERNAME. That didn't work, but I thought it might give you a better bs7452 idea of what he thinks the problem is. bs7452 bs7452 Any ideas? Thanks.mount.smbfs started (version 2.0.6) Initialising global parameters params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [global] doing parameter message command = /bin/sh -c '/usr/bin/linpopup %f %m %s; rm %s' doing parameter netbios name = ss3f129 doing parameter passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd doing parameter workgroup = loganlab doing parameter config file = /etc/samba/smb.conf doing parameter printer = lp doing parameter printing = bsd doing parameter printcap name = /etc/printcap doing parameter security = SERVER doing parameter load printers = True doing parameter hosts allow = 169.226.108.130 169.226.108.129 169.226.108.142 169.226.108.98 169.226.108.92 169.226.108.147 doing parameter wins server = 169.226.25.32 doing parameter guest account = nobody doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba-log.%m doing parameter lock directory = /var/lock/samba doing parameter encrypt passwords = yes pm_process() returned Yes load_client_codepage: loading codepage 850. added interface ip=169.226.108.129 bcast=169.226.108.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name s2_casnet0x20 getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 169.226.108.92 ss3f092 getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 169.226.108.98 ss3f098 getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 169.226.108.130 ss3f130 getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 169.226.108.129 ss3f129 getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 169.226.108.142 ss3f142 resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name s2_casnet0x20 resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name s2_casnet0x20 bind succeeded on port 0 nmb packet from 169.226.25.32(137) header: id=9609 opcode=Query(0) response=No header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 question: q_name=S2_CASNET20 q_type=32 q_class=1 Sending a packet of len 50 to (169.226.25.32) on port 137 Received a packet of len 62 from (169.226.25.32) port 137 nmb packet from 169.226.25.32(137) header: id=9609 opcode=Query(0) response=Yes header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=Yes rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=Yes header: rcode=0 qdcount=0 ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0 answers: nmb_name=S2_CASNET20 rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=0 answers 0 char @. hex 4000A9E21916 Got a positive name query response from 169.226.25.32 ( 169.226.25.22 ) Connecting to 169.226.25.22 at port 139 Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 session request ok size=91 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=3520 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=17 (0x11) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=67 (0x43)
