Re: sawfish vs sawmill?
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:56:27PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > What's the difference between sawfish and sawmill (for gnome)? They seem > to conflict with each other, and have the same descriptions. Sawmill was old name for the project. Sawfish is the new name, following a name conflict with another project. They are the same project. > Which is better/newer? Sawfish is the new name for the project. -- Karsten M. Self http://www.netcom.com/~kmself Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.http://www.opensales.org What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Debian GNU/Linux rocks! http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0 pgp2maD3Pg48H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sawfish vs sawmill?
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:56:27PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: > What's the difference between sawfish and sawmill (for gnome)? They seem > to conflict with each other, and have the same descriptions. > > Which is better/newer? I think he had to abandon sawmill in favor of sawfish because someone else was already using that name. -- Bob Bernstein"Sufficiently advanced file sharing systems atshould be indistinguishable from corporate Esmond, R.I., USA VPNs. Bless VPNs for creating all that suspicious-looking encrypted traffic." D.Marti
sawfish vs sawmill?
What's the difference between sawfish and sawmill (for gnome)? They seem to conflict with each other, and have the same descriptions. Which is better/newer? ...RickM...